On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Kelly Hamlin wrote:
> 1. How do i intergrate Razor into spamassassin and mailscanner?
You read the docs at least a -little- bit before asking questions that are
listed in the feature list ...
> 2. How can i change logging options of Sendmail so that i can scan it with MRTG.
1. How do i intergrate Razor into spamassassin and
mailscanner?
2. How can i change logging options of Sendmail so
that i can scan it with MRTG.
Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:23:39PM -0800, brad wrote:
> I just turned on SA in an ISP environment using spamd with no
> auto-whitelist for about 5000 users.
I've got a 12,000 user setup for a community ISP.
> I have received about 50 complaints from people Yelling at me to
> disable this for th
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Paul Friend wrote:
> I tried to get rid of the report section of the email and simply leave
> the subject line as *** so I removed the report section, but now I
> get SPAM: (no report template found)
>
> in the body of the spam message. How can I get this configured so t
> Not at the moment. Don't know how easy it'd be to setup given the CVS
> setup at sf.net -- probably not impossible. But it's fairly easy to
> just do a "cvs -n update" of course...
It is possible on sf (I set it there in the past). It is not that
difficult even though the docs could have bee
I tried to get rid of the report section of the email and simply leave the
subject line as *** so I removed the report section, but now I get
SPAM: (no report template found)
in the body of the spam message. How can I get this configured so that
there is nothing in the body but only the
I just turned on SA in an ISP environment using spamd with no
auto-whitelist for about 5000 users.
I have received about 50 complaints from people Yelling at me to disable
this for them. I was reading the docs and I don't know how to disable on
a per user basis when using spamd. I used to use t
Not at the moment. Don't know how easy it'd be to setup given the CVS setup at sf.net -- probably not impossible. But it's fairly easy to just do a "cvs -n update" of course...
C
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 13:15, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
Is there an email lists that reports commits when the
Whatever it is you are suggesting -- it's a bad idea.
Some systems use '^From ' as the message delimiter for mboxes.
Other systems don't need, or even -break-, if a '^From ' line is there.
A line with '^\tFrom ' is worse than useless - it will continue to confuse
some mail software, and won't h
> > > You're all assuming mbox delivery too :) Or even accessability of
> > > the mailboxes being delivered too. Grepping the logfiles is a more
> > > reliable way of catching everything SA's seen.
>
> Logfiles? Now you are assuming that I am running spamd or some such. I
> am not. I am runnin
> More MUAs need to support Maildir. Unfortunately the one I like the
> best does not yet do so.
Which one is that, Bob?
>
> Bob
>
Dave
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin
> > You're all assuming mbox delivery too :) Or even accessability of the
> > mailboxes being delivered too. Grepping the logfiles is a more reliable
> > way of catching everything SA's seen.
Logfiles? Now you are assuming that I am running spamd or some such.
I am not. I am running spamassa
> but ignoring mails containing a
> "X-Spam-Flag: YES"
> couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :)
It certainly seems unlikely that a spammer would add that to a
message themselves. :-)
Charlie> You using procmail for delivery? Just include that logic
Charlie> there - don'
Is there an email lists that reports commits when they happen?
Thanks
Paonia
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Bug in NoMailAudit.pm for Spamassassin 2.0
Having the from line is no problem, just having a in front of it fixes the problem.. Maybe you could try this behavior, and see if it works for everyone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:44:44AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :)
>
> You using procmail for delivery? Just include that logic there - don't
> pass it through spamassassin again if that header exists.
nope, using qmail-scanner, which
On 19 Jan 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> You're all assuming mbox delivery too :) Or even accessability of the
> mailboxes being delivered too. Grepping the logfiles is a more reliable
> way of catching everything SA's seen.
LOL ...I wouldn't use that nasty format. Maildir, baby.
Hehehe.
--
Ch
You're all assuming mbox delivery too :) Or even accessability of the mailboxes being delivered too. Grepping the logfiles is a more reliable way of catching everything SA's seen.
C
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 08:20, Charlie Watts wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote:
>
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> > As others have mentioned: It's hard to reliably be sure that a message
> > has((n't)?) been scanned before. My system might scan the message before
> > forwarding on to your system, for ins
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:13:05PM -0500, dman wrote:
> bodyDEAR_SIR_MADAM_b/Dear Sir\/Madam:/
> describeDEAR_SIR_MADAM_bMessage contains "Dear Sir/Madam:"
> score DEAR_SIR_MADAM_b2.0
Mmm, it would catch many of my "non-spam" mails... So ok, but
with a score of 0.5 m
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
> As others have mentioned: It's hard to reliably be sure that a message
> has((n't)?) been scanned before. My system might scan the message before
> forwarding on to your system, for instance.
>
> What I'd recommend is -NOT- using th
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:13:05PM -0500, dman wrote:
| While we're in the business of tagging junk mail, this helps too,
| sometimes. (obviously it doesn't work with mime or html messages)
|
| bodyBLANK_MESSAGE /^(\w)*$/
| describeBLANK_MESSAGE The message has no contents.
| s
A spam got through, but this addition catches it :
bodyDEAR_SIR_MADAM_b/Dear Sir\/Madam:/
describeDEAR_SIR_MADAM_bMessage contains "Dear Sir/Madam:"
score DEAR_SIR_MADAM_b2.0
header DEAR_SIR_MADAM_tTo =~ /Dear Sir\/Madam/
describeDEAR_SIR_MADAM_tT
Ok, I just read through the "ok_locales" section of the documentation
(good thing I checked before posting this, the doc was 404 yesterday).
I want to know how to consider UTF-8, ISO8859-1 and ISO8859-15 encoded
messages as _not_ CHARSET_FARAWAY. I had a message with
charset="us-ascii:iso-
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Gerry Doris wrote:
> Sometimes after spamassassin does its thing I can't read the message.
> Pine reports the following error:
>
> "Error: Formatting Error: non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding"
>
> What does this mean and is there a fix for it??
I've seen that too, but
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Olivier M. wrote:
> Now a little suggestion (but maybe it's already corrected): I have
> messages which are travelling twice on the server, and it's then scanned
> twice, so spams are getting two or event three *SPAM* in their
> Subject. Shouldn't SA check if there is
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Charlie Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > If you're using standard mbox format, you -CAN'T- have lines
> > beginning with '^From ' in the body - because that is the message
> > delimiter. Lines that begin with '^From ' in the body of a message
> >
* Charlie Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you're using standard mbox format, you -CAN'T- have lines
> beginning with '^From ' in the body - because that is the message
> delimiter. Lines that begin with '^From ' in the body of a message
> must be escaped by the MDA (typically they are conve
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Can anyone give me pointers on how I could easily count the spam that is
> > > filtered by spam assassin.
> >
> > Assuming you are saving it to a spambox then:
> >
> > grep -c '^From ' spambox
>
> (not very precise if you
Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Can anyone give me pointers on how I could easily count the spam that is
> > filtered by spam assassin.
>
> Assuming you are saving it to a spambox then:
>
> grep -c '^From ' spambox
(not very precise if you have lines beggining with From in the body, and
I would still
30 matches
Mail list logo
