pkg-common-lisp Alioth administrators and webpages (was: Request to Join Project Debian Common Lisp Team)

Hi there! Please Cc: me, I am not subscribed to the list. On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:51:05 +0100, wrote: > Aron Xu has requested to join your project. I got this request because I was still an administrator of the pkg-common-lisp Alioth group. Once I remove myself, however, there will be only two

Mailing list(s) administration

Hi there! Planning my complete departure [1], I removed myself from the administrator interface of our mailing lists and, given that Peter was the only one still listed there, I added Christopher [4] and Milan [5]. Yes, I wrote "lists" because the old one on CommonLisp.net [2] is still working an

Re: Cedilla removed from sid, users complain

Hi there! Juliusz, it is better to point your question to the *maintainer* of the package, not to debian-devel@ (which is not a mandatory mailing list for all the maintainers). Adding the Debian Common Lisp team to the loop. On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:25:19 +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > It seems that

Re: Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

Hi Christoph! On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:08:03 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Luca Capello writes: >> On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:23:29 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: >>> Luca Capello writes: >>>>>> - ecl [...] >> Christoph, given that I think you created a

Re: Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

Hi Christoph! On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:23:29 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Luca Capello writes: >>>> - ecl >>> >>> The Git repository on Alioth is not up-to-date: Christoph, can you push >>> your last changes, please? >> >> Ping (this tim

Re: Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

Hi there! On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:06:54 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > Please note that in a week from now I will ask for removal of the > packages specified below, if no one complains before. It took me a bit more time, but in the end here I am ;-) > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:54:36 +0

Bug#610903: ftp.debian.org: RM: cedilla -- ROM; orphaned

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! Given that I have no more interest in maintaining cedilla and that no one from the Debian Common Lisp team expressed interest, hereby I ask for cedilla removal: Message-ID: <87fwt921lt@gismo.pca.it> URL:

Bug#610902: ftp.debian.org: RM: url-rewrite -- ROM; orphaned

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! Given that I have no more interest in maintaining url-rewrite and that no one from the Debian Common Lisp team expressed interest, hereby I ask for url-rewrite removal: Message-ID: <87fwt921lt@gismo.pca.it> URL:

Bug#610900: ftp.debian.org: RM: rfc2388 -- ROM; orphaned

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! Given that I have no more interest in maintaining rfc2388 and that no one from the Debian Common Lisp team expressed interest, hereby I ask for rfc2388 removal: Message-ID: <87fwt921lt@gismo.pca.it> URL:

Bug#610899: ftp.debian.org: RM: ironclad -- ROM; orphaned

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! Given that I have no more interest in maintaining ironclad and that no one from the Debian Common Lisp team expressed interest, hereby I ask for ironclad removal: Message-ID: <87fwt921lt@gismo.pca.it> URL:

Re: Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

. On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:54:36 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:00:44 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: >> According to <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=l...@pca.it> and >> <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=gi...@debian.org>, the >> packa

Re: Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

Hi there! On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:00:44 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > I think it is time for me to officially leave the Debian CL Team: I have > not been active for a while, now, and anyway my general involvement > (being it reading/moderating the mailing list, replying bugs and taking

Leaving the team, Uploaders: to be fixed

Hi there! I think it is time for me to officially leave the Debian CL Team: I have not been active for a while, now, and anyway my general involvement (being it reading/moderating the mailing list, replying bugs and taking care of packages) is already below zero for several months. According to <

Bug#504514: closed by Peter Van Eynde (Bug#504514: fixed in clisp 1:2.49-1)

Hi Sam! On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:53:19 +0200, Sam Steingold wrote: > I don't see 2.49 at > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=clisp Now is there, as a general note the Debian PTS (Package Trackying System) is lagging behind real "world", IIRC nowadays of at least 6 ours. Thx, bye, Gismo /

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi Desmond! On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:03:45 +0200, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 20:36, Luca Capello wrote: >> BTW2, please have a look at pristine-tar, we should import in the Debian >> Git repository all the previous .orig.tar.gz in a pristine-tar branch, >

Mailing list administration (was: On the use of Git)

Hi there! On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:31:11 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > PS: maybe we also need more 'admin' people for the mailing lists. Is > someone a volunteer to do this? We need more, yes, especially given the fact that I am slowly fading away from CL-related stuff in Debian. Christoph,

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi there! On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 03:15 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 > of my package "stumpwm". Done, as I am still listed in the Uploaders field and I was the previous maintainer. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca signature.asc Des

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi Desmond! On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 02:57 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:19, Luca Capello wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 01:18 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 05:13, Luca Capello wrote: > >> > BTW, these

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi Desmond! On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 01:18 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 05:13, Luca Capello wrote: > > BTW, these are not complaints, I actually want to understand why you > > half-switched to source-format-3.0(quilt) ;-) > > Since I simply use &

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi Desmond! On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 14:00 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 14:54, Luca Capello wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 04:38 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 > >

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

Hi Desmond! On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 04:38 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 > of my package "stumpwm". If I would be too much conservative, I would say that you are hijacking StumpWM (yes, it is a bit outdated, but there are not

Re: Do we need an unofficial debian repository?

Hi there! Thanks to DebConf10, I am catching up with my huge mail backlog, which (obviously) includes pkg-common-lisp as well. On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:31 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > The team is inactive now. People's bugreports and patches don't get > any response. Many packages have been

Bug#580779: cl-asdf: ecl won't install: The function SYSTEM-SOURCE-FILE is undefined

Hi there! Please do not top post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting. On Sat, 08 May 2010 17:04:17 +0200, Faré wrote: > It's another case of "we need to upgrade cl-asdf and the package > failed to specify so". Well, everything is explained at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#578740: common-lisp-controller: should Suggests: darcs for `clc-clbuild setup`

Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 7.2 Severity: normal Tags: patch clc-clbuild must be "configured" through `clc-clbuild setup`, which fails if darcs is not present. Thus c-l-c should Suggests: darcs. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers

Bug#565522: common-lisp-controller: stumpwm still broken

tags 565522 + patch thanks Hi Kenyon! On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:25:07 +0200, Kenyon Ralph wrote: > On 2010-04-15T16:15:13+0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:26:18 +0100, Kenyon Ralph wrote: >> > I upgraded to the version in which this is supposed to be fixed

Bug#565522: common-lisp-controller: stumpwm still broken

Hi Kenyon! On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:26:18 +0100, Kenyon Ralph wrote: > I upgraded to the version in which this is supposed to be fixed, and > stumpwm still fails to start: I cannot reproduce it on an up-to-date amd64 sid, which... > ii cl-asdf 2:1.502-1 Another System Defin

Bug#571791: Can this be still be reproduced?

Hi Pierre! On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:05:06 +0100, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > I installed the newest version of clisp and I got not problem in the > configuration step. Can anyone reproduce this bug? I can not reproduce it in a clean squeeze chroot, setting the locale to fr_FR.UTF8 as Pier

Bug#567598: stumpwm fails to run with clisp

reassign 567598 cl-ppcre forcemerge 565522 567598 retitle 565522 cl-ppcre: Program stack overflow with clisp thanks Hi there! On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:00:52 +0100, XU Benda wrote: > Package: stumpwm [...] > After updating to xserver-xorg-core to 2:1.7.4-2, stumpwm fails to run > with clisp with "Pr

Bug#565522: stumpwm: startx fails

reassign 565522 cl-ppcre found 565522 2.0.1-2 severity 565522 important thanks Hi Memnon! On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:13:19 +0100, Memnon Anon wrote: > Package: stumpwm [...] > Snip= > ;; Datei /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/stumpwm.asd wird

Bug#553484: slime: depends on an emacs version other than emacs-snapshot

Hi there! On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:35:45 +0100, TheGZeus wrote: > I only have emacs-snapshot installed, and would prefer to keep things > that way. [...] > emacs23 is great, but I like the weekly updates for various reasons, > and slime works fine on them. slime does not depend on any Emacs version

Re: Slowly giving up on most packages

# arnesi forcemerge 547120 540699 # fiveam forcemerge 547122 540700 # qbook forcemerge 547123 540702 # yacml forcemerge 547121 540703 # parenscript forcemerge 546079 540704 thanks Hi there! On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:26:56 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Luca Capello wrote: >> Adoption req

Bug#536915: stumpwm: FTBFS: stumpwm.texi: No such file or directory

tags 536915 + pending thanks Hi Lucas! On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:51:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. [...] >> ; compilation aborted because of fatal error: >> ; READ failure in COMPILE-FILE: >> ; SB-INT:SIMPLE-R

Re: /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ not in asdf:*central-registry*

Hi there! On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:42:07 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Tamas Papp wrote: >> I thought I would write before filing a bug report. Apparently >> /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/ is not in asdf:*central-registry* any >> more by default. Of course adding it manually fixes this, but it

Bug#545344: stumpwm does not start

tags 545344 + pending thanks Hi Dean! On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:33:24 +0200, Dean Menezes wrote: > stumpwm fails to start with an error "cannot find component stumpwm" in CLISP > 2.48 > I can manually register stumpwm.asd, but this stops working after I kill > stumpwm This is caused by a change i

Re: Slowly giving up on most packages

Hi there! On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:35:30 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Here a more detailed view of the situation... Some news... > - all the BESE tools will be removed in one week if no one from this > list or upstream one (to which I will write shortly after this mail) > will sh

Bug#540704: RFA: parenscript -- JavaScript embedded in a Common Lisp host

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi there! As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no more interest in maintaining Parenscript: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html The package is outdated mostly because of a bug with th

Bug#540703: RFA: yaclml -- Yet Another Common Lisp Markup Language

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi there! As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no more interest in maintaining yaclml: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html If no one will step in and adopt yaclml, I will ask for its

Bug#540702: RFA: qbook -- create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi there! As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no more interest in maintaining qbook: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html If no one will step in and adopt qbook, I will ask for its re

Bug#540700: RFA: fiveam -- simple regression testing framework

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi there! As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no more interest in maintaining FiveAM: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html If no one will step in and adopt FiveAM, I will ask for its

Bug#540699: RFA: arnesi -- small Common Lisp utilities

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi there! As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no more interest in maintaining arnesi: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html If no one will step in and adopt arnesi, I will ask for its

Bug#540696: RM: cl-geodesics -- ROM; dead upstream

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! One year ago I saved cl-geodeiscs from removal: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494404#15 One year later, there are no new installations according to popcon and since I do not have any more time to maintain it, I think the be

Bug#540692: RM: trivial-sockets -- ROM; dead upstream, replaced by usocket

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! trivial-sockets is dead upstream and usocket is the "official" replacement: http://www.cliki.net/trivial-sockets http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/ While usocket's author provides a migration library (called trivial-usocket, not availa

Bug#540689: RM: tbnl -- ROM; superseded by hunchentoot

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! TBNL was later renamed to Hunchentoot and since lenny the tbnl source package builds a transitional dummy package: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2008-October/001024.html It is time to completely remove tbnl,

Slowly giving up on most packages

Hi there! It is with big sad feelings that I write this e-mail, since I have decided that I need to face reality: I have no more time to properly maintain Common Lisp packages, because I do not use some of them anymore and I have been more and more implicated in supporting Debian on the Openmoko s

Bug#518183: stumpwm: Doesn't honour keyboard settings in xorg.conf

Hi Antony! On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:59:15 +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote: > Version: 1:20080721-2 Please, can you check if the latest version I just uploaded, i.e. 1:20090502.git482df740-1, still has the same bug? > I'm just trying stumpwm for the first time, and it seems to ignore my > Dvorak keyboa

Bug#520685: stumpwm: When returning from screensaver, keyboard doesn't respond

Hi Antony! On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:17:46 +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote: > Version: 1:20080721-2 Please, can you check if the latest version I just uploaded, i.e. 1:20090502.git482df740-1, still has the same bug? I cannot reproduce it with 1:20080721-2 on a KVM virtual machine. > Sometimes when ret

Bug#521906: clisp: FTBFS: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared

severity 494587 serious merge 494587 521906 thanks Hi Daniel! On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:13:39 +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: clisp > Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 > Severity: serious > >>From my pbuilder build log: [...] > bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function)

CLISP 2.47 and i18n module

Hi there! I (finally) took the time to upgrade the Debian CLISP package to the latest upstream version, i.e. 2.47. While the CLISP core builds without any problem, I get an error in the i18n module: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ;; Compiling file /tmp/buildd/c

Bug#517205: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1

Hi Peter! On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:38:54 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Evgeny M. Zubok wrote: >> Peter Van Eynde writes: >> >>>* Removed xref.lisp again and added a test in the makefile for it >>> (Closes: #517205) >> >> And what about Lenny? Does this DFSG violation need a fix in stable

Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime

Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > >> > Loadi

Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch

tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. Thank you, applied: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsig

Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server

reassign 519920 cl-swank found 519920 1:20090217-1 severity 519920 normal merge 517167 519920 thanks Hi there! On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:01:21 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: sbcl > Version: 1:1.0.25-1 > > Starting a new swank server with the following code Please do not submit another bug you alread

Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server

reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: slime The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-sw

Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade

tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Updating SLIME in

Bug#518021: aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze

severity 518021 grave tags 518021 + pending thanks Hi Mikhail! On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:32:29 +0100, Mikhail Vasil'jev wrote: > I upgraded Lenny to Squeeze today, and tried to purge slime. [...] > Removing slime ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/slime.prerm: line 24: unregister-common-lisp-source: > comman

Re: Upcoming Section changes in the archive

Hi Stefano! Cc:ing again the Debian Common Lisp mailing list, please keep it! On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:02:59 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:04:36AM +0100, Luca Capello wrote: >> FYI, as Aaron already showed with his list, ome packages (especially the >&g

Re: Upcoming Section changes in the archive

Hi there! Cc:ing the Debian Common Lisp mailing list. On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:02:03 +0100, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Joerg Jaspert writes: >> Its lisp. Not one special part of it, just lisp. So other dialects as >> well, if someone gets me a list of packages (or matches) for it. [...] > cl-* FY

Re: quilt use in clisp

Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:15:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > I tried to update clisp to the latest upstream, but I discovered that > it now uses quilt. Yeah, I used quilt because I thought it was the preferred tool, after the long discussion on d-devel: http://wiki.debian.org/debian/

Bug#492943: slime: Package depencies: add recommmend konqueror

Hi there! On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:14:32 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Good idea, however I don't see 'kfmclient' anywhere in the sources. > And I use the build-in emacs browser > > Isn't this an emacs setting? As per (info "(slime)Documentation"), SLIME defaults to `browse-url-browser-functi

Re: Dedicating Lenny to Thiemo: Call for Signatures

ristoph's mail, I would say that you can: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Luca Capello wrote: [...] >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Christoph Berg [...] >> We welcome every Debian developer, maintainer, translator, or >> contributor in any

Fwd: Dedicating Lenny to Thiemo: Call for Signatures

Hi there! In case someone would like to contribute, given that Thiemo had taken SBCL maintainership in the last year. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --- Begin Message --- The upcoming Lenny release will be dedicated to Thiemo Seufer (ths). This will be expressed by the attached file that will be put on

Bug#511835: [INTL: gl] cltl debconf template translation

Hi Marce! Cc:ing the d-i18n mailing list to ask for advice: please keep the bug report cc:ed or at least send a copy to the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list. When doing so, no need to cc: me, I will read your reply. On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:00:02 +0100, Marce Villarino wrote: > Please, find enc

Bug#177057: [Debian] clisp base/full linking sets

Hi Sam! On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:09:15 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: >> I am fine with one package with two linking sets, but having two >> separate packages is IMHO a better solution, since it will help people >> who wants a minimal clisp installation. > > on a second thought, you might be right. > i

Bug#462085: [Debian] clisp base/full linking sets

merge 177057 462085 thanks Hi Jörg! On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:18:02 +0100, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Luca Capello schrieb am Sun 23. Nov, 18:21 (+0100): >> I moved the discussion about the linking sets to bug #177057 [4] where >> it belongs to, please continue there (again, no subscr

Bug#505196: NMUing kpax?

Hi Thomas! On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:22:24 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > I'm not sure why we have the urgent desire to release with stuff that > "is quite mature and has been in production use for years, the > documentation is currently not good enough to support use by the > general public" per th

Bug#177057: [Debian] clisp base/full linking sets (was Re: [Debian] clisp-dev dependencies)

Sommer will not disagree in one week, I will merge the two bugs. On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:44:24 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-05 00:01:59 +0100]: >>> readline-dev x11-dev et al are required only for building images on >>> top o

Bug#504514: [Debian] clisp-dev dependencies

Hi Sam! On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:44:24 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-05 00:01:59 +0100]: >>> the __ONLY__ true dependencies are clisp & a C compiler (not >>> necessarily gcc). >> >> Thanks to `apt-cache

Re: Trivial Garbage package

Hi Barry! On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:04:28 +0100, Barry deFreese wrote: > Luca Capello wrote: >> >> I do not like to pollute the debian/ folder with single-line files. >> Obviously, this is my opinion on this matter, so feel free to follow it >> or not. >> >> N

Re: Trivial Garbage package

Hi Barry! On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:21:36 +0100, Barry deFreese wrote: > Luca Capello wrote: >> 1) debian/changelog [...] >>In this specific case, Matthias Benkard (cc:ed) opened the ITP [4] >>(cc:ed as well): Matthias, do you want to maintain trivial-garbage? > >

Re: Trivial Garbage package

Hi Barry! I am sorry for the long mail, but I can be very verbose sometime... Since we discussed on IRC, you know why I was late ;-) On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:52:48 +0100, Barry deFreese wrote: > I apologize for posting to the development list but I've been trying > to catch someone on IRC to no av

Bug#504514: [Debian] clisp-dev dependencies (was Re: debian clisp package)

block 504514 by 177057 thanks Hi Sam! On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:49:52 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: >>> 3. clisp-dev appears to depend on gcc 4.1 (at least when I try to >>> install clisp-dev on ubuntu, it wants to install gcc 4.1 in addition >>> to the standard gcc 4.2, see >>> https://bugs.launchpad

Re: debian clisp package

Hi Sam! On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:30:35 +0100, Luca Capello wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:49:52 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: >> Luca Capello wrote: >>> BTW, I read the pkg-common-lisp mailing list on a regular basis, so you >>> do not need to cc: me. >> >> I

[Debian] clisp-link.1 (was Re: debian clisp package)

44 --- a/debian/patches/02_add-clisp-link-manpage.patch +++ b/debian/patches/02_add-clisp-link-manpage.patch @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- /dev/null +++ clisp/doc/_clisp-link.1 -@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +.\" -*- nroff -*- +.\" +.\" Copyright (c) 2008 Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Debian] README.Debian and disassemble (was Re: debian clisp package)

Hi Sam! On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:49:52 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: > Luca Capello wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:50:39 +0200, Sam Steingold wrote: >>> 1. README.Debian says "In order to use the "disassemble" function you >>> must install gdb"

Re: debian clisp package

Hi Sam! On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:49:52 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: > Luca Capello wrote: >> I should apologize for being late: I planned to reply to your mail in >> the next days and providing patches. Unfortunately, I was then caught >> by other work, both for my rea

Re: debian clisp package

Hi Sam! I should apologize for being late: I planned to reply to your mail in the next days and providing patches. Unfortunately, I was then caught by other work, both for my real life and for Debian. BTW, I read the pkg-common-lisp mailing list on a regular basis, so you do not need to cc: me.

Please re-add cl-geodesics_20010214-9

* debian/rules: + adapt to quilt. + add dh_lisp call to binary-indep target. - remove unnecessary dh_link call in install target. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:32:50 +0200 -8<---cut here---end--->8--- Thx, b

Please unblock parenscript_20061003-2

ymlink. * debian/make-pdf.sh + check for python. + teTeX -> TeXlive transition. * debian/README.Debian: + add python note. + teTeX -> TeXlive transition. * debian/rules: - remove DH_COMPAT export. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 20 Oct 2008

Bug#503255: sbcl: Error using null pointer in ffi

2PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> I haven't looked yet at it in details, but is there any upstream bug >> opened, maybe with a patch that can backported to SBCL-1.0.17? In that >> case the fix can be easily applied to the version already present in >> lenny and the

Bug#503255: sbcl: Error using null pointer in ffi

Hi there! For the d-release list: this is a request about how to fix the bug below in time for lenny. For everyone: please keep at least the bug report cc:ed, no subscription needed, TIA. On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:48:53 +0200, David Matthew Mattli wrote: > Package: sbcl > Version: 1:1.0.18.0-1 > Se

Please unblock libsigsegv_2.5-2

t, thus adding support for GNU/kFreeBSD, thanks to Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #466356). - remove darcs-specific hacks. - remove suspicious line. - remove trailing spaces. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:39:18 +02

Please unblock tbnl_0.9.10-2

removed. * debian/rules: + minimize rules. + swap binary-arch and binary-indep targets, thanks to lintian. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:06:25 +0200 --8<---cut here---end--->8--- Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes

Please unblock url-rewrite_0.1.0-4

o Uploaders: + add Homepage: field. + add VCS-* fields. * debian/rules: + swap binary-arch and binary-indep targets, thanks to lintian. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:07:23 +0200 --8<---cut here---end--->8---

Please unblock ironclad_0.11-2

o Uploaders: + move debhelper to Build-Depends:, thanks to lintian. + add Homepage: field. + add VCS-* fields. * debian/rules: + swap binary-arch and binary-indep targets, thanks to lintian. -- Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:41:16 +0200 --8<---

Bug#500411: document the braille support in the release notes

Hi Wolfgang! On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:52:03 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > tags 500441 +patch > tags 500441 +pending > thanks > > This is now in SVN rev. 5413. FYI, you simply misscopied the bug number in the To: field :-D Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpUWdDZgcusz.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Alceste's packages moved to team maintenance

Hello! Since I found that Alceste's packages (Ironclad, TBNL and URL-REWRITE) are not yet team-maintained, I moved them, taking the opportunity to switch to Git: Ironclad [1] and URL-REWRITE [2]. TBNL has a different story: upstream renamed it to Hunchentoot a long time ago (a Debian package is a

Bug#497386: sbcl: sometimes unable to hibernate PC from gnome while SBCL repl running

Hi David! On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:27:21 +0200, David Creelman wrote: > I use SBCL on the go and sometimes (seems more frequent of late, but > that's a subjective call) when I'm hibernating the PC (laptop DELL > C640) s2disk starts, but fails to hibernate and returns me back to > X11. How do you hi

Re: GCL

Hi David! I'm sorry for the lag: I planned to work on CL issues during DebConf8, but I then got distracted by other stuff [1]. Even if the issues WRT Maxima/GCL are AFAIK now solved, I'd like to avoid the same problem in the future. FYI, I cc:ed Camm Maguire, GCL maintainer. On Tue, 29 Jul 2008

Bug#494587: Patch to build with bdb4.7

tags 494587 + upstream thanks Hi Cesare! On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:54:07 +0200, Cesare Tirabassi wrote: > clisp FTBFS with bdb4.7: [...] > The problem is that the flags DB_DIRECT_LOG and DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE are > obsoleted in bdb 4.7, see: Thus this bug is an upstream one and it's not yet solved [1].

Re: Clisp gtk2 module

Hi David! On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:46:10 +0200, David wrote: > I am common lisp and debian user. You're very welcome! > I would like know if there is some plan to build clisp package with > gtk2 module support. I don't really know how to manage this. There're already two bugs about base/full pac

Bug#486376: [Ecls-list] Bug#486376: Bug#486376: ecl: /usr/lib/libecl.so doesn't provide a SONAME

Hi Juanjo! On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:10:10 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll play the Devil's advocate here, sorry: does this mean that 0.1.0 > will be SONAME-compatible with 0.1.1?

Bug#486376: [Ecls-list] Bug#486376: Bug#486376: ecl: /usr/lib/libecl.so doesn't provide a SONAME

Hi Juanjo! Why didn't I wait for ten more minutes before sending my previous mail? I'd have seen you already fixed it, thank you! On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:55:30 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Bug#486376: [Ecls-list] Bug#486376: Bug#486376: ecl: /usr/lib/libecl.so doesn't provide a SONAME

Hi Juanjo! On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:51:30 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > Well, for one I do not believe in LSB. At least I do not believe > people are going to include ECL in the list of required software by > the LSB committee, and that implies no program can expect it is going > to have t

Re: A new package -- cl-lisp-unit

Hi Des! On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:28:10 +0200, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > I'm a debian user and a new lisper. Both are good choice ;-) > Recently I have packaged lisp-unit, a test framework from Christopher > K. Riesbeck, as cl-lisp-unit. > Can I contribute the package to the team? Yes, please! >

Bug#486376: [Ecls-list] Bug#486376: Bug#486376: ecl: /usr/lib/libecl.so doesn't provide a SONAME

Hi Juanjo! On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:41:25 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configuration >>> option that operating systems may prov

Bug#494404: patch + comments on cl-geodesics

Hi Peter! On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:36:11 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:08:53 +0200 > Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > - utilities.lisp doesn't have an IN-PACKAGE form, so it gets loaded >> > in whatever random package happ

Bug#495351: [Ecls-list] ECL sigill on debian armel (lenny)

reassign 495351 libc6 found 495351 2.7-13 severity 495351 normal merge 498008 495351 thanks Hi Detlef! On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:32:12 +0200, D Schmicker wrote: > the problem is probably tracked down to a bug in libc6. > > Here is the bugreport: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498

Bug#495351: [Ecls-list] ECL sigill on debian armel (lenny)

Hi Detlef! For the debian-arm mailing list: this is bug Debian bug #495351: http://bugs.debian.org/495351 On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:16:28 +0200, Detlef Schmicker wrote: > as there is no simple well documented way to install a standard > armel-omap kernel on the N800 (at least I could not find one

Bug#497680: cmucl: FTBFS in lenny: Error in function UNIX::SIGSEGV-HANDLER: Segmentation Violation at #x10044FF0.

unarchive 483331 forcemerge 483331 497680 severity 483331 minor thanks Hi Lucas! On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:24:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in lenny, your package failed to build on > i386. [...] >> Error in function UNIX::SIGSEGV-HANDLER: Segmentation Violation

Bug#486376: [Ecls-list] Bug#486376: ecl: /usr/lib/libecl.so doesn't provide a SONAME

Hi Juanjo! On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:19:19 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This bug has nothing to do with the rpath issue (now solved [1]). >> Thus, the problem remains: is there any particul

  1   2   >