>I've actually been planning to set up a service like this on my server. I've >run into lots of people who think that SA is a good idea, but installing it >themselves or convincing an ISP to do so is beyond them. > >Unlike other spam-filtering services, this one would admit up front that it >runs SpamAssassin and refer people to the SA site for more information. >[...] >I was planning to charge $5-10 a month for this service and see if anyone >bites. Any comments or suggestions (or rants about what a bad idea this is) >would be greatly appreciated. I'll probably be ready to deploy it sometime >next >month.
I think it'd be a worthwhile service to have - it must be reasoably priced to work - but I do see people interested in paying for a working, spamfree, virifree email solution. The problem I see is administrative overhead: charging and supporting people. I'd suggest deals like $25/year or something and not much support beyond webdocs. So unless you're running an ISP anyway and have the manpower anyway it might be a bit tedious. Definitly do go ahead. I'd lilke to see a lot of the admin tools solutions for qmail etc. being developed and discusses on this list in the contrib package of SA when they're finished. - Gregor _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
