"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > First,
> <snip>
> > So, we do far more than compiling them.
> > 
> I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
> out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
> of a public forum.


That's you who started the debate...
feel free to continue mailling me in private.

> 
> > Second,
> > we do not insult redhat on our list, please be polite and do so.
> > 
> 
> This was not intended as an insult, just a statement of experience. 

A statement of experience ?
Are you kidding ?

I think you have not so many mandrake experience to say such a thing.
(quoting you : mandrakesoft don't care if it work... Just if it compile.)
what you said is not true.

> YOu know the rules as well as I do. These are *MY* opinions and are
> therefore seperate from Red Hat. Did I post from a Red Hat account? No,
> therefore insinuating that I am speaking FOR Red Hat is out of turn on
> your part, for which YOU need to apologize. (Pretty dirty trick)

I've never said this was the redhat opinions,
i'm saying it is a redhat mailling list and that we do not do so on mandrake one,
nor we will let people insult redhat.

however, people are free to say they prefer redhat or mandrake,
but they are not free to say the work of other is bullshit.( what you've done ).

Now, knowing you're a redhat employee, it is even worse,
because you should know we do not only make the things compile.

> 
> > Now come back and apologize.
> > 
> 
> I apologize.. I expect the same in return for the above.

read above

> 
> > Ps :
> > Open source community is powerfull because everybody is working together,
> > by this kind of puerile reaction, you are fighting this community.
> 
> No, I have done nothing to damage the Open Source community, nor fight
> the community. Qouting philisophical lines does not a community player
> make.

Do i say your work is bullshit ?
No i have not, and i do not plan to do so.

This is *exactly* what you are saying by telling such thing.

> 
> > 
> > Wooa,
> > for a Microsoft certified person i think you say more than you know :
> > 
> 
> It's just a cert. Just a cert. Do I work for microsoft? No. Therefore
> THIS comment is out of line as well. And you claim, *I'M* fighting the
> community. I guess anyone who's taken the time to actually understand
> the enemy is also the enemy. hmmm. Good to know.

Your CV did not let me think you were knowing unix well.
but i was probably wrong :)

> Yeah Yeah Yeah, I've got quite a few others as well. Want to list those
> too?

Nope, it was just a flamming return.
I don't like people saying that we're just doing s'/redhat/mandrake/'
on spec file. ( which would mean that if it only compile but doesn't work
( what you've said ) it is your fault :-) ).

We do far more than that.

-- 
                   -- Yoann,  http://prelude.sourceforge.net
     It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc().
     The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.

-- 
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to