[sage-devel] A bug in multi-variate polynomial ring

2009-05-21 Thread Kwankyu
Hi, sage: S.=QQ[] sage: S(0).degree() -1 sage: R.=QQ[] sage: R(0).degree() 0 This seems to me a bug. Isn't it? I am using Sage 3.4.2. Kwankyu --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[sage-devel] Re: Wiki translation?

2009-05-21 Thread ahmet alper parker
If not any exists or poor, I can contribute in the Turkish translation too... If there is a standard way of doing that, it would be much easier for other languages as well... On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:34 AM, David Joyner wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Maurizio wrote: >> >> Hi all,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On May 21, 8:16 pm, mabshoff wrote: > On May 21, 8:11 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > > On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > > > are in > > > >    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/rele

[sage-devel] Re: Rebased the Sage-Combinat patch for 4.0.rc0

2009-05-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Mike, dear Sage-Combinat developpers, On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 09:19:09PM -0700, Nicolas Thiéry wrote: > I just rebased the patches on the server to apply on 4.0.rc0. In > principle, they still apply on 3.2. I haven't tried on older > releases. Let me know if you encounter any probl

[sage-devel] Rebased the Sage-Combinat patch for 4.0.rc0

2009-05-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi! I just rebased the patches on the server to apply on 4.0.rc0. In principle, they still apply on 3.2. I haven't tried on older releases. Let me know if you encounter any problem! They probably don't apply on 4.0.alpha0, and I won't support it. If you plan to do development on the p

[sage-devel] Re: Graph Theory: schnyder.py problem

2009-05-21 Thread Emily
Fidel, Nice catch! This bug has been posted and resolved on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6117. The show() method now accepts 'talk' as a keyword. -Emily On May 11, 11:25 am, Fidel wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in sage 3.4.2. > > I was going through the code in graphs/schnyder.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread mabshoff
On May 21, 8:11 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > > are in > > >    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ > > > Once I get online I will post mor

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread John H Palmieri
On May 21, 7:14 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > are in > >    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ > > Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take > a couple hours. Sorry

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Kiran Kedlaya
On a fresh build on 64-bit Fedora 10 (Opteron), only one doctest fails: sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx" due to numerical noise as follows: ** File "/scratch/sage-4.0.rc0/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx",

[sage-devel] Strange issue with type coercion with matplotlib

2009-05-21 Thread Kevin Horton
I have a very strange situation with matplotlib plotting in sage-4.0.rc0. The worksheet below illustrates the problem. If the worksheet is restarted, and "Evaluate All" is selected, the last cell produces an error (see traceback at the end). But, if that input cell is evaluated again, the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi, Fresh build of 4.0.rc0 on an Archlinux machine worked. However, doing make ptestlong gave quite a few doctest failures: sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/nf_introduction.rst # 3 doctests failed sage -t -long devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst # 1 doctest

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Michael Abshoff
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer > credit for it.  David rebased and reviewed all of it himself. Fixed. > Best, > Alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread J Elaych
As usual 4.0.rc0 compiled and tested fine on Ubuntu 64 amd64 x2 9.x. I did notice that desolve still uses maxima; is anyone planning to change that? I couldn't find DE support in pynac so it looks like maxima will still be with sage for a while. On May 21, 4:29 pm, Tim Lahey wrote: > On May 2

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Tim Lahey
On May 21, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > I have two open tickets related to symbolics, and sadly the new > symbolics hasn't magically fixed either. :( > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4142 > This one is limits, which I believe is still being done with Maxima which is probabl

[sage-devel] Re: Wiki translation?

2009-05-21 Thread David Joyner
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Maurizio wrote: > > Hi all, > > For some strange reason, I fell into the SAGE-intro-Italian wiki page. > I am Italian, and I can see that translation has been done with an > automatic translator (something like babelfish or google translate), > and looks a bit emb

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 21 May 2009 at 10:17AM -0700, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:14 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > > are in > > > >   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ > > > > Once I get online

[sage-devel] Re: Wiki translation?

2009-05-21 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 21 May 2009 at 02:00PM -0700, Maurizio wrote: > For some strange reason, I fell into the SAGE-intro-Italian wiki page. > I am Italian, and I can see that translation has been done with an > automatic translator (something like babelfish or google translate), > and looks a bit embarrassing :

[sage-devel] Re: algorithm vs. method

2009-05-21 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John Cremona wrote: > However sometimes I have felt that "algorithm" did not quite capture > the distinction being made for some function.  I have written > functions in Sage which have an algorithm parameter which can be > either "pari" or "sage", where the under

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Rob Beezer
./sage -upgrade from 4.0.alpha0 to 4.0.rc0 Then failed many tests. rm devel/sage/build/sage/symbolic/constants.so sage -ba sage -testall and all tests passed. 64-bit (K)Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel Core Duo. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sa

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Robert Miller wrote: > > ratpoints is a program for finding points of bounded height on curves > of the form > > y^2 = a_n x^n + ... + a_1 x + a_0. > > A version of ratpoints was the starting point of John Cremona's > mwrank, but since then there have been substan

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 John Cremona : > 2009/5/21 John Cremona : >> Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu. > > Scratch the second half of that:  I had typed "make && sage --testall" > instead of "make && ./sage --testall" so it was testing the previous The genuine test of 4.0.rc0 g

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Kevin Horton
On 21 May 2009, at 10:14, mabshoff wrote: > > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > are in > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/ > rc0/ A worksheet that worked fine under sage 3.4.2 and 4.0.alpha0 fails under 4.0rc0. The who

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
Here are two potential fixes for the rc0 update problem you have: system:sage system:sage {{{id=3| import matplotlib.pyplot as pyplot /// }}} {{{id=0| RealNumber=float; Integer=int A=3202.6427147395325 B=2.7068484110275158e-05 fit(x)= A + B * x Xfit=[0, 8] Yfit=[float(fit(0)), float(fi

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread pang
> Does anyone > have a non-trivial example they have already used which could > be posted on the wiki? I have uploaded an example of an interaction which could be used to present the problem of the eight queens: http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact/misc#Queensonboard --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-devel] Re: algorithm vs. method

2009-05-21 Thread Jason Grout
William Stein wrote: > 2009/5/21 Jason Grout : >> Referring to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6094 ... >> >> I hope this isn't too much bikeshedding [1]... >> >> Suppose a function has several ways to do its calculation, and wants to >> provide the user with a way to select between the

[sage-devel] 2d math input

2009-05-21 Thread jason-sage
Ben Woodruff wrote: > Do you know if 2D math input is in the process of being developed, > such as being able to type matrices in matrix format instead of having > to create a list of lists. I assume you mean like how Mathematica uses ctrl-enter and ctrl-comma to create a grid of inputs in thei

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Alex Ghitza
Hi Michael, One clarification regarding credit for #6042: I shouldn't get reviewer credit for it. David rebased and reviewed all of it himself. Best, Alex On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:14 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hi, > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > are i

[sage-devel] Wiki translation?

2009-05-21 Thread Maurizio
Hi all, For some strange reason, I fell into the SAGE-intro-Italian wiki page. I am Italian, and I can see that translation has been done with an automatic translator (something like babelfish or google translate), and looks a bit embarrassing :) I am willing to give my contribute providing a "h

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Jaap Spies
Jaap Spies wrote: > > Is this bad or expected? > For a log See: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/tests/test_4.0_rc0.log Jaap --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send e

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 John Cremona : > Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu. Scratch the second half of that: I had typed "make && sage --testall" instead of "make && ./sage --testall" so it was testing the previous version. Is doing "make test" just the same? or better, or wo

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:30:27AM -0700, pang wrote: > > On May 21, 2:48 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > Something closely related was discussed but apparently never > > implemented a while ago (a box to click for not updating immediately, > > which would be unclicked when one wanted things to update a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: >> mabshoff wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 >>> are in >>> >>>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ >>> >>> Once I get online I

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu. John 2009/5/21 William Stein : > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: >> >> mabshoff wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 >>> are in >>> >>>    http://sage.m

[sage-devel] Re: algorithm vs. method

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 William Stein : > > 2009/5/21 Jason Grout : >> >> Referring to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6094 ... >> >> I hope this isn't too much bikeshedding [1]... >> >> Suppose a function has several ways to do its calculation, and wants to >> provide the user with a way to select be

[sage-devel] Re: algorithm vs. method

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
2009/5/21 Jason Grout : > > Referring to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6094 ... > > I hope this isn't too much bikeshedding [1]... > > Suppose a function has several ways to do its calculation, and wants to > provide the user with a way to select between the different ways. > > What is

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 Robert Miller : > > John, > > On May 21, 9:38 am, John Cremona wrote: >> 2009/5/21 Robert Miller : >> 2. It is not true to say that "A version of ratpoints was the starting >> point of ... mwrank", not at all.   mwrank does 2-descent, during the >> course of which it has to search for p

[sage-devel] algorithm vs. method

2009-05-21 Thread Jason Grout
Referring to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6094 ... I hope this isn't too much bikeshedding [1]... Suppose a function has several ways to do its calculation, and wants to provide the user with a way to select between the different ways. What is the standard option name to select be

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread David Roe
+1 from me as well. On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Robert Miller > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > On May 21, 9:38 am, John Cremona wrote: > >> 2009/5/21 Robert Miller : > >> 2. It is not true to say that "A version of ratpoints was th

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 >> are in >> >>    http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ >> >> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Robert Miller wrote: > > John, > > On May 21, 9:38 am, John Cremona wrote: >> 2009/5/21 Robert Miller : >> 2. It is not true to say that "A version of ratpoints was the starting >> point of ... mwrank", not at all.   mwrank does 2-descent, during the >> course o

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread Robert Miller
John, On May 21, 9:38 am, John Cremona wrote: > 2009/5/21 Robert Miller : > 2. It is not true to say that "A version of ratpoints was the starting > point of ... mwrank", not at all.   mwrank does 2-descent, during the > course of which it has to search for points on such curves.  For the > firs

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread kcrisman
> > Actually, I did implement this > athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5194, and it was merged in > Sage 3.3. Yes, this is documented - sorry for the mixup. It works as advertised - including that for now, the image disappears as soon as one changes a control. A quick search using

[sage-devel] Re: click on a plot to select a point, using interact

2009-05-21 Thread Marshall Hampton
Yes. My student is graduating next month, and I will take whatever he has and polish it up and submit it. It was a learning experience for him, so progress was slow, but I can commit some time in June to moving this along. -Marshall On May 21, 6:40 am, Jason Grout wrote: > Pablo Angulo wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: Gap to complex

2009-05-21 Thread David Joyner
I guess this is a bug but you for now you can just coerce into k first, right? On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Jerome Lefebvre wrote: > > Hello, > I've been trying to convert gap complex number to Sage complex > numbers, and not doing well. > More precisely, given a gap object, x, that represe

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread kcrisman
Same problem here to some extent: During upgrade from 4.0.alpha0 on OSX.4 G4 Powerbook, on the Sphinx build process I repeatedly get the following or a similar error: ImportError: dlopen(.../sage/symbolic/constants.so): Library not loaded: .../local/lib/libpynac-0.1.2.dylib Reason: image not fou

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > are in > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ > > Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take > a couple hours. Sorry. > Upgrading fr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:14 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > Hi, > > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 > are in > >   http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ > > Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take > a coupl

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread Mike Hansen
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:48 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > Something closely related was discussed but apparently never > implemented a while ago (a box to click for not updating immediately, > which would be unclicked when one wanted things to update again). > Would this idea be relevant to your needs

[sage-devel] Re: Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 Robert Miller : > > ratpoints is a program for finding points of bounded height on curves > of the form > > y^2 = a_n x^n + ... + a_1 x + a_0. > > A version of ratpoints was the starting point of John Cremona's > mwrank, but since then there have been substantial improvements. I > have b

[sage-devel] Should we include Michael Stoll's ratpoints as a standard spkg?

2009-05-21 Thread Robert Miller
ratpoints is a program for finding points of bounded height on curves of the form y^2 = a_n x^n + ... + a_1 x + a_0. A version of ratpoints was the starting point of John Cremona's mwrank, but since then there have been substantial improvements. I have been working on a Sage-native implementatio

[sage-devel] Gap to complex

2009-05-21 Thread Jerome Lefebvre
Hello, I've been trying to convert gap complex number to Sage complex numbers, and not doing well. More precisely, given a gap object, x, that represents some number and given a field,k, (coming from Sage), I'd like to find y\in k that equivalent to x. While the math is obviously field specific, t

[sage-devel] Re: Segmentation fault

2009-05-21 Thread Nick Alexander
> It works fine to do > sage: g = P2.division_points(19, poly_only=True) > which defines a polynomial of degree 361 over Q(sqrt(-87)), but then > g.roots() goes Boom. Me too. I've opened http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6113 Nick --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[sage-devel] Re: Segmentation fault

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/21 John Cremona : > In 4.0.alpha0, this causes a segmentation fault: > > -- > | Sage Version 4.0.alpha0, Release Date: 2009-05-15 | > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| >

[sage-devel] Segmentation fault

2009-05-21 Thread John Cremona
In 4.0.alpha0, this causes a segmentation fault: -- | Sage Version 4.0.alpha0, Release Date: 2009-05-15 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.| ---

[sage-devel] Sage 4.0.rc0 released!

2009-05-21 Thread mabshoff
Hi, I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 are in http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take a couple hours. Sorry. Cheers, Michael Merged in Sage 4.0.rc0: #6104:

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread pang
On May 21, 2:48 pm, kcrisman wrote: > Something closely related was discussed but apparently never > implemented a while ago (a box to click for not updating immediately, > which would be unclicked when one wanted things to update again). > Would this idea be relevant to your needs? Well, that w

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread kcrisman
Something closely related was discussed but apparently never implemented a while ago (a box to click for not updating immediately, which would be unclicked when one wanted things to update again). Would this idea be relevant to your needs? http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/t

[sage-devel] Re: click on a plot to select a point, using interact

2009-05-21 Thread Jason Grout
Pablo Angulo wrote: > Hello > Sometimes when writing an interactive plot with @interact I would like > to select a 2D point. I can put two input boxes, one for each > coordinate. When either coordinate is updated, it starts to recompute > the graph, while I'd prefer it to compute only when bot

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread Pablo Angulo
> You are correct. Right now one can't do what you want with controls. > It would > be possible for us to implement it though. How would you like to > specify that a control > doesn't cause a change? For example, @interact def _(var1=input_box(default_value=1, trigger_updates=False), var2=inpu

[sage-devel] Re: not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > > Hello: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's no way to avoid that an interaction > is rebuilt after any change in the controls. While I've been able to > live with that, I was now working in some examples using persistent data > (code is

[sage-devel] not all controls on interact should trigger an update

2009-05-21 Thread Pablo Angulo
Hello: Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's no way to avoid that an interaction is rebuilt after any change in the controls. While I've been able to live with that, I was now working in some examples using persistent data (code is below), and I'd really love two or three things: 1) To choose wh

[sage-devel] Re: click on a plot to select a point, using interact

2009-05-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > >  Hello >  Sometimes when writing an interactive plot with @interact I would like > to select a 2D point. I can put two input boxes, one for each > coordinate. When either coordinate is updated, it starts to recompute > the graph, while I'd

[sage-devel] click on a plot to select a point, using interact

2009-05-21 Thread Pablo Angulo
Hello Sometimes when writing an interactive plot with @interact I would like to select a 2D point. I can put two input boxes, one for each coordinate. When either coordinate is updated, it starts to recompute the graph, while I'd prefer it to compute only when both coordinates are changed. But

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.0.alpha0 build failure on OS X PPC

2009-05-21 Thread gsw
Hi, Sage-4.0.alpha0 did build fine on my G4 PowerBook 550Mhz with OS X 10.4.11 and Xcode 2.5. From the istall.log: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. - DOPERATION_scan1 -O2 -mpowerpc -no-cpp-precomp -force_cpusubtype_ALL - c scan1.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/s