Hi,
Thanks everybody for the reactions. Even though I haven't solved the
backtracking problem yet, I now know a bit more. The exact name of the
scanner I'm using is indeed Trust Direct WebScan 19200 (see
http://www.trust.nl/products/product.aspx?artnr=12389). Apart from the
backtracking (which
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 02:29:31PM +0100, s...@rsenden.speedlinq.nl wrote:
> I've got sane installed on a LinkSys NSLU2 embedded linux device
> running the OpenSlug Linux distribution (see
> http://www.nslu2-linux.org) for use with my Trust Direct WebScan
> 19200 scanner.
Is "Trust Direct Web
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 14:29 +0100, s...@rsenden.speedlinq.nl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got sane installed on a LinkSys NSLU2 embedded linux device running the
> OpenSlug Linux distribution (see http://www.nslu2-linux.org) for use with my
> Trust Direct WebScan 19200 scanner.
>
> The scanner basi
the slug is a little slow, esp. if there are multiple usb devices using
the bus at the same time. there are also supposedly issues with usb2.0
hubs on the slug, though i dont remember the details. can you try on a
full-sized linux pc?
allan (sane and slug developer)
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 s...@rs
Hello,
I've got sane installed on a LinkSys NSLU2 embedded linux device running the
OpenSlug Linux distribution (see http://www.nslu2-linux.org) for use with my
Trust Direct WebScan 19200 scanner.
The scanner basically works, but scanning is slow due to the scanner hopping
backwards quite ofte
Bertrik Sikken wrote in message
<429b8665.6010...@zonnet.nl>
> Tony van der Hoff wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think the first thing to try is to update the kernel.
>
> Kind regards, Bertrik
>
Yay, Excellent, Bertrik, thank you very much for that pointer!
I've updated my kernel from 2.6.8 to 2.6.11, a
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get my UMAX Astra 2200 USB scannner to work with my Mandrake
> Linux 10.1 (kernel 2.6.8.1) box, and am failing miserably. The scanner works
> fine (both USB and SCSI) under 'doze.
>
> I think I've got SANE installed correctly, but I'm not even gett
Hi,
I'm trying to get my UMAX Astra 2200 USB scannner to work with my Mandrake
Linux 10.1 (kernel 2.6.8.1) box, and am failing miserably. The scanner works
fine (both USB and SCSI) under 'doze.
I think I've got SANE installed correctly, but I'm not even getting a
/dev/usbscanner entry. When replu
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:48:27AM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Any ideas if/how to get this scanner working w/ FreeBSD?
I'm afraid that's not possible at all. Even with Linux a lot of people
told us that it wouldn't work because of the kernel patch which is for
old kernels.
> man uscann
Hi!
Any ideas if/how to get this scanner working w/ FreeBSD?
man uscanner(4) says it is supported, but there is noting about it on the
sane site.
Kernel says:
uscanner0: PRIMAX Colorado USB 19200, rev 1.00/1.01, addr 2
when connecting it. Correct.
sane-find-scanner says:
# No SCSI scanners
Eelke Klein wrote:
> --- Cory Foy wrote:
>
>>Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing
>>/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777
>>instead of
>>0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
>>
>
> Normally in Gentoo the group will be changed to scanner.
--- Cory Foy wrote:
> Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing
> /etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777
> instead of
> 0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
>
Normally in Gentoo the group will be changed to scanner. If you
add any user who need
Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing=20
/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777 instead of=20
0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
Cory
Cory Foy wrote:
> Ok, I got it working completely. I'm on a 2.6 kernel, so this might hel=
p=20
> someone.
Ok, I got it working completely. I'm on a 2.6 kernel, so this might help=20
someone.
The first problem was that I couldn't get sane-find-scanner to work.=20
This is because libusb has to be installed before SANE. Using Gentoo, I=20
had to set the USE flags in /etc/make.conf to be aware of usb. The
Eelke Klein wrote:
> --- Cory Foy wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have been working to get my Canon LIDE 30 scanner working
>>under Gentoo
>>with a 2.6 kernel. I've installed Sane (and Xsane). My
>>dll.conf has only
>>"plustek" not commented out, and my plustek.conf file looks
>>like:
>>
>>[u
cory, the kernel scanner module is deprecated under kernel 2.6 that is why
you cannot find it, and why it does not show up under /dev/
instead, there is a user-space library called libusb which sane can use to
find and send usb commands to the scanner. just having libusb is not
enough, as it is
Hello,
I have been working to get my Canon LIDE 30 scanner working under Gentoo
with a 2.6 kernel. I've installed Sane (and Xsane). My dll.conf has only
"plustek" not commented out, and my plustek.conf file looks like:
[usb] 0x04a9 0x220e
device /dev/usbscanner
However, when I do a sane-find-s
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:57:14PM +0200, Georg Halfas wrote:
> Am Mi, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger um 10:25:
> > Hi,
> >
> > regarding the results of our search-engine, which should always be
> > consulted,
> > the scanner is marked as not supported.
>
> Is there any support in si
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:53:44PM +0200, Georg Halfas wrote:
> I'm working with the above mentioned scanner but I can't get it running
> with SuSE-Linux 9.1. As I could not find support within my distribution
> I tried to find out which scanner it exactly is with
> 'sane-find-scanner'. The re
Am Mi, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Gerhard Jaeger um 10:25:
> Hi,
>
> regarding the results of our search-engine, which should always be consulted,
> the scanner is marked as not supported.
Is there any support in sight. I mean this is a scanner sold by Aldi in
Germany at a quite cheap price. So there
Hi,
regarding the results of our search-engine, which should always be consulted,
the scanner is marked as not supported.
Sorry,
Gerhard
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:01, Georg Halfas wrote:
> I'm sorry, by mistake I sent the wrong scanner-name actually it's a
> Medion MD 6190 Slim 1200 U2
>
>
I'm sorry, by mistake I sent the wrong scanner-name actually it's a
Medion MD 6190 Slim 1200 U2
Hi,
I'm working with the above mentioned scanner but I can't get it running
with SuSE-Linux 9.1. As I could not find support within my distribution
I tried to find out which scanner it exactly is with
Hi,
I'm working with the above mentioned scanner but I can't get it running
with SuSE-Linux 9.1. As I could not find support within my distribution
I tried to find out which scanner it exactly is with
'sane-find-scanner'. The result was:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x0461, product=0x037b) a
Hi Gene,
could it be, that something is broken by your "dual" kernel installation?
Did somebody know something 'bout changes in the usb interface?
Do we need to recompile the libusb stuff before using kernel 2.6?
It is also very suspicous that after setting the debug stuff you'll see
nothing.
P
On Saturday 08 November 2003 05:28, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
>Hi Gene,
>
>could it be, that something is broken by your "dual" kernel
> installation? Did somebody know something 'bout changes in the usb
> interface? Do we need to recompile the libusb stuff before using
> kernel 2.6?
I wouldn't be su
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:07:52PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Oops, sorry Henning. The scanner is an Epson Perfection 1250u.
> sane-backends is 1.0.11 IIRC. Present kernel is 2.6.0-test9-mm2.
1.0.12 is the current stable version. There are also snapshots of
1.0.13. However I don't rememb
On Friday 07 November 2003 15:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:07:52PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Oops, sorry Henning. The scanner is an Epson Perfection 1250u.
>> sane-backends is 1.0.11 IIRC. Present kernel is 2.6.0-test9-mm2.
>
>1.0.12 is the current stabl
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:30:13PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I've been unsubscibed for about 90 days, and now of course I'm way
> behind. When I got back from temporary duty in Colorado, one of the
> things I found was that my scanner is always busy.
[...]
> Is this a known recent issue
On Thursday 06 November 2003 16:20, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:30:13PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I've been unsubscibed for about 90 days, and now of course I'm way
>> behind. When I got back from temporary duty in Colorado, one of
>> the things I found was
Greetings list;
I've been unsubscibed for about 90 days, and now of course I'm way
behind. When I got back from temporary duty in Colorado, one of the
things I found was that my scanner is always busy.
Currently running kernel 2.6.0-test9-mm2 and I've managed to get
virtually everything else
Hi
Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> you should not need any additional configuration. I just tried my HP
> ScanJet 6350c with libusb without problems (up to now I used scanner.o).
> You can try to reduce your hp.conf to the minimum entries that you need:
>
> usb 0x03f0 0x0201
Thanks, b
Hi Jan,
you should not need any additional configuration. I just tried my HP
ScanJet 6350c with libusb without problems (up to now I used scanner.o).
You can try to reduce your hp.conf to the minimum entries that you need:
usb 0x03f0 0x0201
Just this line.
From the listing I see that the libus
Hi
Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> is this scanner really a HP ScanJet 4200c. USB says that it is a ScanJet
> 6200c. But that doesn't matter.
> After the first (and only) scan has completed, do the following:
yes it is a 6200c, sorry. My main Problem is why does it work only the
firs
Hi Jan,
is this scanner really a HP ScanJet 4200c. USB says that it is a ScanJet
6200c. But that doesn't matter.
After the first (and only) scan has completed, do the following:
export SANE_DEBUG_HP=255
scanimage > hp.ppm 2>hp.lis
and send hp.lis back to me.
Sincerely
Peter
Jan Rüdiger schr
Hi
I try to connect a HP 4200C to my PC running SuSe 8.2 with Kernel 2.4.20
and sane 1.0.11 (also tried 1.0.12). The Problem is that the scanner
only works for one scan after that sane doesn't find any devices. The
only solution is to reload the usb-uhci modul (rmmod/insmod usb-uhci)
I'm not s
Finally I can to use mi HP 4300C with xsane and also with gimp thruogh
NIASH. But the scanarea is limited only at half A4, and not the entired
page. I put the scanarea to "full size" the preset area and to "free"
the aspect ratio in the prewiew window. So I select "Acquire prewiew"
and after "Star
Hi,
this all looks okay, the problem is either your dll.conf
and/or the plustek.conf file...
At least you need the entry plustek in the dll.conf
and in the plustek.conf:
[usb] 0x004a9 0x2206
device auto
Check the examples in the file, that has been delivered with
the TEST3 tar-ball. Itmight happen
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 06:14:40PM -0500, adam wrote:
> after installing latest sane-backends, along with the 45test3 patch
This patch hasn't any effect on sane-find-scanner.
> [root@alakard rpms]# sane-find-scanner
[...]
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2206 [CanoScan
after installing latest sane-backends, along with the 45test3 patch
i am still receiving this message -
[root@alakard rpms]# sane-find-scanner
# No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make
sure that
# you have loaded a SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.
found USB sc
After a huge help from Henning Meier-Geinitz I have the current
paper that helps anyone get a USB scanner found by SANE. It is basic by
intention so most of you can read it without a lot of trouble.
The paper will be available for reading at my web site which is:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:04:20PM -0700, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
>
> Hi Gang, this is expected to work with the Linux systems
> defined. If you see errors please note them to me.
I'm only commenting on topics that are not already mentioned by others.
> If the scanner you have ha
Hi Henning, thanks for all the great help! I will include your
corrections and put this paper on my web page so it can be a referanced
URL. It will be like www.zianet.com/k5di/usb/ by tomorrow.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:04:20PM -0700
Thanks Frank. I will repair your, and on hotplug my Red Hat 8 Linux has
it but I don't know how to use it yet. Last night I joined the hotplug
list and hope someone can tell me how it works.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Frank Zago wrote:
>
> Hi Karl,
>
> In at least 3 places, replace "your" by "you
Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> Hi Gang, this is expected to work with the Linux systems
>defined. If you see errors please note them to me.
>
>
> Recipe for Setting Up a Scanner using USB
> Karl Larsen
>November 17, 2002
>
>
Hi Karl,
In at least 3 places, replace "your" by "your're" or "you are".
And most of the new distribution support hotplug, so it shouldnt be necessary
to
insmod or modprobe the scanner driver. The parameters to the scanner (if
necessary) can be written into /etc/modules.conf.
Except that, your
Hi Gang, this is expected to work with the Linux systems
defined. If you see errors please note them to me.
Recipe for Setting Up a Scanner using USB
Karl Larsen
November 17, 2002
If the scanner you hav
On Thursday 24 October 2002 06:33, Michael Herder wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 10:15 schrieb Henning
Meier-Geinitz:
>> > While it's possible to mount usbdevfs with devmode=0666 (the
>> > number of the beast ?:-) on all SuSE system, it fails with
>> > Caldera, i.e. permissions still look
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Michael Herder wrote:
> > Maybe kernel 2.4.2 is just too old and the mount option wasn't
> > included in that kernel version.
>
> Hm, it works with 2.2.20 !? It's really hard, to tell users how to install an
> usb scanner, if every system behaves dif
Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 10:15 schrieb Henning Meier-Geinitz:
> > While it's possible to mount usbdevfs with devmode=0666 (the number of
> > the beast ?:-) on all SuSE system, it fails with Caldera, i.e.
> > permissions still look like this:
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18 Oct
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:46:05AM +0200, Michael Herder wrote:
> Caldera OpenLinux 3.1, kernel 2.4.2
>
> While it's possible to mount usbdevfs with devmode=0666 (the number of the
> beast ?:-) on all SuSE system, it fails with Caldera, i.e. permissions still
> look like this:
> -rw-r--r--
Hi,
I'm normally testing my (usb) backend on the following systems with different
access methods (scanner module/libusb):
SuSE Linux 7.3, kernel 2.4.17 (updated)
SuSE Linux 7.0, kernel 2.4.16 (updated)
SuSE Linux 6.4, kernel 2.2.20 (updated)
Caldera OpenLinux 3.1, kernel 2.4.2
While it's possible
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:42:08PM +0200, antoine wrote:
> > > I want to write a SANE USB scanner driver.
> > For which scanner?
> HP 3300C or Microtek 3800
But as far as I understand that page the HP 3300C is already supported
by the NIASH backend, isn't it?
> http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~bert
> > I want to write a SANE USB scanner driver.
> For which scanner?
HP 3300C or Microtek 3800
http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~bertrik/hp3300c/README.html
gives information but not enough ...
antoine
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:55:53AM +0530, Manoj wrote:
> I want to write a SANE USB scanner driver.
For which scanner?
> Is there any documentation available for writing a USB scanner driver in
> sane for Linux.
Just keep in mind that SANE is not Linux-only.
> How does it communicate with
Hello,
I want to write a SANE USB scanner driver.
Is there any documentation available for writing a USB scanner driver in
sane for Linux. How does it communicate with the Linux USB system and what
are the calls used.
Thanks in advance
Manoj
Once upon a time (on Sunday 22 September 2002 09:12), Jaeger, Gerhard wisely
wrote:
> No problems here with that test program! But you should run this one
> as root user.
Yes, ran as root. Segfaults. I've investigated in the code, and it really
crashes when trying to access the first device of
On Sunday, 22. September 2002 02:28, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
[SNIP]
> OK. In dmesg, the device identifies itself as VID/PID:0x4a9/0x220D, that is
> the same as a N670U. So the chip inside ought to be the same (or
> compatible). After some digging, I came up with these results: N676U scans
> at 48 bits
--Boundary-00=_TADTQDO6ABLCA9CNND8L
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Saturday 21 September 2002 12:49, you wrote:
> the chip inside should be a merlin LM9832 or 9833. I currently
> bought a Canon N670U which should be compatible with
Hi there,
the chip inside should be a merlin LM9832 or 9833. I currently
bought a Canon N670U which should be compatible with the N676U
and will try an integrate it into the Plustek backend so far.
I'm not sure if the patch will make it into SANE 1.0.9 but I'm rather
optimistic...
Stay tuned
Ge
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:45:27PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> I've just had a brand new Canon CanoScan N676U. I hope it works great as it
> is not yet supported by Sane. That's why I volunteer to add support for this
> device in Sane.
>
> Could someone please point me to documents / source
Hi all!
I've just had a brand new Canon CanoScan N676U. I hope it works great as it
is not yet supported by Sane. That's why I volunteer to add support for this
device in Sane.
Could someone please point me to documents / source code / URLs / RFC /
whatever is of interest to start coding a new ba
Does anyone on this list use a USB scanner successfully with Linux?
I am still struggling to get mine working with an unofficial SANE patch.
I know I can't expect to get specific help with this particular scanner,
but I have no experience with any scanner usage under Linux, and would
really apprec
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Bob Young wrote:
> Does anyone on this list use a USB scanner successfully with Linux?
Yes.
What is your problem exactly? Is your scanner recognized by the scanner
module?
> I am still struggling to get mine working with an unofficial SANE patch.
> I know I can't expect to g
Another request for help
Has anyone used ioctl in the usb scanner module to read control data from a
unit?
My first attempts to send control messages to the scanner returns no error.
But when I try to read data back I do not get the data I hoped for.
As the function returns immediately, has it h
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 06:36:54PM -0800, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
> > Can you see the scanner at /proc/bus/usb/devices ?
>
> Nope. Not a thing in there. Which has me rather confused too. Do I need
> to
> be running usbmgr or something along these lines to 'activate' my USB
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Sorry Folks,
I meant to REPLY ALL and missed. So here's what's up att.
- -- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] USB scanner troubles
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:36:54 -0800
From: "G. L. `Griz' Inabnit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 08:48 am, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:18:41AM -0800, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
> > Some of this is going to be out of the scope of this mailing list (usb
> > info) but I'm stuck.
> > I ha
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:18:41AM -0800, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
> Some of this is going to be out of the scope of this mailing list (usb
> info)
> but I'm stuck.
> I have a clients machine in my shop who wanted to get away from the M$
> Kludge so we loaded on Debian. All wen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hey Folks,
Some of this is going to be out of the scope of this mailing list (usb
info)
but I'm stuck.
I have a clients machine in my shop who wanted to get away from the M$
Kludge so we loaded on Debian. All went lovely until I attempted to set
69 matches
Mail list logo
