If any of those mailing lists are open, regular lists that I could be subscribed to, for testing, I’d be happy to try to do so to validate this for you.
-Dan > On May 9, 2025, at 21:07, Nick Tait via Postfix-users > <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > > On 10/05/2025 15:29, Nick Tait via Postfix-users wrote: >> But of course if the first scenario still exhibits the issue, then that >> probably disproves my theory immediately? > > Just thinking a bit more about this... If the first test fails, then you can > compare the headers and body in the received email with what you sent in the > raw email text file, to see if there have been any changes made in-transit. > If there aren't any differences, then the most likely explanation for the > DKIM failure would have to be a DNS issue - i.e. the server validating the > DKIM signature isn't getting the right data when querying for the DKIM > selector? In that case you might look at whether you get different results > when you query the TXT record (e.g. with "dig" tool) using your local > resolver vs. using 8.8.8.8 (for example)? > > Nick. > > _______________________________________________ > Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org > To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
