Am 20.10.2011 04:04, schrieb Svoop:
> Mail clients such as Outlook breach standards by translating "Re" e.g. to "AW"
> (German short for "Antwort"). This results in cascades such as "Re: AW: Re:
> AW:
> Hello World" as a message goes hence and forth. I've written a simple
> header_check which sa
> Do you want to REJECT all emails containing an attachment? Or do you
> want to remove the attachment and let the message go trough?
Thanks for the reply.
Preferably reject but removing the attachment might be acceptable.
Ian
Zitat von Noel Jones :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/2011 9:04 PM, Svoop wrote:
Mail clients such as Outlook breach standards by translating
"Re" e.g. to "AW" (German short for "Antwort"). This results in
cascades such as "Re: AW: Re: AW: Hello World" as a message
goes
> Preferably reject but removing the attachment might be acceptable.
Well, this seems to have done it:
/name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
How embarrassingly simple.
Sorry for the noise.
On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> I agree and that's exactly my current solution, but I have some
>> questions regarding how I'm doing that. Without repeating myself, can
>> you please have a look at my configuration in the mail that originated
>> this thread and comment on my solution?
>
* Svoop :
> Mail clients such as Outlook breach standards by translating "Re" e.g. to "AW"
> (German short for "Antwort"). This results in cascades such as "Re: AW: Re:
> AW:
> Hello World" as a message goes hence and forth. I've written a simple
> header_check which sanitizies this madness:
>
>
* Ian Masters :
> > Preferably reject but removing the attachment might be acceptable.
>
> Well, this seems to have done it:
>
> /name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
That's wrong syntax...
/name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
means:
"name" followed by an arbitrary number of "="
fol
> That's wrong syntax...
>
> /name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
>
> means:
>
> "name" followed by an arbitrary number of "="
> followed by an arbitrary number of "."
>
> You probably meant:
>
> /name=/ REJECT no attachments allowed
Thanks for pointing that out. I wonder why it worked .
* Ian Masters :
> > That's wrong syntax...
> >
> > /name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
> >
> > means:
> >
> > "name" followed by an arbitrary number of "="
> > followed by an arbitrary number of "."
> >
> > You probably meant:
> >
> > /name=/ REJECT no attachments allowed
>
> Thanks for
> Except when an attachment does not have a name. Eg inline images in a html
> email.
>
> Sorry about the top post.. my current mail client leaves much to be desired.
ah, that's interesting ... the inline part anyway ... thanks
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
[..]
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix, whose
> > first lines clearly mention the flaws you're system will run into
> > (generate backscatter, for instance)
>
Hello,
Just to add that Thawte has changed the certificat chain with wildcard
certificate. Now, there is a new intermediate CA that you have to add in
the chain.
So, if you are in a case of certificate renewal, it can be "normal" that
the old process you've used last time didn't work for now
Hi,
I've configured Postfix to do header_checks on all incoming mail.
The header_checks check if the To: address is one in the header_checks file
and then do an action (FILTER in my case)
I had to do the filtering this way because I was not able to get 2
content_filtering working the on the same
Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
On 20/10/11 12:08, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 19/10/11 21:00, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/sp
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
> I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
It looks quite good (at least to me as a native german).
> On 20/10/11 12:08, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> > On Th
On 10/20/2011 4:07 AM, Ian Masters wrote:
>> That's wrong syntax...
>>
>> /name=*\.*/ REJECT no attachments allowed
>>
>> means:
>>
>> "name" followed by an arbitrary number of "="
>> followed by an arbitrary number of "."
>>
>> You probably meant:
>>
>> /name=/ REJECT no attachments allowed
>
> T
On 10/20/2011 5:22 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've configured Postfix to do header_checks on all incoming mail.
> The header_checks check if the To: address is one in the
> header_checks file and then do an action (FILTER in my case)
>
> I had to do the filtering this way because I was
Hi,
still in the topic of trying to deliver email to a Dovecot public folder
I resort to use Dovecot deliver. I still used virtual, but with the
following in main.cf
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
virtual_mailbox_domains = shared.folder
virtual_transport = dovecot
then I defined in
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:18:01 +0530
"J. Bakshi" wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:31:30 +0200
> mouss wrote:
>
> > Le 12/10/2011 12:01, J. Bakshi a écrit :
> > > [snip]
> > >>
> > >> set the restriction before permit i.e
> > >>
> > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > > check_recipient_a
Hi Noel,
Sorry, but that is not working.
The first filter (Disclaimer), caps the message to a tempfile. The last
sendmail command put that file and sends the message back to the
queuemanager.
I tried all, but doesn't seem to work. That's why I did it that way, but
that doesn't explain why mails
Simone Piccardi:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> still in the topic of trying to deliver email to a Dovecot public folder
> I resort to use Dovecot deliver. I still used virtual, but with the
> following in main.cf
>
> dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
> virtua
On 20/10/11 13:07, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Hello Dennis, thank for your comments, they are much appreciated.
>> I hope I understand enough to formulate a valid reply.
>
> It looks quite good (at least to me as a native german).
I w
On 10/20/2011 7:08 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> Sorry, but that is not working.
>
> The first filter (Disclaimer), caps the message to a tempfile. The
> last sendmail command put that file and sends the message back to
> the queuemanager.
>
> I tried all, but doesn't seem to work.
On 10/20/2011 7:02 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>> an alternative (that will also work for mail submitted via the sendmail
>>> comand) is to use transport_maps:
>>>
>>> nore...@example.com error:...
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that if you don't want to receive errors for such mail, then you
>>> should use a "null s
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 7:08 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > Sorry, but that is not working.
> >
> > The first filter (Disclaimer), caps the message to a tempfile. The
> > last sendmail command put that file and sends the message back to
I'm considering if I should enable opportunistic TLS on our smtp
gateways. Our gateways are known by several DNS names, so I think it
will be difficult to use certificates signed by a "reputable" CA.
It seems safe enough to enable smtp_tls_security_level=may, but how
do other mailservers behave i
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:40:57PM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> I'm considering if I should enable opportunistic TLS on our smtp
> gateways. Our gateways are known by several DNS names, so I think it
> will be difficult to use certificates signed by a "reputable" CA.
>
> It seems safe enou
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:44:03AM -0500, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
> I would think that a SAN cert with all the names of the gateways
> listed should work and is available from most "reputabble" CA's.
Yes, you're right, and then there are cheap wildcard certs too -- but
that adds maintenance. Will
Hi all
I'm using the Postfix mail server and I have 6 IPs available. I'd like to
make each mail domain use different ip address. Is that possible with
postfix and how can I implement this??
Regards
Am 20.10.2011 16:09, schrieb Jan-Frode Myklebust:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:44:03AM -0500, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>>
>> I would think that a SAN cert with all the names of the gateways
>> listed should work and is available from most "reputabble" CA's.
>
> Yes, you're right, and then there are
On 10/20/2011 8:40 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> I'm considering if I should enable opportunistic TLS on our smtp
> gateways.
Good idea. Opportunistic TLS is good for preventing eavesdropping.
> Our gateways are known by several DNS names, so I think it
> will be difficult to use certificate
On 10/20/2011 8:33 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> I have a script for adding disclaimers to all outgoing email. (see
> disclaimer-script below)
> The line, "cat >in.$$ ||", caps the message in a tempfile. the last
> sendmail command takes the message and sends it to qmrg.
Change the sendmail comma
Amira Othman:
> Hi all
>
> I'm using the Postfix mail server and I have 6 IPs available. I'd like to
> make each mail domain use different ip address. Is that possible with
> postfix and how can I implement this??
You also want the right domain name in "sorry your mail could not
be delivered" mes
While a user gets a fairly meaningful message when something is bounced
because they hit message_size_limit, admins running the server don't seem
to:
A user gets:
: message size 18302670 exceeds size limit
5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.com[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
The admin only gets to see:
Sep 1
Am 20.10.2011 21:33, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> A user gets:
> : message size 18302670 exceeds size limit
> 5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.com[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
>
> The admin only gets to see:
> Sep 19 14:15:43 zcs7-ga postfix/smtpd[23718]: connect from
> unknown[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
> Sep 19 14:15
--On Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:42 PM +0200 Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 20.10.2011 21:33, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
A user gets:
: message size 18302670 exceeds size limit
5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.com[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
The admin only gets to see:
Sep 19 14:15:43 zcs7-ga postfix/smtp
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:42 PM +0200 Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 20.10.2011 21:33, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
A user gets:
: message size 18302670 exceeds size limit
5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.com[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
The admin only gets to see:
Sep 19 14:15
On Thursday 20 October 2011 14:48:30 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:42 PM +0200 Reindl Harald
>
> wrote:
> > Am 20.10.2011 21:33, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> A user gets:
> >> : message size 18302670 exceeds size
> >> limit 5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> While a user gets a fairly meaningful message when something is bounced
> because they hit message_size_limit, admins running the server don't seem
> to:
>
> A user gets:
>
> : message size 18302670 exceeds size limit
> 5024000 of server zcs7-ga.qa.qalab.com[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
Am 20.10.2011 21:48, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:42 PM +0200 Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>> how should this work? the server does NOT know why the
>> CLIENT is closing the connection
>
> The server is the one rejecting the mail because it passed a limit set in
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:49 PM
>
> >> Is there any way to customize the error message logged by postfix so
> >> admins viewing the postfix lo
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> unknown[xx.xx.xx.xxx]
> >> Sep 19 14:15:43 zcs7-ga postfix/smtpd[23718]: lost connection after EHLO
.,.
> The server is the one rejecting the mail because it passed a limit set in
> postfix.
No, the CLIENT hangs up after sending EHLO. The server rejects nothing.
--On Thursday, October 20, 2011 4:11 PM -0400 "Grobe, Tony"
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:49 PM
>> Is there any way to customize the error me
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:44:16PM +0900, Ian Masters wrote:
> Is it possible to block all attachments with postfix? I'm using
> /etc/postfix/mime_header_checks but I can't seem to block all attachments,
> especially ones without file suffixes.
Be careful what you wish for: The question of what i
* Grobe, Tony :
> If the client uses EHLO and the server response includes a SIZE
> statement, the client will often disconnect without issuing a command
> because it knows the message is undeliverable. In this case, the server
> has no information to log about why this happened.
This also happen
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:13:48 -0500
Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 7:02 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> >>> an alternative (that will also work for mail submitted via the sendmail
> >>> comand) is to use transport_maps:
> >>>
> >>> nore...@example.com error:...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Note that if yo
46 matches
Mail list logo
