A two-year old Sage ticket added 64-bit OS X support for Numpy.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3186
But the method used was a bit brain-dead. A script with a hard-coded path to gcc
was used, which had the -m64 flag. That was then copied and used as compiler.
I've removed that file
Following Roberts huge effort to get a lot of .spkg updates into
sage-4.5.0.alpha0, a 64-bit build of Sage on both Solaris 10 SPARC and
OpenSolaris x64 does not look to be a distant dream any more. I think it will be
close race between a Cygwin port and 64-bit Solaris or OpenSolaris port.
Ther
On 06/28/10 09:38 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On some 64-bit platforms, which include, but is not limited to:
* Some version of OS X (I don't know what versions or processors)
* Solaris on SPARC processors.
* Solaris on x86 processors.
* OpenSolaris on SP
On 06/28/10 01:37 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
There is a set of nose tests installed in matplotlib.tests. It can be
invoked with:
import matplotlib
matplotlib.test()
or (from the commandline):
nosetests matplotlib.tests
Mike
Thank you Mike. We don't have 'nosetests' as a part
A heads-up,
Many Sage Developers are getting the following form-letter email...
William
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mary Nadar
Date: Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:23 AM
Subject: William, Write a "Sagemath" Book for Packt Publishing!
To: wst...@gmail.com
Hi William,
I am an author
Hi,
I have found an unhandled SIGFPE in number_field_element_quadratic as
explained in ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9357
Basically, sage does not check if a quadratic algebraic number is zero
when trying to invert it.
I added a trivial patch that checks if the zero element is
I know there are not tons of PPC users still on these lists, but I
wanted to ask whether they had seen something weird when testing sage/
interfaces/maxima.py. Namely, there is a guaranteed timeout (even
with SAGE_TIMEOUT=1)! Previously I traced this to the functions
which create the tab-comp
Hi,
I have moved Frobby from optional to experimental due to build issues
that haven't been sufficiently addressed by any package maintainers
over the past 2 months. I'll move it back when this problem is
addressed.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8783
william
--
William Stein
Prof
Even if it is a form letter, I don't think Packt is a scam of any
kind.
They appear to be a real publisher. They focus on IT titles. They do
have staff (usually hired from India, but with "impeccable" English)
who work with the author over a series of revisions and through peer
review, typesetting
On 28 Jun, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> As with all such things, beware you are dealing with the real people
> and not some phoney. I see the links in the form letter don't direct
> to the websites they say they do, but instead go via google. Not sure
> what's up with that
Maybe it's
I don't think it is a click-through.
I think this publisher is for real and actually does quite a good job.
Apart from the fact that the cover illustrations have nothing at all
to do with the content, their books seem well-written. They publish a
lot of titles and they offer them much cheaper if
I implemented the algorithm for multivariate poly multn. But it is in
flint2, which won't be suitable for inclusion in Sage for some months
(probably the end of the year).
In the mean time, Sage uses Pari or Singular for multivariate poly
multn, if I recall. There's not really anything you can do
On 28 Jun, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I don't think it is a click-through.
>
> I think this publisher is for real and actually does quite a good job.
I was only commenting on the trip through Google, not trying to get engaged in
discussions about religion and politics.
Justin
--
Ju
On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> I was only commenting on the trip through Google, not trying to get engaged
> in discussions about religion and politics.
For the record, any url posted on google groups always redirects
through google when you click on it. Wiliam posted a plain-te
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> I don't think it is a click-through.
>
> I think this publisher is for real and actually does quite a good job.
>
> Apart from the fact that the cover illustrations have nothing at all
> to do with the content, their books seem well-written. They
Despite the title of #9346, I think that could potentially screw up on any
platform. The updated package should hopefully fix it.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
I noticed this error message
creating /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rpy2
error: could not create '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/rpy2': Permission
denied
whilst trying to build R. (See more below if you wish).
The important thing is that it tried to write to directories where the system
On 28 Jun., 19:28, kcrisman wrote:
> I know there are not tons of PPC users still on these lists, but I
> wanted to ask whether they had seen something weird when testing sage/
> interfaces/maxima.py. Namely, there is a guaranteed timeout (even
> with SAGE_TIMEOUT=1)! Previously I traced t
On 28 June, 22:21, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>
> > I was only commenting on the trip through Google, not trying to get engaged
> > in discussions about religion and politics.
>
> For the record, any url posted on google groups always redirects
> throug
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 28 June, 22:21, Volker Braun wrote:
>> On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>>
>> > I was only commenting on the trip through Google, not trying to get
>> > engaged in discussions about religion and politics.
>>
>> For the reco
On 28 June, 22:21, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
> > I don't think it is a click-through.
>
> > I think this publisher is for real and actually does quite a good job.
>
> > Apart from the fact that the cover illustrations have nothing at all
> > to
On 28 June, 23:19, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
> > On 28 June, 22:21, Volker Braun wrote:
> >> On Jun 28, 9:49 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>
> >> > I was only commenting on the trip through Google, not trying to get
> >> > engaged in discus
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 28 June, 22:21, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Bill Hart
>> wrote:
>> > I don't think it is a click-through.
>>
>> > I think this publisher is for real and actually does quite a good job.
>>
>> > Apart from the
Then I don't understand. What do you mean by free? I don't see how
anything at all about Springer exemplifies even a beginning of an
understanding. They are to me the archetypal proprietary publisher...
To contrast them to Packt well, OK, I can download your Springer
book without paying for it
sage-flame?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> Then I don't understand. What do you mean by free? I don't see how
> anything at all about Springer exemplifies even a beginning of an
> understanding. They are to me the archetypal proprietary publisher...
>
> To contrast them to Pa
I'm pretty sure I was banned from posting there.
On 29 June, 00:51, Robert Miller wrote:
> sage-flame?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
> > Then I don't understand. What do you mean by free? I don't see how
> > anything at all about Springer exemplifies even a beg
OK. I agree, I was over the top a bit.
I removed my follow up to this, FWIW. I see you mean at least the
information in the book is now "free", which is a good thing.
Bill.
On 29 June, 00:37, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
> > On 28 June, 22:21, W
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Georg S. Weber
wrote:
> I remember that once Michael Abshoff had created some mechanism to
> make the Sage/Maxima interface (i.e. the pexpect interface in general)
> produce verbose output into some log files (via setting an enironment
> variable?), but I didn't ge
Hi,
On Sage 4.4.4, I have the following bug.
sage: F.=GF(4)
sage: m=matrix(2,[F(1),2,3,4])
sage: magma(m)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
...
TypeError: unable to coerce element
The promised binaries are up at
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
sage-4.4.4-i386-Darwin.dmg
has the "old" application--the one that you can make with sage -bdist
sage-deluxe-4.4.4-i386-Darwin.dmg
has the "new" application--it should be nicer, but more experimental.
On Jun 28, 2010, at 9:12 AM, caleb wrote:
I've attached the output of gcc -v to the discussion, but I notice now
that it was mentioned in some earlier discussion that gcc 4.1.0 was
blacklisted. The version of gcc is the only difference that I notice
between the cluster that complies Sage flawles
Yes, I believe so too, however, the latest version of gcc 4.5.0 causes a
build error with R, so I'm compiling and testing an intermediate version ,
gcc-4.3.5.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 9:12 AM, caleb wrote:
>
> I
Hi,
Does anybody have a clue why users accidentally randomly delete
Moinmoin pages all the time? This is constantly happening to people
at Sage Days 22, with all kinds of browsers, networks, etc.
This is very weird. I couldn't find anything via a fast web search.
We should either upgrade the w
33 matches
Mail list logo
