I guess I should have called this "How I did it" as I doubt it has the kind
of rigor my friend mabshoff would have preferred.
The good news is that this build takes the latest code from all the repos...
and works with sage-4.1.2
http://wiki.sagemath.org/GlennTarbox/InstallingMayavi2
-glenn
--
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> Sounds interesting. I'm curious--what kind of savings are you getting
> over the Python and Cython versions (for, say, the 100-1000 bit range)?
>
> - Robert
It's 6-7 times faster than my prototype Cython code in that range.
However, the
Sounds interesting. I'm curious--what kind of savings are you getting
over the Python and Cython versions (for, say, the 100-1000 bit range)?
- Robert
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started this project: http://code.google.com/p/fastfunlib/
>
> I'm goin
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:18 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For a grant proposal, I would like to assemble a list of people
> running Sage notebook servers either publicly or privately (but more
> than just for their own person use, of course, e.g. for their group),
> with maybe some statem
William Stein a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> For a grant proposal, I would like to assemble a list of people
> running Sage notebook servers either publicly or privately (but more
> than just for their own person use, of course, e.g. for their group),
> with maybe some statement about how the notebook server
On Oct 15, 3:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
> This is a known issue with how tinymce is used by sage, but I think
> there is no known clear way to demonstrate the bug. You might try
> sage-4.1.2 (binaries are posted). I don't make any claim that will
> fix the bug, though it's possible since ma
Hi,
For a grant proposal, I would like to assemble a list of people
running Sage notebook servers either publicly or privately (but more
than just for their own person use, of course, e.g. for their group),
with maybe some statement about how the notebook server is being used.
This could be very
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Elliott wrote:
>
> Hello, I was going to use sagenb.org today to verify a plot for my
> math homework, but I kept getting segmentation faults for some odd
> (and rather scary) reason. I made a mistake and used "typeof" instead
> of "type" and got
>
> typeof((1, 2,
On Oct 16, 1:14 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > if you want access to a HP-UX machine, I can create you an account.
>
> Sure. Thank you for the offer. My preferred username is "mvngu".
I've sent you details by pri
Hello, I was going to use sagenb.org today to verify a plot for my
math homework, but I kept getting segmentation faults for some odd
(and rather scary) reason. I made a mistake and used "typeof" instead
of "type" and got
typeof((1, 2, 3))
///
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1,
On Oct 15, 7:05 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Sage 4.1.2 will now build completely on Solaris with no manual intervention.
Congratulations! That's been quite a project.
And I hope you continue working on similar projects, lest the pipes
freeze out in the shed. ;-)
Rob
--~--~-~--~--
Following a patch to pari
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6579
which needs review, Sage 4.1.2 will now build completely on Solaris with
no manual intervention.
I've built it on my own Solaris box, and a build is in progress on t2
now at
/scratch/kirkby/gcc32/sage-4.1.2/
(no prizes for
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I'm applying to NSF for some Sage Days workshops (off in the future:
> think 2-4 years from right now). If anybody has any idea about what
> might constitute a good topic for their dream Sage Days, please
> respond to this email with the t
Good point.
On Oct 15, 10:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > Just found out: 'div' became "__floordiv__" which is invoked also
> > as //
>
> > (fromhttp://docs.python.org/library/operator.html)
>
> > Which kinda brings the question: why do
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Just found out: 'div' became "__floordiv__" which is invoked also
> as //
>
> (from http://docs.python.org/library/operator.html)
>
> Which kinda brings the question: why doesn't "|", also known as
> "__or__" is not implemented by polynom
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:09 PM, NoSyu wrote:
> Dan Drake 쓴 글:
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 at 02:46PM -0200, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>
>
> I can try to have the spanish translation done if somebody else
> figures out the details needed to support i18n (say, figure out
> gettext for python, produce th
Just found out: 'div' became "__floordiv__" which is invoked also
as //
(from http://docs.python.org/library/operator.html)
Which kinda brings the question: why doesn't "|", also known as
"__or__" is not implemented by polynomials, as a synomim for divides?
Reads equally well:
Given:
P. = GF(7)
Dan Drake 쓴 글:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 at 02:46PM -0200, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
I can try to have the spanish translation done if somebody else
figures out the details needed to support i18n (say, figure out
gettext for python, produce the .pot files for translation, load the
.po fil
On Oct 15, 2:11 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I. SAGE-4.1.2: Sage-4.1.2 has been released.
>
> 1. You can download the source code here:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/sage-4.1.2.tar
> 2. I've posted many binaries here:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/h
One topic I would like to see is Applied Math. Maybe it would attract
some developers who would make Sage more attractive to applied math
folks.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm applying to NSF for some Sage Days workshops (off in the future:
> think 2-4 year
Hi,
I'm applying to NSF for some Sage Days workshops (off in the future:
think 2-4 years from right now). If anybody has any idea about what
might constitute a good topic for their dream Sage Days, please
respond to this email with the topic. The more details you can give
the better.
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> This is for developers interested in Calculus.
>
> Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
> finished my work on #6479
>
> You have to use 2 patches from #6479 and one patch from #385
>
> After t
Hi sage-devel,
See
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/1549228/Doubts-Raised-About-Legal-Soundness-of-GPL2
Two lawyers with links to free and open source software think GPLv2 is
too ambiguous as a legal document.
I'm not particularly drawn to questions of legality (of which I prefer
Hi David,
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> if you want access to a HP-UX machine, I can create you an account.
Sure. Thank you for the offer. My preferred username is "mvngu".
> I can't guarantee I will run the thing 24/7 forever, as it uses quite a
> bit of powe
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Like you, I also compile and doctest Sage on the following machines:
>
> * High-end servers
> * bsd.math --- Mac OS X 10.6.1
> * rosemary.math (outside the Sage network of computers) --- 64-bit
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 5.4
> * sage.math --- 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04.
I've uploaded MPIR 1.3 alpha 2 at http://www.mpir.org/
This fixes some assembly issues discovered by Jeff Gilchrist during
testing.
I am going away over the weekend, but will hopefully have short
intervals of internet connectivity during which I can upload docs
which are the only thing missing t
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 at 02:46PM -0200, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> I can try to have the spanish translation done if somebody else
> figures out the details needed to support i18n (say, figure out
> gettext for python, produce the .pot files for translation, load the
> .po files from the notebook, the
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Chris Seberino wrote:
>
> I'm using sage-4.1.1-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux on Ubuntu 9.04 and a
> Lenovo R52 laptop.
>
> I'm seeing a bug as I try to add various text regions to Sage
> notebooks
> (By pressing Shift-Click on blue vertical lines.)
>
> Text sometim
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 at 09:06AM -0700, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> I really like the homepage they created. Could that homepage along
> with the language translation be added to the notebook?
Actually, if you check, their homepage is entirely images except for the
login box. I really, really dislike t
I'm using sage-4.1.1-linux-Ubuntu_9.04-i686-Linux on Ubuntu 9.04 and a
Lenovo R52 laptop.
I'm seeing a bug as I try to add various text regions to Sage
notebooks
(By pressing Shift-Click on blue vertical lines.)
Text sometimes gets deleted or moved around.
cs
--~--~-~--~~---
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:28 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 říj, 18:57, William Stein wrote:
>>> Yes. And ping me as soon as you do it, since I can review it.
>>>
>>> William
>>
>> The fixed spkg file is at
>> http://user.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15 říj, 18:57, William Stein wrote:
>> Yes. And ping me as soon as you do it, since I can review it.
>>
>> William
>
> The fixed spkg file is at
> http://user.mendelu.cz/marik/temp/jsmath-image-fonts-1.4.spkg
> (cannot upload
On 15 říj, 18:57, William Stein wrote:
> Yes. And ping me as soon as you do it, since I can review it.
>
> William
The fixed spkg file is at
http://user.mendelu.cz/marik/temp/jsmath-image-fonts-1.4.spkg
(cannot upload to trac server due to the filesize limit)
Robert
--~--~-~--~~
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William's prereq-0.3 made use of a 'check()' which checked the existence
> of certain commands. It also appears in my updated version (0.4, which
> is currently in Sage). Unfortunately, the method is not portable, as it
> fails to work
William's prereq-0.3 made use of a 'check()' which checked the existence
of certain commands. It also appears in my updated version (0.4, which
is currently in Sage). Unfortunately, the method is not portable, as it
fails to work on Solaris, instead indicating every command is present,
even wh
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> I'm just trying to create a revised 'prereq' script, which I updated
> recently. One of the things I notice in there is these few lines.
>
> echo "Unfortunately, building SAGE on Cygwin is not currently
> supported,"
>
Dear sage-devel,
Just a question/rant: Please don't close tickets without directly
informing the release manager! Unless that's ok - in whch case, what
is our policy regarding ticket closure?
The previous regime was pretty eagle-eyed about that sort of thing,
but our intrepid new managers aren'
I'm just trying to create a revised 'prereq' script, which I updated
recently. One of the things I notice in there is these few lines.
echo "Unfortunately, building SAGE on Cygwin is not currently
supported,"
echo "though we are actively working on supporting it. If you
woul
Hi,
In earlier versions of sage, polinomials of one variable over Finite
Fields implemented the 'div' method, which would return the exact
quotient from the division algorithm. On sage 4.1.1 only the '__div__'
is implemented, which actually returns the result the Rational Field.
Was the original
I got an "Illegal Instruction" error when I tried to launch Sage using
the latest ver4.1 LiveCD.
I was able to see this error by trying to launch Sage from a terminal
typing "sage -notebook".
I have a Lenovo R52 laptop.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
Hi folks,
The sage.math binary for Sage 4.1.2 can be found under my sage.math
development directory [1]. That directory also lists MD5 checksum
files to cater to your paranoia needs ;-)
[1] http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/sage.math-bin/
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:54 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
>
> On 15 říj, 17:55, Jason Grout wrote:
>> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. This issue is now tracked
>> athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7229
>>
>
> From the manual I have an impression that it is sufficient to downlo
On 15 říj, 17:55, Jason Grout wrote:
> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> Thanks. This issue is now tracked
> athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7229
>
>From the manual I have an impression that it is sufficient to download
the spkg file, unpack, fix (perhaps only one line) in the install
s
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, the worksheet format on sagenb.org has changed and is not
>> backward compatible. You can't load a worksheet created with the new
>> notebook into an old notebook server.
>>
>> If you are desparate you can "tar jxvf" the worksheet.sws
>
> Yes, the worksheet format on sagenb.org has changed and is not
> backward compatible. You can't load a worksheet created with the new
> notebook into an old notebook server.
>
> If you are desparate you can "tar jxvf" the worksheet.sws file. Inside
> there is a file "worksheet.html", which yo
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Timothy Clemans
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> Here's a complete translation of the Sage notebook into Korean:
>>
>> http://math1.skku.ac.kr/
>>
>> Go ahead and log in -- username test, password "test95". This is the
>> work of a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Alex McFerron wrote:
> I'm a lurker on this list. I keep wanting to join up and start coding for
> Sage. I'm a computer science grad student. Anyway, i'll be at the Joint
> meetings. Would love to meet people and learn more about Sage.
>
> could also pass out card
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 8:00 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:54, William Stein wrote:
>> > I'm curious how it is working for people/courses/whatever.
>>
>> sagenb.org is not loading for me, probably down (but no error so far).
>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Here's a complete translation of the Sage notebook into Korean:
>
> http://math1.skku.ac.kr/
>
> Go ahead and log in -- username test, password "test95". This is the
> work of a couple students and professors at Sungkyunkwan University.
> They a
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
>
> On 15 říj, 16:38, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>>> * Install *all* jsMath image fonts on sagenb.org
>>> * Silently fall back to using image fonts if TeX fonts are not available
>> This is what was done in the sage notebook a few days ago. William ha
> Is there any real reason to use "Modules(R)" as "Bimodules(R,R)"
> beyond the comfort of not changing the names? If not, I'd strongly
> suggest forgetting the name "Modules" for noncommutative rings or
> default it to left modules.
Oh, interesting that you say that. That is exactly what PanAxi
On Oct 15, 4:00 pm, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Module(R) can only be instatiated if R is a commutative ring.
> To make it more clear:
> Isn't that what you want? Maybe you should use FriCAS. ;-)
Precisely that's what I am suggesting for Sage categories code, that
the word "Module" is only used fo
Hi there,
> > Is there any real reason to use "Modules(R)" as "Bimodules(R,R)"
> > beyond the comfort of not changing the names? If not, I'd strongly
> > suggest forgetting the name "Modules" for noncommutative rings or
> > default it to left modules.
>
> Oh, interesting that you say that
Sorry I mixed-up Module with Bi-module
So that you certainly have two other categories RightModule and LeftModule.
Here I see two possibilities:
1 - Restrict Module to the commutative case and create RightModule and
LeftModule and define:
Module(R) := Bimodule(R,R)
BiModule
On Oct 15, 8:00 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:54, William Stein wrote:
> > I'm curious how it is working for people/courses/whatever.
>
> sagenb.org is not loading for me, probably down (but no error so far).
> it's 8am sage server time.
Homework was due last night at
On 15 říj, 16:38, Jason Grout wrote:
> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> > * Install *all* jsMath image fonts on sagenb.org
> > * Silently fall back to using image fonts if TeX fonts are not available
>
> This is what was done in the sage notebook a few days ago. William had
> installed the optional jsm
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 02:54, William Stein wrote:
> I'm curious how it is working for people/courses/whatever.
sagenb.org is not loading for me, probably down (but no error so far).
it's 8am sage server time.
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, sen
Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> * Install *all* jsMath image fonts on sagenb.org
> * Silently fall back to using image fonts if TeX fonts are not available
This is what was done in the sage notebook a few days ago. William had
installed the optional jsmath-image-fonts spkg a long time ago. What
pro
On Oct 15, 3:00 pm, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Could you elaborate. I would like to understand why the statement that
> "every module is a bimodule" is not acceptable.
Because people tend to think "module = representation" and this is not
true for bimodules, or at least not true in the sense one wou
I'm a lurker on this list. I keep wanting to join up and start coding for
Sage. I'm a computer science grad student. Anyway, i'll be at the Joint
meetings. Would love to meet people and learn more about Sage.
could also pass out cards or help out in some way if needed
cheers,
alex
On Thu, Oct
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hello, I still have problem with jsmath mentioned at thread "notebook
> help needed". See the copy below and Jason's reply. I have the error
> message on sagenb.org and I can see Latex code instead of the formula.
> No problem of this type with Version 4.1.1.
>
> It woul
Could you elaborate. I would like to understand why the statement that
"every module is a bimodule" is not acceptable.
In PanAxiom we have
BiModule(R:Ring,S:Ring):Category ==
Join(LeftModule(R), RightModule(S))
Module(R:CommutativeRing): Category == BiModule(R,R)
add
if not(R is %)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:34:46AM -0700, javier wrote:
>
> Positive review for algebra_ideals.
Thanks.
> With respect to algebra_modules, we have again the problem of
> commutativity. Whilst it makes sense to simply say "ideals" for two-
> sided ideals, this is not the case for modules: I don'
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:50:19AM -0700, javier wrote:
> * commutative_algebras.py
>
> Algebras with unit? Then add in the description!
> Add to "To do": Include product (=cartesian product), and coproduct
> (tensor product over base ring)
> OK for the rest
Done.
> * commutative_ring_ideasl.py
Indeed that is not needed in the spkg any more. It is (hopefully)
enough to just do make install. Perhaps Mike can correct that.
Bill.
On 15 Oct, 11:29, daveloeffler wrote:
> I just tried to build 4.1.2 with the new spkg and got a build error:
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/david/sage-
Dear Javier, dear Tim and Axiom developpers,
Thanks Javier for your fine and prompt reviewing work!
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:14:12AM -0700, javier wrote:
> - 46 return [GcdDomains()]
> + 46 return [UniqueFactorizationDomains()]
> since all PID's are UFD's it makes more sense to return
I just tried to build 4.1.2 with the new spkg and got a build error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/david/sage-4.1.2/spkg/build/
mpir-1.3.0.p0/src'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `install-gmpcompat'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/david/sage-4.1.2/spkg/build/
mpir-1.3.0.p0/src'
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> For someone
> who has a hobby of building complex software on a wide variety of
> systems (and I'm very glad people like you are out there as the Sage
> project wouldn't be where it is without it) doing this is no burden at
> all. I'd rather spend my time thinking
William Stein schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Last night I switched the full http://sagenb.org over to use the new
> separate-from-Sage Sage notebook code.In particular, this involves
> using code for which the evaluation and storage code has been
> rewritten. I'm curious how it is working for people/cour
Here's a complete translation of the Sage notebook into Korean:
http://math1.skku.ac.kr/
Go ahead and log in -- username test, password "test95". This is the
work of a couple students and professors at Sungkyunkwan University.
They also translated Rob Beezer's linear algebra quick reference and
h
Thanks Mike. That was amazingly quick!
On 15 Oct, 06:46, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>
> > I've just put up MPIR 1.3 (alpha) for testing.
>
> > As there is sooo much new code there is a very real possibility that
> > the Sage test suite
Hello, I still have problem with jsmath mentioned at thread "notebook
help needed". See the copy below and Jason's reply. I have the error
message on sagenb.org and I can see Latex code instead of the formula.
No problem of this type with Version 4.1.1.
It would be nice if jsmath on sagenb.org wo
72 matches
Mail list logo
