At 10:42 3/16/00 -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote:
>Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else.
>Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better
>doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH
>user.
agreed.
>But the question still stands - what's the timeline for 4.0?
the following was posted on redhat-list the other day, doesn't give
a timeline but I think it shows they're already looking at it (or
at least bero is) I think the followon conversation may have gotten
an answer to your question, but it looks like my mail server is hoarding
about half the messages in the thread to deliver in a month or so
(!#%^ ATHM!) much like it has the preceeding pissing contest.
At 18:29 3/14/00 +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>For those who complained, XFree86 4.0 packages are now available.
>
>Before even considering to install, keep in mind they're
>- unstable and highly experimental, I would NEVER have called this version
> a stable release
>- 1000% unsupported
>- lacking support for some chipsets that used to work
>- lacking ANY config tool that actually works
>- not fully compatible with 3.x (other library versions)
>
>If you still want to try it, here's the location:
>http://people.redhat.com/bero/experimental/
>
>LLaP
>bero
cabbey at home dot net <*> http://members.home.net/cabbey
I want a binary interface to the brain!
Today's opto-mechanical digital interfaces are just too slow!
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
