Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 10:01 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: Package: x42-plugins > > -Architecture: any > > +Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 > > kfreebsd-i386 mips powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc > > Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package. > I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the > issue is sorted out.
If you request removal from unstable and testing, then upload to unstable with Arch: all and it FTBFS on mipsel, it will nevertheless migrate to testing, because there was no previous package available for mipsel in testing then and thus the FTBPS is not coinsidered a regression. Is this right? - Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
