On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Tim Harig <user...@ilthio.net> wrote: > On 2011-01-16, geremy condra <debat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tim Harig <user...@ilthio.net> wrote: <snip> >>> Personally, I think the time is ripe for a language that bridges the >>> gap between ease of use dynamic languages with the performance and >>> distribution capabilities of a full systems level language. >> >> I agree. That does not make Go that language, and many of the choices >> made during Go's development indicate that they don't think it's that >> language either. I'm speaking specifically of its non-object model, >> lack of exceptions, etc. <snip> > > 2. Go has a similar mechanism to exceptions, defer/panic/recover. It does > downplay >
Downplay what exactly? Seems your paragraph got truncated. Cheers, Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
