Thanks for your answer ...
No, i don't have writing, it's qmail-scanner that put me "messages over
10 hits will be quarantined"
Salvatore Toribio a écrit :
> At 7:04 +0100 2-12-2006, Noc Phibee wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> actually i have :
>>
>> Spamassasin Required_Hits=4.9
>> sa-quarantine=6.5 (
At 7:04 +0100 2-12-2006, Noc Phibee wrote:
>Hi
>
>actually i have :
>
>Spamassasin Required_Hits=4.9
>sa-quarantine=6.5 (messages over 10 hits will be quarantined)
>sa-delete=7 (messages over 11 hits will be deleted)
>sa-reject=0
>
>message with score 11.4 to 11.9 are put in q
Hi
actually i have :
Spamassasin Required_Hits=4.9
sa-quarantine=6.5 (messages over 10 hits will be quarantined)
sa-delete=7 (messages over 11 hits will be deleted)
sa-reject=0
message with score 11.4 to 11.9 are put in quantine and >12 are deleted.
Now i want change for n
>>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I have a mail system running using qmail, vpopmail and qmail-scanner.
>> For now there are eight entry points (tcpserver) to this system, each
>> resulting in a different QMAILQUEUE set for different qmail-queues (from
>> qmail-scanner). eight because i use spamassassin, virus
Hi all!
I have a mail system running using qmail, vpopmail and qmail-scanner.
For now there are eight entry points (tcpserver) to this system, each
resulting in a different QMAILQUEUE set for different qmail-queues (from
qmail-scanner). eight because i use spamassassin, virus scan and policy
check
Can anyone give me any insight as to why this is happening? My
server will run fine for a few days.. and then I'll get all these
clamd proccesses just stuck in there.
I'm running ClamAV 0.80/628/Tue Dec 14 07:43:11 2004
root 2505 0.0 0.1 3236 948 ?S14:44 0:00
/usr/local/
Matt wrote:
Can anyone give me any insight as to why this is happening? My
server will run fine for a few days.. and then I'll get all these
clamd proccesses just stuck in there.
I'm running ClamAV 0.80/628/Tue Dec 14 07:43:11 2004
Few things.
1. You give no details about what OS or version of
I'm running ClamAV 0.80/628/Tue Dec 14 07:43:11 2004
I stated that at the beginning.. it's the version...
clamd was off the list I pasted.. it's there... but I'm not sure why
it buckled up so bad like that?
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:49:15 +1300, Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>
At 8:53 +1300 12-11-2004, Jason Haar wrote:
Matt wrote:
I see you can do the --sa-forward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (defaults to nothing)
but is there anyway to have it forward on mail that it would have/did
tag as spam, and to ALSO forward it to the user, tagged? So in other
words I can tag the mail
Matt wrote:
Oh hey.. that's fine.. so it will archive messages it tags as spam and
pass them on? nifty.. so now pardon my ignorance.. but how do I do
that? :)
check /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl
#What maildir folder to archive received Email in instead of deleting
my $archiveit='0';
my $ar
Oh hey.. that's fine.. so it will archive messages it tags as spam and
pass them on? nifty.. so now pardon my ignorance.. but how do I do
that? :)
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:53:18 +1300, Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>
>
>
> >I see you can do the
> >--sa-forward <[EMAIL PROTE
Matt wrote:
I see you can do the
--sa-forward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (defaults to nothing)
but is there anyway to have it forward on mail that it would have/did
tag as spam, and to ALSO forward it to the user, tagged? So in other
words I can tag the mail and send it on to the end user, but also
g
I see you can do the
--sa-forward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (defaults to nothing)
but is there anyway to have it forward on mail that it would have/did
tag as spam, and to ALSO forward it to the user, tagged? So in other
words I can tag the mail and send it on to the end user, but also
gather it for
Hi,
I was wondering why the following email was not tagged with a higher score, yet it was
quarantined. The email and my qmail-scanner options are as follows (I had to change
some words below because this email was getting rejected by lists.sourceforge.net;
"V-word" is the stuff for men to hel
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> At 10:39 -0400 1-06-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> >Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> >> At 17:34 -0400 30-05-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
> Hi Asif
>
> No, It is not necessary, if you don't set '--scanners' qmail-scanner
> will search your server for the scanners, just start the sca
At 10:39 -0400 1-06-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
At 17:34 -0400 30-05-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>Hi All
>
>I am planning to upgrade my qmail-scanner from 1.20 to 1.22st. Now as
>far as the scanners variable these are the options I have
>
># ./configure --spooldir /var/spool
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
> At 17:34 -0400 30-05-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> >Hi All
> >
> >I am planning to upgrade my qmail-scanner from 1.20 to 1.22st. Now as
> >far as the scanners variable these are the options I have
> >
>
> ># ./configure --spooldir /var/spool/qmailscan --qmaildir /var/qmail
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Asif Iqbal wrote:
| Hi All
|
| [...]
|
| Now, I would like to use clamdscan and spamd for improved performace and
| like to use "***SPAM***" as the pretag in Subject for all detected spams
|
| What would be my best configuration approach to achieve the
At 17:34 -0400 30-05-2004, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I am planning to upgrade my qmail-scanner from 1.20 to 1.22st. Now as
far as the scanners variable these are the options I have
# ./configure --spooldir /var/spool/qmailscan --qmaildir /var/qmail
# --bindir /var/qmail/bin --qmail-queue-binar
y /v
Hi All
I am planning to upgrade my qmail-scanner from 1.20 to 1.22st. Now as
far as the scanners variable these are the options I have
--scanners
Defaults to "auto" - will use whatever scanners are
found
on system.
Use this option to overr
At 15:53 -0400 20-04-2004, Matt wrote:
I know qmail-scannner-1.21st is not an official release here.. but I
thought maybe I could get some help if someone has used it.
How can I have all messages tagged as spam sent to the quarantine?
So I want mail above 5 to be tagged.. and sent to the quarantine
I know qmail-scannner-1.21st is not an official release here.. but I
thought maybe I could get some help if someone has used it.
How can I have all messages tagged as spam sent to the quarantine?
So I want mail above 5 to be tagged.. and sent to the quarantine..
obviously setting mail quarantine to
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:18:48PM -0500, Pantelis Hadzipantelis wrote:
> I would like to know if there is a way (from my workstation (win2k,
> outlook xp)) to view the emails that I am archiving.
Have you read the documentation? See under "Philosophy behind Quarantining"
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Hello,
Currently I have several domains hosted on my Linux mail server.
I have the following set up and working flawlessly. (Qmail,
Qmail-Scanner, SpamAssassin and ClamAV). I'm currently archiving all
emails for 1 domain to /var/spool/qmailscan/archives
I would like to know if there is a
WellI had it owned by qscand...it worked fine...then we shutdown the box and rebooted it and now it doesent. Has anyone ever ran into this problem on Slackware9.1?
Thanks!Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:12, Trey Nolen wrote:> Qmail-scanner doesn't run as qscand.
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:12, Trey Nolen wrote:
> Qmail-scanner doesn't run as qscand. Make the /var/spool/qmailscan
> directory owned by qmailq with group qmail and give it 770 permissions. That
> should work.
?? Er - yes it does. From 1.20 onwards Q-S runs everything as qscand.
Cheers
Jason H
Qmail-scanner doesn't run as qscand. Make the /var/spool/qmailscan
directory owned by qmailq with group qmail and give it 770 permissions. That
should work.
Trey Nolen
>Ok i got a question. I'm using 1.20 and /var/spool/qmailscan is owned by
qscand:qscand with full premessions for them but 0 fo
Ok i got a question. I'm using 1.20 and /var/spool/qmailscan is owned by qscand:qscand with full premessions for them but 0 for everyone else. yet when I send a email I get a error message that says I cannot write to the tmp dir. Yet when I chmod 777 qmailscan it is able to write fine.
Anyone hav
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:56:11AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using Qmail + qmailscanner + etc...
> nowaday i found one problem that qmailscanner is filtering non-english
> text mail for Illege MIME issue.
Strange - the "Illegel MIME" code is to do with looking for line breaks at
the w
I am using Qmail + qmailscanner + etc...
nowaday i found one problem that qmailscanner is filtering non-english
text mail for Illege MIME issue.
i have a quarantine-attachments.txt like this.
...
#The following matches Date: headers that are over 100 chars in length
#these are impossible in the wil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After doing that, I get:
Aug 28 14:59:02 fbsd spamc[3554]: invalid usage
in my maillog.
This is my exact spamc_options:
my $spamc_options=' -c -f -u $recips';
single quoting doesn't alow the $recips var to be interpolated, try dbl
my $spamc_options=" -c -f -u $recips";
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dallas L. Engelken
> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]question about mysql sa with qs
>
> Aug 28 14:59:02 fbsd sp
Quoting "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Lyszczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Lyszczek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]question about mysql sa with qs
>
>
> > my $spamc_opt
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>>
>>
>> I'm using qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 with spamassassin-2.60rc2 (mysql) and
>> vpopmail-
>> 5.3.24.
>>
>> I cannot get spamc to pass the proper owner to spamd so it can pull out
>> the
>>
>> proper userprefs out of the mysql db.
>>
>> I keep getting this in my mail
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> I'm using qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 with spamassassin-2.60rc2 (mysql) and
> vpopmail-
> 5.3.24.
>
> I cannot get spamc to pass the proper owner to spamd so it can pull out the
>
> proper userprefs out of the mysql db.
>
> I keep getting this in my maillog:
>
> Au
I'm using qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 with spamassassin-2.60rc2 (mysql) and vpopmail-
5.3.24.
I cannot get spamc to pass the proper owner to spamd so it can pull out the
proper userprefs out of the mysql db.
I keep getting this in my maillog:
Aug 28 13:34:02 fbsd spamd[99929]: processing message
<
Quoting "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Everytime I configure, I keep getting the following message from Q-S:
>
> Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but is not capable of
> detecting a serious piece of spam (didn't include a "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
> line in output
Hi,
Everytime I configure, I keep getting the following message from Q-S:
Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but is not capable of
detecting a serious piece of spam (didn't include a "X-Spam-Status: Yes"
line in output) - ignoring...
I'm using the following configure options:
./c
Thanks Ryan;
I didn't realize it was simply a drop-in replacement. I appreciate your help.
Regards,
Tren
Quoting Ryan Finnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I sent a message to the list about that earlier this month; search the
> archives for "working avpdaemon code". You should be able to drop the
I sent a message to the list about that earlier this month; search the
archives for "working avpdaemon code". You should be able to drop the
code in place of the existing avpclient subroutines.
RF
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Tren Blackburn wrote:
> *sigh* My bad. I had used google search instead o
*sigh* My bad. I had used google search instead of the one on sourceforge.
Anyhow, I've upped my softlimit to 30,000,000 as per the emails I found
there. Is the daemon version of kav a bit less resource hungry? I'd asked
some questions about it previously (mainly how to implement it) but di
Hi to all of you Kaspersky experts out there. I have been using Kaspersky on
a new mailserver for a couple months now and am noticing quite a few messages
are being rejected with exit code 139. I cannot find this documented
*anywhere* I have checked the list archives as well as the Kaspersky
e run qmailctl cdb
> to reload new rules :)
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Shireley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb
>
>
>
> I'm running RH7.2/x86.
>
> Well, I re-ran it again, and this time came out with the same results
> you did (2131 file siz
gt;
To: "John Shireley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb
> On 17 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
>
> > ..which is weird, because the contents of my tc
I'm running RH7.2/x86.
Well, I re-ran it again, and this time came out with the same results
you did (2131 file size). But I still get this:
[root@internal etc]# tcprulescheck tcp.smtp.cdb
default:
allow connection
Shouldn't that reflect what I just compiled into the .cdb file, i.e.
only all
On 17 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
> ..which is weird, because the contents of my tcp.smtp file is
> this:
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
Something is weird:
keithh@fs [107]* cat |tcprules /tmp/x /tmp/xx
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
keithh@fs [108]
I apologize for the newbieness nature of my posting, I'm still learning
a lot of this qmail stuff.
tcprulescheck /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
outputs:
default:
allow connection
..which is weird, because the contents of my tcp.smtp file is this:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
10.:allow,RELA
On 17 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
> It does sound large, but I have nothing to compare it to. Mysteriously
> enough (unless I'm just not understanding this), it grew over the
> weekend to roughly the same size. Here's a directory listing:
It grew? By itself or did you re-run tcprules?
What d
It does sound large, but I have nothing to compare it to. Mysteriously
enough (unless I'm just not understanding this), it grew over the
weekend to roughly the same size. Here's a directory listing:
drwxr-xr-x2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Feb 17 08:11 .
drwxr-xr-x9 vpopmail vchkpw 4
On 14 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
> Ok, that seems to have done something, or at least the tcp.smtp file
> didn't disappear. It did, however, shrink considerably in size. The
> former one was like 18K, and the new one is a scant 2k. Sound normal?
18k sounds abnormally large. 2k sounds right
Ok, that seems to have done something, or at least the tcp.smtp file
didn't disappear. It did, however, shrink considerably in size. The
former one was like 18K, and the new one is a scant 2k. Sound normal?
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 16:55, Keith Hanlan wrote:
> On 14 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
On 14 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
> I did what you said to, and it just returned me to the prompt.
Typical Bernstein verbosity in the great Unix tradition...
> It also removed the tcp.smtp file altogether, so I take it
> that's normal behavior?
No, that's not normal. Did you accidentally
Thanks Keith, I appreciate the sanity check on that. Since I've got
vpopmail installed, my path is /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp (that's the
only place I can find that file, anyway).
I did what you said to, and it just returned me to the prompt. It also
removed the tcp.smtp file altogether, so I
On 14 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote:
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> ..but I can't figure out the concise syntax for compiling that into the
> .cdb file.
>
> Question 1: will "10." allow all networks under that /8 to relay openly?
Yes.
> Question 2: how do I recomp
I couldn't find a concise answer to this in the documentation or
scanning the list. If this isn't appropriate for the scanner list,
please let me know.
System: RH7.2, Qmail 1.03, qmail-scanner-1.15 (pretty much the Shupp
toaster, God bless him!)
This mail system is on a NAT'd network (10.x.x.x),
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:04:45PM -0600, Terry Letsche wrote:
> Should I remove the call to spamc from my .qmail file, or should it remain
> so that I can preserve my per-user white-lists and threshold settings? I
> assume that if I retain it it will cause each message to be processed by
> spam
Hello.
Previously, I had qmail 1.03 installed with spam assassin 2.43, and all
was working great. My .qmail file was:
| spamc | safecat ./Maildir/tmp ./Maildir/new
I've since patched qmail with the qmail-queue patch and installed
qmail-scanner 1.15.
Should I remove the call to spamc from my
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:04:41AM +0100, Rietsch Thierry wrote:
> if i put in /etc/tcp.smpt the line:
> :allow,...
> isn't then the realy open? it is if i understand right. that isn't very
> helpful.
Please read standard Qmail documentation. The tcpserver files normally have
nothing to do with re
Rietsch Thierry wrote:
> and then it scans all incoming mails? am i right?
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: In-Tuition List QMail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 13:48
> Try something like:
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qma
Rietsch Thierry wrote:
> hi
> i've installed successfully the qmail-scanner with
> clamantivirus. but know i
> have a question how to tell qmail to scann all incoming mails (i mean
> that qmail use qmail-scanner-queue instead of qmail-queue). my
> problem is: if i put in /etc/tcp.smpt the line:
>>
hi
i've installed successfully the qmail-scanner with clamantivirus. but know i
have a question how to tell qmail to scann all incoming mails (i mean that
qmail use qmail-scanner-queue instead of qmail-queue).
my problem is:
if i put in /etc/tcp.smpt the line:
:allow,...
isn't then the realy open?
how different AV-products is
licenced? Per server/seat/domain/e-mailaddress?
Regards, Jonas
- Original Message -
From:
Jose Ruiz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:12
AM
Subject:
[Qmail-scanner-general]Question.
Please,
Please,
could anybody tell
me which is the best antivirus scanner for qmail-scan?,
any help would be
apreciated.
Thanks in
advace.
Jose
Ruiz
> is what or who is the "nmladm" I can't locate this variable any where
> else in the code.
>
> if (¬ify_addr('admin') || (¬ify_addr('nmladm') &&
> !&is_unreplyable_email('sender'))) {
>
>
> If I'm trying to reinvent the wheel someone please tell me before I hack
> this up..
>
> Thanks
I'm trying to write some code to notify the domain Postmaster/admin when
someone sends a virus to or from that admin's domain. Looking at the
qmail-scanner-queue.pl under the sub_email_sender I saw the following
line for notification of the global admin for the scanner. My question
is what or who
From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A few of you have complained/noted that you didn't like that Q-S gave
out
> file and dir details as shown at the bottom of this message.
> There are (as usual) several ways to deal with this, but I want to
hear what
> people think of this one:
This is wha
A few of you have complained/noted that you didn't like that Q-S gave out
file and dir details as shown at the bottom of this message.
There are (as usual) several ways to deal with this, but I want to hear what
people think of this one:
I intend to now send (up to) three separate alerts: one ea
I'm trying to improve the patch I did for implementing nod32, so I'm asking
myself what's the utility to scan the raw e-mail message and .txt attachments.
My question derives:
1) from the effective danger coming from embedded html and external text;
2) from the fact that, wanting to analize ra
I have a very general question to ask qmail-scanner users.
Most of these commercial AV outfits sell license PER DOMAIN on a mail
server that may contain hundreds of domains.
Using qmail-scanner to invoke the AV executables for every e-mail that
comes in, technically one could just use a single
71 matches
Mail list logo
