On 06/11/2023 15:43, Jens Hoffrichter via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm currently leaning towards trying dkimpy-milter, as it seems to be
something still in active development, and if things go wrong, it is
always good that the maintainer of the software is still responding š
That is probably the a
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:16:25 -0400 (EDT) wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
> Please look at the second half of my response?
I discounted the other option in the response, as at the moment most
recipients are local. Thank you for the other follow up email though;
I will try that shortly.
Many thanks,
Thanks for the reply Wietse,
> > I have a domain, for which I would like to deliver some email locally
> > (as a virtual domain) and some email via a relay (using a transport
> > map). The differentiation is based on the recipient address.
>
> Assuming that most recipients are local, use virtual_
Dear all,
I have a domain, for which I would like to deliver some email locally
(as a virtual domain) and some email via a relay (using a transport
map). The differentiation is based on the recipient address.
For example, I would like us...@example.com to be delivered locally,
but to have email f
On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:30:11 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On May 11, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Andrew Beverley
> > wrote:
> >
> > I've tried setting relay_domains and
> > relay_recipient_maps accordingly, but what I failed to mention in my
> > fir
On Wed, 10 May 2017 19:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Normally I would avoid a catch-all for the obvious reasons, but
> > we're undertaking a migration, and for a short period we want to
> > have the Postfix server relay to another MX server any messages
> > that it has no specific acti
Dear all,
Is there a way that I can specify that a transport rule should only be
carried out as a "catch all" for email addresses that are not otherwise
delivered locally?
Normally I would avoid a catch-all for the obvious reasons, but we're
undertaking a migration, and for a short period we want
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:45:22 +0100 "postmas...@quantum-radio.net" wrote:
> This is the problem line that canāt be put in anything but the
> standard /etc/aliases file. Or the majordomo.aliases file.
>
> majordomo: ā|/path/to/majordomo/wrapper majordomoā
Can you put that line in the /etc/aliases f
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 23:11 +1300, Peter wrote:
> You're not supposed to respond to the teaser, it's a spam trap.
> You're supposed to wait for the real banner and respond to that. If
> you wait a few seconds postfix will issue the real banner and *then*
> you respond with an EHLO command.
Th
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 06:13 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You did not behave as a legitimate MTA.
>
> The postscreen_greet_banner "220-text..." teaser banner becomes the
> first part of a multi-line server greeting.
>
> 220-first line from postscreen
> [6-second pause]
> 220 last line
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 06:13 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You did not behave as a legitimate MTA.
>
> The postscreen_greet_banner "220-text..." teaser banner becomes the
> first part of a multi-line server greeting.
>
> 220-first line from postscreen
> [6-second pause]
> 220 last line
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 21:09 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Clearly the sending server is not talking the SMTP protocol correctly,
> > but would someone mind explaining the reason why please?
>
> This error message is described in a "readme" tutorial.
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.htm
Hi,
I'm seeing the following postscreen rejection:
PREGREET 28 after 0.1 from [72.35.20.197]:20586: HELO
ics.igloosoftware.com\r\n
addr 72.35.20.197 listed by domain list.dnswl.org as 127.0.10.1
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [72.35.20.197]:20586: 550 5.5.1 Protocol
error; from=<27612720=optionsnotif
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 14:06 -0700, joh...@fastmail.com wrote:
> I'm now at the phase of looking into Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam. Looks
> like ClamAV and Spamassassin are the main options here.
>
> Both of those projects seem to be pretty alive and kicking too.
>
> So I'm left with how to integrate
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience of delivering to the main Chinese email
providers (such as 126.com, 163.com and qq.com)?
I'm experiencing the sort of behaviour that one gets when delivering
bulk mail from a new IP address to the main Western providers
(rejections, rate-limits etc).
I'm hopin
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 16:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > This requires that you have access to the account from which the email
> > > is being forwarded, correct? In my case, it is a single remote sender
> > > that is being forwarded on to gmail.
> >
> > No, you need access to the acco
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 09:16 -0400, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 21:04 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > I have a postfix-2.10.5 server on fedora, and have several users that
> > > forward the
On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 21:04 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have a postfix-2.10.5 server on fedora, and have several users that
> forward their mail through to gmail. This is apparently enough to
> break SPF and make gmail think I'm the originator of the email,
> instead of the actual sender. Consequently,
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 09:03 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> As much as I hate these things it seems that we do have a use case for
> one at the present. Ideally this would run as entry in an aliased
> :include: mailing list. I suppose I could just put a simple bash
> script together and call that
On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 17:04 +0200, z...@oper.hu wrote:
> When my useres send mail most of the mails goes into spam.
When you start sending from a "new" IP address, it is not unusual for
the big email providers to "spam" your mail initially, until they get an
idea of what's coming from your server
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 16:32 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Note that "smtp_use_tls = yes" is obsolete, the preferred interface
> is:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_security_level
Thanks Viktor, I've updated my config to use that.
Andy
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 14:59 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Beverley:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
> > > need a client certificate for sending email.
> >
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
> need a client certificate for sending email.
My mistake. I'd added in some of those settings when I couldn't get it
working. In actual fact I was missing:
smtp_sasl_tls_s
Hi,
Just a quick suggestion for the excellent Postfix documentation.
Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
stating that "smtp_use_tls = yes" is
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 15:09 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix already logs the script's output (stdout and stderr) streams,
> and it already logs and reports a non-zero exit status.
The problem is monitoring this though: it seems that when the above are
logged they are logged at a level below
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 14:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Beverley:
> > So, is there a way to either change the return-path for all external
> > commands, or alternatively set a higher log level for any errors?
>
> If the error happens in the external command, the
Dear all,
I have some external scripts that are executed through a variety of
aliases[1]. I just discovered recently that one of the external commands
was dying prematurely, so I wondered: what is the best way for
monitoring this happening?
I tried setting alerts on my mail.log for messages with
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 10:55 +0100, Tiemo Kieft wrote:
> Unfortunately there is no real way to know why Google is behaving like
> this. Could it be a configuration error?
Personally I think that the most likely explanation is that Google does
not have enough history of the IP address. The more (gen
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 01:56 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07:18AM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:43 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > > Connection re-use does not prevent concurrency, you'd need a pool
> >
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:43 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Connection re-use does not prevent concurrency, you'd need a pool
> of connections or parallel submission processes pulling messages
> from the application queue. Concurrency is more important than
> connection re-use.
Ah, okay. Is defau
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:23 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:06:34AM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, I am submitting using the sendmail command, rather than
> > SMTP (against the advice of the tuning README) - how much difference is
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
[...]
> spit a lot of messages in the queue means that from the
> application side the sending process is done, deliver
> bulk mail to the final RCPT is a different story
Thanks for the additional info.
> for *really* large amount of mail
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 11:12 +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 30.07.2014 11:06, schrieb Andrew Beverley:
> > I am looking for somebody who can provide consultancy to help me tune
> > some Postfix installations. Can anybody provide recommendations?
>
> tune *what* context
M
Hi Guys,
I am looking for somebody who can provide consultancy to help me tune
some Postfix installations. Can anybody provide recommendations?
I can provide further details if needed, but in a nutshell I am
delivering a lot of list email which is generated using Perl scripts.
I would prefer an
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 23:56 +0200, Titanus Eramius wrote:
> So, I guess my question is: How do you, good and experienced folks,
> keep your backup MXs updated?
>
> I've looked at two solutions so far:
> MySQL Replication
+1 for mysql replication for backup mail servers. It's been pretty
reliable
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 22:53 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 30.06.2012 22:41, schrieb Andrew Beverley:
> >>> html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.3/html
> >>
> >> Hmmm, 2.3.3 is very old, and did not have support for this:
> >
> > Well spott
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:47 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > I've come across instances when mail is still delivered to a
> > command using the user "nobody" (such as when a mail is generated
> > from the local server rather than delivered from an external
> > source).
>
> You forgot to include logs
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 13:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On the Mailman-users list someone suggested Postfix may be a better
> > bet for this type of delivery, I have been looking into this over the
> > past few days and I can get the initial Postfix set up on a test VM,
> > but want to know t
I've been using the default_privs setting to control which user Postfix
uses to deliver mail to external commands. However, I note from the
manual that this setting is only used "from an aliases file that is
owned by root, or when delivery is done on behalf of root".
I've come across instances whe
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 21:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Trying to route email to a script.
>
> what are the permissions of the parent-folders?
> i bet there lies the problem
I've had problems in the past with scripts not owned by the user that
postfix was executing them as (even though that us
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 19:31 +0700, Kingā¢ wrote:
> > When I send a email from my mail server to gmail account, a check mail
> > header in gmail account and it show is it ok ? please help me check it
> >
> >
> >
> > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
> > X.X.X.X is n
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 19:15 +0700, KingT wrote:
> I have install Postfix + Dovecot +OpenKim
>
>
>
> When I send a email from my mail server to gmail account, a check mail
> header in gmail account and it show is it ok ? please help me check it
>
>
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 16:46 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
> I read the details of the multiple instance support but it's not clear
> to me how I can use it to achieve my goal. Do anyone have similar
> setup and share your configuration here?
Please don't top post.
You'll have to give some more details a
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 20:49 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have explained. I run a bunch of mailing lists, and use
> > different IP addresses for different mailing lists (amongst other
> > things). Everything runs from Perl scripts,
>
> perhaps this helps, if you can wrap it
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 13:32 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Beverley:
> > > You have not explained what problem you are trying to solve with
> > > different IP addresses for different mailings (does mail from the
> > > same sender address go out via differ
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 12:15 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrew Beverley:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I currently use multiple Postfix instances to send email from my server
> > from different IP addresses. Each Postfix instance has its own master.cf
> > file in its own c
Hi,
I currently use multiple Postfix instances to send email from my server
from different IP addresses. Each Postfix instance has its own master.cf
file in its own configuration directory, and I use the "-C" parameter of
the sendmail command to specify which one to use.
I was wondering whether t
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:22 +, Helder Oliveira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we start sending lots of emails to hotmail accounts and lots of them
> are in the active queue waiting for delivery for long time...
> Some of our clients have hotmail accounts for testing and are complaining
> abou
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 13:24 -0500, Tim Tyler wrote:
>I have a peculiar problem where a client is trying so send out to
> 1700 local email addresses to our cloud (gmail), but it only seems to
> be able to send out a small portion of the list successfully. This
> person is using Outlook 10 with
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 06:32 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday, June 12, 2011 09:46:41 PM Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have installed clamav-milter on my postfix 2.7 which is running on
> > ubuntu 10.04 server LTS. I have configured the config file where the
> > socket i
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 12:56 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> marshall:
> > Hello;
> >
> > I've been searching around for a while, but I've not found any
> > documentation or
> > examples that show how you can configure Postfix to log bad/bounce/failed
> > emails
> > to MySQL or how to read a log
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:25 -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Gary Smith wrote:
> >>> Anyway, the question is, how does the community as a whole deal with
> >>> big ISP's losing email? It seems that some companies (like ATT) seem
> >>> to have less and less access to tools necessary for communicating
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:54 -0800, Gary Smith wrote:
> I have a client who sends about 600mgs/week total from their SBS server
> through our email relays. The relay IP has a positive reputation and
> isn't flagged for spam on any of the lists. Recently they had an issue
> in which email they sen
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 21:36 -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> This is a "best practices" question for other Postfix users who may be using
> Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
>
> So with all that explained, I have few questions:
>
> 1) What's the optimal way for us to process t
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 14:22 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:53:44PM +0000, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>
> > > Note, that the above applies also to "bare" domain queries, so tables
> > > with "domain =" con
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:21 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 12:48 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:50 -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have n
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 17:13 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:50:21PM -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
>
> > On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
>
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:50 -0500, Jerrale G wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 4:40 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
> > virtual_alias_maps mysql database query for every email that it is
> > processing,
Hi,
I have noticed that my Postfix (version 2.3.8) is performing a
virtual_alias_maps mysql database query for every email that it is
processing, even if the domain is not listed in virtual_alias_domains.
So for example, I have andybev.com in virtual_alias_domains and a
database query set up for
59 matches
Mail list logo
