t
> > is_connected(Pid) = true
> >
> > How are you organizing connection pools which work 24/7? How you check pool
> > workers or refresh them?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > r
ickest solution.
I think this is essentially what their solution does, they just call
it grace time, but it basically changes the interval. We're going
to be trying the patch out next week, I'll let you all know how it
goes.
-Anthony
--
--
f you if you try it out, or
> if you need help doing so.
If we have a chance we'll try it out, but as it's probably not a supported
backend for Riak EDS, we may not be able to. Any sense on if it will
make it into riak proper at some point?
-Anthony
--
--
and don't have the time right now to
dig in and have been leaving it up to basho support, but maybe you'll
end up with a better solution (and thus a better patch).
Good Luck,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
> Here be dragons?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -mox
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
-----
__
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
's a good solution.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe my idea of using riakc_pb_socket together with poolboy is not
> > >> convenient? Maybe I should start a pool per each riak node? Maybe
> > >> poolboy is not that convenient in this case as it seems?
>
t; > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
--
;/var/lib/riak/kv_bitcask/exp_1day/1233142006497949337234359077604363797834693083136/1341246813.bitcask.data"]]
> in 0.06311 seconds.
>
>
> Regards,
> Denis
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
&g
t; >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean Cribbs
> Software Engineer
> Basho T
can grab a range.
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
o maybe M/R
on that isn't so bad. Is there any speed up with 2i and a key filter (can
you even create a key filter based on 2i?).
Anyway, still searching for a way to do this efficiently,
-Anthony
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:20:04AM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 20
y ever have one node leave. Any subsequent
node seems to just ignore the leave command.
-Anthony
--
----
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
ounds messy).
Anyway, hopefully someone will have an idea,
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
there some other scheme I could use to determine what has been
replicated?
Thanks,
-Anthony
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:37:17PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm evaluating Riak EDS for a system where I'd like to have data
> replicated between several colo&#
Ping
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:28:00PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I found one of my riak clusters misbehaving and found out it was
> running on some inferior hardware. After getting some new machines from
> my ops group. I went ahead and added several nod
work correctly or not.
Does anyone else have any idea of a way to do this sort of thing?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak
doing a rolling restart hoping that
might fix things, but I'm thinking I might be stuck.
Is there anyway to remove these nodes?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
-----
n
> your script. Any chance you straightened things out? Or are you still trying
> to rectify things?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system running riak 0.14.2 (I've kept from updating it ba
ata for any vnodes?
>
> -Joe
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a 12 node riak cluster running riak 0.14.2. I had several nodes
>> crash with OOM errors, and after restarting them I see the following when
spread across 12 machines. Each machine does
roughly 55-120K vnode gets per second, 20-40K node gets per second, 1-2K
vnode puts, and 1-2K node puts.
Thanks for the help,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
this mess? Can I
do something like remove a node, then re-add it? I'd prefer not to
lose data if possible, so any hints would be great.
-Anthony
--
----
We've got a riak_core based application in production which currently has 83
and which at one point had 85 nodes so the practical limit is definitely higher
than 20. It would be nice to know of a real limit though...
-Anthony
On Jan 28, 2012, at 7:31 AM, David Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28,
indexes with riak_core
as well.
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
.basho.com
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
hanks,
-Anthony
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:40:52PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I was getting ready to start updating riak from 0.14.2 to 1.0.1 and
> thought I should probably update my client as well (although from what I
> can tell this is not a requirement to upgrade)
ined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined})
in call from riakc_pb:'-pb_test_/0-fun-4-'/0
===
Failed: 2. Skipped: 0. Passed: 24.
Cover analysis:
/home/molinaro/p
sho.com
> >
> >
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
y written to
> where SASL messages are.
>
> -Scott
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
tty_h is still
going somewhere, but I don't quite understand how.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing
anything better.
Anyway, I'm trying to get some hardware to run basho_bench with and will
try out some different things, but if anyone has done any of this work
already it might be interesting to know.
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
----
ak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
info,
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
old work on #2 that is nearly a year old, and I think Andy Gross
> may have done some of what's needed for #3.
>
> With less words: I agree, all this should be made smaller.
>
> And don't let this stop you if you want to jump ahead and give some of it a
> try!
>
ks this is an awesome analysis.
-Anthony
--
----
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
ny
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:06:31PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:53:29PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:57:25PM -0600, David Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Anthony Molinaro
>
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:53:29PM -0700, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:57:25PM -0600, David Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> > Thus, depending on
> > your merge triggers, more space can be used than is strictl
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:57:25PM -0600, David Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> wrote:
> >
> > Bitcask-Capacity-Planning Cluster-Capacity-Planning Reality
> > RAM 34.9 GB 34.9 GB
k are completely off, they are different depending on
which page you look at on the wiki and vastly underestimate reality.
I'm hoping someone from basho can clarify so I can really determine
capacity.
Thanks,
-Anthony
--
------
the sort of thing that might be useful for testing riak_core,
especially if you can manage to get the problem with excess data movement
to be reproduceable with that code.
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
As I asked this question I thought I would pipe in with my experience (comments
inline).
On May 20, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> 4) Q --- Lets say I have several new nodes to add, is the recommended
> procedure to add them one at a time and wait for all transfers to
> finish, or can
, but you might
want to check what changed for tracking reasons, and I do understand that
you won't be absolutely accurate all the time, but I mostly am looking for
something scalable and mostly accurate).
-Anthony
--
-----
st
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing
> > To:
> > Subject: Large ring_creation_size
> >
> > ___
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
> _
out 100Mio keys per node, and riak uses about 7GB of RAM.
>
> Cheers,
> Nico
>
> On 23.03.2011 23:24, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> >So a question about when to add new nodes. I'm looking at the output of
> >this script and the output of riak-admin status to attem
_
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
__
> > riak-users mailing list
> > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/ma
tes. this is all
> configurable and would only be triggered if your updates or deletes pushed
> your dead bytes over that threshold.
>
> -alexander
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any thoughts on this? I added a t
n our frequency server which uses riak_core
with a linked in driver for a backend, we have to grow the file every
so often which lead to these sort of spikes, so maybe bitcask has some
thing similar?
Thanks,
-Anthony
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:09:34PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
e to run even if the client times out.
Anyway, just curious if others have experienced this sort of long tail
spikiness.
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
ria
t;
> http://wiki.basho.com/Open-Files-Limit.html
>
> Give that a shot and let us know if the problem persists.
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Anthony Molinaro
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just set up a 4 node cluster mostly vanilla config with t
anks,
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
or atoms. So binaries are
a bit surprising. But I don't have a strong opinion, so I'll just document
what's working.
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
issue tracker: https://github.com/basho/riak_wiki/issues
> and we'll get it corrected. If you're feeling enterprising, you can also
> fork, fix and send a pull-request for the page.
>
> Sean Cribbs
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> http://bash
ation/json" -d
> '{"props":{"backend":"my_backend"}}' http://127.0.0.1:8098/riak/mybucket
>
> Also note that only allow_mult and n_val are supported bucket properties from
> the PB interface (something we'll be fixing soon).
>
>
,1>>]}]
links: [<0.65.0>]
dictionary: []
trap_exit: false
status: running
heap_size: 987
stack_size: 24
reductions: 1541
neighbours:
neighbour: [{pid,<0.65.0>},
{registered_name,[]},
{initial_c
s_lists.basho.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> riak-users mailing list
> > >> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak
nyway, mostly curious if there was a reason before I look into
patching my fork.
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-
gt; > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> >
>
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:30:58PM -0700, David Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:57:45PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> >> some minor iolist functions). The mainline has had some very nice recent
> >> features, the handrolled parser was replace
systems.
-Anthony
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:57:45PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:38:45PM -0800, Dan Reverri wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > Would you mind sending a pull request for the documentation updates without
> > the protobuffs
ified as binaries. I'll fix that
> now.
Cool, I'll look for it.
-Anthony
--
--------
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-us
take a binary like all the other calls?
Just wondering,
-Anthony
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone had an opinions on this idea?
Thanks,
-Anthony
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:20:58PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a situation where I need to store sets of integers as efficiently
> as possible. In order to do so I was going to
Aww, looks like luwak got updated a few hours ago to use
riak_kv 0.14 branch so thats where the dependency is coming
from, just FYI.
-Anthony
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:17:58PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just going through the fast track and am getting an er
red out why because it seems like the rebar.config for
riak has version 0.13.0 in it for riak_kv, so
-Anthon
--
Anthony Molinaro
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
68 matches
Mail list logo
