On 9 June 2015 at 10:15, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@debian.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 10:01 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler: Package: > x42-plugins >> > -Architecture: any >> > +Architecture: amd64 arm64 armel armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 >> > kfreebsd-i386 mips powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc >> >> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package. >> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the >> issue is sorted out. > > If you request removal from unstable and testing, then upload to > unstable with Arch: all and it FTBFS on mipsel, it will nevertheless > migrate to testing, because there was no previous package available for > mipsel in testing then and thus the FTBPS is not coinsidered a > regression. > > Is this right?
Correct, with s/all/any/ . -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
