On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <mira.mi...@gmail.com>: >> 2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >> >>> Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package. >>> I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42 build again when the >>> issue is sorted out. >> >> I asked removal mipsel build >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788231 >> Is it fine just like this or other step is needed? > > x42-plugins didn't entered "testing" what to do now?
just wait? #788231 has not been closed yet, so x42-plugins is still listed as supporting mipsel. you also might want to give some more detailed reasoning in the bug-report, as to why you would like to have mipsel builds removed. (if stating "FTBFS" were enough, we could just do automatic removal of archs that fail to bulid, no?) gfmsard IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
