Re: Ipchains

First idea is kill ipchains if you want ftp to work. Go to iptables and do NOT look back. Ipchains is an emulation using IPTables, poorly, under the 2.4 kernels. You can't load the modules you need to proeprly use ftp. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Vasyl Kenyuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: tap tap tap, is this thing on?

Um, not quite. It appears to be about 4.734521 degrees off vertical. {O,o} - Original Message - From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 20:50 PM Subject: tap tap tap, is this thing on? -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROT

Re: Excellent signature

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > across. Or at least until some manager tells me to 'tow the line' Um, there is a charm to the humorous vision of "towing the line," especially if the line is attached to the "line of bull the marketdroids keep feeding me." However, the general phrase is "toe the line"

Re: iptables netmask

From: "Jay Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Would cover from 65.32.0.1 to 65.63.255.254 > > > > > Will ip address 64.255.0.0 trigger a hit? > > No. > > > > > Will ip address 65.55.1.1 trigger a hit? > > Yes. > > > > > How do I test the incoming source address against the above rule and determine > >

Re: Excellent signature

From: "Guy Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Rob Unsworth wrote: > ---%<...snip... > > > > > To use that sig, I would be advocating the use of HTML in mail, as the > > mail itself or as an attachment. > > > > I oppose both. > > True that, but at least you don't have to go out and buy a new version of

Re: Excellent signature

From: "Guy Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Absolutely, PDF creates bloated documents that require a lot of CPU to compile > there output {It is just a variety of PostSCript}. Besides PDF documents are > not that easy to read from the console, are they. I used to have a job where I > maintained hand

Re: Excellent signature

I was speaking generically, Guy. Overriding the way the recipient wishes to view messages with sender's own preferences is not necessarily "communicating" what the sender wishes to communicate. Often it communicates arrogance and hostility (and sometimes an obsession with "cute".) {^_^} - Orig

Re: Excellent signature

From: "Guy Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Some people actualy get mail from sources outside of these lists for work. There IS an advantage to gray hair. I get to play Palace Guru to the company masses. For email I strongly recommend to management that documents should be zipped and attached that w

Re: Excellent signature

From: "Craig White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 18:09, jdow wrote: > > From: "Guy Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Some people actualy get mail from sources outside of these lists for work. > > > > There IS

Re: Firewall settings

Go to the ipmasquarade resource site. Copy down their two example firewalls. Both are proper implementations of what you have below. http://ipmasq.cjb.net/ {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 01:47:11 -0500, Buck wrote: > > > I j

Re: port 1 & 137

From: "Stephen Carville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sunday 26 January 2003 05:12 pm, Buck wrote: > > I was wondering what they might be. I think 137 could be the > microsoft > > messenger popup ads looking for victims, but I don't know what port > 1 > > http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-98.0

Re: port 1 & 137

From: "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? 1434 and 137. What bothers me is the number of ICMP probes coming through of late. That's unusual; and, I don't know what it is yet. They seem to be originating almost anywhere. {^_^} -- Psyche-l

Re: port 1 & 137

From: "Tom Diehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, jdow wrote: > > > From: "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > What ports are the popular ones for this attack we are under? > > > > 1434 and 137. What bothers me is th

Re: iptables strangeness

From: "Charles A. Crayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In building a script for my iptables commands, I find that if I enter > the command: > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o ppp+ -j MASQUERADE > > from a command prompt, then it executes correctly, but if I place the > identical co

Re: One To One NAT

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm trying to setup a Router using One to One NAT on RH 8. Anyone know if > > any good documents or ideas on how to do this? I'm assumingI will be > > using > > IPTables, just not sure how to do it all. > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. Eric, have you

Re: RE forward eth0 to ppp0

For that you need to setup NAT, masquerading. For this you need to setup iptables. This is actually a good thing to do when you connect to the internet, anyway. You cannot use ordinary routing because 10.2.0.0 will never propagate over most Internet routers because that is in one of several reserve

Re: rp-pppoe and firewall scripts

From: "Wolfgang Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The question is - adsl-start and adsl-connect call the firewall scripts > in /etc/ppp and these are using ipchains. > Do adsl-setupt modify the iptables also. So is my version of rp-pppoe to > old or do I have remove the calls to /etc/ppp/firewall.xxx

Re: OT: the whole SCO IP patent(s) mess

From: "Keith Winston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tom Georgoulias wrote: > > I'm kinda surprised that this hasn't come up on any of the Red Hat > > mailing lists I'm subscribed to, but does anyone have credible info on > > how much of an effect SCO's patent enforcement lawsuits would/could have > > on R

Re: OT: the whole SCO IP patent(s) mess

From: "Justin Zygmont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Keith, there is no product to buy, essentially. This is the action of a > > company in its death throes that owns some IP and was bought by lawyers. > > They are trying to milk the assets for anything they can get before the > > entire company is defu

Re: OT: the whole SCO IP patent(s) mess

SCO Group is the name that Caldera is moving towards using. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Martin Stricker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > jdow wrote: > > > Keith, there is no product to buy, essentially. This is the action of > > a company in its death throe

Re: Time Drift / Shift Problem - Please Help

I seem to remember a report of an interaction between the battery monitor tool and time of day. You might try disabling the battery monitor and see what happens. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Michael Kuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 13 Feb 2003, Charlie McVeigh wrote: > > > This is a rep

Re: Unsubscribe

- Original Message - From: "Jeff Starr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 14:16 PM Subject: Re: Unsubscribe > > Unsubscribe > How INCREDIBLY rude and stupid, Jeff. First you neglect the messages you received during the subscription process

Re: Internet Connection Sharing with Linux

From: "Tommy McNeely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BAD NEWS!! DO NOT USE THIS SITE! > > This was written for linux 2.2 using ipchains.. I suggest you do not use > this site .. at least not explicitly.. I am still searching for a decent > site that explains this using a recent version of linux. > > Tommy

Re: Internet Connection Sharing with Linux

From: "Carter, Shaun G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > yeah, I just noticed that. Sorry, don't ipchains commands work in iptables > though? I thought I remembered reading that somewhere. No. Nor are the two command NAT "solutions" at all secure. They do nothing to protect the NAT machine. The http://ipm

Re: C++

- Original Message - From: "Thomas Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:20 AM Subject: C++ > I had a question for a C++ programmer. Thought I might find one here :) > > > I have 2 classes that need t

Re: removal of System.map-*

Not if you also remove their associated kernels. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Quillen, Channon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Is there any reason to keep old versions of System.map? They are located in > /boot. > > -Channon > -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman

Re: Ext3 File System Check

> I really don't want to hear from you again, Mr. Schwendt, and if I do > I'll take the matter to the people that run the list. I hope I make > myself absolutely clear. > > John Lowell John, Michael is one of the helpful people on the list. If he says "read the man page" please take it serio

Re: Michael Schwendt

No, as I mentioned he is one of the finer members of this list. Your attitude, on the other hand, could adjust a little. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "John Lowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and > got back a lecture and

Re: Ext3 File System Check

Now read the freaking man page to find out which form is suitable for your system in case they are not identical in meaning. Seriously, John, what is wrong with consulting the documentation? {^_-} - Original Message - From: "John Lowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > >O

Re: Ext3 File System Check

rying franticly to > >get something working under immense pressure. Otherwise I'd be rather > >tempted to lace into you quite nastily for your arrogance. > > > >{^_^} > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting, jdow, but I rather saw him, and now you, as a bother. > Kindly never write me here again or I'll contact the list manager. > > John Lowell -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: And Now Hate Mail?

> As Glinda, the Good Witch of the North once said, "Be gone! You have no > power here." Camron, don't feed the troll. {^_^} -- Psyche-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Re: Ext3 File System Check

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *i'm* the one who, on a regular basis, tees off on folks > who post in HTML or (my favorite pet peeve) use really > worthless, content-free subjects like "help", or "need help" > or "REALLY, REALLY, REALLY NEED HELP". > > i've worked hard to earn

Re: And Now Hate Mail?

> Normally I keep my mouth shut, but this is too much. My Brother is an > RHCE, and will not answer my questions until I've exhausted all > available resources. If you have not tried your very best to find the > answer, then dont expect someone to just hand it to you on a silver > platter.(its

Re: SpamAssassin and sm-client

From: "Arthur Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I will treat spamassassin and the sm-client issue separately. > > About sm-client. We checked our /etc/hosts and we are very sure > we have this down correctly. Since it is an internal private network for > now, we set the hostname in /etc/sysconfig/net

Re: Problem with IPtables

From: "Tomas Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -i lo -s $UNIVERSE -d $UNIVERSE -j ACCEPT > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -i $INTIF -s $INTNET -d $UNIVERSE -j ACCEPT > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -i $EXTIF -s $INTNET -d $UNIVERSE -j drop-and-log-it > $IPTABLES -A INPUT -i $EXTIF -p ICMP -s $UNIVERSE -d

Re: Default Nic?

check out "/etc/modules.conf". It declares which is eth0 and which is eth1. You CAN fudge this. Then check the settings in /etc/system-config/network. Don't let "fiber" fool you into thinking there is something special here. Once the fiber card is appearing in ifconfig the rest of the of the setup

Re: Best way to update to RH9 from 8.0 ?

From: "Cédric Chausson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello all, > > I am interested in updating to RH9. I have two options : > > _ Doing a full install > _ Doing an update instal > > Up until now I have always used the full install option and not the > update possibility. But I have installed a lot of pr

Re: ntp sync'ing

From: "Mike Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Quite assuredly. Unless you are coupled to a GPS clock of some sort the > > local host should be setup as running at stratum 10 if it is "end of the > > l

Re: ntp sync'ing

From: "Powell, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > First, look at this article (if you haven't already): > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054 > > Next, you may want to take a look at this whitepaper: > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314054 Ron, the

Re: ntp sync'ing

Ah - after scanning that document I am happy I am using "NIST TimeSet". It is a proper full NTP implementation rather than the simplified version MS implemented. It is also not quite so "fussy" about stratum issues. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Powell, Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Woo

Re: Firewall Probs.

Are you making the changes as root? (Of course, the best tools are knowledge and an editor vi(m) or emacs or your choice. {^_-}) {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Stephen H Carbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have tried to change my security settings, but it doesn't "take" ... if I > change t

Re: Firewall Probs.

d recently try "/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables restart". Of course, if you are using IPChains then change names to protect the guilty. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Stephen H Carbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 10:15 PM 10/25/2002, jdow wrote: > >Are you makin

Re: Firewall Probs.

From: "Kevin McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- Stephen H Carbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How and what do I need to edit manually to disable > > the firewall? > > If you want to completely disable the firewall, you > have a few choices. If you feel more comfortable with > graphical too

Re: Undelete command

From: "Stephen Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On KDE Konqueror if I accidental delete a file or directory how can I > recover it (undelete) Stephen, for some one at your level of expertise the answer is basically, "There is no way." With any OS of the level of complexity of Windows NT, Linux, BSD, or

Re: Undelete command

Well, give 'em a try. Ext2 is Ext3 plus a journal. Or do they simply refuse to run if the journal is present? (If you've written much of anything to the disk since you deleted the files recovery COULD be iffy. Try anything you can as soon as you can while preventing writes to the disk with the del

Re: IPCHAINS modules to unload and IPTABLES modules to load.

service ipchains stop# Stop IPChains that may be running now. service iptables on # Start IPTables now. chkconfig ipchains off # Stop IPChains from running on boot up. chkconfig iptables on# Start IPTables on boot up. That should be all there is to it. If you want more information

Re: IPCHAINS modules to unload and IPTABLES modules to load.

From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > and which iptables modules load so I can finally do > > "service iptables start". > > It will load ip_tables and a few others automatically. Unfortunately, once iptables is running it doesn't stop as easily as ipchains. {^_-}

Re: IPCHAINS modules to unload and IPTABLES modules to load.

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > # chkconfig --level 0123456 ipchains off (turn off auto start) > # service ipchains stop (stop ipchains) > # rmmod ipchains (unload the module) > # rpm -e ipchains (if you're SURE :-) > > # insmod ip_tables (insmod or modprobe?) > # chkcon

Re: IPCHAINS modules to unload and IPTABLES modules to load.

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > =>On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Taylor, ForrestX wrote: > => > =>> Robert P. J. Day wrote: > =>> > as part of a tutorial i'm writing on iptables, here's what i've listed -- > =>> > feedback is appreciated. > =>> > > =>> > to switch

Re: firewall configurator.

From: "Alejandro González Hernández - Imoq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I sucessfully migrated from ipchains to iptables, but now I am having a > hard time in setting up the iptables firewall script. > > I used to edit /etc/sysconfig/ipchains by hand, since I am familiar with > it, but iptables is a who

Re: IPCHAINS modules to unload and IPTABLES modules to load.

May I humbly request PLAIN TEXT EMAIL, PRETTY PLEASE! That tiny font of yours is s little rough on my ageing eyes.   Thank you. {o.o}  Plain text stops me from responding to you with         accurate data obscured by white on white text.   - Original Message - From: "Cochran Robert

Re: cdrecord obsolete

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Also, amost no changes will be backported to 1.10. Any bug > >reporter are asked to try the latest alpha. I think alpha is a > >poor name for the code. It much beter than alpha usually > >implies. > > Regardless, it is named an 'alpha' release, and as

Re: security level not changing

From: "w" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > redhat-config-securitylevel is a front end for lokkit. lokkit is a > > write-only app--it does not initialize itself to your current > > configuration, it always starts the same way. So it's not a very good > > way to see what your current config is. > > > > Use

Re: how do I get off this email list?!!!! AHHHH!!! HELP!!!

Read the entire messages you are quoting. That will tell you. Because of the way you asked I am loathe to help you. It seems your attitude is its own reward. Hint: Read the Red Hat supplied footer for this message, read the full message headers on this message, or actually READ the helpful message

Re: How do I get off this email list!!

From: "Joe Klemmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm sorry but you are far to stupid to be taken off the list. > Since you are a total idiot, it is your fate to be permanently subscribed > to the list. Especially since you did the most asinine thing of sending > this email multiple times to the list. I

Re: How do I get off this email list!!

And here you didn't get the pun, intentional or not. Is this an indication of illiteracy or merely lack of tolerance for someone else being frustrated by an idiot? Now, just who's the "DUMBASS"? {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Nathan Stahlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ya know...you are no

Re: How do I get off this email list!!

From: "Basil L. Copeland Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 01:46 PM 11/5/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > > I'm sorry but you are far to stupid to be taken off the list. > >Since you are a total idiot, it is your fate to be permanently subscribed > >to the list. > > LOL (though I see you are g

Re: How do I get off this email list!!

From: "Joe Klemmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I love the way you 'allowed' as "aloud"... > > Hey, if the spell checker doesn't flag it then it goes through. > As anyone who's been on any of the RH lists since the 2.1 days knows, I > can't spell anything with more than one litter in it. I just wi

Re: No can spell I (was: Re: How do I get off this email list!!)

From: "Joe Klemmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Back in the old Fidonet days a friend of mine had an echo that was > quite fun to play in. We'd pick different rules, like you can only post > messages in the thread that are two or more syllables or you have to post > sentences where the words are in alp

Re: issues with KVM switches

From: "Paul Hamm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Common problem that I have seen with low end KVMs and some not so low end > ones. It is not a Linux issue but a hardware issue. I have found that some > systems (PCs) work better, may be signal strength, than others. Also some > KVMs work better than othe

Re: issues with KVM switches

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For those using/needing/wanting KVM switches... think again... > > http://synergy2.sourceforge.net > > Synergy2 is a completley free open source software solution that > can do almost everything a KVM can do, only over the network. > One drawback b

Re: OT:UK/US spelling [was: How do I get off this email list!!]

But then, some people notice the family heritage and say "Deadly Nightshade". (Ah, the shame of a life without marinara sauce or decent pizzas.) {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Iain Buchanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 15:57 PM Subjec

Re: IBM packed decimal format conversion utilities

Hm, a simple (A)REXX program could solve this. Of course, I suppose that means someone somewhere could also use perl, python, dylan, or one of the other absurdities abounding in this world. (The real challenge would be to write the conversion in BASH's scripting language. There's a slim chance it

Re: cdrecord obsolete

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote: > > >Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 09:52:31 -0500 > >From: Rinaldi J. Montessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > > > > > > >> Other alternatives are freshrpms.net, rpmfind.net, freshmeat.net > >

Re: strange e-mail from root

And looking up that 211.101.254.226 address gives: --8<-- # dig 226.254.101.211.in-addr.arpa. ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> 226.254.101.211.in-addr.arpa. ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2931 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY:

Re: strange e-mail from root

From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:24:14PM -0800, jdow wrote: > > The Chinese are at it again, either second hand through a hacked host or > > first hand. > > I don't think that's called for in this forum. After all,

Re: strange e-mail from root

ck individual addresses I simply leave all addresses blocked and open one or two specific addresses. Life's easier that way. {^_-} {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Cochran Robert L (NO)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have to agree with jdow also. I'm getting hit w

Re: home lan

Tony, the best approach, from my experience, is to find a spare machine, say an old 75 MHz Pentium, and set it up with a pair of NICs as your firewall and network gateway using NAT. That will hide all your other serious machines behind some level of protection. This will allow for gadgets such as n

Re: unsubscribe

Please find a way to read the full messages or at least the full headers to the messages. The address to use for requests is there for the reading. --8<-- From the headers List-Unsubscribe: , --

Re: unsubscribe

It didn't work for him because he threw away the password he used and cannot remember it, I bet. {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Gerry Tool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Eddie Armstrong wrote: > > I've tried doing this on the web site but it hasn't worked - please > > unsubscribe me > > It work

Re: imapd information

Have you tried "cd /usr/share/doc/imap*"? {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Nadeem Bitar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Where can I get more information/documentation regarding the imapd > included with Redhat 8.0? > What are other people running for IMAP servers? -- Psyche-list mailing list

Re: Sayonara (Was - Re: Dist. Suggestions)

Amazing, someone got under Mike's collar. I wonder who could bozo well enough to manage that? {O.O} From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, David Durst wrote: > > >> A full install does not install every single RPM package. There > >> is a reason for that. > > > >Sound

Re: Dist. Suggestions

From: "David Durst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:39, David Durst wrote: > > > >> I will not bother to respond to you comment about being pointless and > >> counterproductive discussion, just refer to the above about NOT > >> READING THE ORIGINAL POST. > > > > Dave, I have been

Re: Unremovable File

More likely, Thomas, he has a problem with his hardware. It sounds like his file system is hosed completely. I had this problem long ago with an Adaptec SCSI card back when the 2940 was a brandy spanky new product. It could not exist in a system that also had IDE disks. The IDE transfers would get

Re: iptables -P INPUT REJECT

From: "David Durst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>But then again you may want to think twice about using a DEFAULT DROP > >> firewall, DEFAULT DROP uses alot of resources for packets you might > >> just be able to ignore. > > > > That is false. > > > > DROP means "drop this packet on the floor and do no

Re: NAT

s 98. How can I set up the NAT to share my > internet. I do not know anything about NAT except that windows did it > automatically for me. Thanks for any help. Joshua, a slightly more ambitious firewall/NAT configuration exists on my web site: URL: http://home.earthlink.net/~jdow/iptabl

Re: Stateful firewalling for fun and profit

I have some details and quibbles, Dax. First there is no iptables DENY rule. This is now "DROP". From the netfilter web site: "The DENY target is now DROP, finally." This rule simply drops the packet on the floor and does nothing at all with it. Second, more amplification of the above from the ne

Re: Why you should not buy Promise products if you use Linux

From: "JUSTIN GERRY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Then again I probably should have stuck with RedHat's software based > RAID, I've had a server running that for over a year with no ? problems to > date. Justin, I have a quibble with your statement there. You are making an improper assumption. It is the

Re: smb.conf file - Solved :)

From: "Neil Loffhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I know I only recently posted the below message, but thought it > good top > post the solution that I stumbled across. I did another try in the > windows network neighbourhood and got a different message, about "No > service is operating at the destina

Re: iptables interface eth0:1 does not work

From: "Jack Bowling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ** Reply to message from Hidemasa Yamakawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 06 > Dec 2002 10:16:19 -0500 > > > > Hi, all, > > > > I assigned 2 ip address to one ethernet card. > > One is eth0 and another is eth0:1. > > INPUT and FORWARD policy is DROP > > When

Re: SSH with TCP Wrappers

sshd is not a tcpwrappers/xinetd thing. Delete the file you created and issue the command "service sshd start". If sshd is installed on your system this should be all it takes to get it running. However, running is not enough. You may also need to open a hole for it in your firewall if you have on

Re: SSH with TCP Wrappers

From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Friday 06 December 2002 14:38, jdow wrote: > > sshd is not a tcpwrappers/xinetd thing. Delete the file you > > created and issue the command "service sshd start". If sshd > > is installed on your s

Re: Dynamic E-Mail Signatures

From: "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Around Fri,Dec 13 2002, at 11:53, Jonathan M. Slivko, wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I noticed that Rick and a few other people are using dynamic e-mail signatures > >for this list, I was wondering how I can do the same using Evolution. Please let > >me know, thanks.

Re: Macromedia Flash plugin 6 released for x86 Linux

From: "David Durst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hey I don't like the crap anymore than you. What I am saying is that > about 75% of my friends are web developers. Of as late most of the > requests the > have been getting are for full FLASH sites. :( Just so long as your friends are nice enough people

Re: OT exam question

From: "David Sudjiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, faisal gillani wrote: > > 1 write a one line command to create a directory > > called dir1 to move into it list its content & @ last > > print your working directory "all in one line ?" > > mkdir dir1 && find ./dir1 && pwd > > >

Re: OT exam question

From: "Douglas K. Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 12:56 AM 12/17/2002, jdow wrote: > >From: "David Sudjiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, faisal gillani wrote: > > > > 2 wat type of network topology do we

Re: Macromedia Flash plugin 6 released for x86 Linux

From: "Kevin McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123" > > I haven't been bitten by that one yet, but you'd be > > surprised how many > > sites use Javascript. Lynx doesn't handle that at > > all. The Gnome > > Accessibility Project is coming along, so I sh

Re: Macromedia Flash plugin 6 released for x86 Linux

From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 19 December 2002 07:35, Kevin McConnell uttered: > > But my point being that, we all know you wouldn't be > > very happy if you went and visited a site that you > > couldn't know what was going on simply because > > everything there was graph

Re: umask is different in 8.0

Well, grasshopper, one must examine such files as .bashrc and .bash_profile in one's home directory for hints. (I believe I'd use .bash_profile for exporting the umask value. If I am off track someone will assuredly grasshopper me.) {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Eric Wood" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Macromedia Flash plugin 6 released for x86 Linux

Ah yes, you are another friend restricted to lynx or flakey screen readers. Important things should be accessible to the greatest extent possible in text only modes as the most universally accessible mode. {^_^} (I'm vain enough I want EVERYONE to have access to my genius. {O,o} Ack! Plb

Re: Adding an 80G Seagate IDE drive....

Tell the BIOS to boot from the first SCSI drive. This is always a SCSI option not a Linux option. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Bob Parry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RH 8.0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 17:35 PM Subject: RE: Adding an 80G Seagate IDE drive >

Re: ip_conntrack_ftp

From: "Chris Kloiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 15:40, Tommy McNeely wrote: > > > > my question.. which everyone keeps sorta dancing around :) > > > > is how do I make it load automatically at system boot time... will just > > specifying the options in /etc/modules.conf work fo

Re: SpamAssassin install issues Redhat 8.0

I take that as a broad hint you already have a SpamAssassin running and need to remove it before installing the new one. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Bret Chrismer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:46 PM Subject: SpamAssassin install issu

Re: Security level configuration

The design of the firewall setting program is somewhat funkity. It ALWAYS comes up showing you with IT thinks you SHOULD be using for your firewall configuration not what you are actually using. This is a known bug. It should have a button somewhere to "Show Current Configuration". {^_^} - Ori

Re: Error to recompile Kernel 2.4.18-14

For what it is worth the last two kernels that appeared in the 7.2 updates would not compile "straight out of the box" here. There seemed to be missing include files. I figure there is a missing file or some other idiot problem I have not had time to troubleshoot. {^_^} - Original Message

Re: Firewall

http://www.netfilter.org aka http://www.iptables.org-->> About IPTables http://ipmasq.cjb.net/ -->> About masquerading Ignore anything that is ipchains. Use iptables. {^_^} - Original Message - > HOW-TO iptables > > > > Hi, All! > > I'm using RedHat 8

Re: Firewall

"rpm -e ipchains" might be a good start. Then turn to iptables and do not look back. If you want to leave ipchains on your system for whatever silly reason you may have (trust me, it is silly even if it doesn't seem that way) then "service ipchains stop" should turn the trick. Leave it stopped. Do

Re: Ipchains

I still prefer "rpm -e ipchains". Luke. I suppose stopping it first would be a Martha Stewart thing. {^_-} - Original Message - From: "Lucas Albers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Iptables is the default for Redhat 8.0 > Ipchains is default for 7.3 > > #clear all rules > iptables -F > service ip

Re: home lan

be far better of (not to mention all the control > >> that you will > >> gain,,e.g Samba, SSH, vnc etc) to have a running real router via *nix > >> than one of those home appliances. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 14:15, Chris

Re: home lan

From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, jdow wrote: > > > From: "Dale Kosan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Just for the record, most of the lower price dsl/routers also do port > > > forwarding so you

  1   2   >