Den 31.01.2021 14:20, skrev natan:
Hi
For users who use spamcop in postfix RBL list. Domain is lost or has
been taken
https://t.co/4Skoy0JjmQ <https://t.co/4Skoy0JjmQ>
First: why the spammy look on your mail ? I mean
"Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transf
Hi
For users who use spamcop in postfix RBL list. Domain is lost or has been taken
https://t.co/4Skoy0JjmQ
On 2014-10-20 16:21, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Patrik B?t:
>> It seems like SpamCop has/had some problems, our reject for SpamCop
>> drops yesterday, anyone else that experience the same?
>>
>> https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91005
>
Patrik B?t:
> It seems like SpamCop has/had some problems, our reject for SpamCop
> drops yesterday, anyone else that experience the same?
>
> https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91005
This is the POSTFIX mailing list.
Wietse
On 2014-10-20 11:43, Patrik Båt wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> It seems like SpamCop has/had some problems, our reject for SpamCop
> drops yesterday, anyone else that experience the same?
>
> https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91005
>
> Snip:/
> //H
Hello!
It seems like SpamCop has/had some problems, our reject for SpamCop
drops yesterday, anyone else that experience the same?
https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=91005
Snip:/
//Hey All,//
//Just to let you know Spamcop is down, the "captcha" function is loo
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:24:33 -0500
Simon Brereton articulated:
> On Jan 19, 2012 7:13 PM, "Steve Fatula"
> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Robert Fitzpatrick
> >> To: Postfix
> >> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
> >> Subject: Spamcop l
On Jan 19, 2012 7:13 PM, "Steve Fatula" wrote:
>>
>> From: Robert Fitzpatrick
>> To: Postfix
>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
>> Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?
>>
>> Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a maili
From: Robert Fitzpatrick
>To: Postfix
>Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 1:12 PM
>Subject: Spamcop listed gmail?
>
>Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
>the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
>others. Got tw
On 17 Jan 2012, at 8:20, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 1/17/2012 2:08 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
why do you use spamcop ?
Why wouldn't I?
Because it has a long-running tendency to intermittently list various
major "legitimate" freemail outlet points. This is not a new beha
On 1/17/2012 2:08 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> why do you use spamcop ?
Why wouldn't I?
--
Robert
On 1/16/2012 2:28 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> "We recommend that when using any spam filtering method, users be given
> access to the filtered mail - don't block the mail as documented here,
> but store it in a separate mailbox. Or tag it and provide users
> documentation so that they can filter bas
Am 16.01.2012 20:12, schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick:
> Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
> the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
> others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
> users and both
count as google but percentual
90% junk
Still they are ignorant and I report daily about one of their mails to
spamcop. I tried contacting their abuse@, I tried to contact listowner
etc but
I still receive mailing list I never asked for. And this is their
problem if they do not report spam
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:22:41 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
No, permit_dnswl_client isn't the right solution for the OP in this
case.
its a free world :-)
yep sure one could skip dnsbl from freemail domains if wanted that way
Am 16.01.2012 22:22, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing "the world".
>>> See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client
>>
>> h
On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing "the world".
>> See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_dnswl_c
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:34 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
the mail delivering to you once the dnslbl stops listing "the world".
See: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_rbl_client
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_dnswl_client
http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:48 -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Jan 16 13:52:25 mx1 postfix/smtpd[72538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com[209.85.214.175]: 554 5.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [209.85.214.175] blocked using
bl.spamcop.net;
Blocked - see http://www.
On 1/16/2012 1:12 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
> the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
> others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
> users and both
Perhaps this is not the place for this, I didn't find a mailing list on
the spamcop site and just looking to see if this is experienced by
others. Got two calls this morning, both not receiving mail from gmail
users and both being blocked by my usage of 'reject_rbl_client
bl.spamcop.ne
t; Hmm, what is his experience? Not much complaints? hmm..
>
> One more thing I learned from keeping BL for Estonia. I do process spam
> and make BL or "list". I do not make rules how others should use the
> list. Same about spamcop. They keep list. How one uses this list is
>
nd make BL or "list". I do not make rules how others should use the
list. Same about spamcop. They keep list. How one uses this list is
decicion of mailhost. If mailhost decides to trust it (what I do), then
mailhost decicion is to DROP, REJECT, ACCEPT or react somehow different.
Sorry
Ok, I agree with /dev/rob0 , this has gone way off topic for this list.
All of us are free to handle spam as we decide to do it, if Dennis
wants to block @yahoo.* @gmail.com @hotmail.com , that's his decision.
In my case, the amount of spam I receive from these domains is
minimal (and is catch by
> On 17/11/2011 14:39, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
>>
>> tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on
>> the
>> school domain. Also, as a policy, I blacklist all yahoo, gmail, hotmail
>> junk and li
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:19:48 +0100
Dick Visser articulated:
> On 2011-11-17 16:05, Tõnu Samuel wrote:
>
> > What is ham and what is spam often depends also some cultural
> > background.
>
> It does indeed. Having "Dick" as first name in a mostly
> English-oriented environment doesn't work in my
Enough of this thread. Really.
Spamcop is risky if used for outright rejection. This is not new
information, and as pointed out, Spamcop themselves say so. The
subject line is pure ignorance, "abusing mail systems," absurd.
Reliance on email where you do not control both ends is
ing major-providers like yahoo, google you can go ahead
>>> and turn your mailserver off and close your company because NO CLIENT will
>>> accept this with no argument and to say it clear: if someone thinks it is
>>> cool to block major-isp's for whatever reason
On 2011-11-17 16:05, Tõnu Samuel wrote:
> What is ham and what is spam often depends also some cultural background.
It does indeed. Having "Dick" as first name in a mostly English-oriented
environment doesn't work in my favor ;-)
--
Dick Visser
System & Network Engineer
TERENA Secretariat
Sing
Am 17.11.2011 16:36, schrieb Tõnu Samuel:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:30 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> if you really report 500 mails each day you should give over your
>> job to someone with more qualifications because we are hosting some
>> thousand mail-addresses and i could never report 50
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:30 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if you really report 500 mails each day you should give over your
> job to someone with more qualifications because we are hosting some
> thousand mail-addresses and i could never report 500 spam-mails per
> day because they are not receive
e NO CLIENT will
>> accept this with no argument and to say it clear: if someone thinks it is
>> cool to block major-isp's for whatever reason maybe he is doing the wrong job
>
> I report about 500 mails daily to spamcop and this takes important part
> of my time. Sorry for
if someone thinks it is
> cool to block major-isp's for whatever reason maybe he is doing the wrong job
I report about 500 mails daily to spamcop and this takes important part
of my time. Sorry for being unpolite towards spammers but I believe that
noone should be whitelisted because they are
Greetings,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On 17/11/2011 14:39, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
>>
>> tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on the
>> school domain. Also, as
enough to accommodate all kind of bots, viruses etc. For example
somehow Gmail managed to include me in some arabic religios mailing
list. There is no way I can find someone in Google to look on my weird
problem. I just report every single mail from this list to SpamCop. I do
this for months an
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:48 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> never heard a more arrogant statement with so few knowledge!
>
I somewhat understand his position. What is ham and what is spam often
depends also some cultural background. For example I have anything with
"From: aol.com" blocked because
On 17/11/2011 14:39, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on the
school domain. Also, as a policy, I blacklist all yahoo, gmail, hotmail
junk and life is much better at the
On 17 November 2011 09:28, wrote:
> Zitat von Dan The Man :
>
>>
>>
>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
>> could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
>> servers worldwide.
>
>
Am 17.11.2011 15:39, schrieb Dennis Clarke:
>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
>
> tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on the
> school domain. Also, as a policy, I blacklist all yahoo, gmail, hotmail
> junk and life is much better
>
>
> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment ..
tell your students to use the email address provided by the school on the
school domain. Also, as a policy, I blacklist all yahoo, gmail, hotmail
junk and life is much better at the office.
If someone does not have a valid
Am 17.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Tõnu Samuel:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:35 -0600, Dan The Man wrote:
>>
>> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
>> could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
>> server
Zitat von Dan The Man :
Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to
me and could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all
yahoo/shaw etc servers worldwide.
The subject is wrong. Spamcop simply list mailservers sending a lot of
spam and Yahoo for
>> email bounced would agree very much :)
>>
>> I think my solution should stand, we got all the other rbl's,
>> and spamassassin etc, there really no need to have anything
>> legitimate dropped till they fix their issues.
>
> Spamcop recommend you use it for sc
ould stand, we got all the other rbl's,
> and spamassassin etc, there really no need to have anything
> legitimate dropped till they fix their issues.
Spamcop recommend you use it for scoring, not blocking
[snip]
Man wrote:
Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
servers worldwide.
Solution:
remove: reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
from your smtpd_recipient_restrictions line until they fix their ab
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:35 -0600, Dan The Man wrote:
>
> Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
> could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
> servers worldwide.
>
> Solution:
> remove: reject_rbl_client
Today I had an unhappy unix student try to submit an assignment to me and
could not. Spamcop has decided to go off blacklisting all yahoo/shaw etc
servers worldwide.
Solution:
remove: reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
from your smtpd_recipient_restrictions line until they fix their abuse
47 matches
Mail list logo
