Hi there! Please do not top post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting.
On Sat, 08 May 2010 17:04:17 +0200, Faré wrote: > It's another case of "we need to upgrade cl-asdf and the package > failed to specify so". Well, everything is explained at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565522#48 Briefly, c-l-c_7.1 depends on cl-asdf >= 1.625, but the epoch in cl-asdf causes troubles: ===== l...@gismo:$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.625 lt 2:1.502-1 && echo OK OK l...@gismo:$ ===== The other cases you probably referred to are the two following ones, both with duplicates and both "fixed" from the implementation side (clisp) and not in the source (c-l-c): http://bugs.debian.org/565522 http://bugs.debian.org/579460 Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
pgpqkzuApr8eL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
