Op 30-06-13 19:50, Ian Kelly schreef:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Antoon Pardon
That is a bit odd. Rurpy seemed to consider it a big nono if others
used methods that would coerce him to change his behaviour. But here
you see shaming as an option which seems a coercive method.
Well, if
On 29 June 2013 15:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> On 29/06/2013 14:44, Dave Angel wrote:
>>
>> Since you're using the arrogant and buggy GoogleGroups, this
>> http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
>>
> Please don't make comments like this, you'll upset the Python Mailing List
> Police.
*d
I was wondering if there was a couple of words or things i could add to the top
of my python script to password protect it so that it asks user for the
password and then after three tries it locks them out or says "access denied"
and closes/ends the script but if they get it wright it proceeds o
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 23:46:12 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On a related note, I think that generator functions should in some way
> be explicitly marked as such in the declaration, rather than needing to
> scan the entire function body for a yield statement to determine whether
> it's a generator or n
Στις 1/7/2013 9:23 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Enough is enough. Iam not a troll, neither incompetent. Period.
No not period. You have by your behaviour made yourself a reputation
of being an incompetent inconsiderate jerk. You don't lose such a
repuation by simply claiming you are not.
Bei
Στις 1/7/2013 9:37 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to
have his feelings hurt when so many people pick on him -- whether they
are justified or not.
So? Should we particularly care about Nikos's feelings? Nikos is not
the victim, he is
On 2013-06-29 16:52, Joshua Landau wrote:
On 29 June 2013 15:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 29/06/2013 14:44, Dave Angel wrote:
Since you're using the arrogant and buggy GoogleGroups, this
http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
Please don't make comments like this, you'll upset the P
Op 01-07-13 09:52, Νίκος schreef:
> Στις 1/7/2013 9:23 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>>> Enough is enough. Iam not a troll, neither incompetent. Period.
>>
>> No not period. You have by your behaviour made yourself a reputation
>> of being an incompetent inconsiderate jerk. You don't lose such a
>>
Op 01-07-13 09:55, Νίκος schreef:
> Στις 1/7/2013 9:37 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>>> Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to
>>> have his feelings hurt when so many people pick on him -- whether they
>>> are justified or not.
>>
>> So? Should we particularly care abou
Στις 1/7/2013 11:54 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful in this list.
Or sod off.
Preferably do the latter.
Oh we do have illusions of grandeur, don't we? You are in no position
to judge who is useful on this list or not.
I'am not waste any more
Hi,
I'm new to Python and trying to run a already written code. Can someone please
explain the error below? And if possible, how do I resolve this?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:\Project_1\regression_1.py", line 7, in
from sklearn import metrics, cross_validation, linear_mode
On 2013-07-01 10:13, preri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Python and trying to run a already written code. Can someone please
explain the error below? And if possible, how do I resolve this?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:\Project_1\regression_1.py", line 7, in
from sk
> I've been using the settrace function to write a tracer for my program,
> which is working great except that it doesn't seem to work for built-in
> functions, like open('filename.txt'). This doesn't seem to be documented, so
> I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or that's the expected
Op 01-07-13 11:05, Νίκος schreef:
> Στις 1/7/2013 11:54 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>>> So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful in this list.
>>> Or sod off.
>>> Preferably do the latter.
>> Oh we do have illusions of grandeur, don't we? You are in no position
>> to judge who is us
"Νίκος" wrote:
>Στις 1/7/2013 11:54 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>>> So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful in this list.
>>> Or sod off.
>>> Preferably do the latter.
>> Oh we do have illusions of grandeur, don't we? You are in no position
>> to judge who is useful on this list
Στις 1/7/2013 12:32 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Op 01-07-13 11:05, Νίκος schreef:
Στις 1/7/2013 11:54 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful in this list.
Or sod off.
Preferably do the latter.
Oh we do have illusions of grandeur, don't we? You ar
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 02:13:50 -0700, prerit86 wrote:
> I'm new to Python and trying to run a already written code. Can someone
> please explain the error below? And if possible, how do I resolve this?
> ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.
You're missing the dll
Στις 1/7/2013 12:31 μμ, ο/η Steve Simmons έγραψε:
I don't know about the other members of this list but I am becoming
increasingly disturbed by the rudeness and especially the foul language
that is being perpetrated on this thread. Please, if you have any
decency at all, continue the rest of thi
Thanks!
Solved. I found the package that would resolve this dependency. It was
numpy-MKL.
Downloaded from http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pandas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm running this code that reads 2 csv files (one of them is train.csv). The
code gives an error saying 'file not does not exist'. However, the file does
exists in the same location as the .py file. Can someone please help me on
this. Thanks!
Code Output-->
Reading dataset...
Traceback (most r
On 2013-07-01 11:47, preri...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running this code that reads 2 csv files (one of them is train.csv). The
code gives an error saying 'file not does not exist'. However, the file does
exists in the same location as the .py file. Can someone please help me on
this. Thanks!
Ho
Op 01-07-13 12:47, preri...@gmail.com schreef:
> I'm running this code that reads 2 csv files (one of them is train.csv). The
> code gives an error saying 'file not does not exist'. However, the file does
> exists in the same location as the .py file. Can someone please help me on
> this. Thanks
The variable 'train' is being called like this ->
def main(train='train.csv', test='test.csv', submit='logistic_pred.csv'):
print "Reading dataset..."
train_data = pd.read_csv(train)
test_data = pd.read_csv(test)
Let me know if I need to post the full code.
--
http://mail.python.
I got it. The working directory was different. Sorry, I'm new and didn't the
working directory has to be the location of the data. I thought the location of
.py file and data file should be same. Thanks! Es. Robert Kern.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 01-07-13 12:57, preri...@gmail.com schreef:
> The variable 'train' is being called like this ->
>
> def main(train='train.csv', test='test.csv', submit='logistic_pred.csv'):
> print "Reading dataset..."
> train_data = pd.read_csv(train)
> test_data = pd.read_csv(test)
>
> Let me
My answers
I think Robert wanted to know how you started the program.
What instruction do you use to launch?
- used command c:\python27\python.exe c:\project_1\code.py
In what directory are you launching your program?
- working directory was c:
- python is in c:\python27
- code was in c:\projec
On 07/01/2013 07:00 AM, preri...@gmail.com wrote:
I got it. The working directory was different. Sorry, I'm new and didn't the
working directory has to be the location of the data. I thought the location of
.py file and data file should be same. Thanks! Es. Robert Kern.
Python didn't make th
I know. Had I written the code, I would have not done this. I just wanted to
get some initial results by leveraging this code. I would now build on this to
improve my work's accuracy.
Thanks for the inputs!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 01-07-13 11:37, Νίκος schreef:
> Στις 1/7/2013 12:32 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>>
>> The above is a first class illustration of why I think you are
>> problematic. We don't want you to explain yourself, we want
>> you to change your behaviour. Someone behaving like a jerk
>> explaining himse
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:45:52 +0100, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2013-06-29 16:52, Joshua Landau wrote:
>> On 29 June 2013 15:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/06/2013 14:44, Dave Angel wrote:
Since you're using the arrogant and buggy GoogleGroups, this
http://wiki.python.org/moin/
Op 01-07-13 11:46, Νίκος schreef:
> Στις 1/7/2013 12:31 μμ, ο/η Steve Simmons έγραψε:
>
>> I don't know about the other members of this list but I am becoming
>> increasingly disturbed by the rudeness and especially the foul language
>> that is being perpetrated on this thread. Please, if you have
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:52:28 +0300, Νίκος wrote:
> All i did was asking for help for issues i couldn't solve. That what
> everybody would do if he couldn't help himself solve something.
[...]
> So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful in this list. Or
> sod off.
> Preferably do the l
On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
> to achieve the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing
> Python's clean syntax in the process.
>
> Go on, do your worst!
I'v
Op 01-07-13 14:43, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
> Νίκος, I am not going to wade through this long, long thread to see what
> problem you are trying to solve today.
Nikos is not trying to solve a problem in this thread. What happened is that
the original poster here got a rather short answer to his q
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
>> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
>> to achieve the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing
>> Python's
Στις 1/7/2013 3:28 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Did i told you to fuck off? Well never mind. Fuck off!
I think this needs some work. You need more creativity.
Try to think of something more forceful. My little niece
of 10 can do better than that.
Well i could, but i don't want to spend my tim
Στις 1/7/2013 3:43 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε:
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:52:28 +0300, Νίκος wrote:
All i did was asking for help for issues i couldn't solve. That what
everybody would do if he couldn't help himself solve something.
[...]
So shut your piehole and start proving yourself useful
On 2013.07.01 08:28, Νίκος wrote:
> So, Steven you want me to sit tight and read all the insults coming from
> this guy?
>
> If that happened to you, wouldn't you feel the need and urge to reply
> back and stand for yourself?
You can ignore it (this is the best solution) or you can take it off-l
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:56:54 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 01-07-13 09:55, Νίκος schreef:
>> Στις 1/7/2013 9:37 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to
have his feelings hurt when so many people pick on him -- whether
they
On 06/30/2013 11:25 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 28-06-13 19:20, Ian Kelly schreef:
>[...]
>> Flaming a troll is not punishing to them.
>
> I see I didn't make my point clear. This was my response to
> your remark about the collective experience going back decades.
> The collective experience oft
On Monday, July 1, 2013 7:31:18 PM UTC+5:30, Walter Hurry wrote:
> Please...enough. Polite request: consider killfiling him and having done
> with it.
>
>
> It is irritating to see all the responses even though I killfiled him
> long ago. Whilst I realise, of course, that it is entirely your
>
On 2013-07-01, rusi wrote:
> To wit:
>
> 1. Kill-filing/spam-filtering are tools for spam.
> Nikos is certainly not spamming in the sense of automated
> sending out of cooked mail to zillions of recipients/lists.
> His posts are definite and intentional
I disagree. Kill-files are not only for spa
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:28:52 +0300, Νίκος wrote:
> Στις 1/7/2013 3:43 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε:
[...]
>> The above of course assumes that I have not kill-filed you for
>> continuing to be abusive on-list.
>
> So, Steven you want me to sit tight and read all the insults coming from
> this gu
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:08:18 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 01-07-13 14:43, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
>
>> Νίκος, I am not going to wade through this long, long thread to see
>> what problem you are trying to solve today.
>
> Nikos is not trying to solve a problem in this thread. What happened
On Monday, July 1, 2013 9:04:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > And no, i do not want to piss off people like you, who have spend time
> > helping me.
> Too late. I asked you to stop flaming on-list, and you didn't. I am now
> kill-filing you for a month. Feel grateful that it is not perma
Στις 1/7/2013 6:34 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε:
And no, i do not want to piss off people like you, who have spend time
helping me.
Too late. I asked you to stop flaming on-list, and you didn't. I am now
kill-filing you for a month. Feel grateful that it is not permanent, and
take this time
On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
>>> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way
>>> to achieve the same t
Στις 1/7/2013 6:00 μμ, ο/η rusi έγραψε:
On Monday, July 1, 2013 7:31:18 PM UTC+5:30, Walter Hurry wrote:
Please...enough. Polite request: consider killfiling him and having done
with it.
It is irritating to see all the responses even though I killfiled him
long ago. Whilst I realise, of course
Στις 1/7/2013 6:34 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε:
The above of course assumes that I have not kill-filed you for
continuing to be abusive on-list.
So, Steven you want me to sit tight and read all the insults coming from
this guy?
If that happened to you, wouldn't you feel the need and urge to
On 1 July 2013 16:49, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, July 1, 2013 9:04:11 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> > And no, i do not want to piss off people like you, who have spend time
>> > helping me.
>> Too late. I asked you to stop flaming on-list, and you didn't. I am now
>> kill-filing you for a m
Στις 1/7/2013 7:56 μμ, ο/η Joshua Landau έγραψε:
So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
the list. I haven't followed any of the other arguments, true, but you
two in particular are causing a lot of trouble for the rest of us. It
is not hard to avoid making your dis
On 1 July 2013 18:15, Νίκος wrote:
> Στις 1/7/2013 7:56 μμ, ο/η Joshua Landau έγραψε:
>
>> So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
>> the list. I haven't followed any of the other arguments, true, but you
>> two in particular are causing a lot of trouble for the rest
On Monday, July 1, 2013 10:26:21 PM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
> So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
> the list.
This 'and' is type-wrong.
> I haven't followed any of the other arguments, true, but you
> two in particular are causing a lot of trouble for th
So today, I created a file called 'formatter.py',
and my program broke. It turned out that I was
also import 'gluon' from web2py, which in turn,
somewhere, imported the regular python formatter.py
with which I was not familiar.
So the question is: Does one simply always have
to be knowledgeable
On Monday, July 1, 2013 11:59:35 PM UTC+5:30, Tobiah wrote:
> So today, I created a file called 'formatter.py',
> and my program broke. It turned out that I was
> also import 'gluon' from web2py, which in turn,
> somewhere, imported the regular python formatter.py
> with which I was not familiar.
Op 01-07-13 16:01, Walter Hurry schreef:
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:56:54 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 01-07-13 09:55, Νίκος schreef:
Στις 1/7/2013 9:37 πμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Remember that Nick is as much a human as all of us, he is bound to
have his feelings hurt when so many people pi
Op 01-07-13 18:56, Joshua Landau schreef:
To put things in perspective, these are the people who have been
insulting on this post:
Mark Lawrence (once, probably without meaning to be insulting)
Nikos
Antoon Pardon
I don't consider something insulting if it can be supported
by argument and evi
On 1 July 2013 19:29, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, July 1, 2013 10:26:21 PM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
>> So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
>> the list.
>
> This 'and' is type-wrong.
I don't follow.
>> I haven't followed any of the other arguments, true, but
Op 01-07-13 17:33, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:08:18 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 01-07-13 14:43, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
Νίκος, I am not going to wade through this long, long thread to see
what problem you are trying to solve today.
Nikos is not trying to solve a pro
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 12:46:40 AM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 19:29, rusi wrote:
>
> > On Monday, July 1, 2013 10:26:21 PM UTC+5:30, Joshua Landau wrote:
>
> >> So yes, Antoon Pardon and Nikos, please stop. You are not representing
> >> the list.
> > This 'and' is type-wro
On 1 July 2013 20:12, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 01-07-13 18:56, Joshua Landau schreef:
>
>>
>> To put things in perspective, these are the people who have been
>> insulting on this post:
>>
>> Mark Lawrence (once, probably without meaning to be insulting)
>> Nikos
>> Antoon Pardon
>
>
> I don't co
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread
can continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
number_drawn=()
def load(lot_number,number_drawn):
first=input("enter first lot: ")
last=input("enter last lot: ")
for lot_number in range(first,last):
line_out=st
On 17:30 Mon 01 Jul , Joshua Landau wrote:
> On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> >> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple,
> >>> and write an insanely complica
On 1 July 2013 20:18, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Op 01-07-13 17:33, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
>
>> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:08:18 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>
>>> Op 01-07-13 14:43, Steven D'Aprano schreef:
>>>
Νίκος, I am not going to wade through this long, long thread to see
what problem y
On 1 July 2013 20:32, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread can
> continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
Thank you. I shall do the same below. Unfortunately I don't have high
hopes that any progress will be made on this thread -- Charles Be
Are you familiar with absolute and relative imports:
http://docs.python.org/release/2.5/whatsnew/pep-328.html
Doesn't seem to work:
Python 2.7.3 (default, May 10 2012, 13:31:18)
[GCC 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
I installed a 32 bit python and it still gives me the same error.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 07/01/2013 03:32 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other thread
can continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
number_drawn=()
def load(lot_number,number_drawn):
first=input("enter first lot: ")
last=input("enter last lot: ")
for l
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:32:44 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Angel wrote:
> But what was the expected output? And who cares? The code made no
> sense, was incomplete, and the posted question was nonsensical.
Yes in this specific instance all this is probably true.
I believe however, that Joel's intent in
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:24:30 AM UTC+5:30, Tobiah wrote:
> > Are you familiar with absolute and relative imports:
> > http://docs.python.org/release/2.5/whatsnew/pep-328.html
>
> Doesn't seem to work:
> Python 2.7.3 (default, May 10 2012, 13:31:18)
> [GCC 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)] on linux
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:38:50 -0700, rusi wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:24:30 AM UTC+5:30, Tobiah wrote:
>> > Are you familiar with absolute and relative imports:
>> > http://docs.python.org/release/2.5/whatsnew/pep-328.html
>>
>> Doesn't seem to work:
>> Python 2.7.3 (default, May 10 2012,
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> Here is another example which I came across when playing with
> generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
> generator is the whole fun:
>
> from functools import wraps
> def init(func):
> """decorator wh
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:42:48 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> How about the following comprimise. I'll get myself a second identity.
> Every respons I make to Nikos will be done with the same identity.
> Normal python exchanges will be done with the other. You can then simply
> killfile my identity t
On 1 Jul 2013 20:58, "Tobiah" wrote:
>>
>> Are you familiar with absolute and relative imports:
>> http://docs.python.org/release/2.5/whatsnew/pep-328.html
>
>
> Doesn't seem to work:
>
> Python 2.7.3 (default, May 10 2012, 13:31:18)
> [GCC 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)] on linux2
> Type "help", "
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:18:26 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> I am not baiting Nikos.
Your opinion, mine differs.
> all I have done in the last two weeks that involves Nikos as a
> subject is the "Don't feed the troll thread"
Calling him a troll is baiting. Please stop.
--
Denis McMahon, denis
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:42:48 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> How about the following comprimise.
> Let me know what you think about this.
How about you just ignore him.
--
Denis McMahon, denismfmcma...@gmail.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 07/01/2013 05:16 PM, rusi wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 1:32:44 AM UTC+5:30, Dave Angel wrote:
Yes in this specific instance all this is probably true.
I believe however, that Joel's intent in reposting this is more global (and
important) in its scope, viz:
If this list persists i
On 2/07/2013 5:32 AM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
I copied the original question so that the rant on the other
> thread can continue. Let's keep this thread ontopic
You've included the same set of code twice. Also, it doesn't run as is,
so you haven't reduced it to a minimal working example for us t
On 1/07/2013 7:37 PM, Νίκος wrote:
I dont expect anyone to solve my problems,
This is not consistent with the number of "HELP ME I BROKE MY BUSINESS"
posts you've made.
iam happy if they point me to
a direction which i can solve it myself
This is not consistent with your repeated claim that
Found this:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13871833/negative-lookahead-assertion-not-working-in-python
.
This pattern seems to work:
pattern = re.compile(r"^(?!.*(CTL|DEL|RUN))")
But I am not sure why.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jason Friedman wrote:
> I have table names in this form
After making a slightly chnage inside my pelatologio.py script
substituting '*' instead of '-' for no apparent reason i receive
the following error:
[Tue Jul 02 06:33:06 2013] [error] [client 46.12.97.148] OSError: [Errno
26] \\u0391\\u03c1\\u03c7\\u03b5\\u03af\\u03bf
\\u03ba\\u03b5\\
Steven D'Aprano於 2013年7月2日星期二UTC+8上午6時09分18秒寫道：
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
>
>
>
> > Here is another example which I came across when playing with
>
> > generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
>
> > generator is the whole fun:
>
On Monday, July 1, 2013 8:36:53 PM UTC+5:30, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-07-01, rusi wrote:
> > 1. Kill-filing/spam-filtering are tools for spam.
> > Nikos is certainly not spamming in the sense of automated
> > sending out of cooked mail to zillions of recipients/lists.
> > His posts are definit
On 02Jul2013 06:37, Νίκος wrote:
| After making a slightly chnage inside my pelatologio.py script
| substituting '*' instead of '-' for no apparent reason i
| receive the following error:
|
| [Tue Jul 02 06:33:06 2013] [error] [client 46.12.97.148] OSError:
| [Errno 26] \\u0391\\u03c1\\u0
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:38:50 -0700, rusi wrote:
>> 2. The __future__ is not necessary in python 2.7 [Not necessary or not
>> allowed I not know :-) ]
>
> Not necessary.
IIRC that it is needed, to solve the OP problem: one thing is the
syntax, which under Python 2.7 is e
On 2 July 2013 05:34, rusi wrote:
> On Monday, July 1, 2013 8:36:53 PM UTC+5:30, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>> On 2013-07-01, rusi wrote:
>> > 1. Kill-filing/spam-filtering are tools for spam.
>> > Nikos is certainly not spamming in the sense of automated
>> > sending out of cooked mail to zillions of re
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Jason Friedman wrote:
> Found this:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13871833/negative-lookahead-assertion-not-working-in-python.
>
> This pattern seems to work:
> pattern = re.compile(r"^(?!.*(CTL|DEL|RUN))")
>
> But I am not sure why.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013
Στις 2/7/2013 8:15 πμ, ο/η Cameron Simpson έγραψε:
On 02Jul2013 06:37, Νίκος wrote:
| After making a slightly chnage inside my pelatologio.py script
| substituting '*' instead of '-' for no apparent reason i
| receive the following error:
|
| [Tue Jul 02 06:33:06 2013] [error] [client 46
On 22:09 Mon 01 Jul , Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:36:29 +0100, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
>
> > Here is another example which I came across when playing with
> > generators, the first function is actually quite useful, the second
> > generator is the whole fun:
> >
> > from
Op 02-07-13 01:17, Denis McMahon schreef:
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:42:48 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> How about the following comprimise.
>> Let me know what you think about this.
> How about you just ignore him.
Why about you just ignore me?
Serious, a lot of people here seem to think t
90 matches
Mail list logo
