DL Neil wrote:
(not that New Zealanders need to know much about snakes!)
Probably recommended when we visit Australia, though.
Also we seem to have imported some of their spiders in recent
years, so it's only a matter of time before their snakes
follow.
I wonder if we could get Australia to p
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:33 AM DL Neil wrote:
>
> On 18/01/19 8:20 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:12:33 +1300, Gregory Ewing
> > declaimed the following:
> >
> >> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> >>> Getting too close to REXX (which was something like Restructured
> >>> EX
On 18/01/19 8:20 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:12:33 +1300, Gregory Ewing
declaimed the following:
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Getting too close to REXX (which was something like Restructured
EXtended eXecutor).
And if we continue the theme of dinosaur evolution,
On 17/01/19 6:10 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Avi Gross wrote:
The question that seems to come up too often about the python name is a
distraction. In particular, it is answered fairly prominently in many
places
as just being a nonsensical name because a founder once liked a comedic
entity that ch
Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Gregory Ewing
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 12:10 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
Avi Gross wrote:
> The question that seems to come up too often about the python name is
> a distraction. In particular, it is answere
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Getting too close to REXX (which was something like Restructured
EXtended eXecutor).
And if we continue the theme of dinosaur evolution, we end up
with Tyrannosaurus REXX.
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Avi Gross wrote:
The question that seems to come up too often about the python name is a
distraction. In particular, it is answered fairly prominently in many places
as just being a nonsensical name because a founder once liked a comedic
entity that chose an oddball name, so they did too.
That
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:37 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:46:29 -0500, "Avi Gross"
> declaimed the following:
>
> >Imagine people developing languages like X and Y and over the years
> >enhancing them.
> >
> >An Enhanced or Extended X, naturally, might be renamed EX.
>
>
[HUMOR for the ALERT]
The question that seems to come up too often about the python name is a
distraction. In particular, it is answered fairly prominently in many places
as just being a nonsensical name because a founder once liked a comedic
entity that chose an oddball name, so they did too.
Bu
Chris,
On 11/01/19 10:06 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:01 AM DL Neil wrote:
PS the smart reply: who do you think coded the Alt-Tab window-switching
mechanism?
or, whose shoulders' do you young, whipper-snappers think you're
standing on? (and, "please get down, and go and
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:01 AM DL Neil wrote:
> PS the smart reply: who do you think coded the Alt-Tab window-switching
> mechanism?
> or, whose shoulders' do you young, whipper-snappers think you're
> standing on? (and, "please get down, and go and wash your feet")
Hold on hold on. "Window-swit
On 11/01/19 8:57 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 6:48 AM DL Neil wrote:
Working with a bunch of younger folk (who may technically be of the age
of 'grand-children' - pardon me, I almost fell over my (long, grey)
beard), I am frequently the butt of their gentle, if ageist, joke
On 8/01/19 12:04 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:10:13 +1300, DL Neil
declaimed the following:
Why is that obscure? It makes perfect sense - to those of us who have
used tape/serial storage! Perhaps less-so to [bobble-heads], sorry I
mean people who grew-up with 'bubble mem
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 6:48 AM DL Neil wrote:
> Working with a bunch of younger folk (who may technically be of the age
> of 'grand-children' - pardon me, I almost fell over my (long, grey)
> beard), I am frequently the butt of their gentle, if ageist, jokes.
> However, my sardonic amusement is t
On 8/01/19 4:59 PM, rbowman wrote:> On 01/07/2019 02:10 PM, DL Neil wrote:
>> Why is that obscure? It makes perfect sense - to those of us who have
>> used tape/serial storage! Perhaps less-so to [bobble-heads], sorry I
>> mean people who grew-up with 'bubble memory' (Memory sticks, 'flash
>> driv
On 01/07/2019 02:10 PM, DL Neil wrote:
Why is that obscure? It makes perfect sense - to those of us who have
used tape/serial storage! Perhaps less-so to [bobble-heads], sorry I
mean people who grew-up with 'bubble memory' (Memory sticks, 'flash
drives', SSDs). In point-of-fact, Python Context Ma
On 2019-01-07 23:04, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 10:10:13 +1300, DL Neil
declaimed the following:
Why is that obscure? It makes perfect sense - to those of us who have
used tape/serial storage! Perhaps less-so to [bobble-heads], sorry I
mean people who grew-up with 'bubble m
On 7/01/19 3:25 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 01/04/2019 10:45 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
FORTRAN is older than most of us. So it influenced what we think a
computer language should sound like.
Sadly, not for all of us... FORTRAN seeded later languages with terms
that are obscure, like rewind(). A
On 7/01/19 2:52 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 01/04/2019 09:34 AM, Avi Gross wrote:
Although I used FORTRAN ages ago and it still seems to be in active
use, I am not clear on why the name FORMULA TRANSLATOR was chosen. I
do agree it does sound more like a computer language based on both the
sound and
On 7/01/19 9:09 AM, Avi Gross wrote:
[Can we ever change the subject line?]
{REAL SUBJECT: degrees of compilation.}
Peter wrote:
"...
Hoever, this is the Python list and one of the advantages of Python is that we
don't have to compile our code. So we need a different excuse for fencing on
offi
On 01/04/2019 10:45 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
FORTRAN is older than most of us. So it influenced what we think a
computer language should sound like.
Sadly, not for all of us... FORTRAN seeded later languages with terms
that are obscure, like rewind(). A blazing powerhouse like the IBM
Sys
On 01/03/2019 05:31 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
Why did I mention Anaconda? Because python is also the name of a snake and
some people considered it appropriate to name their pet project that
includes python, as the name of another snake:
Probably not politically correct to mention but Colt had seven
On 01/03/2019 09:53 PM, DL Neil wrote:
Thus the OP's original assumption/confusion between a programming
language and a serpent; Java and a large island; right down to C, R, etc
which are too short to be usable search terms in most engines.
C# wins the prize for not getting what you expect in a
On 01/04/2019 11:17 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
One would
turn in a deck of cards to be spooled in the job queue, and come back some
hours later to get the printout from the job.
Or, in most cases, obscure compiler errors because you forget the
continuation punch in column 6. Back to the keyp
On 01/04/2019 09:34 AM, Avi Gross wrote:
Although I used FORTRAN ages ago and it still seems to be in active use, I am
not clear on why the name FORMULA TRANSLATOR was chosen. I do agree it does
sound more like a computer language based on both the sound and feel of FORTRAN
as well as the expa
On 01/04/2019 09:06 AM, William Ray Wing wrote:
On 3/01/19 2:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would suggest it
was a computer language?
I think the name is the least important aspect of a computer language.
I’d like to propose that classic
On 01/03/2019 10:08 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
DL Neil writes:
Thus the OP's original assumption/confusion between a programming
language and a serpent; Java and a large island; right down to C, R, etc
which are too short to be usable search terms in most engines.
And still, you enter "Ant" into
On 01/03/2019 01:28 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-01-03, Gene Heskett wrote:
Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
in a decade so maybe its died?
About 20 years ago, the RedHat Linux
On 01/03/2019 12:40 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
in a decade so maybe its died?
Very alive and well...
https://www.anaconda.com/what-is-anaconda/
It's no
On 01/03/2019 09:53 AM, Avi Gross wrote:
Bad analogy, but snakes do tend to shed their skin periodically as they grow.
3.x certainly was a snake shedding its skin. ESRI moved to 3 for the
cloud oriented products but their non-cloud products are still 2.7 and
that's the world I live in.
Som
On 01/03/2019 07:59 AM, Jack Dangler wrote:
Odd that COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language) and DIBOL (Digital
Business Oriented Language) follow the paradigm, but SNOBOL went with
"symBOlic"...
I vaguely remember it as being sort of an inside joke vis a vis COBOL.
--
https://mail.python.or
On 01/02/2019 06:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
A Programming Language? APL.
A company I worked for bought an IBM 5120, not to be confused with the
later 51xx PC's. It shipped with BASIC and APL in the ROM, had a toggle
switch to select between the two, and the weird characters on the
keyboard. Tha
On 01/02/2019 12:41 PM, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
The name "Python" may not make sense, but what sense does the name Java make,
or even C (unless you know that it was the successor to B), or Haskell or Pascal or even
BASIC? Or Caml or Kotlin or Scratch? Or Oberon or R? Or Smalltalk, or SNOBOL?
On 01/02/2019 11:06 PM, songbird wrote:
i can only claim to have written one program in
SNOBOL and that was over 30yrs ago...
My sympathies...
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2019-01-06, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2019-01-06 13:43:02 -0500, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 13:26:15 +0100, "Peter J. Holzer"
>> declaimed the following:
>>
>> >For example, about 10 years ago I built a continuous integration
>> >pipeline for a project I was working on
>
[Can we ever change the subject line?]
{REAL SUBJECT: degrees of compilation.}
Peter wrote:
"...
Hoever, this is the Python list and one of the advantages of Python is that we
don't have to compile our code. So we need a different excuse for fencing on
office chairs ;-).
..."
I understand what
On 2019-01-06 13:43:02 -0500, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 13:26:15 +0100, "Peter J. Holzer"
> declaimed the following:
>
> >For example, about 10 years ago I built a continuous integration
> >pipeline for a project I was working on
[...]
> >The result was that any change took ab
On 2019-01-04 22:59:40 -0500, Avi Gross wrote:
> I don't go back to the beginning of FORTRAN. My comment was not that FORTRAN
> was badly named when it was among the first to do such things. I am saying
> that in retrospect, almost any language can do a basic subset of arithmetic
> operations.
So
On 2019-01-04 12:56:56 -0500, songbird wrote:
> Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > Almost all of these points don't seem to be related to the language, but
> > to your environment.
>
> an application isn't useful unless it actually can
> be deployed and used in an environment.
True. But environments ar
IGRESSION.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 5:43 PM
To: Python
Subject: Re: the python name
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:34 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> I recall an example from a version of mathematical LISP that I will
> rew
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:34 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> I recall an example from a version of mathematical LISP that I will rewrite
> in python for illustration:
>
> def is_greater(left, right):
> if left <= 0 : return False
> if right <= 0 : return True
> return is_greater(left - 1, right -
n when viewed as
loops or exception handling. Heck, we now often hide loops.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Dennis Lee Bieber
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2019 1:46 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 22:59:40 -0500, "Avi Gross&
On Friday 04 January 2019 20:27:44 Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 06:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:28:49 Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> About 20 years ago, the RedHat Linux (way before RHEL) installer
> >> (which was written in Python) was called Anaconda.
> >
> >
On 2019-01-05, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/03/2019 06:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:28:49 Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> About 20 years ago, the RedHat Linux (way before RHEL) installer
>>> (which was written in Python) was called Anaconda.
>
>> Thanks for rescuing my ol
list
> On Behalf Of Avi
> Gross
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 6:55 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: RE: the python name
>
> Gene,
>
> It is simple in Python:
>
> if "IV" in "FIVE":
> print("Roman 4 is 5!")
>
> prin
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Dennis Lee Bieber
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:17 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 11:34:24 -0500, "Avi Gross"
declaimed the following:
>
>Although I used FORTRAN ages ago and it still seems to be in
On 01/03/2019 06:35 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:28:49 Grant Edwards wrote:
>> About 20 years ago, the RedHat Linux (way before RHEL) installer
>> (which was written in Python) was called Anaconda.
> Thanks for rescuing my old wet ram Grant, thats exactly what I was
>
Oops. They autocorrected the word piethon below so it makes no sense. I
meant a pie-eating-marathon or whatever.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Avi Gross
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 6:55 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: the python name
Gene,
It is simple
n, we
might be having marathon sessions evaluating digits of pi or eating dessert.
Time to stop posting before ...
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 4:20 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
On Friday 04 January
On Friday 04 January 2019 16:37:49 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:31 AM Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Friday 04 January 2019 13:22:03 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > > And then there was WATFIV, which stands for WATerloo Fortran IV.
> > > Because 5 == IV.
> >
> > Not what I was taught 75 yea
Rick Johnson wrote:
...
> You're singing a sad tune songbird, but i feel your pain...
like all things, this too shall pass... :)
songbird
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:31 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 January 2019 13:22:03 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > And then there was WATFIV, which stands for WATerloo Fortran IV.
> > Because 5 == IV.
>
> Not what I was taught 75 years ago. Thats a brand new definition of fuzzy
> logic. :(
Maybe it's
On Friday 04 January 2019 13:22:03 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 10:59 AM Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 01:12:42 -0500, "Avi Gross"
> >
> >
> > declaimed the following:
> > >language, Formula Translator? (I recall using the What For
> > > version).
> >
> >
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> songbird wrote:
hi,
thank you for your reply.
...
> Almost all of these points don't seem to be related to the language, but
> to your environment.
an application isn't useful unless it actually can
be deployed and used in an environment.
the easier it is for me
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Avi Gross wrote:
>
>
[BYTE]
> As I joked in an earlier message, I remember using a version of FORTRAN
> called WATFOR. Yes, there was a WATFIV.
>
>
Yah - WATFOR was Waterloo FORTRAN, an interpreted FORTRAN that was used a lot
in intro classes. No matter w
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 10:59 AM Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 01:12:42 -0500, "Avi Gross"
> declaimed the following:
>
>
> >language, Formula Translator? (I recall using the What For version).
>
> WATFOR => WATerloo FORtran
And then there was WATFIV, which stands for WA
On 2019-01-04 11:34:24 -0500, Avi Gross wrote:
> Although I used FORTRAN ages ago and it still seems to be in active
> use, I am not clear on why the name FORMULA TRANSLATOR was chosen.
Keep in mind that FORTRAN was one of the very first languages which
didn't have a 1:1 mapping to machine code. A
On Thursday 03 January 2019 15:28:49 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-01-03, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime
> > in the past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it
> > mentioned in a decade so maybe its died?
>
> About 20 y
ython-list
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 11:06 AM
To: Python
Cc: William R. Wing
Subject: Re: the python name
On 3/01/19 2:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
> Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would suggest
> it was a computer language?
> I think the name is the least im
On 3/01/19 2:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
> Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would suggest
> it was a computer language?
> I think the name is the least important aspect of a computer language.
I’d like to propose that classic FORTRAN (FORmulaTRANslator) came/comes close.
On 2019-01-04 02:04:14 -0500, songbird wrote:
> Rick Johnson wrote:
> > songbird wrote:
> >
> ...
> >> if you want to know the perspective of a new person
> >> to the language and to help out make it better i have
> >> a few suggestions for where to spend your time in a
> >> way that will help out
Rick Johnson wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>
...
>> if you want to know the perspective of a new person
>> to the language and to help out make it better i have
>> a few suggestions for where to spend your time in a
>> way that will help out people a great deal.
>
> I'm listening...
i only get so ma
On
Behalf Of DL Neil
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 11:54 PM
To: 'Python'
Subject: Re: the python name
On 3/01/19 2:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
> Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would
suggest it was a computer language?
>
> I think the name is
On 3/01/19 2:03 PM, Avi Gross wrote:
Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would suggest it
was a computer language?
I think the name is the least important aspect of a computer language.
Perhaps not.
If you subscribe to the wider StackOverflow Driven Design philoso
f Of Grant Edwards
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:29 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
On 2019-01-03, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in
> the past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see
On 2019-01-03, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2019-01-03, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
>> past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
>> in a decade so maybe its died?
>
> About 20 years ago, the RedHat
On 2019-01-03, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
> past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
> in a decade so maybe its died?
About 20 years ago, the RedHat Linux (way before RHEL) installer
(which was w
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:01 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
> past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
> in a decade so maybe its died?
Hmm, I don't know about a *language* per se. There is a *distr
t snakes do tend to shed their skin
> periodically as they grow.
>
Do I miss-remember that there was an anaconda language at sometime in the
past? Not long after python made its debute? I've not see it mentioned
in a decade so maybe its died?
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original
i think leaving py2 is in the shed-skin process
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
http://www.pythonmembers.club | https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:55 AM Avi Gross wrote:
> Back to seriousness. I do not understand any suggestions that the python
> language will go away any time soon. It will continue to evolve and sometimes
> that evolution may introduce incompatibilities so earlier versions may have
> to stop bein
world advances, some growth is a good
idea. Bad analogy, but snakes do tend to shed their skin periodically as they
grow.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Martell
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 8:08 PM
To: Avi Gross
Cc: Python
Subject: Re: the python name
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:04 P
Odd that COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language) and DIBOL (Digital
Business Oriented Language) follow the paradigm, but SNOBOL went with
"symBOlic"...
On 1/2/19 7:22 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Which was a derivative of BCPL (so one could clai
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 5:26 PM songbird wrote:
>
> Rick Johnson wrote:
> > [ a bunch of irrelevant drivel ]
>
> if FORTRAN and COBOL aren't dead i don't see Python
> going away any time soon.
>
> if you want to know the perspective of a new person
> to the language and to help out make it bett
Rick Johnson wrote:
...
> Of course, no one can predict the consequences of every action. Not even GvR,
> in is almost infinite wisdom, and his access to a semi-dependable time
> machine, could predict such a tragedy of epic proportions.
>
> To say i'm saddened by the whole experience, would be a
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:41:36 +, "Schachner, Joseph"
> declaimed the following:
>
>
>>The name "Python" may not make sense, but what sense does the name Java make,
>>or even C (unless you know that it was the successor to B), or Haskell or
>>Pascal or even BASIC? Or
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:04 PM Avi Gross wrote:
>
> Challenge: Can we name any computer language whose name really would suggest
> it was a computer language?
COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language)
FORTRAN (Formula Translation)
PL/1 (Programming Language 1)
ALGOL (Algorithmic Language)
--
ht
least important aspect of a computer language.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Dennis Lee Bieber
Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 7:02 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: the python name
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:41:36 +, "Schachner, Joseph"
dec
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
Which was a derivative of BCPL (so one could claim a successor of C
should be named P), ?, mathematician, beginners all-purpose symbolic
instruction code. R? maybe a subtle implication to be better/in-front-of
S. SNOBOL is the ugly one, since
On 2019-01-02 19:41, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
Python was started in the late 1980s by Guido Van Rossum, who (until quite
recently) was the Benevolent Dictator for Life of Python. His recent strong
support of Type Annotation was what got it passed - and having to fight for it
was what convince
Python was started in the late 1980s by Guido Van Rossum, who (until quite
recently) was the Benevolent Dictator for Life of Python. His recent strong
support of Type Annotation was what got it passed - and having to fight for it
was what convinced him retire from the role of BDFL. Anyway, at
On 18-12-31 22:39:04, pritanshsahs...@gmail.com wrote:
why did you kept this name? i want to know the history behind this and
the name of this snake python.
It's named after Monty Python [0].
[0] https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/appetite.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
ht
wrote in message
news:05ff6fbc-69d5-4d3c-9073-67e774bd3...@googlegroups.com...
why did you kept this name? i want to know the history behind this and the
name of this snake python.
I asked google the same question, and this is what it found -
https://docs.python.org/3/faq/general.html#why
83 matches
Mail list logo
