question is: what’s the best way to take the queue file and convert it
back to something which most closely resembles what came in over the wire? The
read generated by postcat has some weird wrapping and formatting.
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list
ficate, is it because we’re misconfigured on our end? I’m sure we’re not
asking for client certs, and as far as I know there’s no way to present one if
we’re not asking.
I wasn’t aware there was a signaling method to say “I don’t like it, go away”.
Thanks as always for what you folks do.
-Dan
pto/openssl/ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1605:SSL alert
number 42
They're probably harmless, but I am sort of interested in what would make these
happen?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
there.
especially for a mailing list generator that presumably generates lots of the
same thing.
-Dan
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 10, 2025, at 09:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Dnia 9.05.2025 o godz. 16:18:35 Matus UHLAR - fa
If any of those mailing lists are open, regular lists that I could be
subscribed to, for testing, I’d be happy to try to do so to validate this for
you.
-Dan
> On May 9, 2025, at 21:07, Nick Tait via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2025 15:29, Nick Tait via Postfix-users w
your cert chain, it will do the right
thing as long as the certs are in the correct order.
-Dan
> On May 8, 2025, at 15:34, Carl Brewer via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been running postscript on a FreeBSD 13.x server with Letsencrypt
> runnin
for a sigfail.
-Dan
> On May 8, 2025, at 13:06, Ken Biggs via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> OpenDKIM is failing signature verification on most incoming emails. Out of
> 1,146 incoming emails, 173 have been successfully verified and 973 have "bad
> signature data".
> On Feb 10, 2025, at 01:59, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:22:44AM -0800, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> I’d like to turn this into a check in our internal monitoring, since we
>> do occasionally roll the cert
rules).
Viktor, do you have that code up somewhere? (Obviously, I’d make it
single-target)
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
/dev/null, but this
means I might miss “real” errors.
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:22 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:29:21AM -0500, Dan Lists via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to
> send
&
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:50 AM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> Dan Lists via Postfix-users:
> > I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to
> send
> > email. Some of those devices do not do authe
I have a small email relay server that is used to allow IOT devices to send
email. Some of those devices do not do authentication. I'd like to
restrict the sender domain based on the IP.
I'm looking for something like smtpd_sender_login_maps, but for client IPs.
Example of a smtpd_sender_login
ove to see it.
(Ignoring the fact that sometimes stupid filters like office365 just
silently discard or accept and route to spam instead of properly bouncing
-- we can't really solve that).
-Dan
--
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi
> On Jun 15, 2024, at 15:03, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> One addendum about how to distinguish from root@mydomain
> from different hosts.
>
> Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
>>> Use a virtual alias mapping from "r...@dayjob.org" to the
> On Jun 15, 2024, at 06:19, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We currently have myorigin = $mydomain, and mydomain = dayjob.org
>> on one of our border MXes, which is also the outbound MX for
myorigin, without causing potential surprises
elsewhere?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 08:35, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 10:52, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
>>> mailto:postfix-users@postfix.org
> On Apr 2, 2024, at 10:52, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:14:29AM -0400, Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Hey there all,
>>
>> I’m setting up a staging version of dayjob’s ticket system, and we’d
>> basi
port 25 connection. I’d like
nothing to leave the box.
Is there some kind of transport hack I can use for this?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
hey are root equivalent. That is not the improvement that you
> appear to be looking for.
>
> Maybe you can use a pull model instead, like curl and a REST server.
This is a solved problem, using tools like ansible, chef, or puppet. Puppet
specifically can be configured to do periodi
l destined to an internal domain (like
zimbra.example.org) such that only our internal machines can deliver to it, but
that any host on the outside gets an immediate reject notice from our border
MXes?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- pos
which ones it supports, implicitly.
Ergo, the only way to really test this, seems to me to experimentally try
STARTTLS against a much older machine (or one with older ciphers), that would
have been current at the time the iDrac 7 was new, and see which the highest
supported is — even if you
> On Jul 6, 2023, at 6:40 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 6.07.2023 o godz. 05:43:22 Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users pisze:
>> In /etc/aliases:
>>
>> noc:"|/usr/local/sbin/rtmailgate ops noc cor",
>
s there a way to tell it to do this when
delivering to a given maildir?
-Dan
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
thout completely splitting
the config up?
-Dan
--
--------Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
___
Po
Hey there all,
I am one of the people who has maintainer access to OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC. I
use both regularly, but I’m also a novice as a C-coder. (Sysadmin, not
developer). As mentioned in another thread, I don’t have access to the web
hosting stuff or the list management stuff, though I’
d I’m not going to respond much here.
We could use help on a bunch of things, and I’m going to try and put together a
list. I have administrative access to many things, but critically, NOT the box
hosting the DNS or the mailing lists.
I want to fix things. It’s not my day job, and I need he
I know that P-U stands for postfix users. I get it that a short subject tag
was desired, but would [postfix] have been that much more distracting, without
adding the obvious third-grader label that might better be held by qmail?
-Dan
___
Postfix
If there’ a pull request to get it into the current “develop” branch of
opendmarc, I have the privs to merge it.
-Dan
> On Mar 8, 2023, at 11:14 AM, Peter Ajamian via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 9/03/23 08:11, Peter wrote:
>> On 8/03/23 15:46, Scott Kitterman via P
> On Jan 10, 2023, at 18:28, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:10:41PM -0800, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>> My actual question of "is there a mailing list engine that *just*
>> handles a tiny subset of what a full-blown mailman does (no cgi, no
>> m
ctual question of "is there a mailing list engine that *just* handles a
tiny subset of what a full-blown mailman does (no cgi, no membership
management, some basic body tagging perhaps)" remains unanswered and I can't
believe that such an animal doesn't exist. This is exactly the featureset we'd
get with some kind of ESP, except in-house.
-Dan
envelope-sender address . Do the docs need to be updated to cover this as well?
-Dan
===
Here’s that bounce message:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
support-conta...@support.isc.org <mailto:support-conta...@support.isc.org>
Your message couldn't be delivered to th
All,
Does anyone know of a simple remailer tool that can be used inside an aliases
(via a pipe) file that will:
* ‘explode’ messages out to a group statically defined in a textfile.
* not expose my original envelope sender and recipients?
Office365 is rejecting when they see our internal alias
2022-October/106746.html
I will note that we run our messages though openARC at both the point where
mail enters our network (at our border MXes) as well as on our mailman
machines, which applies a seal both as a message enters, and exits. This is
the way the received chain is supposed to work.
Hope it helps, or at least demystifies?
-Dan
ak things on other platforms. And there's a
bunch of stuff that, honestly, just needs to be ripped the hell out (like the
GnuTLS support).
If people want to get together on some chat platform and bang things out, I'd
love to work with anyone who can.
-Dan
> On Dec 27, 2022, at
Can you post the relevant bits of the postfix and opendkim configs (omit the
actual key data, of course).
Anything in the logfiles?
-Dan
> On Dec 25, 2022, at 15:18, Water Around wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, thanks for the response...
> I have exhausted my attempts with plesk docs,
> On Dec 4, 2022, at 11:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Dan Mahoney:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We have a mailing list (of like ten, not-often-changing people)
>> that we'd like to not have to spin up a full mailing list program
>> like mailman or whatnot.
&g
...@google.com <mailto:j...@google.com>
I feel like the right answer here is something like “procmail” — is there some
kind of alias map that can be used to handle this? Is there a standard postfix
way to rewrite headers like this?
-Dan
ere a good answer for that as well?
-Dan
buted script that can handle that
expansion better than an alias :include:?
Controlling who may *send* to such an alias/script is also a
consideration. Is there a good answer for that as well?
-Dan
--
--------Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: f
> On Oct 8, 2022, at 18:57, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Wietse Venema:
>> Dan Mahoney:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2022, at 12:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dan Mahoney:
>>>>> Hey there all,
>>&
> On Oct 8, 2022, at 12:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Dan Mahoney:
>> Hey there all,
>>
>> We have a couple of recipient canonical maps that do things like
>> transform firstname_lastname into username (i.e. dan_mahoney -->
>> dmahoney), also handle
> On Oct 7, 2022, at 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Dan Mahoney:
>> Hey there all,
>>
>> We have a couple of recipient canonical maps that do things like
>> transform firstname_lastname into username (i.e. dan_mahoney -->
>> dmahoney), also handle
> On Oct 7, 2022, at 15:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> CONTENT_FILTER_README
I assume by that you mean https://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
CONTENT_FILTER_README yields a 404.
-Dan
ine will not match.
Is there a way to tell specific milters where in this chain to fire?
-Dan
Hello all,
If I am piping my mail to a program (in this case, day job's RT install), is
there some way in which I can exit that will cause a message to be bounced back
to the sender?
Or do I need a full-on milter to do this kind of rejection?
-Dan
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 14:37, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 01:33:58PM -0700, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>
>> I've always figured "if you configure your sendmail with both a client
>> cert and a server cert, you might as well use it, af
is recommended or
not recommended behavior. I know the authors also move in the OpenSSL
community, and probably in the standards community as well. Are you aware of
anything (internet drafts, BCP documents, etc).
(Is this better asked on mailop, perhaps?)
-Dan
m thinking of?
Best,
-Dan
l)
Postfix has sane defaults as long as you run a fairly recent version, and the
developers have clue. Not all apps have sane defaults (for example, I could
see the need to configure default SSL configs with Sendmail).
-Dan
some of this down.
-Dan
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 19, 2022, at 6:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:33:50PM -0700, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>
>> Does postfix have any support for TLS reporting (RFC8460)?
>>
>> Technically, one need not be using MTA-STS to benefit from this.
e-compaint script, and do your part to make the internet a
little cleaner.
-Dan
> On Apr 22, 2022, at 8:53 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 06:54:56PM -0700, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>
>> masquerade_domains = !ops.foo.org, !support.foo.org, !gitlab.foo.org,
>> !lists.foo.org, isc.org
>> masquerade_exception
Which presents us with a problem.
Is there any way to remove that exception but rewrite the root mail so that
it's perhaps something like:
"Systemname root" mailto:r...@foo.org>>, or even VERP it to be
something like "Roots name from /etc/passwd" mailto:systemname=r...@foo.org>>
-Dan
Hey there,
Does postfix have any support for TLS reporting (RFC8460)?
Technically, one need not be using MTA-STS to benefit from this. We get
monitoring of this with our dmarc monitoring provider, and it feels like it
would be useful to send these reports as well.
-Dan
he state of which messages have been
marked read, etc?
-Dan
PF done properly, use a dedicated SPF component (of which
> there are several).
We are considering (and the latest releases release notes say) deprecating the
internal SPF libs, and currently recommend using libspf2, which is not perfect,
but at least spares us having to maintain our own internal implementation.
-Dan
ache for
131.211.31.189:443, and thus will answer regardless of which Host: header is
sent, just as if you browsed to it via IP address. (Which would also give you
a cert mismatch warning).
If we want something to be concerned about, the apache version is like...40
minor versions out of date. (2.4.6 -- it could be lying about its version).
-Dan
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 1:46 PM, Mike wrote:
>
> On 1/3/2022 2:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> One more question: Does anyone know of a "reflector" like service that one
>> can use to test DANE validation, i.e. a site that one is
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022, Dan Mahoney wrote:
This is a problem when your local resolver is slaving the root zone, as a standard root
zone "type slave" will hand . NS out with the AA bit set, but will not set the
AD bit.
There's a feature in more recent versions of BIND (mirror zone
> On Jan 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:49:05AM -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
>
>> We run validating resolvers at the day job, but by default not on the box
>> where postfix runs. (I.e. we rely on the AD bit).
ound mail?
If you've set smtp_tls_security_level=dane, but haven't set
smtp_dns_support_level=dnssec, is a warning logged?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
On Sat, 1 Jan 2022, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dan Mahoney (Gushi):
Hey there,
I'm trying to modernize older configs at the day job and have found that a
coworker specified:
milter_connect_macros = b i j _ {daemon_name} {if_name} {if_addr}
milter_end_of_data_macros = b i j _ {daemon_name} {if
x.org/MILTER_README.html#macros ...
..I don't see a "b" in the postfix docs. Is there a former value
associated with this, or some sendmail compatibility shim or something?
(For that matter, I don't see if_name or if_addr, but I do see the
"workaround" notes).
Clu
All,
Question really says it all. Everything in postfix, except these, seems to be
lower case. I’m not sure if this is a stylistic thing, or something having to
do with an openssl internal, but if these get lowercased in a config, will it
break?
-Dan
, #corporate office
5.6.7.8, # remote office
[2001:1234:::dead:beef], #local office ipv6
Or would that break things?
Alternatively, would
mynetworks = 1.2.3.4,
# and then the remote
5.6.7.8,
work?
-Dan
> On Oct 29, 2021, at 10:01 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:36:38PM -0700, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
>
>> I see sites like cipherlist.eu suggesting overriding the "medium" cipher
>> set to only be:
>
> Ignore much of
For example, it looks like at some
point postfix stopped doing sslv2 and sslv3 (so the above
smtpd_tls_protocols is already wrong for a modern postfix?), but with
tls10 also known-problematic, will that drop out at some point?
Best,
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, W
ow
running 3_6), to see what changes to your config are effectively made by
enabling that level? (effectively, to show a defaults-diff, or any commands
whose behavior may not have the same meaning under a previous version)?
-Dan
r Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:46:57PM -0400, Dan Ziolkowski wrote:
>
> > understood, i will gather them.. DAN
>
> Just one or two log entires showing a delivery failure logged by
> postfix/smtp (not smtpd), is sufficient. No need for bulk log data.
>
>
Viktor-
understood, i will gather them.. DAN
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 1:40 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 01:16:45PM -0400, Dan Ziolkowski wrote:
>
> > I have postfix working fine sending mails though gmail while VPN not
> > connected. When connected ,
===
So I added 495 , also tried 587.
465 inet n - - - - smtpd
But still blocked.
In summary, postfix mail works fine if VPN if off, does not work if VPN is
on, any advice would be appreciated, thanks DAN
--
Dan Ziolkowski KC2STA
SKCC #4290T
Ubuntu LINUX
e any easy way in postfix to say things like "Block all gmail.com
addresses for stuff sent to i...@dayjob.com"?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
27;ve marked as trusted. Is
there a way to tell Postfix "we know it's invalid, accept it at the border
anyway?" only for sites that have presented a valid client cert?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielM
Yup, either fix spamd so it listens on localhost (you'd see a LISTEN on port
783, which is missing), or correct your spamc flags to include -U
/var/spool/postfix/spamass/spamd.sock
-Dan
> On Sep 28, 2021, at 11:45 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at
Connection refused speaks to the socket not running. What does netstat -na
report?
-Dan
> On Sep 28, 2021, at 11:38 AM, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
>
> Sending to spamassassin group, and no answer will by appair, possible this
> are outdated?
> Please how I can fix this con
tools here could
be as simple as tail, grep and sort
I haven't automated this for fear of shooting myself in the foot, but I'm
happy to share the script off-list. It's quick and hacky so I haven't
bothered sticking it up on like, Github or something.
Best,
-Dan
Hi Ha
I offer criticism and well-wishes)
Same issue with outlook.com, for what it's worth. I get spammed by
dmarc-passing sharepoint notifications from sexy girls, I am on office.com's
feedback loop but occasionally get blocklisted for no reason.
Neither answers abuse@, there's no way to get a human.
It's incredibly frustrating.
-Dan
> Forcing all senders to be "dan@mydomain" seems like the wrong
> solution, but I guess that's ok if it works for you and no one else uses the
> server.
> Sometimes when you hold a hammer everything looks like a nail.
Agreed, it is a bit draconian! But there won&
will also add that because my login is "mylogin",
I had to employ address rewriting as described here to map the FROM
"mylogin" to "dan":
https://serverfault.com/questions/147921/forcing-the-from-address-when-postf
ix-relays-over-smtp
When I execute:
mylogin@myvps:
This page: http://www.postfix.org/OVERVIEW.html
provides an excellent “picture” of how a message is passed between server
processes.
What I cannot yet get my brain wrapped around is how the server process
sequences are expressed and/or configured in the master.cf file.
A clue or three for this
includes Dovecot with
virtual mailbox accounts.
The current setup is very confusing and convoluted. I would rather rebuild
from scratch rather than waste any more time trying to understand the old mess.
Thanks.
___
Dan White : d_e_wh
It's not dnssec signed.
-Dan Mahoney
> On May 17, 2021, at 6:14 PM, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> I noticed in the headers it shows:
>
> dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected)
>
> What does the unprotected part refer to?
> Anything to worry about? Something i ne
against libspf2) and
stuff it in to the existing port (which will set the appropriate sane defaults
for —prefix and the like).
None of the patches in the current version of the port should be required.
If you run into trouble, email me privately.
-Dan
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
1.3.x is
latest.
-Dan
> On Apr 30, 2021, at 2:07 PM, Xavier Belanger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> John Levine wrote:
>
>> I cloned the github repo which contains no zip files, so no I don't know
>> that.
>
> Cloning the repository will indeed not create a zi
.)
We'll likely be turning our attention to OpenDKIM next, as it's also long
due for a maintenance release. I'd like to thank the people on this
mailing list for your lively discussion and feedback, and tolerance of the
occasional off-topic post.
Stay safe out there,
-Dan Mah
s it has issued, perhaps pumping those into an access
table of some sort (with a perl script or the like) may be helpful to you.
That said, if what you’re trying to do is use certs to say:
the cert issued to bob.domain.com will only allow sending from b...@domain.com,
then except on your own mail server, nobody is going to be inspecting the
headers
for this.
(That is to say, this isn’t S/MIME).
If the result is that mail is rejected unless this matches, then you’re only
increasing the load on yourself.
-Dan
>
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 17, 2021, at 14:16, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dan Mahoney (Gushi):
>> All,
>>
>> The dayjob has a number of machines out in the wild that need to be able
>> to send mail (mostly from cron jobs) home to the mothership. Not all hav
igured as a client cert (which we may want to *validate*,
but *not permit for relaying*, that cert would allow relay)
It seems that There are knobs that let you list *individual certs* for
allowing trusted relaying, but not *individual ca's*.
Is there any way around this?
-Da
like to get this out the door soon.
If you hit a show-stopper, push an issue to our github or contact me
privately.
Best,
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
o
do such a thing.
Apologies for the noise here. It may not fully be over, but it's my hope
that the net result is good software for the internet at large.
-Dan
--
----Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linke
Replied inline and snipped. Apologies if my mail.app gets this wrong.
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 7:49 PM, Simon Wilson wrote:
>
> - Message from Dan Mahoney -
> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:19:05 -0700
> From: Dan Mahoney
> Subject: Re: Milters and p
header, and
> OpenDMARC set to trust the Authserv-Id added in Authentication-Results
> headers by policyd-spf and OpenDKIM. All working nicely and good to
> understand the sequence.
Please read CVE-2019-20790, and tell me you’ve found a way to tell PyPolicyd
not to trust the SMTP HELO to generate a passing AR header.
-Dan
>
> Simon.
>
> --
> Simon Wilson
> M: 0400 12 11 16
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 1:09 PM, David Bürgin wrote:
>
> Dominic Raferd:
>> On 31/03/2021 17:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> On 2021-03-31 18:21, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>>>
>>>>> problem is your setup used Sender-ID with is long time depric
Why would you advise not using libspf2?
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 09:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-31 17:51, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
>
>> SPFIgnoreResults true
>> SPFSelfValidate true
>
> set both to false
>
> and dont use libspf2
>
> problem is your setup used Send
This really feels to me like a “oh crap somebody put this email address on
10,000 pieces of customer correspondence and now we have to support it” problem.
It’s about the only excuse I would consider valid.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 19:00, John Levine wrote:
>
> It appears th
turned off the ! handling in postfix:
-Dan
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 4:56 AM, Paul Fowler wrote:
>
> .
> On Mar 11, 2021, at 11:09 PM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2021 02:35, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 11, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Dominic Raferd >> <mailto:domi...@timedicer.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This works for me:
>>>
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
