y Marc Culler in the following version.
>
>Please get
>*SageMath-10.7_x86_64.dmg*
>from
>https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/releases
>
>Everything works, including JupyterLab notebooks.
>
>Beware: You are advised to use *Firefox (version 115 ESR)* instead of
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 4:37 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I just installed 10.6 from the 3-manifolds site. My system is Mac OS
> Catalina, 10.15.7, on an Intel MBP (2019). Attached is the crash report.
> Immediately after I installed the tarball, I ran “sage
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 4:08 AM HG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before we had sagemath in ubuntu deb, there is no more sage in it !
> It was well integrated in debs, as I compile it works fine but not all
> link to it ?
>
> Does any one know why it's no more in ubuntu ?
Ubuntu gets its debs for Sage from
I don't think many people run 10.2, and it might be that your problem is fixed
in 10.6.
Can you post a complete reproducer for the problem?
Best,
Dmitrii
On July 11, 2025 1:07:08 PM CDT, Fernando Gouvea wrote:
>Running Sage 10.2 on Ubuntu in WSL...
>
>When I try to plot certain discontinuous f
Hi, your macOS is too old to run this binary.
(it's in fact well past EOL).
Your best bet is to build from source, although I expect big trouble.
If it's an old hardware you must use to run Sage, I can only suggest to install
Linux or FreeBSD on it, either directly, or in a VM
HTH
On July 6
Dear Stuart,
thanks for the message. We don't test Sagemath on machines with
Mathematica installed, sorry.
Do you actually have a working Mathematica installation?
Sage is able to use terminal interface to it, using "math" command.
Does typing "math" (without quotes) in the terminal give you a
Mat
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 8:29 AM Maxime Louvet wrote:
> I had a correct sage 10.5 build. But after an upgrade from a previous version
> to Unbuntu 22.04, it didn't work. After several try of make distclean &&
> build, i deleted everything and tried to install sage 10.6 from start in a
> new dir
Hi,
most probably the problem is due to Conda in your PATH:
PATH: /home/pierretchamitchian/.local/bin/
PATH: /home/pierretchamitchian/miniforge3/bin/
PATH: /home/pierretchamitchian/miniforge3/condabin/
PATH: /usr/local/sbin/
PATH: /usr/local/bin/
PATH: /usr/sbin/
PATH: /usr/bin/
PATH: /sbin/
PAT
is not supported
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 18:39, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > PS. You also have not set an objective function, not sure, but it could
> be why you have no termination
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2025, 11:37 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >>
>
It should be possible to construct the polyhedron determined by the
feasible set of the LP, triangulate it, and do simplex by simplex or
perhaps use various results relating volumes and presence of integral
points in polyhedra.
On Wed, May 21, 2025, 11:27 Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.c
PS. You also have not set an objective function, not sure, but it could be
why you have no termination
On Wed, May 21, 2025, 11:37 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> It should be possible to construct the polyhedron determined by the
> feasible set of the LP, triangulate it, and do simplex by simp
There is no need to build Sage's Python, an external Python will always do.
(We have at last agreed that this mostly broken capability of Sage, to
build its own Python,
should be removed, as it mostly leads to such annoyances)
I suggest to install enough system packages, as suggested by the
./conf
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 2:18 AM Topaze wrote:
> I got another error.
>
> I still have version 10.5 installed and fully functional, so I'm not
> really in a hurry.
>
> Maybe I should wait for this problem to be fixed upstream?
>
this is all fixed in the latest Sage beta, 10.7.beta1.
IMHO we should
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:24 AM Topaze wrote:
> OK, so I started from scratch. I've got lots of disk space and memory, so
> I don't know why make stumbled. And twice in the same place, hence my
> report. But this time I managed to compile without any problem (did make
> -j 1 (parameter “1”, no mo
Sage 10.6 was released with numpy 2.2.3, and matplotlib 3.8.0 from 2023,
which is incompatible with numpy 2 (the compatibility was added in 3.8.4).
While 10.6.rc0 was released, this problem was noticed (see
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/TkPM0xL2fFA/m/LB0dT9PLAwAJ)
but was not acted upo
this does look like some kind of hardware issue:
> sed: couldn't flush stdout: Ressource temporairement non disponible
> make[4]: *** [Makefile:3412 : numpy-SAGE_VENV-no-deps] Erreur 141
Try restarting make, hopefully it will finish building numpy
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:34 AM Topaze wrot
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 4:22 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> Mhh, interesting.
>
> In the REPL it works:
> A=matrix([[0,0,0,0],[1/2,0,0,0],[0,1/2,0,0],[0,0,1,0]])*AA.one()
> ok
> and:
> sage: A.parent().is_exact()
> True
>
> But an other problem happens:
> The class "RungeKutta" (the parent class of R
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 4:22 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> Mhh, interesting.
>
> In the REPL it works:
> A=matrix([[0,0,0,0],[1/2,0,0,0],[0,1/2,0,0],[0,0,1,0]])*AA.one()
> ok
> and:
> sage: A.parent().is_exact()
> True
>
> But an other problem happens:
> The class "RungeKutta" (the parent class of R
"Sign in with Google" button (showing the long gone g+ thing) works for me
(I'm based in US, since Oct 2024, perhaps this matters nowadays).
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 6:19 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> I am trying to ask a question to ask.sagemath.org.
>
> When posting my question, I try to connect w
Hi,
you are using a very recent xcode, and it needs
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39915
and
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39936
to fix lcalc and fflas_ffpack problems (the latter are caused by old
givaro).
Do you need instructions about applying these?
In short, assuming you are u
Hi,
please try 10.6 instead of 10.5.
On 16 April 2025 02:07:36 GMT-05:00, Dibyendu Roy
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I am unable to build sage 10.5. Log is attached. Please help.
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"sage-support" group.
>To unsubscribe fro
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:03 AM Denis Sunko wrote:
>
> I have been installing Sage from source on three workstations and a laptop
> for ages. The last release which went without a hitch was 10.3. I skipped
> 10.4, but with 10.5 and 10.6 one of the workstations has a weird problem: the
> build s
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:38 PM Dibyendu Roy wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am unable to build and getting the attached error. Please advise.
>
> Error building Sage.
>
>
> The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily
>
> during this run of 'make all-build'):
>
>
> * package:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:50 AM Philippe Delavalade
wrote:
>
> Le mardi 08 avril à 18:10, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > Your MAKEFLAGS value looks funny. Can you just leave -j an -l
> > arguments there, as recommended in our README.md, and try again?
>
> Tirst, many thank
Your MAKEFLAGS value looks funny. Can you just leave -j an -l
arguments there, as recommended in our README.md, and try again?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 10:57 AM Philippe Delavalade
wrote:
>
> HI all.
>
> I obtain the same kind of error than dibyendu but with package m4ri
>
> So I attach files
> con
#x27;make' or whatever is appropriate.
>
> Instead, the following commands setup all environment variables
>
> correctly and load a subshell for you to debug the error:
>
> (cd
> '/Users/vishalshahi/Desktop/sage/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.12.5/var/t
ource(*ei, graph)],
+to_return.push_back({static_cast(index[boost::source(*ei,
graph)]),
{index[boost::target(*ei, graph)],
get(boost::edge_weight, graph, *ei)}});
}
l
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:32 PM Dima
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:33 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I successfully built 10.6 from scratch on 5 different machines (all
> ubuntu), then (as is my usual practice) did "make gap_packages". This
> worked on all but one machine where I see this, of which the relevant
> line seems to be "UnicodeDec
ly
> > caused by different translation units being compiled with different
> > visibility settings.
Dima
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 1:50 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Once again, what Sage version are you using? 10.6 was just released
> (it's basically the same as 10.6.rc1)
>
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 9:08 AM henry reichow wrote:
>
> I've just began using sage, so if there's a simple solution I apologize.
>
> I'm trying to download the database_odlyzko_zeta database package using the
> steps here:
> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/databases/sage/databases/odly
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:34 AM Erick Ross wrote:
>
> OS:Ubuntu 20.04 (using WSL2 running on 64-bit Windows 10)
> Sage Installation: Using "apt install sagemath" in the terminal
> Crash details: Just typed "sage" into the terminal, and it crashed.
>
> There is some undefined symbol e
John,
Chrome is officially a spyware, why are you complaining that it
doesn't always work as you like? :-)
You might try chromium browser instead.
Dima
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 11:37 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> For what it is worth, after building 10.6 (both from scratch, and also
> upgrading from a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 4:45 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> I still have the problem. Although what I did in my previous post "fixed"
> the issue once last week, this week I am back to not being able to use the
> notebook as it asks for a token but does not accept the token provided. Here
> is th
Do you use Homebrew?
Please post the top level config.log
On 29 March 2025 05:28:32 GMT-05:00, 'Vishal Shahi' via sage-support
wrote:
>
>
>Dear Sage Development Team,
>
>I am experiencing an issue while building Sage on my MacBook Air M1 running
>macOS Sequoia. I followed all instructions outl
the previous report/fix on this was
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/h309YA14cq8/m/h2ydGdDOAwAJ
On Friday, March 28, 2025 at 10:13:26 AM UTC-5 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 06:14:50AM -0700, Ben Salisbury wrote:
> > I looked through past messages and did
it is a Homebrew issue, I forgot where it was mentioned. (search the last
couple of weeks of messages here)
Update/upgrade Homebrew, reinstall perl.
On 27 March 2025 15:50:47 GMT-05:00, Ben Salisbury
wrote:
>Hi all. I hope I have a minor error here that I'm missing. I'm attempting
>to upgr
clean up the repo:
git clean -fdx
then update the branch
git pull
and build again
On 27 March 2025 11:34:34 GMT-05:00, Ashutosh Rajora
wrote:
>woahh, now it seems the build is broken and even sage is not working, do i
>need to build it again?
>
>On Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 3:10:53
Your brial log is from 3 march, it's most probably not the problem you have.
Try to update your conda install and clean up the Sage installation before
trying to rebuild by
removing all built artefacts
(careful: this will also remove all uncommitted changes/files in the repo!)
git clean -fdx
Dear all,
this is to point out that SageMath is one of GitHub orgs affected by
"tj-actions changed-files through 45.0.7 allows remote attackers to
discover secrets by reading actions logs"
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mrrh-fwg8-r2c3
we are working to fix this in sagemath GitHub org repos
(s
the test logs should be in logs/tests.log,
post them here, otherwise it's hard to say what's wrong
On 9 March 2025 00:09:53 GMT-06:00, Ashutosh Rajora
wrote:
>
>The testing ended, but i can see a lot of FAILED TESTS, are they normal?
>and can i proceed to contribute or these need to be fixed?
perhaps you are running too many complications in parallel, and that's why one
of them errors out. As scipy uses ninja, check out ninja documentation on how
to limit the number - that's a parameter to add to ninja call.
This might need a small patch to scipy,
or using another version of scipy...
It looks indeed as an insufficient RAM for the C++ compiler.
Do you have a fixed amount of RAM allocated to WSL? It should better be 4Gb or
more.
I am not sure what "free -h" is showing here.
If RAM is dynamically shared between Windows and WSL, it doesn't mean much.
Try re-running "make"
On
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 12:51 PM Seth Chaiken wrote:
>
> In Sage 10.4, we tried to inject a RR number into a RR polynomial ring
> quotient. It
> works fine when the ideal had one (monomial) generator but precision is lost
> when
> it had two generators.
It's not a bug - it's half-expected that
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:48 AM dmo...@deductivepress.ca
wrote:
>
> This is a question about how to use sagemath, not an issue about sagemath
> development, so you should post it on a different forum, such as
> ask.sagemath.org. The people there are very knowledgeable.
Another option is sage-su
It seems that your system-wide libnauty is not linked with libcliquer.
Could you post output of
ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so
?
It should look approximately like
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7f5878adc000)
libcliquer.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libcliquer.so.1 (0x7f5878a1a000)
libc.
no, it's down, together with a number of other machines in the same French lab.
Hopefully will be fixed in the coming week
On 9 February 2025 20:36:19 GMT-06:00, Kevin Youren wrote:
>Is it only me?
>
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"sage-support
Of course if you have a few millions to donate to the project, we will be able
to provide the users with the most beautiful installation experience, with
visuals and music. After several years of work. The result will still have
bugs, of course.
The follow-ups please to sage-fl...@googlegroups.
Hi,
few thing you ought to consider with your setup.
We presently don't really support installing Sage in a venv
(this is being worked on, but it's far from being ready for general use)
Basically, Sage will create its own venv instead.
Then, we're not supporting Python 3.13 yet.
You can use 3.12
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:03 PM Xie wrote:
>
> for M in matroids.AllMatroids(8, type='sparse_paving'):
> : print(M)
> sparse_paving_n08_r04_#0: Matroid of rank 4 on 8 elements with 56 bases
> sparse_paving_n08_r05_#0: Matroid of rank 5 on 8 elements with 48 bases
> sparse_paving_n08_r
The macOS app is mainly dealt with by Marc Culler - not sure whether
he reads this group, so I put him in CC.
He knows more about these annoying macOS details than other Sage devs, for sure.
HTH
Dima
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:51 AM James Propp wrote:
>
> Thanks, John. I tried your idea, but Sag
Please provide more details on how exactly you installed SageMath, which
installer is this?
On 24 January 2025 15:06:33 GMT-06:00, James Propp wrote:
>
>
>How do I do a *complete* uninstall that (among other things) will
>“un-answer” the installation software’s questions about giving various
Have you updated your jupyter(lab) recently?
nbclassic doesn't seem to be a module required by SageMath jupyter kernel.
Can you install it into whatever Python environment your jupyter(lab)
installation is using?
(you may also try ./sage --pip install nbclassic)
Best
Dima
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at
This is a bug in sagemath/sagetex
These files have to be properly packaged for installation by pip.
On 10 January 2025 13:21:45 GMT-06:00, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
>In my current installation :
>charpent@zen-book-flip:~/Temporaire/Latex/sagetex$ ls
>/usr/local/sage/venv/share/texmf/tex
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 8:08 AM Pavel Galashin wrote:
>
> I ran the same commands from scratch in new folders:
>
> $ git clone -c core.symlinks=true --filter blob:none \ --origin upstream
> --branch develop --tags \ https://github.com/sagemath/sage.git $ cd sage $
> make configure $ source ./.ho
It would be great if you tried newer Homebrew Pythons, .i.e. 3.10 and 3.11,
too, and reported here the results.
On Thursday, January 9, 2025 at 10:52:07 AM UTC-6 pgal...@gmail.com wrote:
> It was installed via homebrew, same as python3.12:
> $ which python3.9 /opt/homebrew/bin/python3.9
>
>
>
Thanks. So, what's the output of
which python3.9
in your case? And where does it come from? I suppose the issue lies in
multiptocessing/multithreading support in Python, which eveloved a lot
since 3.9.
More Pythons to try might be from https://www.python.org/downloads/ (it
would be good to k
Our docbuilder isn't great, it uses some custom outdated tricks for
parallel building. Switching to a more standard sphinx setup is overdue...
Try cleaning docs by
make doc-clean
and then run
make -j1
On Tuesday, January 7, 2025 at 2:56:47 AM UTC-6 pgal...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you for th
On 5 January 2025 14:04:20 GMT-06:00, "Éricles Lima"
wrote:
>It's funny... why should removing log files change the error obtained?
less scrolling to look for the real error.
>
>Anyway, it did. Now it fails when building gmpy:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*Error building Sage.The following package(s) may have
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 12:15 PM Éricles Lima
wrote:
>
> Is there more than one config.log?
>
> I considering copying the one I found below, but the formatting became too
> awful, so I add it again as an attachment here (it's also attached to my
> first message in this discussion)
>
> Thanks befo
Your error indicates that your system Python3 was rejected for some reason.
Please post the top-level config.log - it contains the needed details.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 10:18 AM Éricles Lima
wrote:
>
> But that's basically what I did before - the steps on that sagemanifolds
> website are basica
/usr/bin/python3 you end up using is no good for using with Sage (and
unfortunately our
./configure doesn't see it), that's why.
I suggested to install python3.12 in Homebrew and use it instead.
(because building Sage's python is broken on your macOS version, too,
there aren't many other
easy opt
No error log was attached
On 2 January 2025 18:15:47 GMT-05:00, Pranav Setpal
wrote:
>Hello, I am trying to build sage 10.6.beta2 on NixOS. I followed what was
>mentioned
>here(https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/tree/nixos-unstable/pkgs/by-name/sa/sage#i-want-to-update-sage)
>
>to do the same
You can install Homebrew's Python 3.12 :
brew install python@3.12
and run
./configure --with-python=python3.12
to tell Sage to use it and do not build Python.
On 2 January 2025 06:27:09 GMT-05:00, Pavel Galashin
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am trying to build a local sage version for de
Why won't you use Python from Homebrew?
Not that it explains your error, but they know how to build Python on macOS.
On 2 January 2025 06:27:09 GMT-05:00, Pavel Galashin
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am trying to build a local sage version for development and keep running
>into the below problem.
>
>I h
We should really drop our old docbuild system in favour of a more
direct use of Sphinx, so that only changed files are rebuilt, etc.
But it's quite a bit of work, and we are short of hands in this area.
Volunteers?
Dima
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 8:11 AM Seth Chaiken wrote:
>
> I had errors buildi
Hi,
you are trying to install Sage 10.0, for some reason.
Since Sage 10.4 or 10.5 (the current one) you certainly can use gcc-14/g++-14.
HTH
Dima
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 7:29 PM brett stevens wrote:
>
> I recently updated my system to Ubuntu 24.10 and am having trouble compiling
> sagemath.
> I
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:27 AM Xavier Wong wrote:
>
> When I utilise the BKZ algorithm on a basis as shown in the code below, I
> will receive a runtime error "terminate called recursively". After running
> the code again, I got another error that states "infinite loop in babai".
> This made
A vastly better way of building sagelib is via meson. We already have
a preliminary support for it included - notice all these meson.build
files in the source tree. In some cases you can already use it. More
is being worked on, see e.g.
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39030
testing and user i
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 10:12 AM Thuong To wrote:
>
> In fact it showed sth like this:
> ldd /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/14/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libnauty.so
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7f4e134d7000)
> libcliquer.so.1 => /lib/libcliquer.so.1 (0x7f4e1341f000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-
>From your log it's clear that libnauty (typically from a package
called nauty, or libnauty, or libnauty-dev - depending on the
particular Linux distribution you're using) installed system-wide on
your machine is broken:
--
...
[spkg-install] /usr/bin
gt;4*a^2 + 3*a + 1
>sage: Zy. = ZZ[]
>sage: Zy(list(b))
>4*y^2 + 3*y + 1
>
>On Wednesday, 27 November 2024 at 06:51:57 UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> A natural way would be to construct the quotient ring of GF(5)[x] modulo
>> (P), then b will be a polynomial in
A natural way would be to construct the quotient ring of GF(5)[x] modulo (P),
then b will be a polynomial in x, and you will have direct access to its
coefficients.
On 26 November 2024 16:46:50 GMT-06:00, "G. M.-S." wrote:
>Already asked on
>https://ask.sagemath.org/question/80389/conversion-
Opening an issue on GitHub will help.
It shouldn't be harder than posting here.
On 25 November 2024 03:52:39 GMT-06:00, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-support
wrote:
>I'm not familiar with the developing process. So I guess someone (maybe
>you?) should open a ticket? Or I could try to fill the "Issue
ase --abort".
Could not apply db5bf6ce535... Filter out R warnings
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 3:03 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 7:06 PM Jackson Walters
wrote:
>
> I don’t think I understand. I am just making commits in PR #38455. If I
switch to the develop branch, s
base in your case will be automatic (I
got the branch from #38455 and tested on it)
Dima
>
> Thanks,
> Jackson
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 7:00 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20 October 2024 01:58:14 BST, Jackson Walters
>> wrote:
>>
on I was working with. I should
>also mention I do have an installation from binary installed (10.4).
>
>Thanks,
>Jackson
>
>On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 4:01 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> According to the config.log, you are trying to install Sage 10.5.beta0
>> - whi
According to the config.log, you are trying to install Sage 10.5.beta0
- which might just not work.
(beta0 are often broken, etc). Anyway, for the development purposes
you'd normally use one of the latest betas.
The latest is 10.5.beta7. Please try it instead.
If you already have changes in your s
The errors you have might be due to the use of pyenv (perhaps it's not
activated, but still it might be a problem). Specifically, in your
PATH you have
PATH: /opt/homebrew/Cellar/pyenv-virtualenv/1.2.4/shims/
PATH: /Users/jacksonwalters/.pyenv/shims/
PATH: /Users/jacksonwalters/.pyenv/bin/
PATH: /
Hi,
could you post the top-level config.log
and logs/install.log ?
Thanks.
On 18 October 2024 20:19:13 BST, Jackson Walters
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am making some changes to `symmetric_group_representations.py`, and it
>would be useful to test them locally before committing them to a PR. I
>have
Hi Gordon,
On 3 October 2024 12:06:03 BST, Gordon wrote:
>This is not exactly a bug, but definitely a "gotcha" which will catch many
>people unawares but could easily be fixed.
>
>It is related to the two functions "orientations" and
>"acyclic_orientations" which are meant to return iterators to
Please post here config.log and install.log
It's next to impossible to guess what goes wrong without this info.
On 28 September 2024 15:28:38 BST, A wrote:
>Hi,
>I am using the following sage installation guide -
>https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html
>
>Every time I tried to run
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:04 PM Trey Davis wrote:
>
> It still doesn't work...any logs or something I should post?
We'd appreciate more details on how you run Sage and invoke view, and
what exactly you see in the error message.
E.g. if you run Sage in a WSL terminal and invoke view() at sage:
p
I can only say that Sage isn't properly geared to plot non-smooth
functions.
If you have such a piecewise-linear graph, it's probably better to split it
into polyhedral pieces and plot them.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 3:42 PM Fernando Gouvea wrote:
> Recently I was trying to get SageMath to plot
Curiously, this might be a regression in meson 1.3.2 (or perhaps your
OS mangles it somehow), as Sage carries 1.3.1.
Anyhow, the current meson version is 1.5.1, so both of these are old.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 2:17 PM Kevin Youren wrote:
>
> Dima,
>
> well done and thank you!
>
> I started the
That's unfortunate, and it might be a bug in the meson/meson-python/ninja
versions installed on your machine. (that's a curse of LTS versions, they
often remain with old buggy versions).
You can check if using instead versions vendored by Sage would work.
Run
./configure --with-system-meson=no --
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 7:00 AM Kevin Youren wrote:
>
> Dima,
>
> thanks for the hint,
>
> but
>
> export NINJA_ARGS="-j4"
> make
>
> didn't work. It still 'froze' .
Could you try -j1 rather than -j4 ?
And also
export JOBS=1
>
>
> Restarting
>
> using
> export NINJA_ARGS="-j4"
> make
>
> is wor
gards, Kevin
>
>
>
>On Friday 13 September 2024 at 21:29:07 UTC+10 oscar.j@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 14:25, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> >
>> > Sage merely invokes pip to build scipy from source.
>> >
>> > Indeed, apart from n
:
> On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 09:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > scipy itself is not built with configure/make, it's built with meson,
> ...
> > There is no direct way to specify a non-default "-j" value, however it
> appears to be possible to do this via
scipy itself is not built with configure/make, it's built with meson, which
invokes ninja (a faster replacement for make, in particular
it parallelizes the tasks much better - but in your case it goes overboard
with it).
You can see it in your log:
[spkg-install] Found ninja-1.11.1 at /usr/bin/nin
On 25 August 2024 09:52:20 BST, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
>*Correction :*
>
> - /usr/bin/maxima, the “standalone” version of maxima provided by Debian
> testing, runs without error :
>
>(%i3) t:taylor(g, x4, 0, 8)$ (%i4)
>
> - /usr/local/sage-10/local/bin/maxima, “our” versi
I would remove the symbolic link 'sage' in
/usr/local/bin/
Dima
On 22 August 2024 15:27:25 BST, Ben Salisbury wrote:
>I'm not sure how to tell what's supposed to be there and what isn't. Here
>is my top level /usr/local/
>
>salis1bt@MTH158053PE212 local % ls -ao
>
>total 0
>
>drwxr-xr-x 9 r
To see exactly how it fails in Maxima, it has to be initialised with the same
options as passed to maxima_calculus. It loads several non-default Maxima
packages.
I suppose one of the latter triggers the error in question.
On 22 August 2024 12:04:31 BST, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
>Inspi
August 20, 2024 at 3:08:47 PM UTC-4 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> Why is gmp from Brew rejected?
>> Please post top-level config.log
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20 August 2024 16:31:08 BST, Ben Salisbury wrote:
>>
>>> Hi. I'm trying to build Sage fr
testing Brew's gmp errors out with not found.
Something is funny with the Xcode installation, I presume
On 20 August 2024 20:38:39 BST, Ben Salisbury wrote:
>This one? I included the install.log, too, just for fun.
>
>On Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 3:08:47 PM UTC-4 Dima P
Why is gmp from Brew rejected?
Please post top-level config.log
On 20 August 2024 16:31:08 BST, Ben Salisbury wrote:
>Hi. I'm trying to build Sage from source (the develop branch) on an M2
>MBAir running Sonoma 14.5 and the build continues to fail at gmp. I
>downloaded a fresh copy of Comma
t; The 1st one hits the Ref1 but 2nd one don't. That leads to ConstantPolynomial
> Error.
>
> On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 3:42:28 AM UTC+5:30 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 9:59 PM 'Animesh Shree' via sage-support
>> wrote:
>> &
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 9:59 PM 'Animesh Shree' via sage-support
wrote:
>
> I saw this behavior
>
> sage: R1. = QQ[]
> sage: R2. = QQ[] # Rearrange variables of R1
> sage: R1
> Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y, z over Rational Field
> sage: R2
> Multivariate Polynomial Ring in z, x, y over Ra
It appears that FriCAS - one of the packages - is broken.
Try reinstalling it, by running the following 3 commands
make fricas-clean fricas-uninstall
make fricas
make build
On 26 June 2024 18:23:01 BST, Kate Stange wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just did a fresh install of Sage and it runs:
>
>│ SageMath v
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 7:18 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> I'll share some additional facts for everyone's convenience.
>
> The total size of these 5 wheel packages to be added in
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37301is about 500 kilobytes. (As a
> comparison, that's 10% of the size of ou
The latest beta (10.4.beta6) has a number of problems on macOS.
Either wait for the next beta, or check out the relevant PRs in our repo,
github.com/sagemath/sage/pulls
On 21 May 2024 17:35:03 BST, Jon Higa wrote:
>
>Jon Higa
>Mar 25, 2024, 4:22:29 PM
>to sage-support
>I tried to build Sage 1
1 - 100 of 1991 matches
Mail list logo
