On Jan 17, 3:08 pm, "Octavian Rasnita" <orasn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: "Adam Skutt" <ask...@gmail.com> >> And we're not discussing those languages, we're discussing Python, >> which has an explicit policy of "batteries included". As such, >> criticism of the standard library is perfectly acceptable under the >> name "Python", whether you like it or not. Besides, it's inevitable >> anyway. > > "Batteries included"? > > Python doesn't follow this policy at all. We can say that maybe PHP follows > it, but not Python. >
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=python+%22batteries+included%22&l=1 > And if this is the wanted policy, why should it be "cheap batteries included" > and not "strong batteries included"? You'd have this same argument regardless of GUI toolkit you end up picking, or even if you choose to not include one at all. This would be because none of them are universal solutions, all of them have deficiencies (actual or perceived) that make them unsuitable for certain applications. Adam -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
