-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
how can I take control of quota in the field "mailQuotaSize" using postfix?
Best Regards
- --
..
Eduardo Costa
Centro de Comunicações - Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
raposo at ipb.pt
http://www
..@coders-heaven.org> >,
> relay=mail.my-domain.org[78.46.212.11]:25, delay=0.03, delays=0.03/0/0/0,
> dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for mail.my-domain.org loops back to
> myself)
Fix your $mydestination setting to include all variants of my-domain.org
for that MX records exist.
Hi,
I've got a problem with my Postfix.
The emails I try to send are all bounced because of this failure message:
Feb 5 09:18:50 mail postfix/smtp[4659]: warning: host
mail.my-domain.org[78.46.212.11]:25 greeted me with my own hostname
my-domain.org
Feb 5 09:18:50 mail postfix/smtp[4659]: wa
* Eduardo Costa :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> how can I take control of quota in the field "mailQuotaSize" using postfix?
You can't with Postfix. Postfix LDAs don't support quotas.
Use Dovecot's deliver LDA or maildrop if you use Courier or ...
p...@ri
In case anyone else hits this problem, my issue was as follows:
1. 'owner_request_special' was enabled (by default)
2. My MySQL-based 'alias_maps' succeeded for all addresses, including
those with an 'owner-' prefix. This was by design, as the query is
dynamic--intended to parse addresses and
Hi,
I've been running postfix under SuSE now for several years. I keep
up to date with SuSE by every now and then moving everything across
to a newly installed machine (git repository for config, and rsync
for data). This time something has gone wrong which prevents
fetchmail sending to postfix.
Paul Gardiner wrote:
Hi,
I've been running postfix under SuSE now for several years. I keep
up to date with SuSE by every now and then moving everything across
to a newly installed machine (git repository for config, and rsync
for data). This time something has gone wrong which prevents
fetchmai
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running postfix under SuSE now for several years. I keep
> up to date with SuSE by every now and then moving everything across
> to a newly installed machine (git repository for config, and rsync
> for data). This time something has gone wrong which prevents
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:58:17AM -0500, Doug Jaquays wrote:
>
>> > - The "pickup" fifo has been deleted from /var/spool/postfix/public
>> >
>> >Make sure $queue_directory contains a private/pickup fifo.
>>
>> This
Hello,
I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, openssl req
-new -nodes -keyout privatekey.pem -out privatekey.pem -days 1825 and
openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out publiccert.pem -infiles privatekey.pem
, copied the key and cert under /etc/ssl/private and /etc/s
* Tolga :
> I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, openssl
> req -new -nodes -keyout privatekey.pem -out privatekey.pem -days 1825 and
> openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out publiccert.pem -infiles
> privatekey.pem , copied the key and cert under /etc/ssl/private and
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Paul Gardiner wrote:
Hi,
I've been running postfix under SuSE now for several years. I keep
up to date with SuSE by every now and then moving everything across
to a newly installed machine (git repository for config, and rsync
for data). This time something has
Paul Gardiner wrote:
Oh, yes I did. Sorry. I was in such a hurry. I hadn't realised quite how
much I rely on all this working flawlessly, as it has for years, until
this recent misconfiguration I must have done. Thanks for responding
so quickly.
And in a hurry again, I forgot the output of pos
*test*
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
>> You post a fetchmail log entry, but no Postfix ones.
>> A bit more clarification of what Postfix is doing may help us help you.
>
> Ah right. I have a simpler test without using fetchmail now (
> I've substituted host.domain for the from
Apologies again for contacting the list when I hadn't exhausted my own
tests. Thing was, when I sent the first message, I was completely at
a loss.
Paul Gardiner wrote:
Feb 5 15:12:34 glidos postfix/smtpd[15222]: connect from localhost[::1]
Feb 5 15:12:34 glidos postfix/smtpd[15222]: NOQUEUE
Paul Gardiner wrote:
> Has postfix just recently been updated to use IPv6 when present?
>
>From http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html:
The first new parameter is called inet_protocols. This specifies what
protocols Postfix will use when it makes or accepts network connections,
and also controls
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Paul Gardiner wrote:
Has postfix just recently been updated to use IPv6 when present?
From http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html:
The first new parameter is called inet_protocols. This specifies what
protocols Postfix will use when it makes or accepts netwo
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Tolga :
> > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca, openssl
> > req -new -nodes -keyout privatekey.pem -out privatekey.pem -days 1825 and
> > openssl ca -policy policy_anything -out publiccert.pem -
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 02:32:59AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I have a postfix making SQL queries
> >
> > > to PostgreSQL, and can see from postgresql logs that postfix does
> > > set client_encoding to 'LATIN1'
> > > How can I change that
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:42:33AM -0800, Damon Miller wrote:
> In case anyone else hits this problem, my issue was as follows:
>
> 1. 'owner_request_special' was enabled (by default)
>
> 2. My MySQL-based 'alias_maps' succeeded for all addresses, including
> those with an 'owner-' prefix. Th
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Doug Jaquays wrote:
> > Does:
> >
> > # postkick public pickup W
> >
> > move mail out of the queue in a more timely fashion?
>
> It does not seem to be anymore effective than mailq -q.
>
> Is there any more verbose logging that I can enable for thi
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Doug Jaquays wrote:
>
> > > Does:
> > >
> > > # postkick public pickup W
> > >
> > > move mail out of the queue in a more timely fashion?
> >
> > It does not seem to be anymore effective than mailq -q.
> >
> > Is there any more verb
* Tolga :
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > * Tolga :
> > > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca,
> > > openssl
> > > req -new -nodes -keyout privatekey.pem -out privatekey.pem -days 1825 and
> > > openssl ca -policy policy_any
Hi all!, I am new in the forum. Please excuse me for my bad English.
What I want to do is to set up a round-robin from the Postfix to various
exchange servers
| EXCH 1 (10.0.0.207)
Inet => Postfix |
| EXCH 2 (10.0.0.208)
Pablo Scheri:
>
> Hi all!, I am new in the forum. Please excuse me for my bad English.
>
> What I want to do is to set up a round-robin from the Postfix to various
> exchange servers
>
> | EXCH 1 (10.0.0.207)
> Inet => Postfix |
> | EXCH 2 (10.
Pablo Scheri wrote:
[...]
The problem is that when I send mails to the postfix, for example 1000
mails, It routes 990 to one of the exchange (10.0.0.208) and 10 to the other
one (10.0.0.207).
I alter the order of the A records to see if it changes, but did not.
In the maillog the only differe
Bj?rn Ruberg:
> Pablo Scheri wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
> > The problem is that when I send mails to the postfix, for example 1000
> > mails, It routes 990 to one of the exchange (10.0.0.208) and 10 to the other
> > one (10.0.0.207).
> > I alter the order of the A records to see if it changes, but did
Wietse Venema:
[ Charset UNKNOWN-8BIT unsupported, converting... ]
> Bj_rn Ruberg:
> > Pablo Scheri wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > > The problem is that when I send mails to the postfix, for example 1000
> > > mails, It routes 990 to one of the exchange (10.0.0.208) and 10 to the
> > > other
Hi, thanks for the quick answerd, the DNS is a local Bind.
the command : $ postconf smtp_randomize_addresses
tells me "YES"
In the DNS Zone I define only one MX, and I set 2 A registries for that MX name.
Thanks again!
> Subject: Re: Problems with Postfix / Round-Robin
> To: postfix-users@postf
Pablo Scheri:
>
> Hi, thanks for the quick answerd, the DNS is a local Bind.
> the command : $ postconf smtp_randomize_addresses
> tells me "YES"
>
> In the DNS Zone I define only one MX, and I set 2 A registries for that MX
> name.
>
Now read my other reply. Look in the maillog file for the
I
It is strange but I think I am using the 10.0.0.207 server only when the mail
is get delayed.
This is the log for a mail sent to the 10.0.0.208 server (from 100 mails
received 98 mails):
Jan 21 19:26:18 imsva postfix/smtp[12115]: BECA84E607:
to=,
relay=mx.trendargentina.com.ar[10.0.0.208]:25
Searched docs and archives and I'm not seeing it...
(postconf -n at end)
Situation:
changed config to:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_helo_hostname
This causes legitimate email servers to be rejected (with a
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
> Would some kind soul tell me what i am missing/mucking up here.
> I haven an almost bog standard aliases file in /etc the only changes I
> have made are (and yes I ran newaliases against it and the aliases.db
> looks OK) -
>
> root: postmaster+exam...@exam
Steve Lindemann wrote:
> Searched docs and archives and I'm not seeing it...
> (postconf -n at end)
>
> Situation:
>
> changed config to:
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_helo_hostname
See comments below.
> c
Paul Gardiner a écrit :
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Paul Gardiner wrote:
>>> Has postfix just recently been updated to use IPv6 when present?
>>>
>> From http://www.postfix.org/IPV6_README.html:
>> The first new parameter is called inet_protocols. This specifies what
>> protocols Postfi
Steve Lindemann a écrit :
> Searched docs and archives and I'm not seeing it...
> (postconf -n at end)
>
> Situation:
>
> changed config to:
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
> smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
> reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_helo_hostname
>
> This causes leg
Viktor Duchovni:
>
> It is bestter to leave owner_request_special enabled, and fix the SQL
> query to not synthesize unintended implicit owners. Your RT
integration
> may also need to be re-examined to see if it can be done more cleanly.
> [Perhaps an RT owned aliases file, ...].
>
> Someday you'
Pablo Scheri:
>
> It is strange but I think I am using the 10.0.0.207 server only when the mail
> is get delayed.
>
> This is the log for a mail sent to the 10.0.0.208 server (from 100 mails
> received 98 mails):
>
What is the output from:
dig mx mx.trendargentina.com.ar
Wietse
The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
warning: header To:
=?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva_=3Cclodoaldo=5F?=?
=?utf-8?q?pinto=40yahoo=2Ecom=2Ebr=3E?= from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1];
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
>
> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
> warning: header To:
> =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva_=3Cclodoaldo=5F?=?
> =?utf-8?q?pinto=40yahoo=2Ecom=2Ebr=3E?= from
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:54:39PM -0200, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto wrote:
> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
>
> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
> warning: header To:
> =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva_=3Cclodoaldo=5F?=
2009/2/5 Victor Duchovni :
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:54:39PM -0200, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto wrote:
>
>> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
>>
>> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
>> warning: header To:
>> =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C
2009/2/5 Wietse Venema :
> Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
>> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
>>
>> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
>> warning: header To:
>> =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva_=3Cclodoaldo=5F?=?
>> =?utf-8?q?pin
2009/2/5 Clodoaldo Pinto Neto :
> 2009/2/5 Victor Duchovni :
>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:54:39PM -0200, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto wrote:
>>
>>> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
>>>
>>> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
>>> warning: header To:
>>>
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
> 2009/2/5 Wietse Venema :
> > Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
> >> The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
> >>
> >> Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
> >> warning: header To:
> >> =?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva
Hello list,
I recently found out an unsolicited e-mail that caused high CPU
consumption by cyrus imap on different mailstores.
The poisoned e-mail has a structure of over 31.000 repetiions of these
4 lines in the header
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Magaly
R
First some background. What I am trying to do is write a script that
syslog can be piped into that will parse the maillog in real time and
insert the items into the database -- one row per queue ID (and possibly
one per recipient in another related table).
If there is any program that can do t
Hi Guys,
Why is it that whenever I send emails using yahoo/gmail from a
connection that uses dynamic ip address to the company's smtp server,
postfix blocks them and say it comes from a dynamic ip address using
sbl-xbl, and whenever I send emails using the same yahoo/gmail account
in the office th
Chris St Denis:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> First some background. What I am trying to do is write a script that
> syslog can be piped into that will parse the maillog in real time and
> insert the items into the database -- one row per queue ID (and possibly
> one per re
Carlos Horowicz:
> Hello list,
>
> I recently found out an unsolicited e-mail that caused high CPU
> consumption by cyrus imap on different mailstores.
> The poisoned e-mail has a structure of over 31.000 repetiions of these
> 4 lines in the header
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/html;
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of jan gestre
> Sent: Friday, 6 February 2009 12:16 PM
> To: postfix users list
> Subject: postfix blocking yahoo and gmail
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Why is it that whenever I send
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, jan gestre wrote:
> Why is it that whenever I send emails using yahoo/gmail from a
> connection that uses dynamic ip address to the company's smtp server,
> postfix blocks them and say it comes from a dynamic ip address using
> sbl-xbl, and whenever I send emails using the sam
I'm working on a DB environment integration with Postfix and have gotten
TCP dict lookups to function. Now, I'm working on mail delivery and am
trying to determine which method of mailbox delivery to take. I have a few
limitations in my application, but for the most part I'm open to all
methods.
Hi,
I have configured postfix postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8. all mail user are
getting forged mails as sender and recipient are same. we have
secondary mx i am sending both postconf output,
Please help me to stop forged mail.
Postconf -n of primary MTA
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_ma
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2009, jan gestre wrote:
>
>> Why is it that whenever I send emails using yahoo/gmail from a
>> connection that uses dynamic ip address to the company's smtp server,
>> postfix blocks them and say it comes from a dynamic ip addre
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of itsramesh_s
> Sent: Friday, 6 February 2009 4:25 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Sender-Recipient forged mail
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have configured postfix pos
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 07:43:38PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Tolga :
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > > * Tolga :
> > > > I am reading The Book of Postfix, I applied the steps CA.pl -newca,
> > > > openssl
> > > > req -new -nodes -keyout priv
MacShane, Tracy pisze:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of itsramesh_s
Sent: Friday, 6 February 2009 4:25 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Sender-Recipient forged mail
Hi,
I have configured postfix
59 matches
Mail list logo
