Hi,
thanks!
Bottom line:
I think this is impossible to explain in words! Please include the table
at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_resolution_limit
The rest of this mail is just to convince you ;-)
When setting it to 6, I'm getting this in my logfile:
delays=0.12/0.00058/0/0.023
The 0 is consistent with the text that says "delay values below the
delay_logging_resolution_limit are logged as 0".
No. My delay_logging_resolution_limit is 6, and all these values are
below 6.
So it probably should be something like:
delay values under 1s with more than delay_logging_resolution_limit
zeros after the decimal point are logged as 0.
The 0.12, 0.023, and 0.00058 have two significant digits. That is
consistent with the text that says "delay values under 100s are
logged with at most two-digit precision"
Here the problem is that in the first sentence you talk about "digits
after the decimal point", while in the second sentence you switch to
"two-digit precision". I took theses as synonyms, while in fact the
latter refers to "significant digits in a floating point number"
Besides, "round off" is misleading - should be just "round".
And (while you're at it :-) please add a note to all options that have a
differing behavior under overload, that the overload limit cannot be
changed; this is not 100% clear IMO.
Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
