Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users:
> When setting it to 6, I'm getting this in my logfile:
>
> > delays=0.12/0.00058/0/0.023
The 0 is consistent with the text that says "delay values below the
delay_logging_resolution_limit are logged as 0".
The 0.12, 0.023, and 0.00058 have two significant digits. That is
consistent with the text that says "delay values under 100s are
logged with at most two-digit precision" and "the maximal number
of digits (here, 6) after the decimal point when logging sub-second
delay values".
> But all theses values are "under 100s"; should this be something like
> "delay values over 0.1 are logged with at most two-digit precision"?
Obviously not. If the delay is 123.456 seconds, then it will be
logged as 123 (three-digit precision).
> Besides, it looks like the parameter doesn't refer to the "number of
> digits after the decimal point", but rather the total digits (before
> plus after the comma).
That is an incorrect inference based on the wrong evidence.
Here is an example of inputs and outputs:
input output
==========================
123456 123456
12345.6 12346
1234.56 1235
123.456 123
12.3456 12
1.23456 1.2
0.123456 0.12
0.0123456 0.012
0.00123456 0.0012
0.000123456 0.00012
0.0000123456 0.000012
0.00000123456 0.000001
0.000000123456 0
Numbers below 100 have at most two-digit precision, and no more
than six digits after the decimal point.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
