On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:13 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> After all, that boilerplate just makes the corporation look stupid and
> incompetent.
I wish that were true.
Unfortunately, in the corporate world, it *doesn't* make them look stupid
and incompetent. It makes them look conventional, careful,
On 2016-09-08, Random832 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 18:13, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> After all, that boilerplate just makes the corporation look stupid and
>> incompetent. Any email that leaves the corporate network must be
>> assumed to be visible to world+dog. Anybody who thinks differentl
On 09/08/2016 10:52 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Joaquin Alzola writes:
That's not true; you can do more than we.
Added by the MTA of the company not by my client.
Right. So, here are things you can do (that we cannot) about this:
* Complain, with reasoned explanation, to the management respon
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:27:44 -0400
Random832 wrote:
> If every lawyer in the world benefits from the interpretation that
> this sort of notice is legally effective (since tomorrow it may be
> they who accidentaly send privileged information), who will argue in
> court that it's not? The reality is
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 04:59 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 2:37:48 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Joaquin Alzola writes:
>> > Added by the MTA of the company not by my client.
>>
>> Right. So, here are things you can do (that we cannot) about this:
>> * Switch to a diffe
On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 6:49:52 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/8/2016 4:52 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Joaquin Alzola writes:
> >> >> the world?
> >>
> >> Cannot do anything.
> >
> > That's not true; you can do more than we.
> >
> >> Added by the MTA of the company not by my client.
On Friday, September 9, 2016 at 2:37:48 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> Joaquin Alzola writes:
> > Added by the MTA of the company not by my client.
>
> Right. So, here are things you can do (that we cannot) about this:
> * Switch to a different mail service, one which does not add that
> nonse
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2016-09-08, Joaquin Alzola wrote:
>
>> Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a
>> company of 80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour.
>
> Perhaps others have complained. If enough people complain, maybe
> they'll do something.
>
> Aft
Terry Reedy writes:
> Something that some 'we' could do is ask the python-list
> manager/programmers, or more broadly, the mailman developers, to
> recognize an 'end of message' line, such as '--end message--' and
> delete it and anything appended thereafter.
No, that would be mangling messages
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> I suspect, like the last two companies I've worked for -- corporate IT
> policy is to block any access to non-corporate email systems. (Heck, my
> current company is so paranoid that it adds "EXT:" to the subject of
> incoming ema
On 9/8/2016 4:52 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Joaquin Alzola writes:
That's not true; you can do more than we.
Added by the MTA of the company not by my client.
Right. So, here are things you can do (that we cannot) about this:
Something that some 'we' could do is ask the python-list
manager
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Joaquin Alzola
> wrote:
> > Hi Ben
> >
> > Thanks for the advice.
You're welcome, I hope it leads to positive change.
> > Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a
> > company of 80,000 people I will manage to change
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 18:13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> After all, that boilerplate just makes the corporation look stupid and
> incompetent. Any email that leaves the corporate network must be
> assumed to be visible to world+dog. Anybody who thinks differently is
> deluded and should not be allow
On 2016-09-08, Joaquin Alzola wrote:
> Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a
> company of 80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour.
Perhaps others have complained. If enough people complain, maybe
they'll do something.
After all, that boilerplate just makes
On Thursday September 8 2016 17:17, in comp.lang.python, "Joaquin Alzola"
wrote:
> Hi Ben
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
>> * Complain
>
> Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a company of
> 80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour.
Why don't you, at least, i
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Joaquin Alzola
wrote:
> Hi Ben
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
>> * Complain
>
> Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a company of
> 80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour.
> This email is confidential and may be subject to privil
Hi Ben
Thanks for the advice.
> * Complain
Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a company of
80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour.
This email is confidential and may be subject to privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not copy or di
17 matches
Mail list logo
