2009/5/21 John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com>: > Successful build from scratch and all tests pass on 64-bit ubuntu.
Scratch the second half of that: I had typed "make && sage --testall" instead of "make && ./sage --testall" so it was testing the previous version. Is doing "make test" just the same? or better, or worse? John > > John > > 2009/5/21 William Stein <wst...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jaap Spies <j.sp...@hccnet.nl> wrote: >>> >>> mabshoff wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0 >>>> are in >>>> >>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/ >>>> >>>> Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take >>>> a couple hours. Sorry. >>>> >>> >>> Upgrading from alpha0 on Fedora 10 failed somehow. I had to remove >>> constants.so >>> by hand. >>> >>> $ rm devel/sage/build/sage/symbolic/constants.so >> >> Thanks for reporting this. It is a bug (my fault) and now a blocker: >> >> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6114 >> >>> >>> Now testing. >>> >>> On Fedora 9 I'll do a fresh install. >>> >>> Jaap >>> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> William Stein >> Associate Professor of Mathematics >> University of Washington >> http://wstein.org >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
