Grant Edwards writes: > On 2016-09-08, Joaquin Alzola <joaquin.alz...@lebara.com> wrote: > >> Basically what all comes down is to complain. I wonder if in a >> company of 80,000 people I will manage to change that behaviour. > > Perhaps others have complained. If enough people complain, maybe > they'll do something. > > After all, that boilerplate just makes the corporation look stupid and > incompetent. Any email that leaves the corporate network must be > assumed to be visible to world+dog. Anybody who thinks differently is > deluded and should not be allowed access to information that is > "confidential and subject to privledge".
I read Lebara's "Vision" and "Mission" and I remember that whenever Lebara says anything, they end it with that rude disclaimer. I don't want to get in touch with Lebara. That's how stupid it is. > But, I'm sure there's a lawyer somewhere who's trying to cover his > ass regardless of how foolish it looks... As if Lebara's real mission is to cover their lawyers' asses. >> This email is confidential and may be subject to privilege. If you >> are not the intended recipient, please do not copy or disclose its >> content but contact the sender immediately upon receipt. Spammers should use a disclaimer like that. Then people would not dare to delete the spam without first confirming to the spammer that they read their spam. Or not. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
