Multiline responses in SMTP are (as far as I know) not allowed. I'm sure
Wietse will correct me it I'm wrong, but I can't ever recall it.
~Seth
Hi Wietse,
You wrote:
>> What benefits could there be to Postfix's reformatting of the
>> diagnostic information?
>
> For security reasons Postfix never presents error messages and
> responses "as is" especially when information does not have a
> known-to-be trusted origin. Instead, Postfix rem
On Friday 11 September 2009 20:43:47 mic...@casa.co.cu wrote:
> >> Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but
> >> apparently has a bug, somehow are generating large numbers of
> >> messages to various servers on the internet, yahoo, aol,
> >> hotmail and others. to keep me look like an
Noel Jones escribió:
On 9/11/2009 4:58 PM, mic...@casa.co.cu wrote:
this is generated by webmail - this small pierce of the logs , as you
see are many destinations
Sep 11 03:01:43 serverlinux postfix/pickup[30772]: 902E78F327: uid=48
from=
Your webmail application submits mail via sendmail(
Wietse Venema escribió:
mic...@casa.co.cu:
hello list
Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but apparently has a
bug, somehow are generating large numbers of messages to various
servers on the internet, yahoo, aol, hotmail and others. to keep me
look like an open relay server.
On 9/11/09 5:57 PM, ghe wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also since I didn't find it, I just re-postmapped 'em all.
Postfix includes the name of the file that is out-of-date:
warning: database /etc/postfix/access.db is older than source
file /etc/postfix/access
This
On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also since I didn't find it, I just re-postmapped 'em all.
Postfix includes the name of the file that is out-of-date:
warning: database /etc/postfix/access.db is older than source
file /etc/postfix/access
This is logged when the o
On 9/11/09 5:05 PM, ghe wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
308 *Warning: Database file needs update
This message appears when you have a map file that requires
postmap'ing to bring the db file up to date relat
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, ghe wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
>
>>> I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
>>>
>>> 308 *Warning: Database file needs update
>>>
>>
>> This message appears when you have a map file that requires
>> postmap'ing to bring the
ghe:
>
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
>
> >> I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
> >>
> >> 308 *Warning: Database file needs update
> >>
> >
> > This message appears when you have a map file that requires
> > postmap'ing to bring the db file up to dat
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Try:
>
> postconf -d | grep 10
>
> This is the Postfix mailbox size limit. To enforce the limit,
> the recipient cannot create a file larger than this.
>
> Wietse
>
Wietse,
Thanks for the quick response. The "grep" you su
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
308 *Warning: Database file needs update
This message appears when you have a map file that requires
postmap'ing to bring the db file up to date relative to the source
file. Loo
On 9/11/09 4:48 PM, ghe wrote:
I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
308 *Warning: Database file needs update
This message appears when you have a map file that requires postmap'ing
to bring the db file up to date relative to the source file. Look at
the log messages t
I don't understand this line from today's logwatch report:
308 *Warning: Database file needs update
I looked and didn't find it in the mail logs, but logwatch is saying
it was found 308 times. Google led me to a number of pages that denied
me access and a CVS server that didn't make s
mic...@casa.co.cu:
> hello list
>
> Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but apparently has a
> bug, somehow are generating large numbers of messages to various
> servers on the internet, yahoo, aol, hotmail and others. to keep me
> look like an open relay server.
> Sep 11 03:0
On 9/11/2009 4:58 PM, mic...@casa.co.cu wrote:
this is generated by webmail - this small pierce of the logs , as you
see are many destinations
Sep 11 03:01:43 serverlinux postfix/pickup[30772]: 902E78F327: uid=48
from=
Your webmail application submits mail via sendmail(1), not via
SMTP. Post
Kenneth Stephen:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi,
>
> I have a .forward file on an AIX system running postfix which
> sends the mail to a program. Here is what I've observed on that
> machine:
>
> userid = x
> machine = somehost
>
> from a login session for x:
>
> $ u
Hi,
I have a .forward file on an AIX system running postfix which
sends the mail to a program. Here is what I've observed on that
machine:
userid = x
machine = somehost
from a login session for x:
$ ulimit -a | grep file
file(blocks) 2097151
from the program invoked over the .forw
hello list
Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but apparently has a
bug, somehow are generating large numbers of messages to various
servers on the internet, yahoo, aol, hotmail and others. to keep me
look like an open relay server.
This webmail delivers to a local server th
Paul Cockings:
> Hi List -
>
> I send a mail to d...@gdshgf.ggg via my postfix server
> I get a an NDR back with the a 550 Host or domain name not found (in the
> body)
> - That works like normal
>
> Now I'd like to alter things;
>
> When I get an NDR I'd like to parse the header only to find w
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Paul Cockings :
>
> > That seems like a much better idea - Thanks!
>
> A bit of code sends mail to $...@$2:
>
> /usr/sbin/sendmail -N failure,success -f sender+$1...@charite.de $...@$2 < From: sender
> To: $...@$2
> Errors-To: sender+$1...@charite.de
> Return-Receipt-To
* Paul Cockings :
> That seems like a much better idea - Thanks!
A bit of code sends mail to $...@$2:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -N failure,success -f sender+$1...@charite.de $...@$2 <
To: $...@$2
Errors-To: sender+$1...@charite.de
Return-Receipt-To: sender+$1...@charite.de
Disposition-Notification-To:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Paul Cockings :
Hi List -
I send a mail to d...@gdshgf.ggg via my postfix server
I get a an NDR back with the a 550 Host or domain name not found (in
the body)
- That works like normal
Now I'd like to alter things;
When I get an NDR I'd like to parse the header on
* Paul Cockings :
> Hi List -
>
> I send a mail to d...@gdshgf.ggg via my postfix server
> I get a an NDR back with the a 550 Host or domain name not found (in
> the body)
> - That works like normal
>
> Now I'd like to alter things;
>
> When I get an NDR I'd like to parse the header only to find
Hi List -
I send a mail to d...@gdshgf.ggg via my postfix server
I get a an NDR back with the a 550 Host or domain name not found (in the
body)
- That works like normal
Now I'd like to alter things;
When I get an NDR I'd like to parse the header only to find who the
message was oringally sen
an...@iguanait.com a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> in our two mail servers i see last weeks this:
>
> non-SMTP command from 250.84.221.62.dyn.idknet.com[62.221.84.250]:
> From: ? VIAGRA ? Official Site
>
> How can i block these accesses?
add
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
to your smtpd_recipien
Alejandro Facultad:
> Dear all, I have Debian Etch + Postfix 2.3.8 and I want to fast
> up te mail queue, because sometines I notice that the messages
> are delivered with some delay.
The reason for the delay is logged in the maillog file.
> How can acelerate the sending of messages in Postfix ??
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:53:17PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49:03AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> > >> Don't forget that sendmail(1) is outside the persistent master-managed
> > >> Postfix service and can en-queue mail (to disk) f
Dear all, I have Debian Etch + Postfix 2.3.8 and I want to fast up te mail
queue, because sometines I notice that the messages are delivered with some
delay.
How can acelerate the sending of messages in Postfix ???
Thanks a lot
alexandro
Yahoo! Cocina
Encontra las mejores recetas con
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:53:17PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49:03AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> >> Don't forget that sendmail(1) is outside the persistent master-managed
> >> Postfix service and can en-queue mail (to disk) for later delivery, even
> >>
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 2:53 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
The solution is not to manually create FIFOs. Rather, you should either
run a second Postfix service, or replace the system sendmail(1) with
a symlink to the custom-built binary.
Eh, this is not a normal problem. OSX norm
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:49:03AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> Don't forget that sendmail(1) is outside the persistent master-managed
>> Postfix service and can en-queue mail (to disk) for later delivery, even
>> when Postfix is *not* running (provided it does run eventually...).
>
> Yeah
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 2:16 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:12:58AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Speaking of which, how many postdrop executables exist on the system?
Two. And the system postfix is still running even though it is supposed
to be d
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:12:58AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> Speaking of which, how many postdrop executables exist on the system?
>
>
> Two. And the system postfix is still running even though it is supposed to
> be disabled, because I shut down our postfix instance, and the errors
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 2:07 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to
> look up public/pickup: No such file or directory
postdrop will chdir to the queue directory in
`postconf -dh con
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:04:49AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
>> Also which postdrop is reporting errors? Is there more than one "postdrop"
>> on the system? More than one Postfix-related sendmail(1) with a different
>> default config directory? ...
>
> There is not one running that I see
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 11:04 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
Also which postdrop is reporting errors? Is there more than one
"postdrop" on the system? More than one Postfix-related sendmail(1) with
a different default config directory? ...
There is not one running that I see. O
Wietse Venema:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> > Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look up
> > public/pickup: No such file or directory
>
> postdrop will chdir to the queue directory in
>
> `postconf -dh config_directory`/main.cf
>
> You can't override this unless
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 1:58 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
zimbra:~ zimbra$ postconf -dh config_directory
/opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.2.2z/conf
zimbra:~ zimbra$ cd /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.2.2z/conf
zimbra:conf zimbra$ grep -i queue main.cf
queue_run_delay = 300s
bounce_queue_lifetime =
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:54:16AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, September 11, 2009 1:49 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
> wrote:
>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount:
>>> Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look
>>> up public/pickup: No such file or directory
>>
>>
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 1:49 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look
up public/pickup: No such file or directory
postdrop will chdir to the queue directory in
`postconf -dh config_directory`/mai
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 1:35 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:27:55AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Any ideas on why this would be reporting above error every few minutes,
when everything seems to be correct?
Some nss library is causing "postdrop" to c
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look up
> public/pickup: No such file or directory
postdrop will chdir to the queue directory in
`postconf -dh config_directory`/main.cf
You can't override this unless the non-default config_directory
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:27:55AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> Any ideas on why this would be reporting above error every few minutes,
>>> when everything seems to be correct?
>>
>> Some nss library is causing "postdrop" to chdir? What the working
>> directory of the process?
>
> This is
--On Friday, September 11, 2009 1:21 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:56:49AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
zimbra:public root# pwd
/opt/zimbra/data/postfix/spool/public
zimbra:public root# ls -l
total 0
srw-rw-rw- 1 _postfix _postdrop 0 Sep 11 17:49 cleanup
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:56:49AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> zimbra:public root# pwd
> /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/spool/public
> zimbra:public root# ls -l
> total 0
> srw-rw-rw- 1 _postfix _postdrop 0 Sep 11 17:49 cleanup
> srw-rw-rw- 1 _postfix _postdrop 0 Sep 11 17:49 flush
> prw--
I'm seeing this continually from postfix:
Sep 11 09:24:05 zimbra postfix/postdrop[89912]: warning: unable to look up
public/pickup: No such file or directory
What's odd, is this file does exist, and it seems that pickup is actually
running fine?
zimbra:public root# ps aux | grep pickup
_po
On 9/11/2009 8:40 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
or perhaps you misspelled "restricions" in main.cf like you did in
this message.
Always check your "postconf -n" output to verify that postfix see what
you expect.
Ahh this is more than possible .. Would 'postfix reload' not complain
about a syntax error?
tech_postfix-us...@newcomsrl.it:
> I asked a friend of mine who runs a ISP with EIMS (Eudora Internet Mail
> Server): He says he can easily tell the server to distinguish between
> SMTP submission and remote SMTP requests:
Postfix uses permit_mynetworks to authorize "local" clients for
things th
Brian Evans - Postfix List ha scritto:
Gabriele wrote:
The problem is that my postfix does not ask for authentication if the
recipient is inside any virtual domains of my server, so any user can
connect to my postfix and send emails to any of my domains without
authentication! This is bad!
Mathias Tausig wrote:
> I just tried to replace the "\n" with "\r\l", but to no avail. The same
> problem remains.
I can be wrong here, but shouldn't that be "\r\n" ?
HTH,
Mikael
The php-net-smtp PEAR module implements an SMTP client; you may
be able to pick some pieces to do the server portion of the protocol.
Wietse
hello list
Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but apparently has a
bug, somehow are generating large numbers of messages to various
servers on the internet, yahoo, aol, hotmail and others. to keep me
look like an open relay server.
This webmail delivers to a local server th
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
smtpd_recipient_restricions = reject_unauth_destination,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
permit_mynetworks
Am I doing something wrong?
It seems to me that the restrictions aren't processed in the order that
you specify them o
On 9/11/2009 3:30 AM, Duncan B. wrote:
I tried putting "permit_mynetworks" at the end of the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions instead, but it still just allows all
relaying from mynetworks:
smtpd_recipient_restricions = reject_unauth_destination,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_d
Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 08:38 -0400 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Mathias Tausig:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 10:18 -0400 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > [...]
> > > This is an output buffering problem. You need to flush output
> > > after each reply, perhaps by calling the flush() function.
> > >
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:25:36PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:25 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:06:09PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> > > > > RCPT TO:
> > > > > 250 2.1.5 Ok
> >
> > Mail to "$address_verify_sender" (qualified with @$myorigin if a bare
Gabriele wrote:
> The problem is that my postfix does not ask for authentication if the
> recipient is inside any virtual domains of my server, so any user can
> connect to my postfix and send emails to any of my domains without
> authentication! This is bad!
This will block all incoming internet
Mathias Tausig:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 10:18 -0400 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> [...]
> > This is an output buffering problem. You need to flush output
> > after each reply, perhaps by calling the flush() function.
> >
>
> Hy!
>
> No, I am afraid that this is not the problem.
>
> I am sen
Robin Whittle:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3464#section-2.3.6
>
> diagnostic-code-field =
> "Diagnostic-Code" ":" diagnostic-type ";" *text
>
>Since the Status code
>will sometimes be less precise than the actual transport diagnostic
>code, the Diagnostic-Code field
Greetings,
my mail server runs postfix+dovecot+mysql and has a dozen of virtual
domains.
Users need to authenicate to the SMTP to send mail.
The problem is that my postfix does not ask for authentication if the
recipient is inside any virtual domains of my server, so any user can
connect to
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:25 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:06:09PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > > > RCPT TO:
> > > > 250 2.1.5 Ok
>
> Mail to "$address_verify_sender" (qualified with @$myorigin if a bare
> user name) is not subject to recipient restrictions, by default. In
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Why don't you reject_unknown_recipient_domain BEFORE permitting your networks
(and/or SASL authenticated clients) in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
So, how do I make mynetworks exempt from the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, yet make mynetworks able to re
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
The list of CIDR IP ranges to relay for is in the mynetworks variable,
so I can't do the recipient domain verification in
"smtpd_recipient_restrictions" because I need "permit_mynetworks", so
that my networks can relay through the box! permit_mynetworks
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 10:18 -0400 schrieb Wietse Venema:
[...]
> This is an output buffering problem. You need to flush output
> after each reply, perhaps by calling the flush() function.
>
Hy!
No, I am afraid that this is not the problem.
I am sendig you a few details of my setup
Her
65 matches
Mail list logo
