Tim Harig, 17.01.2011 20:41:
In comp.lang.python, I wrote:
Tim Harig, 17.01.2011 13:25:
If I didn't think Python was a good language, I wouldn't be here.
Nevertheless, it isn't a good fit for many pieces of software where a
systems language is better suited. Reasons include ease of distributio
Venu Allipuram, 17.01.2011 21:01:
lxml is a great one, but it is not simple to install libxml and libxslt on
Linux using user permissions.
Well, you have to build it, obviously. Just pass "--static-deps" to the
build script and it will build and link libxml2 and libxslt automatically
for you.
Venu, 17.01.2011 21:34:
Using cElementTree, would you be willing show to me how to find the nodes with
certain attribute, ie search using attributes and attibute values.
I did not see any example code from the cElementTree official website.
Check out the documentation of ElementTree and lxml.e
I have proposed this before and i shall propose it again. Most of the
naysayers parrot off about how many people use Tkinter. Maybe they are
right, and maybe they are wrong. Nobody, and i repeat NOBODY even GvR
himself can offer reliable evidence as to how important moduleX *is*
or *is not* to thi
On Jan 17, 6:51 pm, nn wrote:
> ...But the api on this baffles me a bit:
>
> >>> d = OrderedDict.fromkeys('abcde')
> >>> d.move_to_end('b', last=False)
> >>> ''.join(d.keys)
>
> 'bacde'
>
> I understand that "end" could potentially mean either end, but would
> "move_to_end" and "move_to_beginning"
On Jan 17, 6:51 pm, nn wrote:
> I somehow missed this before. I like most of the additions from
> Raymond Hettinger. But the api on this baffles me a bit:
>
> >>> d = OrderedDict.fromkeys('abcde')
> >>> d.move_to_end('b', last=False)
> >>> ''.join(d.keys)
>
> 'bacde'
>
> I understand that "end" co
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:41:54 +, Tim Harig wrote:
> One of the arguments for Python has always made is that you can optimize
> it by writing the most important parts in C. Perhaps that is a crutch
> that has held the communty back from seeking higher performance
> solutions in the language its
On Jan 17, 10:24 pm, rusi wrote:
> The quality of ... systems will decline unless they are rigorously
> maintained and adapted to operational environment changes.
This is both eloquent and frightening at the same time when applied to
the current state of Python's stdlib. We have come so far and
On Jan 17, 10:17 am, jmfauth wrote:
> That's life, unfortunately.
Also, an earlier version of the proposal was to create a *.pyr
directory for each *.py file. That was a real mess; be thankful they
worked on it and came up with a much cleaner method.
Carl Banks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailm
On 1/17/2011 10:57 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
On 1/17/2011 8:59 PM, Flávio Lisbôa wrote:
But that's me, i'm sure most of python users don't mind at all.
Seems so. Complaints are rare.
That conclusion isn't valid; the behaviour is (AIUI) only in Python 3.2
and later. You can
On Jan 17, 10:17 am, jmfauth wrote:
> > No, I'm sorry, they're not obvious at all.
>
> These reasons become obious as soon as you start working.
>
> Let's take a practical point view. It did not take a long time
> to understand, that it is much simpler to delete the __pycache__
> directory everyti
On Jan 17, 6:29 pm, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
> find . -name \*.pyc -exec rm -f {} \;
>
> vs.
>
> rm -rf __pycache__
>
> I do not see how this is more difficult, but I may be missing something.
Well the former deletes all the pyc files in the directory tree
whereas the latter o
On Jan 18, 4:13 am, rantingrick wrote:
> On Jan 17, 4:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> > On 1/16/2011 11:20 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>
> > > Ok, try this...
>
> > > http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/screenshots/index.php
> > > http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/pyslsk6.png
> > > http://
Terry Reedy writes:
> On 1/17/2011 8:59 PM, Flávio Lisbôa wrote:
> > But that's me, i'm sure most of python users don't mind at all.
>
> Seems so. Complaints are rare.
That conclusion isn't valid; the behaviour is (AIUI) only in Python 3.2
and later. You can't presume that a lack of complaints m
On 1/17/2011 8:59 PM, Flávio Lisbôa wrote:
That's why i disagree (and hate) the automatic compilation of code, my
project directory becomes full of object files
That is one point of stashing them all in a .__pycache__ directory.
After reading some articles about it, I've come to think python
On Jan 17, 8:51 pm, nn wrote:
> I somehow missed this before. I like most of the additions from
> Raymond Hettinger. But the api on this baffles me a bit:
If we are not careful with all these "additions" we could end up with
a language like ruby which has wasteful methods to clean your
backside,
I somehow missed this before. I like most of the additions from
Raymond Hettinger. But the api on this baffles me a bit:
>>> d = OrderedDict.fromkeys('abcde')
>>> d.move_to_end('b', last=False)
>>> ''.join(d.keys)
'bacde'
I understand that "end" could potentially mean either end, but would
"mov
find . -name \*.pyc -exec rm -f {} \;
vs.
rm -rf __pycache__
I do not see how this is more difficult, but I may be missing something.
— Alice.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 17, 2:20 pm, Jake Biesinger wrote:
> Is there a python standard library way of creating *efficient* 2-dimensional
> lists/arrays, still allowing me to sort and append?
Without using third party libraries, no not really. numpy has it
covered so there's not really a lot of demand for it.
That's why i disagree (and hate) the automatic compilation of code, my
project directory becomes full of object files, and then i need to either
delete everything manually or create a script to do the work (not in python,
because it'll dirt things even more :). Sometimes i notice python doesn't
rec
> IIUC (please confirm), you don't need a generic two-dimensional
> array, but rather an Nx2 array, where N may be large (but the other
> dimension will always have a magnitude of 2).
Yes, that's right, Nx2 not NxM.
> > Since I want to keep the two elements together during a sort
>
> I assume (p
On Monday, January 17, 2011 4:12:51 PM UTC-8, OAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what about pytables? It's built for big data collections and it doesn't
> clog up the memory.
I thought PyTables depends on NumPy? Otherwise I would indeed use their carray
module.
Thanks!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
> Using numpy, I can create large 2-dimensional arrays quite easily.
IIUC (please confirm), you don't need a generic two-dimensional
array, but rather an Nx2 array, where N may be large (but the other
dimension will always have a magnitude of 2).
> Since I want to keep the two elements together d
Hi,
what about pytables? It's built for big data collections and it doesn't
clog up the memory.
Am 17.01.2011 23:54, schrieb Dan Stromberg:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Jake Biesinger
wrote:
Hi all,
Using numpy, I can create large 2-dimensional arrays quite easily.
import numpy
mylis
From: jsmithfi...@hotmail.co.uk
To: w...@python.org
Subject: Entry of Non-European (Unicode or UTF-8) characters
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:26:36 +
Hi there.
I have difficulty entering directly non-European Unicode characters into Python
3.2's interpreter. When I do enter them, I ge
On 2011-01-17, geremy condra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tim Harig wrote:
>> On 2011-01-17, geremy condra wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>> Go is every bit of a general purpose programming language. It is use
No. The benefit of, for instance, not adding 200 .pyc files to a
directory with 200 .py files is immediately obvious to most people.
On 1/17/2011 1:17 PM, jmfauth wrote:
No, I'm sorry, they're not obvious at all.
These reasons become obious as soon as you start working.
Let's take a practic
On Jan 17, 4:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/16/2011 11:20 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>
> > Ok, try this...
>
> > http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/screenshots/index.php
> > http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/pyslsk6.png
> > http://www.wxwidgets.org/about/screensh.htm
>
> Ok, wxwidgets
On 17 Gen, 23:34, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:19:13 -0800 (PST)
>
> carlo wrote:
> > Is it true UTF-8 does not have any "big-endian/little-endian" issue
> > because of its encoding method?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And if it is true, why Mark (and
> > everyone does) writes about UTF-8 wit
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Jake Biesinger
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using numpy, I can create large 2-dimensional arrays quite easily.
import numpy
mylist = numpy.zeros((1,2), dtype=numpy.int32)
>
> Unfortunately, my target audience may not have numpy so I'd prefer not to use
>
On 1/16/2011 11:20 PM, rantingrick wrote:
Ok, try this...
http://juicereceiver.sourceforge.net/screenshots/index.php
http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/pyslsk6.png
http://www.wxwidgets.org/about/screensh.htm
Ok, wxwidgets can look at least as good as tk. Agreed that wxpython
migh
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:19:13 -0800 (PST)
carlo wrote:
> Is it true UTF-8 does not have any "big-endian/little-endian" issue
> because of its encoding method?
Yes.
> And if it is true, why Mark (and
> everyone does) writes about UTF-8 with and without BOM some chapters
> later? What would be the
On 2011-01-17, carlo wrote:
> Is it true UTF-8 does not have any "big-endian/little-endian" issue
> because of its encoding method? And if it is true, why Mark (and
> everyone does) writes about UTF-8 with and without BOM some chapters
> later? What would be the BOM purpose then?
Yes, it is true.
On 17.01.2011 23:19, carlo wrote:
Is it true UTF-8 does not have any "big-endian/little-endian" issue
because of its encoding method? And if it is true, why Mark (and
everyone does) writes about UTF-8 with and without BOM some chapters
later? What would be the BOM purpose then?
Can't answer yo
Hello,
I am trying to use jpype, but after several hours/days, I still cannot get
it to work.
I get a TypeError --- Package is not Callable error. (See below)
I already have done a good workable chunk of code I wrote in Java that
implements steam table calculations. After a few weeks of playin
On 01/17/11 22:00, rantingrick wrote:
On Jan 17, 2:09 pm, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
fortunately it is not my call and I actually
quite like Tkinter.
Are you sure about that Martin? :)))
From: "Martin P. Hellwig"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: GUIs - A Modest Proposal
Date: Fri,
Hi all,
Using numpy, I can create large 2-dimensional arrays quite easily.
>>> import numpy
>>> mylist = numpy.zeros((1,2), dtype=numpy.int32)
Unfortunately, my target audience may not have numpy so I'd prefer not to use
it.
Similarly, a list-of-tuples using standard python syntax.
>>>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Tim Harig wrote:
> On 2011-01-17, geremy condra wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>>> On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>>> I wouldn't say Go is narrowly targeted. It's a systems language that can
>>> compete in the same domain with
Hi,
recently I had to study *seriously* Unicode and encodings for one
project in Python but I left with a couple of doubts arised after
reading the unicode chapter of Dive into Python 3 book by Mark
Pilgrim.
1- Mark says:
"Also (and you’ll have to trust me on this, because I’m not going to
show yo
On Jan 17, 2:09 pm, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
> fortunately it is not my call and I actually
> quite like Tkinter.
Are you sure about that Martin? :)))
> From: "Martin P. Hellwig"
> Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
> Subject: Re: GUIs - A Modest Proposal
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:10:35 +0100
[
On 2011-01-17, John Nagle wrote:
> That's been done once or twice. There's what are called "single
> assignment languages". Each variable can only be assigned once.
> The result looks like an imperative language but works like a functional
> language. Look up "SISAL" for an example. This
On 17.01.2011 21:04, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I say probably not considering the availability of 3rd party
downloads. What say you, Python community?
Available as 3rd party downloads:
XML,HTML,...
HTTP,FTP,SMTP,POP,IMAP/...
MD5,SHA,...
zip,bzip,...
and so on and so on and so on.
Remove them a
On 2011-01-17, geremy condra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>> On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>> I wouldn't say Go is narrowly targeted. It's a systems language that can
>> compete in the same domain with scripting languages. It is true that most
>> languages h
On Jan 17, 3:08 pm, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
>> From: "Adam Skutt"
>> And we're not discussing those languages, we're discussing Python,
>> which has an explicit policy of "batteries included". As such,
>> criticism of the standard library is perfectly acceptable under the
>> name "Python", whe
On 1/17/2011 1:34 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
On 2011-01-17, Paul Rubin wrote:
geremy condra writes:
Which is rather interesting because the OOP community had
traditionally though of functional programming as a 1960's thing that
didn't work out.
Right.
The big problem with functional p
Hi Stefan
Using cElementTree, would you be willing show to me how to find the nodes with
certain attribute, ie search using attributes and attibute values.
I did not see any example code from the cElementTree official website.
Regards,
Venu
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From: "Adam Skutt"
Subject: Re: Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
On Jan 17, 11:01 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I'm afraid that's precisely what I'm arguing you *can't* do -- there's
> nothing reasonable about equating the standard library with the language.
> Some languages don't eve
From: "rantingrick"
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
On Jan 17, 12:27 pm, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> And Python should also not include any editor because for
> some programmers it is absolutely useless anyway. The
> editor can be in
On 01/17/11 19:39, rantingrick wrote:
Q: If you could replace Tkinter with any module/library (THAT IS NOT A
GUI OR IDE!!) what would you like to see fill its place?
Some systems, like FreeBSD have Tkinter and IDLE as a separate package
which is not installed by default. Purely because those
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:52 -0800 (PST)
AlexLBasso wrote:
> I am recruiting for a 9 month contract (with contract extension
> potential) for a company in North Austin.
Please post on the job board instead:
http://python.org/community/jobs/
Thank you
Antoine.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
lxml is a great one, but it is not simple to install libxml and libxslt on
Linux using user permissions. Also it is hard to package the scripts after
the complete development for release. Did anybody try this, if so please let
me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks
venu
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:
On Jan 17, 1:26 pm, Adam Skutt wrote:
> On Jan 17, 11:01 am, Steven D'Aprano > Nevertheless, you can do good, useful work
> > with only a minimal widget set. Back when dinosaurs walked the earth,
[...snip...]
> And when a time machine warps all back to the 1980s, that argument
> might have some
Hello,
We are delighted to inform you that CodeFest, the annual International online
coding festival of Computer Engineering Society, IT-BHU, has been unveiled.
CodeFest is a unique fest wherein concepts of mathematics, logic, artificial
intelligence, algorithms, language syntax, etc. are requ
In comp.lang.python, you wrote:
> Tim Harig, 17.01.2011 13:25:
>> If I didn't think Python was a good language, I wouldn't be here.
>> Nevertheless, it isn't a good fit for many pieces of software where a
>> systems language is better suited. Reasons include ease of distribution
>> without an inte
Even more post thoughts on removing all GUI's from stlib...
Q: If you could replace Tkinter with any module/library (THAT IS NOT A
GUI OR IDE!!) what would you like to see fill its place?
PS: And please make this decision from a *community* perspective and
not pure selfishness.
--
http://mail.p
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
> On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>>> On 2011-01-16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
If the author thinks that Go is a "tried and true" (his words, not mine)
language "where programmers c
On Jan 17, 11:01 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I'm afraid that's precisely what I'm arguing you *can't* do -- there's
> nothing reasonable about equating the standard library with the language.
> Some languages don't even have a standard library, or for that matter a
> standard implementation.
A
More post thoughts on removing all GUI's from stdlib...
This change would not only affect Python in a positive way (lighting
the proverbial load) it would also serve to speed the advancement of
Tkinter because now Tkinter could advance at its own pace untethered
by the release cycles of Python! Yo
I am recruiting for a 9 month contract (with contract extension
potential) for a company in North Austin. I am seeking an
Applications Developer very familiar with the JavaScript toolkit. The
position requires specific experience with Python, Dojo, and JQuery.
In this role, you would be developin
On Jan 17, 12:27 pm, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> And Python should also not include any editor because for
> some programmers it is absolutely useless anyway. The
> editor can be installed separately very easy and the
> programmers can choose the editor they like. The problem
> is not that WxPyt
From: "Steven D'Aprano"
Subject: Re: Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:41:41 -0800, Adam Skutt wrote:
>
>> If you're going to expect me to be that pedantic, then pay me the
>> courtesy of taking the time to find the necessary context. Nevertheless,
>> it's not t
> No, I'm sorry, they're not obvious at all.
These reasons become obious as soon as you start working.
Let's take a practical point view. It did not take a long time
to understand, that it is much simpler to delete the __pycache__
directory everytime I compile my scripts than to visit it just
bec
Venu, 17.01.2011 18:35:
I am getting into serious Python programming for Electronic CAD tools,
I am trying to find the best XML parser modules available. I need good
searching capability for attributes, nodes and block of XML. I am
looking for either a recommendation or previous forum links.
Ca
Hi Venu,
Use element tree module.
This comes with Python itself and does all that you need with presision.
I have already used it and it does a very very good job.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On 17/01/11 23:05, Venu wrote:
Hi,
I am getting into serious Python programming for Electronic CAD tool
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:05 PM, Venu wrote:
Hi,
I am getting into serious Python programming for Electronic CAD tools,
I am trying to find the best XML parser modules available. I need good
searching capability for attributes, nodes and block of XML. I am
looking for either a recommendation
Hi,
I am getting into serious Python programming for Electronic CAD tools,
I am trying to find the best XML parser modules available. I need good
searching capability for attributes, nodes and block of XML. I am
looking for either a recommendation or previous forum links.
Thanks
Venu
--
http://m
Hi Fred, thanks for the reply.
I have already contacted old clients (those that are still in business),
but unfortunately they have either gone the 'off the shelf' route (ie.
don't use bespoke software any more), or moved-over to .NET, which is a
route which I don't want to follow. Still, at
On 17/01/2011 16:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Sherm Pendley, 17.01.2011 16:47:
I believe the widespread use of some functional techniques in JavaScript
had a lot to do with that as well.
I doubt that there's really "widespread use" of functional techniques in
JavaScript. Such code may be widely de
Tim Harig, 17.01.2011 13:25:
If I didn't think Python was a good language, I wouldn't be here.
Nevertheless, it isn't a good fit for many pieces of software where a
systems language is better suited. Reasons include ease of distribution
without an interpeter, non-necessity of distributing source
Everyone needs to jump off the troll wagon and come back to reality.
We need to get back on topic and compare Tkinter and wxPython by nuts
and bolts. We need to make a decision based on facts NOT
misconceptions, based on merit NOT prejudice, and finally based on
sanity NOT lunacy!
---
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:41:41 -0800, Adam Skutt wrote:
> If you're going to expect me to be that pedantic, then pay me the
> courtesy of taking the time to find the necessary context. Nevertheless,
> it's not the least bit unreasonable to address deficiencies in the
> standard library as deficienci
Sherm Pendley, 17.01.2011 16:47:
I believe the widespread use of some functional techniques in JavaScript
had a lot to do with that as well.
I doubt that there's really "widespread use" of functional techniques in
JavaScript. Such code may be widely deployed, but that doesn't tell
anything ab
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 06:31:00 -0800, jmfauth wrote:
> As a scientist using computer tools, and not as a computer scientist, I
> discovered Python long time ago (it was in its 1.5.6 version) and I
> remain an happy user up to now date. Yesterday, I was happy to download
> and test Python 3.2rc1. Pyt
Tim Harig writes:
> Functional programming has been around a long time; but, it only regained
> conciousness outside of academia because of its hyped abilities to
> make threading easier.
I believe the widespread use of some functional techniques in JavaScript
had a lot to do with that as well.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:33:42 +, Mark Summerfield
wrote:
> from ..Graphics import Xpm
> SVG = 1
>
> I can do the relative import with Python 3.0 and 3.1 but not with
> 3.2rc1:
What about 3.1.3? I wonder if it is related to this issue:
http://bugs.python.org/issue7902
--
R. David Murra
On Jan 14, 11:28 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Does this help?
>
> http://packages.python.org/kitchen/api-text-display.html
Ooh, it doesn’t appear to be a full line-breaking
implementation but it certainly helps for what I want to do
in my project! Thanks much!
(There’s also the alternative of us
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:31, jmfauth wrote:
> As a scientist using computer tools, and not as a computer
> scientist, I discovered Python long time ago (it was in its
> 1.5.6 version) and I remain an happy user up to now date.
> Yesterday, I was happy to download and test Python 3.2rc1.
> Pytho
As a scientist using computer tools, and not as a computer
scientist, I discovered Python long time ago (it was in its
1.5.6 version) and I remain an happy user up to now date.
Yesterday, I was happy to download and test Python 3.2rc1.
Python is still this powerful and pleasant language, but...
I
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:23:39 -0500
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:33:42 +, Mark Summerfield
> wrote:
> > from ..Graphics import Xpm
> > SVG = 1
> >
> > I can do the relative import with Python 3.0 and 3.1 but not with
> > 3.2rc1:
>
> What about 3.1.3? I wonder if it is r
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:55 +, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> In article ,
> Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>
> >I grepped through the code to see that it's using =
> >multiprocessing.Listener. I didn't go any further than that because our =
> >project is BSD licensed and the license for Gluino is
On Jan 17, 8:30 am, Albert van der Horst
wrote:
> We are not talking about running applications, but about writing
> applications.
Someone has to write the applications I run...
> I count 4000+ .py files in my /usr/share alone on Ubuntu.
> Your set is totally unrepresentative for those scripts.
In article ,
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>I grepped through the code to see that it's using =
>multiprocessing.Listener. I didn't go any further than that because our =
>project is BSD licensed and the license for Gluino is unclear. Until I =
>find out whether or not its under an equally permissiv
In article <4d337983$0$29983$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:18:16 -0800, Adam Skutt wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>I'm afraid I found most of your post hard to interpret, because you
>didn't give sufficient context for me to understand it. You refer to "hi
In article ,
Adam Skutt wrote:
>On Jan 14, 5:17=A0pm, Albert van der Horst
>wrote:
>>
>> I really don't follow that. You need a tremendous set to write gimp.
>> Obviously you won't write gimp in Python.
>>
>
>You need a tremendous set to write /the majority of the applications
>on your computer/
On 2011-01-17, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>> On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>
Personally, I think the time is ripe for a language that bridges the
gap between ease of use dynamic la
On 2011-01-17, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:12:04 +, Tim Harig wrote:
>
>> Python has been widely used by people like us that happen to like the
>> language and found ways to use it in our workplaces; but, most of the
>> time it is an unofficial use that the company. You st
On Jan 17, 3:30 am, Steven Howe wrote:
> Target your market. Design your software in the Model-View-Controller
> format. It becomes easy to configure you frontend, your GUI, your web
> page, if your code is written to separate the work from the glitz.
>
If there were some evidence MVC actually wo
Announcing M2Crypto 0.21.1
Changes:
0.21.1 - 2011-01-15
---
- Distribution fix
0.21 - 2011-01-12
-
- Support OpenSSL 1.0. Thanks to Miloslav Trmac for figuring out how
to fix test_smime.py
- Rename m2.engine_init to engine_init_error so that
ENGINE_init and EN
On Jan 17, 12:44 am, TomF wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I can enqueue all the jobs before waiting for
> the results, it's just that I want the parent to process the results as
> they come back. I don't want the parent to block until all results are
> returned. I was hoping the Pool module had
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
> On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>>> Personally, I think the time is ripe for a language that bridges the
>>> gap between ease of use dynamic languages with the performance and
>>> distri
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:12:04 +, Tim Harig wrote:
> Python has been widely used by people like us that happen to like the
> language and found ways to use it in our workplaces; but, most of the
> time it is an unofficial use that the company. You still don't see many
> companies doing large sc
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Mark Summerfield wrote:
> Hi Georg,
>
> I can't be sure it is a bug, but there is a definite difference of
> behavior between 3.0/3.1 and 3.2rc1.
>
> I can do the relative import with Python 3.0 and 3.1 but not with
> 3.2rc1:
Are you sure that the package that you
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:01 AM, frank cui wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm quite a novice in doing python,and i wish to ask you guys a question on
> the module import.
>
> Say we have a source file called module1.py.
>
> What's the difference between the " import module1 " and " from module1
> import * "
Tim Harig schrieb:
[snip]
This isn't such a tragedy Erlang as it is for other managed VMs because
Erlang/BEAM makes powerful usage of its VM for fault tolerance mechanisms. I
don't know of any other VM that allows software upgrades on a running system.
styx, the distributed operating system i
Hi all,
I'm quite a novice in doing python,and i wish to ask you guys a question on
the module import.
Say we have a source file called module1.py.
What's the difference between the " import module1 " and " from module1
import * "
I know that conventionally by coding style, we dont use the seco
On 2011-01-17, Paul Rubin wrote:
> geremy condra writes:
>> I agree. That does not make Go that language, and many of the choices
>> made during Go's development indicate that they don't think it's that
>> language either. I'm speaking specifically of its non-object model,
>> lack of exceptions,
hi Chris,
Thank you for your advice.
I will use tmpfs as a temperory file system to detail with it.
Cheers,
Cun Zhang
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Cun Zhang wrote:
> > Hi,all
> > I hope use cStringIO to create virtual file, but my cus
14.01.2011, 21:52, "mukesh tiwari" :
> Hello all , I have implemented Elliptic curve prime factorisation
> using wikipedia [
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenstra_elliptic_curve_factorization].
> I think that this code is not optimised and posting for further
> improvement. Feel free to comment a
On 2011-01-16, geremy condra wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tim Harig wrote:
>> On 2011-01-16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> If the author thinks that Go is a "tried and true" (his words, not mine)
>>> language "where programmers can go to look for work", I think he's
>>> fooling himself
Hi Georg,
I can't be sure it is a bug, but there is a definite difference of
behavior between 3.0/3.1 and 3.2rc1.
Given this directory layout:
$ ls -R Graphics/
Graphics/:
__init__.py Vector Xpm.py
Graphics/Vector:
__init__.py Svg.py
And these files:
$ cat Graphics/__init__.py
__all__ = [
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
