I made these changes and my mail log indicates that the delays in delivery have 
been reduced 
with no loss of connection 
I presume that test mail has been delivered, at least it was delivered to the 
other mail server










> On Oct 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> 
> jason hirsh:
>> 
>>> On Oct 18, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> jason hirsh:
>>>> oops missed step 2
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I get this
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Trying 66.96.142.51...
>>>> Connected to 51.142.96.66.static.eigbox.net.
>>>> Escape character is '^]'.
>>>> 220 bosimpinc11 bizsmtp ESMTP server ready
>>>> EHLO mail.kasdivi.com
>>>> 250-bosimpinc11 hello [209.160.65.133], pleased to meet you
>>>> 250-HELP
>>>> 250-SIZE 30000000
>>>> 250-8BITMIME
>>>> 250-STARTTLS
>>>> 250 OK
>>> 
>>> That is interesting. These are the same commands that Postfix would
>>> send.
> 
> Does the "lost connection" happen because Postfix makes multiple
> connections at the same time? Try this example:
> 
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>    transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
>    slow_destination_concurrency_limit = 1
>    slow_initial_destination_concurrency = 1
>    slow_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 10
> 
> /etc/postfix/transport:
>    example.com <http://example.com/>  slow:
> 
> /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>    # service type  private unpriv  chroot  wakeup  maxproc command
>    slow      unix     -       -       n       -       -    smtp
>        -o smtp_connection_cache_on_demand=no
> 
> for "example.com <http://example.com/>" specify the problem domain name (not 
> hostname
> or IP address).
> 
>       Wietse

Reply via email to