2015-06-19 14:24 GMT+02:00 Robin Gareus :
> On 06/19/2015 01:47 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 02:13 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> [..]
>>> So you are suggesting just simply upload again with all archs allowed?
>>
>> I think so. You could wait for the ftpmasters to remove the mip
On 06/19/2015 01:47 PM, James Cowgill wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 02:13 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
[..]
>> So you are suggesting just simply upload again with all archs allowed?
>
> I think so. You could wait for the ftpmasters to remove the mipsel
> build and for it to migrate to testing if y
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 02:13 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-18 22:55 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill :
> > It's not a concurrent compile issue - the failed build was non
> > -parallel.
> >
> > I've run the build on a few of mipsel machines and it built fine every
> > time so I don't think it's a bug
2015-06-18 22:55 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill :
Hi James,
> It's not a concurrent compile issue - the failed build was non
> -parallel.
>
> I've run the build on a few of mipsel machines and it built fine every
> time so I don't think it's a bug in gcc.
>
> Also mips64el built it fine (uses almost the
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 21:29 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 03:43 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > 2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
> > > isn't that what #788231 is all about?
> > >
> > > anyhow, #788210 is tagged as unreproducible, so it might be worth
> > > digging somemore into the r
On 06/18/2015 03:43 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
>> On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
>>> :
On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>
2015-06-18 16:58 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>
>>> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is
>>> parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow
>>> be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
>> a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is
>> parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow
>> be causing the problem?
>
> x42-plugins not having parallel build enable
2015-06-18 13:26 GMT+02:00 umläute :
> On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
>> :
>>> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>>
> I asked removal mipsel build
> https://b
On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
> :
>> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>
I asked removal mipsel build
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7882
2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
:
> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>>> I asked removal mipsel build
>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231
>>> Is it fine just like this or other step is ne
On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
>> 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
>>
>>> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package.
>>> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the
>>> issue
2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
>
>> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package.
>> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the
>> issue is sorted out.
>
> I asked removal mipsel build
> ht
2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler :
> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package.
> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the
> issue is sorted out.
I asked removal mipsel build
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231
On 9 June 2015 at 10:15, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 10:01 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: Package:
> x42-plugins
>> > -Architecture: any
>> > +Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
>> > kfreebsd-i386 mips powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc
>
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 10:01 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: Package:
x42-plugins
> > -Architecture: any
> > +Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
> > kfreebsd-i386 mips powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc
>
> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel
On 9 June 2015 at 08:42, wrote:
>
> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
> commit d63f06fe94be894c92b2b44abbb7c850f8cacfe1
> Author: Jaromír Mikeš
> Date: Tue Jun 9 13:42:09 2015 +0200
>
> Exclude mipsel from build.
>
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> in
17 matches
Mail list logo