> but ignoring mails containing a > "X-Spam-Flag: YES" > couldn't hurt, don't you think? But that was just an idea :)
It certainly seems unlikely that a spammer would add that to a message themselves. :-) Charlie> You using procmail for delivery? Just include that logic Charlie> there - don't pass it through spamassassin again if that Charlie> header exists. Or alternately you could in that case run it through spamassassin -d to restore it to normal. Then it would run through the, possibly newer, rules currently in effect. Bob _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
