On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 18:27:44 -0400 Random832 <random...@fastmail.com> wrote: > If every lawyer in the world benefits from the interpretation that > this sort of notice is legally effective (since tomorrow it may be > they who accidentaly send privileged information), who will argue in > court that it's not? The reality is more complex, and it appears that > it may only apply if the accidental recipient is a lawyer. I really
I often wonder if these automatic disclaimers actually remove any protection that they might have if they were used judiciously. If they had any validity wouldn't the fact that they are attached to every email, even ones obviously meant for the public, give someone an argument that they don't really apply? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain System Administrator, Vex.Net http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
