On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:25:36PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:25 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:06:09PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> > > > > RCPT TO:<postmas...@mumbai.nstest.com>
> > > > > 250 2.1.5 Ok
> >
> > Mail to "$address_verify_sender" (qualified with @$myorigin if a bare
> > user name) is not subject to recipient restrictions, by default. In
> > many versions of Postfix, "postmaster" is the default value of
> > $address_verify_sender.
> >
> > If you don't use SAV or RAV, set:
> >
> > address_verify_sender = <>
> >
> > and <postmas...@$myorigin> will no longer be exempt from recipient
> > restrictions.
>
> Sorry I checked this mail late. But The server accepts mails for all
> ids , even non postmaster IDS @$myhostname and does not fail on smtpauth
> fail
Then post examples of that, and verbose logging from the SMTP server for
the session in question (changing any base64-encoded passwords that are
not bogus).
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
