On 2015-06-18 10:33, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-06-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" > <umlae...@debian.org>: >> On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com>: > >>>> I asked removal mipsel build >>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231 >>>> Is it fine just like this or other step is needed? >>> >>> x42-plugins didn't entered "testing" what to do now? >> >> just wait? >> >> #788231 has not been closed yet, so x42-plugins is still listed as >> supporting mipsel. >> >> you also might want to give some more detailed reasoning in the >> bug-report, as to why you would like to have mipsel builds removed. >> (if stating "FTBFS" were enough, we could just do automatic removal of >> archs that fail to bulid, no?) > > Thank you I added some info ... I am not sure if something extra > should be done like removing mipsel build from testing?
isn't that what #788231 is all about? anyhow, #788210 is tagged as unreproducible, so it might be worth digging somemore into the reason why it fails. a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow be causing the problem? (i'm really just asking; but iirc a number of builds failed for with obscure errors do to such problems) fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
