On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:34:46AM -0700, javier wrote: > > Positive review for algebra_ideals.
Thanks. > With respect to algebra_modules, we have again the problem of > commutativity. Whilst it makes sense to simply say "ideals" for two- > sided ideals, this is not the case for modules: I don't know of > anybody using "modules" to refer to "bimodules". > > Any other opinions here? No opinion myself except lazyness to change without good reason :-) In MuPAD/Axiom, Modules(R) was a subcategory of BiModules(R). See e.g. http://daly.axiom-developer.org/dotabb.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
