At 10:42 3/16/00 -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote:
>Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else.
>Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better
>doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH
>user.
agreed.
>But the question still stand
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-6.2beta/i386/RedHat/ and couldn't
> find anything related to LFS. Thanks for your patience and sorry to ask so
> many questions but I haven't been able to find any info so I can figure it
> out for myself.
They are in the kernel srpm but commented out by d
>> So are you saying that installing the LFS patches into RH6.1 running on an
>> Intel P2 box will enable a new 64bit version of ext2 (ext3?) filesystem
>> that can handle large files?
>
>Yes. The ext2 fs can already handle large files, its the infrastructure around
>it you need to get. The patche
> So are you saying that installing the LFS patches into RH6.1 running on an
> Intel P2 box will enable a new 64bit version of ext2 (ext3?) filesystem
> that can handle large files?
Yes. The ext2 fs can already handle large files, its the infrastructure around
it you need to get. The patches add
>> I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've
>> created files up to 4gb in size.
>
>Some versions of reiserfs had a hack for this. Its not a good idea and Im
>told its now been removed. If you grab the LFS patches for 2.2 from the
>RH 6.2beta kernel rpms you'll be able to
> I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've
> created files up to 4gb in size.
Some versions of reiserfs had a hack for this. Its not a good idea and Im
told its now been removed. If you grab the LFS patches for 2.2 from the
RH 6.2beta kernel rpms you'll be able to build
I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've
created files up to 4gb in size.
-t
-- Tony Guntharp -- Project Manager SourceForge --
--
___VA Linux Systems___
> know the rules as well as I do. These are *MY* opinions and are
> therefore seperate from Red Hat. Did I post from a Red Hat account? No,
Settle down folks.
You DID sound like a Red Hat person, and you DID claim Red Hat allegiance.
I've seen people clearly representing another company doing
Reiserfs is also 2Gig. If you wish to go past 2Gig you need a set of kernel
patches or the 2.3.99/2.4pre kernel series
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
There is a 2gb file limit when using the ext2 file system. I've gotten
around this by using the Reiser file system. IIRC it supports 4gb file
limits.
Here is a link to the main Reiser site
http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/
Here is a link to a quick and dirty HOWTO
http://kurt.andover.net/Re
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, so I apologize if it isn't.
Running intel RH6.1 with 18 gigs of drive space striped as RAID 0. Is there
a way to work with files larger than 2 gigs? I understand there is an issue
with 32 bit architecture, but I believe there are other OSes doing th
True, the changes from binutils 2.9.1.0.23 to 2.9.1.0.24 were not all that
great, but it would be nice if Red Hat would be consistent. This relates
to Red Hat 6.1.
[stewart@dystopia pub]$ rpm -q binutils
binutils-2.9.1.0.23-6
[stewart@dystopia pub]$ ld -v
GNU ld
Hi!
The same is here, but I never post it to list.
400mhz Celeron, ECC ram, modern HDD from IBM (but ide, not scsi).
This is just with kernel, but very rarely, about 20 compiles and 1 failed.
I just hit Enter on this... Or do "rpm -bb ...
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote:
>
> Ohh, Unreal Tournament run fine on many machine that i know including
> debian and mandrake, i suppose it run fine on redhat too.
>
It's been installed on 3 PII 400 to 450s with 128MB Of RAM, and 2 AMD
k6-2 333 and 400s They all puke with "Segmenation Fault (co
I apologize. I forgot to give the URL.
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager - http://www.linuxnewbie.com
Resume - http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=96113
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe
Brian Patterson wrote:
>
> Whats DJGPP?
DJGPP is the DOS port of GCC. It aslso has G++, Fortran, LISP, and
Pascal IIRC.
Also, there is B20 (now B21 I believe) for writing Windows apps using
GCC)
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager -
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is my last mail on this topic.
>
> Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
> Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 clients and Red Hat Linux 6.1 servers
> handling mail, LDAP, NIS, NFS, Sybase, mysql, and PostgreSQL. The wi
> Ohh and is this also out of line ?
>
> This is your sent mail headers :
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 c
Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else.
Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better
doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH
user.
But the question still stands - what's the timeline for 4.0?
I downloaded the non-packag
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Wooa,
> > for a Microsoft certified person i think you say more than you know :
> >
>
> It's just a cert. Just a cert. Do I work for microsoft? No. Therefore
> THIS comment is out of line as well. And you claim, *I'M* fighting the
> co
> That's you who started the debate...
> feel free to continue mailling me in private.
>
OK, let us continue this in private.
> A statement of experience ?
> Are you kidding ?
I'll ignore that.
>
> I think you have not so many mandrake experience to say such a thing.
> (quoting you : mandr
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > First,
>
> > So, we do far more than compiling them.
> >
> I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
> out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
> of a public forum.
That's you who
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> "David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> > releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
> >
>
> What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done
> has
> First,
> So, we do far more than compiling them.
>
I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
of a public forum.
> Second,
> we do not insult redhat on our list, please be polite and do so.
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
First,
we have 2 dedicated XFree developper doing our X package
and one of them is working full time on X.
They are
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
>
What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done
has been tested.
> I know for a fact that Red
Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
I know for a fact that Red Hat tests their RPMs before releasing them.
If they come in for contrib, then you are usually on your own as to
whether they work or not.
[EMA
27 matches
Mail list logo
