[pfx] Re: postfix/sendmail[25965]: fatal: usage: sendmail [options]

I assume that this error wont interfere with with postfix other operations? > On Nov 26, 2024, at 6:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jason Hirsh via Postfix-users: >> This is an arror I am getting since I manage to damage by configuration in >> my upgrade to Postfix 3.9. an

[pfx] postfix/sendmail[25965]: fatal: usage: sendmail [options]

This is an arror I am getting since I manage to damage by configuration in my upgrade to Postfix 3.9. and FreeBSD 14.1. When I first installed Postfix I added the following to rc.conf sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO"

[pfx] Clearing or Update Postfix Verify Cache

I am still dealing with self inflicted issued when I updated to FreeBSD 14,1 and the associated update to Postfix 3.9 I sort of became aware of the end of support for btree and changed these lines in master.cf from smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache smtp_tls_

[pfx] Re: TLS Library Problem

Thanks. Was just confirming , Yes self signed. I broke certbot > On May 12, 2024, at 4:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users > wrote: > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:55:14PM -0400, Jason Hirsh via Postfix-users > wrote: > >> I have they error message >>

[pfx] TLS Library Problem

Still chasing ssl/tls issue I have they error message postfix/smtps/smtpd[39559]: warning: TLS library problem: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown:/usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1621:SSL alert number 46: I am assuming the ie eher I

[pfx] Re: private/dovecot-lmtp]: Connection refused)

My nonrandom action for tho morning OK I bandaided my going back to an older main.cf but updating the ssl/tls infoThat brought mail back on line Sort of Dovecot still not happy with me but this error seems more warning and best suited to be addressed else where status=sent (delivered via d

[pfx] private/dovecot-lmtp]: Connection refused)

I am running Postfix/Dovecot/MySQL mail server. It was doing ok until I tried to improve it., I dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to triggerfish.theoceanwindow.com[private/dovecot-lmtp]: Connection refused) May 10 20:11:27 triggerfish postfix/lmtp[47754]: 172816542AC3: to=, orig_to=, relay=n

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

No problem with the below NON secure url > On Jan 3, 2022, at 9:08 AM, Alexey Shpakovsky > wrote: > > On Mon, January 3, 2022 14:48, Jaap van Wingerde wrote: >> All the urls on https://www.postfix.org give an 'Not found'error, and a >> 'SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN' error. >> > > try plaintext h

Re: Problem with time out

first. I usually break it.. Thanks again > On Dec 29, 2021, at 1:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jason Hirsh: >> I am having an issue with mail from my server to a particular mail >> server. My errors message is >> >> >> Dec 29 12:08:23 triggerfish

Problem with time out

I am having an issue with mail from my server to a particular mail server. My errors message is Dec 29 12:08:23 triggerfish postfix/smtp[34597]: connect to m1.caribisles.net[204.10.3.4]:25: Operation timed out Dec 29 12:08:23 triggerfish postfix/smtp[34597]: 1898263938CF: to=, relay=none, dela

Re: error 550

P is not listed in the record. > > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On > Behalf Of Jason Hirsh > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 9:41 PM > To: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: error 550 > > Tri

Re: error 550

Tried your link. tried the process I am told the are not blocking my ip They say forward message which i did and it gets bounced tried contacting postmas...@earthlink.net. and get bounced fun > On Feb 2, 2021, at 2:33 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > >  > On 2/2/2021 12:09 PM, Jason

Fwd: error 550

Begin forwarded message: > From: jason hirsh > Date: February 2, 2021 at 2:07:20 PM AST > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: error 550 > > I can not seem to get massages through to earthlink/mindspring. I get the > following error > 550 5.7.1 Connection ref

Re: [External] Re: The historical roots of our computer terms

Thanks you!! > On Jun 8, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Please stop complaining or be deleted. I am not seeing any counter > arguments that haven't already been made in many other project > contexts. > > Wietse

Re: SEMDMAIL Error message

Yes I did plus send process does not show > On Jan 8, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Gerard E. Seibert > wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:00:55 -0400, Jason Hirsh stated: >> Ok apparently installation of postfix from the port has an issue >> >> >> I changed mailer.

Re: SEMDMAIL Error message

at 11:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 08.01.20 11:31, Jason Hirsh wrote: >> Shouldn’t be a permission issue as sendmail isn’t supposed to be running.. >> >> Is there some hidden pasty off sendmail I could have missed when converting >> to postfix? >

Re: SEMDMAIL Error message

YES" natd_interface="em1" natd_flags="-dynamic -m" openvpn_enable="YES" openvpn_configfile="/usr/local/etc/openvpn/server/server.conf" > On Jan 8, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Pintér Tibor wrote: > > permission > > On 1/8/20 4:19 PM, Jason Hirsh

SEMDMAIL Error message

I am getting the following error message even though I am using postfix and no longer start SENDMAIL is rc. conf sendmail[92919]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): can not chdir(/var/spool/clientmqueue/): Permission denied Can anyone tell me what I am missing?

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

You actually got me on right track. Peeled back the onion abit to how OpenDkim was being started I looked in more depth at start up script used by rc.cof.It was looking for a opendkim.conf in /usr/local/etc/mail not /usr/local/etc/opemdkim Copied opedkim.conf back that and all is good T

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

The thing is … that isn an INCOMING not an outgoing email.. Maybe its is failing a DKIM test for incoming I can’t seem to get OpenDKIM to sign my OUTGOING > On Oct 25, 2019, at 1:17 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > > From what I can tell the DNS record was

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

n October 25, 2019 6:52:52 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Hirsh wrote: >> I have gone over my configuration with a fine tooth comb, but >> considering I put them together it is not surprising I can’t spot >> anything >> >> >> O have been trying to locate opendkim action in my

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I corrected.. so I am 80% sure about the associated tables. I was kind of hoping it was something simple and obvious. So much for that idea Thanks to all for the their time and efforts > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Jason Hirsh: >> I have gone over m

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

Ahh .. Interesting I had not understood that But I am still not signing …. > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > From your original email > > Modesv > > > You are verifying and signing so yes that seems to be the

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

erfish postfix/submission/smtpd[52375]: abort all milters Oct 25 12:45:15 triggerfish postfix/submission/smtpd[52375]: milter8_abort: abort milter inet:localhost:8891 The thing that concerns me is the appearance of “dummy” Any thoughts any one/? > On Oct 24, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Jason Hirsh wrote: &

OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I am trying to revive my OpenDKIM installation. I had it working but managed to break it when I updated my ports. It is running but not signing outgoing messages My main.cf configuration relative to OpenDkim is smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:8891 non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters milter_d

Virtual Aliases with not working

I am getting what appears to me to be contradictory messages I am getting a bounce message as follows mailto:ab...@kasdivi.com>>: host triggerfish.theoceanwindow.com [private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 550 5.1.1 mailto:ab...@kasdivi.com>> User doesn't ex

Re: Webmin with Postfix: recommended or not.

I dont know if this is an appropriate place or not I use WEBMIN with the Postfix module and find it very useful for helping me with my Postfix installation > On Mar 27, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > > Wow, you must be having a bad day! I hope you feel better soon. > > Happy Easter, f

Re: RegExp help

> On May 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Barbara M. wrote: > > On Thu, 14 May 2015, jason hirsh wrote: > >> I have bene using >> https://regex101.com >> for test and evaluationIt has also helped on my composition > > Cool. > But I can't still find a so

Re: RegExp help

I have bene using https://regex101.com for test and evaluationIt has also helped on my composition > On May 14, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Barbara M. wrote: > > > I am trying to use regexp to block mails from specific domains to specific > users (and let other users r

Fwd: DNS Resolver

I am not sure what has gotten through on the mailing list 1) I was unable to patch the Net::DNS version .76 I am running version .78 2( The mail system is happily using about 4 RBLs Ater updating all involved ports I am still getting 75371-06) _WARN: rules: failed to run NO_DNS_FOR_

Fwd: DNS Resolver

> Begin forwarded message: > > From: jason hirsh > Subject: Fwd: DNS Resolver > Date: March 1, 2015 at 10:04:24 AM AST > To: Mike Hodson > Cc: posfix-us...@postfis.org > > Watching the log, although I have this error the system is using the RBL for > check

Re: DNS Resolver

really implied with anything I read... > > Mike > > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, jason hirsh <mailto:hir...@att.net>> wrote: > The first link continued the confusion I have been experiencing > > > The second essentially tells me to update

Anonymous TLS Connection

in my Mail log i am getting messages like 27 08:56:51 tuna postfix/smtpd[35786]: Anonymous TLS connection established from telbo-xxx.x.xx.x.cust.telbo.net[xxx.x.xx.x]: TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits) This is from my clients so obviously I have no configured the mail cli

Fwd: SASL On Postfix/Dovecot running on Freebsd 8.1

smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender=yes -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject slow unix - - n - - smtp -o smtp_connection_cache_on_demand=no > Begin forwarded message: > > From: jason hirsh > Subject: SAS

SASL On Postfix/Dovecot running on Freebsd 8.1

I was getting some relay issues when my local IP changed so I realized or thought that perhaps my SASL wasn’t working I did a bunch of tweaking which is never good but when i switched my mail to port 587 i was able to once again send with no problem BUT when i did the telnet test froth postfi

Re: Lost connection

gt; jason hirsh: >> >>> On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> >>> jason hirsh: >>>> oops missed step 2 >>>> >>>> >>>> I get this >>>> >>>> >>>> Trying 66.96.142.51

Re: Lost connection

> On Oct 18, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Richard > wrote: > > > > Original Message >> Date: Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:45:09 -0400 >> From: jason hirsh mailto:hir...@att.net>> >> To: Postfix users > <mailto:postfix-

Re: Lost connection

> On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > jason hirsh: >> oops missed step 2 >> >> >> I get this >> >> >> Trying 66.96.142.51... >> Connected to 51.142.96.66.static.eigbox.net. >> Escape character is '^]'

Re: Lost connection

ITMIME 250-STARTTLS 250 OK > On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > jason hirsh: >> I get this >> >> Trying 66.96.142.51... >> Connected to 51.142.96.66.static.eigbox.net. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> 220 bosimpinc11 bizsm

Re: Lost connection

> On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:30 AM, jason hirsh wrote: > > I get this > > > Trying 66.96.142.51... > Connected to 51.142.96.66.static.eigbox.net <http://static.eigbox.net/>. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 bosimpinc11 bizsmtp ESMTP server ready >

Re: Lost connection

tchell wrote: > > On 10/18/2014 07:01 AM, jason hirsh wrote: >> I have about 8 of these over two days all continue to be retired >> >> I am trying to be pro-active and was just looking if ether was something i >> may have hosed on my side >> >> altho

Re: Lost connection

for expert input > On Oct 18, 2014, at 9:54 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > > Am 18.10.2014 um 15:36 schrieb jason hirsh: >> I am having trouble sending email to a specific server >> >> I got the following error >> >> "lost connection with &

Lost connection

I am having trouble sending email to a specific server I got the following error "lost connection with mx.example.org [xx.xx.xx.xxx] while receiving the initial server greeting” The operator says its my issue yet i have no problems with any other servers m

Re: Spam email containing Hidden Text

Sorry I am using Postfix with Amasvid-new/spam assassin and Dovecot Over all doing pretty good catching stuff but this is combination is new to me and the only guides that discuss it seem to be trying to sell a product On Mar 15, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > On 15/3/2014 8:28

Spam email containing Hidden Text

I have been noting an big increase in spam that contains html and images One common feature is that these emails contain hidden text that only shows up when I look at the source I found samples of this at http://www.hoax-slayer.com/hidden-text-spam.html Right now I have been having some succe

Re: recipient bcc - SOLVED

> > > dovecot on the server >> >>> i also don't see these commands; alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases mailbox_command local_recipient_maps >>> >>> I was not using those in postfix >> >> take some time and read what they do. you s

Re: recipient bcc

On Sep 27, 2012, at 10:07 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote: > >> >> On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:49 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote: >>>

Re: recipient bcc

On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:49 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Jason Hirsh wrote: > >> I am trying to have email coming into postfix be delivered to two mail >> accouts >> >> From what I understand the subject command

recipient bcc

I am trying to have email coming into postfix be delivered to two mail accouts From what I understand the subject command can do that here is my postconf-n postconf-n body_checks = regexp:/usr/local/etc/postfix/body_check bounce_size_limit = 5 command_directory = /usr/local/sbin config_

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 16, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 5/16/2011 10:38 AM, jason hirsh wrote: > >> I have a lot more to learn > > Nah, you've just spent too much time under water breathing through a > tube. Eats away at the brain ya know. You demonstrated th

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 16, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse Venema: >> jason hirsh: >>>>>> What is the output of >>>>>> >>>>>> ifconfig -a | grep 209.160 >>>>> >>>>> inet 209.160.65.133 ne

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 16, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > jason hirsh: >> inet 209.160.68.112 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 209.255.255.255 > > Well that explains everything. With this, your machine believes > that all IP addresses in 209.* are on the local subnet. > >

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 16, 2011, at 10:47 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:29:10AM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: >> On May 16, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> jason hirsh: >>>> 08:40:31.036997 IP mail-iy0-f182.google.com.51101 > >>>> tu

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 16, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > jason hirsh: >> 08:40:31.036997 IP mail-iy0-f182.google.com.51101 > >> tuna.theoceanwindow-bv.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 850119283, win 5720, >> options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 2972295960 ecr 0,nop,wscale 6], l

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

On May 15, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > jason hirsh: >> 08:40:31.036997 IP mail-iy0-f182.google.com.51101 > >> tuna.theoceanwindow-bv.com.smtp: Flags [S], seq 850119283, win 5720, >> options [mss 1430,sackOK,TS val 2972295960 ecr 0,nop,wscale 6]

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread on hold pending useful data]

On May 15, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/15/2011 02:50 PM, jason hirsh wrote: this is the record of the exchange.. it does not appear to be what you expected though 08:40:31.036997 IP mail-iy0-f182.google.com.51101 > tuna.theoceanwindow-bv.com.smtp: Flags [S],

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread on hold pending useful data]

On May 15, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Le 15/05/2011 02:42, jason hirsh a écrit : On May 14, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:56:00PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: I have also tried running the server with the IPFW turned off and still have

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread on hold pending useful data]

On May 15, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Le 15/05/2011 02:42, jason hirsh a écrit : On May 14, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:56:00PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: I have also tried running the server with the IPFW turned off and still have

Re: Google 7720 Error [thread on hold pending useful data]

On May 14, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:56:00PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: I have also tried running the server with the IPFW turned off and still have the issue with some gmail and mindspring.com users I would like to suggest that further posts in

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 14, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * jason hirsh : Th eonly firewall I use is IPFW Well, that's something! Could you somehow dump the rules? Maybe it's accidentially dropping traffic which it should drop (typo!) I double checked the ruleset and 25 and 250

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 14, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: jason hirsh: I repeat my suggestion that you collect real data to show that those SMTP packets from gmail actually reach you. Because when you finally discover that they don't then you can go and fix the real problem. i have no idea H

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 13, 2011, at 7:11 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: jason hirsh: If you want to solve this, then you will need to do the measurements that provide the evidence of what is going on. Until you can show network packets from gmail etc. trying to connect to your Postfix server, you have no evidence

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 14, 2011, at 5:01 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * jason hirsh : the users can access my web page so web services are fine they can ping my server. so DNS is fine i have the message that says that it can't contact my mail server.. my MTA is Postfix where else could iI see help??

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 13, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 5/13/2011 5:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote: i have the message that says that it can't contact my mail server.. my MTA is Postfix where else could iI see help?? do I have to drop postfix and goback tosendmail to debug?? Your connectivity pr

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 13, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: jason hirsh: On May 13, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Victor Duchovni: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:12:18PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more athttp://mail.google.com

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 13, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Victor Duchovni: On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:12:18PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more athttp://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [mail.kasdivi.com. (5

Re: Google 7720 Error

i am on a leased server,, to the best of my knowledge no On May 13, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: I have no proxies and have turned off the firewall although the fact it works for some gmail and mindspring and not other is puzzling Any Cisco firewall (ASA or PIX) on your side? Ma

Re: Google 7720 Error

On May 13, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 5/13/2011 12:12 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I posted this about two months ago the problem continues .. Ihave removed postgrey in its entirety I continue to have issues with some , not all , gmail users and some, not all mindspring users there

Google 7720 Error

I posted this about two months ago the problem continues .. Ihave removed postgrey in its entirety I continue to have issues with some , not all , gmail users and some, not all mindspring users there is no record of any rejection in my mail log.. which i have been told means I am not the

Re: Message can't get through from Mindspring

On Apr 16, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse: What are the DNS records (MX, A) for your mail server? jason hirsh: mail.kasdivi.com. IN A 209.160.65.133 kasdivi.com.IN MX 5 mail.kasdivi.com. Wietse: Now, look in your logs for 168.100.189.2. If

Re: Message can't get through from Mindspring

On Apr 16, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse: What are the DNS records (MX, A) for your mail server? jason hirsh: mail.kasdivi.com. IN A 209.160.65.133 kasdivi.com.IN MX 5 mail.kasdivi.com. Now, look in your logs for 168.100.189.2. If nothing is

Re: Message can't get through from Mindspring

On Apr 16, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: Postfix logs ALL MAIL DELIVEY ATTEMPTS successful or not. If no attempts show up in your logs, then the sending failed to connect to your machine (DNS error, firewall error, and so on). What are the DNS records (MX, A) for you

Re: Message can't get through from Mindspring

On Apr 16, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:jason hirsh:Ok I stumped the band on my troubles on receiving email from google.comNow I am being told that messages from mindspring.com can't get throughPostfix logs ALL MAIL DELIVEY ATTEMPTS successful or not.You need to show Postfix logs for misse

Message can't get through from Mindspring

Ok I stumped the band on my troubles on receiving email from google.com Now I am being told that messages from mindspring.com can't get through here is a copy of the error message Subject: Warning: message 1Q8d0n-0001fo-F7 delayed 24 hours This message was created automatically by mail deliv

Fwd: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is blocking their access. They are getting Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more athttp://mail.google.com

Fwd: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

Begin forwarded message: From: jason hirsh Date: March 3, 2011 4:50:09 PM GMT-04:00 To: John Hinton Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason

Re: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 3:09 PM, jason hirsh wrote: On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 2:52 PM, jason hirsh wrote: On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I have been

Re: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:02 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 2:52 PM, jason hirsh wrote: On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is blocking their access. They are getting

Fwd: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

oops Begin forwarded message: From: jason hirsh Date: March 3, 2011 3:52:45 PM AST To: John Hinton Subject: Re: Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:49 PM, John Hinton wrote: On 3/3/2011 2:34 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I have been

Google The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

I have been informed by a couple gmail users that my server is blocking their access. They are getting Technical details of temporary failure: The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect. Learn more athttp://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=7720 [mail.kasdivi.

Solved: Postfix and Postgrey Not Really Communicating

my mistake i was cutting and paste from some some advise and copies the typo spaces are bad in postfix now to see if postgre wil actually learn this time so far no Begin forwarded message: From: Wietse Venema Date: January 30, 2011 12:41:56 PM AST To: jason hirsh Cc: postfix-users

Postfix and Postgrey Not Really Communicating

OK after some work I have postgrey running but it doesn't appear to be doing "mail stuff" with postfix I am running postfix 2.8 clamav amavid-new dovecot my rc.conf postgrey_enable="YES" postgrey_pidfile="/var/run/postgrey.pid" postgrey_flags="--pidfile=${postgrey_pidfile} --inet=127.0.0.1:

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Jan 3, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: http://blog.minibofh.org/?p=45 -- thank you for you info.. This is pretty much what I did to install and from what I have seen.. it doesn't "learn" for me asbit will grey list the same domain over and over again I will face m

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Jan 1, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Ned Slider wrote: On 01/01/11 21:37, jason hirsh wrote: I can not find any info where the config file is suppose to be.. Create the file /etc/sysconfig/postgrey I have no such directory i am running freebsd 8.0 and add desired options like so: OPTIONS

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Jan 1, 2011, at 4:45 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: Zitat von jason hirsh : OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and thought things were going great The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have tried to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Jan 1, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 06:26:41PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: Where is the rest of this log entry, it too is truncated... Where are the other instances of this same client/sender/recipient triple being rejected? Dec 31 00:03:02 tuna

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:17PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address rejected

Re: Postfix and Postgrey Part II

On Dec 31, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:13:24PM -0400, jason hirsh wrote: I get repeated 450 4.2.0 : Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, This log entry is over-redacted. Show *all* log entries for this message being refused, IN FULL

Postfix and Postgrey Part II

OK Everyone was such a help that I am back.. I got a new server and thought things were going great The issue is Postgrey keeps bouncingh the same message i have tried to debug using my mac.com, comcast.net hotmail.com in all instances it kept boucing the mail until I entered the server in

Re: Installation Error _RESOLVED

the change to the rc.conf doesn't apparently take effect until you reboot.. there might be another way but i am a bit of a newbie On Oct 2, 2010, at 4:42 PM, joe wrote: You rebooted to change the hostname??? Joe On 10/02/2010 01:13 PM, jason hirsh wrote: On Oct 2, 2010, at 3:56 PM,

Re: Installation Error _RESOLVED

On Oct 2, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * jason hirsh : I am doing an installation on a new FreeBSD 8.1 box and it fail with postfix: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 32(decimal): my.domain-server.com remove the trailing or leading space from "my.d

Installation Error

I am doing an installation on a new FreeBSD 8.1 box and it fail with postfix: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 32(decimal): my.domain-server.com Bind is up .. the server name is correct.. I have issued this on my previous server (which this is to replace) and didn't have a p

Re: Send Message when reject_unknown_hostname is invoked [resolved]

On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: jason hirsh: I am apparently having an issue with some servers whose mail is being rejected because of reject_unknown_hostname the reject was shown here Aug 11 00:21:36 xxx postfix/smtpd[96422]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

Re: Send Message when reject_unknown_hostname is invoked

On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Larry Stone wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, jason hirsh wrote: when I stop debugging I won't this is the third instance of I have had of "lost mail" and teh first that I had the address so I can chase it down You didn't lose any mail. The

Re: Send Message when reject_unknown_hostname is invoked

On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 08/13/2010 07:05 PM, jason hirsh wrote: I am apparently having an issue with some servers whose mail is being rejected because of reject_unknown_hostname the reject was shown here Aug 11 00:21:36 xxx batfish ? i was trying

Send Message when reject_unknown_hostname is invoked

I am apparently having an issue with some servers whose mail is being rejected because of reject_unknown_hostname the reject was shown here Aug 11 00:21:36 xxx postfix/smtpd[96422]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail01a.yesbank.com[65.196.66.182]: 450 4.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host

SOLVED Re: Postgrey and Postfix

On Aug 4, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: I raise this question here because it appears the basic postgrey daemon is running I have a

Re: Postgrey and Postfix

On Aug 4, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: Based on above changes i have ths now postgrey 651 0.0 2.4 14384 12028 ?? Is3:24PM 0:00.04 /usr/local/sbin/postgrey --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --inet=127.0.0.1:10023 -d --user=postgrey --group

Re: Postgrey and Postfix

On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: I raise this question here because it appears the basic postgrey daemon is running I have a FReebsd 7.0 server with Postfix, amavisd-new, Dovecot to which i

Re: Postgrey and Postfix

On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Jason Hirsh wrote: I raise this question here because it appears the basic postgrey daemon is running I have a FReebsd 7.0 server with Postfix, amavisd-new, Dovecot to which i added Postgrey I have postgrey runnng as a ps aux grep | postfix

  1   2   >