s a ton of value for
the folks on the list to hear me blathering on until I have a solution. ;-)
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
cally also distributed, are not well documented,
and don't seem to be a supported way to adjust the policy.
I've concluded that the only rational choice to turn SELinux off.
Foolish conclusion, but... not my circus, not my monkeys.
Thomas
__
ogged, and the tools for finding those errors and
explanations as to how to fix them.
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
adding files to the SELinux
policy), or remediation (think help with building exceptions or policy
modules).
Feel free to reach out to me at work at tho...@redhat.com or on this list.
Thanks,
Thomas
On 1/29/25 10:11 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
There are more than a few places in
kers anyway. And I bet if you ask
100 users "What does round off 4.6 mean?", you will not get all 100
answers saying 5.
So I still think the table says it all and is unambiguous for everybody.
But OK, you're the boss ;-)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Thomas
__
ff" is mainly used in a non-mathematical context, e.g.
"round off the evening". The function we're talking about is called
"round" in all programming languages (even in MS Excel :-) and I'm sure
that's the terminology must people here are used to.
Thank
Hi,
thanks - this is indeed better, since it just collects all messages in
the deferred queue meanwhile.
I was bound to the idea of informing connecting clients of the outage,
but this indeed doesn't make much sense... ;-)
Cheers,
Thomas
Am 21.11.24 um 13:26 schrieb Ralph Seichte
o requires:
smtpd_delay_reject = no
So maybe you could introduce a dedicated option for that?: Answer with
400 to everything, with a custom message.
Cheers,
Thomas
Am 19.11.24 um 22:49 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users:
Hi,
when handing over incoming messages to an extern
nd off" is misleading - should be just "round".
And (while you're at it :-) please add a note to all options that have a
differing behavior under overload, that the overload limit cannot be
changed; this is not 100% clear IMO.
Cheers,
Thomas
__
quot;?
Besides, it looks like the parameter doesn't refer to the "number of
digits after the decimal point", but rather the total digits (before
plus after the comma).
And please replace "rounded off" by "rounded down" (I guess), since
"round off" is
queued as...` and sending a bounce?
As I understand it, every mail is handed over to Postfix'es `qmgr`,
which works asynchronously/independently of the SMTP session - but maybe
there's a way around this?
Thanks!!
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
P
On 11/14/24 3:02 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users:
On 11/14/24 4:12 AM, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
I have been notified about datacenter maintenance which will disrupt
access to www.postfix.org. Maintenance is planned for 2024-11-27
sure
that nobody is going to be surprised.
-Ralph
Can someone set up a CNAME or alias for https://www.postfix.org so that
https://postfix.org works?
--
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
log) would really be cool! :-)
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
kind of
mail it is.
Since you're creating the queue ID only after `RCPT TO`, we have the
sender's and the main recipient's address at hand - that would be enough
to set up something like a `queue_id_prefix_map` :-)
BTW: Why don't you `enable_long_queue_ids`
line with `from`, 1
line for each `to`).
But the line that really matters (at least to me :-) is the one with
`status=` - so it would be nice if this one would hold more information.
Maybe through a user-defined option?
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Pos
efore Postfix receives the
message content? After which SMTP command?
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi,
thanks for the hints, guys - I went for rsyslog omprog and it looks good
so far :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
Hi,
thanks for the hint with the `domain` option! :-)
I had missed that :-(
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 11/1/24 4:01 PM, Zachary Appella via Postfix-users wrote:
Is it just me, or has the postfix website been down for months?
Works for me. But you have to go to https://www.postfix.org, not just
https://postfix.org.
--
Thomas
___
Postfix-users
writing them
to a file) send the logfile entries to that command.
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
_part in bar.com's
table.
This will certainly work, but I'm wondering if there's a more
straightforward way than the `'foo.com' = '%d'` hack.
Thanks!!
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
IN1.
Then it would be clearer IMO :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
n I would suggest to just make `dbname` not required anymore, and
that's it. Cause when user & password are optional, and dbname is
required, that's a little strange, isn't it?
--
Cheers,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-u
SSL connection has been
closed unexpectedly?
Why is an SSL connection tried to localhost? (I didn't set the `sslmode`
parameter, see 2)
* Postfix version: 3.7.11
* postfix-pgsql/stable,stable,now 3.7.11-0+deb12u1 amd64 [installed]
* Entry in `main.cf`:
local_recipient_maps = regexp:/
too deeply. It sounds really helpful.
I'm going to take this as my cue to spin up a development machine and
start hammering on it.
With all my free time. ;-)
--
Thanks!
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, AWS SA-Pro
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-use
it's not practical for our use. But I like the
idea a lot.
--
Thanks!
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, AWS SA-Pro
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On 9/5/24 12:53 PM, Noel Jones via Postfix-users wrote:
On 9/5/2024 12:45 PM, Noel Jones via Postfix-users wrote:
On 9/5/2024 9:05 AM, Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_sender_access regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_access
permit_mynetworks
On 9/5/24 12:19 PM, Bastian Blank via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
My sender_access file looks like this:
/@*.onmicrosoft\.com/ REJECT
/\.pro$/ REJECT We reject all .pro domains. Contact thomas dot cameron at
camerontech dot com from a trusted email service if you need assistance.
You
On 9/5/24 10:20 AM, Serhii via Postfix-users wrote:
2024-09-05T14:07:05Z Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users
:
Am I smoking crack? Or is this pretty reasonable? Or should I just knuckle down
and set up Spamassassin or some other anti-spam tool (I'm totally open to
suggestions, I just
= $smtpd_milters
milter_default_action = accept
So my overarching question is, am I being dense by rejecting these
spammy domains? My sender_access file looks like this:
/@*.onmicrosoft\.com/ REJECT
/\.pro$/ REJECT We reject all .pro domains. Contact thomas dot cameron
at camerontech dot com from a
re are no clear cut rules on what to do with folding in the
>middle of the Message-ID payload, and it has long been obsolete,
>so just tolerating whitespace after the header label should
>be sufficient.
I agree on that.
Is there any fix for this special case in sight or would you accept
For example
Message-ID:
would not be written into the In-Reply-To.
So a simple crlf with space.
Thomas
- Original Message -
From: "Wietse Venema via Postfix-users"
To: "Postfix users"
Sent: Thursday, 5 September, 2024 14:12:32
Subject: [pfx] Re: Postfix ign
intended behavior to only allow single-line
message-ids?
Kind regards,
Thomas.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
> This can be verified on Solaris with:
>
> /usr/bin/elfdump -re 'dyn:' path/to/binary_or_library
sorry, this must read: (solaris elfedit in read-only-mode)
/usr/bin/elfedit -re 'dyn:' path/to/binary_or_library
___
Postfix-users mailing list
needed.
or check what the actual run would load with:
ldd -r path/to/binary_or_library
or watch the whole lengthy search-and-load process the runtime linker
does:
LD_DEBUG=files,libs path/to/binary
(or even: LD_DEBUG=files,libs,bindings path/to/binary)
Even a daemon not normally called by the user should output useful
information to verify linking to correct library entities.
Regards,
Thomas
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
The IP it came from was outside my network.
I think it's just a spoofing email. I had not actually seen on, so that
raised my alarm, but I think it's ok. I need to go through and make sure
my SFP and DMARC are sound. I just checked my DKIM couple days ago, so
that's good.
Thanks for the repl
Yes, it was spam, and it was caught by SpamAssassin. It was some bitcoin
plot or something.
The characters were not anything I could read, and the few I could make
out were of a south-east asian descent.
My concern is that the email APPEARED to come from me! I was listed as
the sender.
I e
Please see this description which is similar to mine:
https://serverfault.com/questions/655250/gmail-bouncing-mail-sent-over-ipv6-ipv4-working
And the answers look interesting.
Regards.
No I don't have reverse DNS record for IPv6. I will try that. thank you.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, at 4:44 PM, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 01/03/2021 à 07:01, Philip a écrit :
> >
> > If IPv4 works then maybe IPv6 isn't set up?
> >
> > ping6 ipv6.google.com
>
Postfix can't send email to gsuite's MTA via IPV6 interface.
But if I change this item to:
inet_protocols = ipv4
It works.
Can you help explain this?
Thank you.
Best regards.
Le 07/01/2021 à 23:04, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:24:23PM +0100, Thomas GUIRRIEC wrote:
I have configured Postfix (3.5.8 from Alpine Linux) with
"recipient_canonical_classes = envelope_recipient" &
"recipient_canonical_maps = ldap:/etc
-recipi...@guirriec.fr
cleanup[86]: mail_addr_map:bob-recipi...@guirriec.fr ->
0:bob-recipi...@guirriec.fr
cleanup[86]:
been_here:rfc822;b...@guirriec.fr?0?b...@guirriec.fr?bob-recipi...@guirriec.fr: 0
cleanup[86]: initial envelope M
I don't understand why Postix does the second LDAP Query with
(mail=bob-recipi...@guirriec.fr) filter .
Can someone explain me ?
Best regards.
Thomas
Am 23.05.20 um 18:00 schrieb Ralph Seichter:
From: Thomas Mustermann
with the address nore...@domain.tld being *unknown* on your MX. That
should result in a generic 5xx rejection. If you want more control over
the rejection message, you can use something like the following:
# /etc
Am 28.05.20 um 23:48 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 28 May 2020, at 15:29, Thomas wrote:
I of cource use my own domain where I pay for.
Yes, but read the rest of what I wrote, especially the parts I've highlighted:
Do not create a fake address with someone else's domain. Do not use
mu
Am 25.05.20 um 16:17 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa:
Dnia 25.05.2020 o godz. 14:33:36 Thomas pisze:
FAX is much better because FAX is same as letter and working
digital, nearly 100% yes or no. Email I did not know if it is
arrived,
[...]
What do you actually want to achieve? Because from your
Am 27.05.20 um 17:20 schrieb @lbutlr:
As I said, use a valid domain THAT YOU CONTROL.
Hi,
I of cource use my own domain where I pay for.
thanks
Am 24.05.20 um 17:19 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 23 May 2020, at 08:52, Thomas wrote:
or
The norm is to use an address along the lines you describe there. I use
no-reply@. Emails to that address are accepted and discarded. Do not
use a fake domain or someone else's domain, of course. Yo
Am 24.05.20 um 17:19 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 23 May 2020, at 08:52, Thomas wrote:
or
The norm is to use an address along the lines you describe there. I use
no-reply@. Emails to that address are accepted and discarded. Do not
use a fake domain or someone else's domain, of course. Yo
<> USE LETTER AND STAMP
or
that her understand if he receive my Email, and second I should use 5XX
if he answer if he will not understand?
best regards
Thomas
oh, sorry, I wanted to send my question to german mailing list.
Thomas
Am 23.05.20 um 14:17 schrieb Claus Assmann:
Please use an address for which you can receive at least non delivery
status information.
Otherwise, why do you expect the recipient to handle your non-replyable
address in any
Hallo,
ich sende ab und an etwas an Ämter vorab. Die kommen mittlerweile sogar
mit pdf zurecht!
Vorab per Email (früher vorab per FAX), steht auch so im Briefkopf und
dann zusätzlich als normalen Brief. Manchmal eben auch per Einschreiben
statt Brief, kommt auf die Üblichkeit/Wichtigkeit an.
On 5/14/20 3:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Thomas Strike:
Thought: I am assuming that Postfix is only reading from the main.cf and
master.cf files. Could it be possible that Postfix is trying to use
main.cf* and master.cf*?
On 5/14/20 12:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Type "po
On 5/14/20 2:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Thomas Strike:
The following cryptic line is given as the reason;
.
.
.
.
BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin request of type /^\s*config\b/i
at line 3
How do I correct this?
Look at line 3 of the rejected email message
Which logs are you talking about. After setting up Postfix and Dovcot,
everything reports to var/log/maillog. Postfix doesn't report it's conf
files that it loaded from there, only that it reloaded. Is there other
logs hidden somewhere?
On 5/14/20 12:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tho
On 5/14/20 2:33 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
* Thomas Strike:
The following cryptic line is given as the reason
Not quite cryptic, just a regular expression. ;-) Make sure your subject
line does not match this expression (the first case-insensitive word of
the subject, after 0-n optional
The following cryptic line is given as the reason;
.
.
.
.
BOUNCE postfix-users@postfix.org: Admin request of type /^\s*config\b/i
at line 3
How do I correct this?
f -x | egrep 'mysql-aliases.cf'
nothing found.
3. postconf -M | egrep 'mysql-aliases.cf'
nothing found.
By the way, I do appreciate all the help I can get. Thanks, Tom
On 5/14/20 12:37 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:06:34PM -0500, Thomas Strike wrot
On 5/14/20 2:18 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Have you looked in master.cf? Are you looking at the right main.cf
file?
Look in the output of "postconf -n" and "postconf -M".
Yes. and postconf doesn't list this path/file in any -n, -m, -M, -p, or
-d. I have only one main.cf and one master.cf fi
On 5/13/20 4:29 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:42:47PM -0500, Thomas Strike wrote:
Postfix is trying to access the aliases table in the postfix db with a
wrong file name and directory. I thought I had this fixed yesterday but
it is showing up again today.
I changed the
Postfix is trying to access the aliases table in the postfix db with a
wrong file name and directory. I thought I had this fixed yesterday but
it is showing up again today. I changed the property, alias_maps =
/etc/postfix/mysql-aliases.cf to
mysql:/etc/postfix/sql/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf,
the
removal of the feature from the unstable release; what I was wondering
was whether the use of an external policy server was the
appropriate/recommended approach.
Thomas.
Me to. There is something about writing out your problem in detail that
provides a moment of clarity.
On 5/9/20 1:40 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 08 May 2020, at 02:54, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
ups ... I think I can answer my own question?
Why is it that the answer mostly comes once the email has bee
or the record, the change I was referring to is the following:
20200316
Removed the issuer_cn and subject_cn matches from
check_ccert_access. Files: smtpd/smtpd_check.c,
proto/postconf.proto.
Thomas.
I installed PostfixAdmin with postfix and mariadb. After PostfixAdmin
set up the database, I populated it with adding domains and users
through the PostfixAdmin web interface. It seemed to write all the data
required to all the tables except the alias_domain table which is empty.
Does Postfix u
>On postfix itself you can use regular blocklists to prevent such
obvious IPs.
For the other services like imap etc. it helps to use fail2ban.
I have all filtering that I know of off right now. I am just trying to
establish incoming communication with other SMTP clients right now. Once I get
Matus: your right. I misused the word server. I thought that this was the test
message being sent with gmail because every time I sent a new test, this IP
came up in the maillog.
This turns out to be a Russian IP. Geez, Louise! I have Russia trying to hack
me.
External smtp servers time out after tls v1.2 is established. the
following is from the maillog;
May 8 17:40:48 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: connect from
unknown[185.50.149.12]
May 8 17:40:50 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: Anonymous TLS
connection established from unkno
of the client certificate
is no longer built-in? Should this use case be handled using an
external policy server?
Thomas.
With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am taking a
deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have a
default file path that it looks to or does it just not look at alias_maps if not declare
With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am taking a
deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have a
default file path that it looks to or does it just not look at alias_maps if not declare
Hello,
I habe a problem to understand function of
# /etc/aliases
# /etc/postfix/access_recipient
It seemed to be that aliases is OK for receive emails for recipients.
But what it make sence to use additional access_recipient or whats
function of access_recipient.
thanks
Thomas
"from such operators:
" matter that communication has chosen the unencrypted e-mail
communication with all its dangers ..."
Thanks
Thomas
Ok davide,
does docker run on old cpu's, or how compatible is it with arm cpu's?
ever run an alpha dec?
postfix just provide the code, which compiles into binaries, postfix
don't get involved with packaging, thats the job of vendors.
thats why there are no official postfix docker images, ca
I have a dockerised set of images and kubernetes deployments for you to
look at if you're interested. They work well and serve my domains
without much problem
https://github.com/orgs/kubernetes-mail-server/dashboard
Take a look, maybe there is some contribution you want to make.
Chris
On 26.
Hi,
I am using a letsencrypt tls cert and whenever I receive email, I get
the following error. Is this a problem with my certificate? Or with
the configuration or something??
postfix/smtpd[526]: warning: TLS library problem:
error:060A209F:digital envelope routines:EVP_MD_size:message digest is
n
oh, right.
reading your reply, I re-discovered my local fix I use for the
SFE packaging project:
==
#fix unlucky selection of name for struct (introduced in some 3.4.x
version)
grep "struct sockaddr_un sun;" src/util/unix_dgram_connect.c \
&& gsed -i.bak_undef_sun -e '/struct sockaddr_un sun;/
On 03/03/2019 21.31, Bill Cole wrote:
On 1 Mar 2019, at 9:21, Thomas Seilund wrote:
On 01/03/2019 08.39, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Thomas Seilund!
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamfilter -o
receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
On 02/03/2019 13.38, @lbutlr wrote:
On 01 Mar 2019, at 07:21, Thomas Seilund wrote:
-- Once a day for each user I clear the bayes files and rebuild bayes files
with:
You are removing the bases entries daily and rebuilding them based on a very
few (if any) messages in your LaernAs folders
On 01/03/2019 08.39, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Thomas Seilund!
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamfilter -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
spamfilter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq user=vmail
On 28/02/2019 22.38, Bill Cole wrote:
On 28 Feb 2019, at 0:55, Thomas Seilund wrote:
On 27/02/2019 23.50, John Fawcett wrote:
On 27/02/2019 17:56, Thomas Seilund wrote:
Hi All,
I run a mail server with Postfix (version 2.6.6), Dovecot and
Spamassassin.
The first time I saw an unexpected
On 27/02/2019 23.50, John Fawcett wrote:
On 27/02/2019 17:56, Thomas Seilund wrote:
Hi All,
I run a mail server with Postfix (version 2.6.6), Dovecot and
Spamassassin.
The first time I saw an unexpected directory in virtual_mailbox_base
what medio dec. 2018. The mail server has been running
mysql/virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
virtual_minimum_uid = 2000
virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp
virtual_uid_maps = static:2000
[ec2-user@ec2 ~]$
Any help would be appreciated
Thomas S
That's what I do, it works perfectly.
Thanks.
Le 25.10.2018 19:39, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Thomas Bourdon:
Hi,
First of all, I apologize for my bad english.
I use postfix-3.3.1 and openssl-1.0.2.
Actual ssl config : tlsv1.0 minimum is set for smtp and smtpd. tlsv1.2
minimum is se
Thank you guys to explain me how works smtp<->smtp. I set up tlsv1.0
minimum for smtp<->smtp and tlsv1.2 minimum for auth connections, it
seems working. :)
Thanks again !
Le 25.10.2018 15:10, B. Reino a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Thomas Bourdon wrote:
Because mail providers sen
Because mail providers send mail to my smtp server through this port,
don't they ?
Le 25.10.2018 15:00, B. Reino a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Thomas Bourdon wrote:
Is there a way to allow tlsv1.0 minimum for unauth connection and
allow tlsv1.2 minimum for auth connection on por
nimum for submission/starttls. I thought
about disable auth connection using 465 port but I don't want to force
my users to strictly use starttls.
Is there a way to allow tlsv1.0 minimum for unauth connection and allow
tlsv1.2 minimum for auth connection on port 465 ?
Have a nice day!
Hello Matus,
> for blocking .artegic.net you don't need to use pcre.
> simple hash table containing ".artegic.net" would be faster.
I see. Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
Thomas
tions but as hash. Thank
you for helping me block these spammers.
Cheers,
Thomas
n *.artegic.net How can I obtain that?
Cheers,
Thomas
e the sender
resend it, so it is a whole new message in postfix, it goes fine without
problems.
So the question is, why does some of the mails fail on the server, with no
option to requeue them?
Med venlig hilsen
Thomas Kristensen
Storhaven 12 - 7100 Vejle
Tlf: 75 72 54 99 - Fax: 75 72 65 33
E-ma
"postmap hash:/etc/postfix/transport".
Wietse
Thank you very much this worked perfectly!
Cheers,
Thomas
would I do this? I naively tried adding
user+doesnotexist: doesnoteixst
to my /etc/aliases file, but it was still delivered to my user account.
Thanks for any help.
Cheers,
Thomas
.html#reject_unknown_client_hostname
Thomas
achine?
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s Postfix is unable to communicate with the UNIX socket policy-spf is
supposed to listen on.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* chaouche yacine 2017.03.17 14:52:
> Thank you Thomas, so if I understand correctly in Viktor's config dovecot is
> only used by postfix as a backend to query for valid virtual email addresses ?
Hi Yassine,
one of the benefits of using Dovecot's MDAs besides Sieve, is that
:
user1@virtual.invalid user1/
user2@virtual.invalid user2/
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
st
for this sometime.
--Thomas
Am 27.02.2017 um 00:15 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Feb 26, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Thomas Minor wrote:
>>
>> And, on the other side, postfix as a client
>> should not reuse a dead connection.
> Postfix (somewhat obviously) cannot "reus
on.
Yours,
--Thomas
Am 24.02.2017 um 12:31 schrieb Alex JOST:
> Am 24.02.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Thomas Minor:
>> Hmm, ok,
>>
>> I did search but found nothing. I'll check again.
>
> http://marc.info/?t=14876316702&r=1&w=2
>
--
Thomas Minor, Development
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
