Whatever it is you are suggesting -- it's a bad idea.

Some systems use '^From ' as the message delimiter for mboxes.

Other systems don't need, or even -break-, if a '^From ' line is there.

A line with '^\tFrom ' is worse than useless - it will continue to confuse
some mail software, and won't help the ones that need '^From '.

Justin has already completely proven that '^From ' is a PITA ... (I think
every possible way to handle it has been tried ...) and the command-line
switch is the best (and easiest) solution by far. It Just Works.

On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
>
> Having the from line is no problem, just having a <TAB> in front of it fixes
> the problem.. Maybe you could try this behavior, and see if it works for
> everyone.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1/18/02 10:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bug in NoMailAudit.pm for Spamassassin 2.0
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > This is on a spamd/spamc setup using qmail and qmail scanner, which
> then
> > forwards the mail to a mirapoint virus scanning server, which if it
> finds a
> > "From" header at the beginning of the line, will MANGLE the header.
>
> OK -- we have several people using spamc/spamd who REQUIRE the From
> line, and several people using spamc/spamd who require that it
> NOT be present.
>
> I'm going to turn it on by default (ie back to 3 days ago's behaviour),
> and add command-line flags to allow admins to override this.  it's
> safest.
>
> --j.
>

-- 
Charlie Watts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frontier Internet, Inc.
http://www.frontier.net/



_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to