[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-26 Thread Marvin Renich via Postfix-users
* Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users [241126 11:43]: > * At https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_security_level and > https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_security_level > Sorry, but the text doesn't say what "empty" means. Is this the same as > "none" or not? The man page

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:20:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > > > /^4(\.\d+\.\d+ TLS is required, but host \S+ refused to start TLS: .+)/ > > > 5$1 No luck today > > > > Where is "No luck today" shown then? Only in the DSN or also in the SMTP > > session? > > 2 - As

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-26 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > Hi, > > * default_delivery_status_filter > The documentation says this can also be used to modify the "explanatory > text". Maybe you could add an example for this? > If I extend the existing example like this: > > > /^4(\.\d+\.\d+ TLS is required, but host \

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-26 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, * default_delivery_status_filter The documentation says this can also be used to modify the "explanatory text". Maybe you could add an example for this? If I extend the existing example like this: /^4(\.\d+\.\d+ TLS is required, but host \S+ refused to start TLS: .+)/ 5$1 No luck

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-25 Thread Kris Deugau via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: And "round off" is mainly used in a non-mathematical context, e.g. Neither of us is qualified to make authoritative statements about the (US) English language. Rounding off numbers is mentioned in the following: https:/

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > And "round off" is mainly used in a non-mathematical context, e.g. Neither of us is qualified to make authoritative statements about the (US) English language. Rounding off numbers is mentioned in the following: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/round-off htt

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 03:09:06PM +0100, Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users wrote: > * First is a question: > Is default_delivery_status_filter affecting Postfix's messages (a) in the > SMTP session, (b) in the logfile, and/or (c) in DSNs? As promised, it modifies the delivery status, which may

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-24 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, I have some more small suggestions, but I don't want to start a separate thread for each ;-) * First is a question: Is default_delivery_status_filter affecting Postfix's messages (a) in the SMTP session, (b) in the logfile, and/or (c) in DSNs? I can't see any difference in (a) and (b), so

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-21 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > I think this is impossible to explain in words! Please include the table > at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit Instead, I have replaced some narrative text with a bullet list. * Delays >= 100s are rounded off to an integ

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-21 Thread Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
Hi, thanks! Bottom line: I think this is impossible to explain in words! Please include the table at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit The rest of this mail is just to convince you ;-) When setting it to 6, I'm getting this in my logfile: delays=0.12/0

[pfx] Re: Docs: Improve delay_logging_resolution_limit

2024-11-20 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users: > When setting it to 6, I'm getting this in my logfile: > > > delays=0.12/0.00058/0/0.023 The 0 is consistent with the text that says "delay values below the delay_logging_resolution_limit are logged as 0". The 0.12, 0.023, and 0.00058 have two significant digi