Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.openwrt.org certificate expired

Thanks, fixed. On 10/07/2016 10:09 PM, Eric Schultz wrote: > Just wanted to let folks know that the certificate for git.openwrt.org > is expired > > Thanks, > > Eric > > -- > Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation > http://www.prplfoundation.org > eschu...@pr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

On 08/12/2014 08:41 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Please consider switching from svn to git, and then if possible > connecting openwrt git with github so patches are synced between them. http://git.openwrt.org/ > Thanks. Welcome. ___ openwrt-d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

On 08/12/2014 08:58 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > I know about git.openwrt.org and user it regularly, but how are svn > and and git connected? Does current setup allow git.openwrt.org to be > synced and connected to github? Why not? It is an exact git-svn clone. Maybe I missed a point her

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] platform xburst / maintainer

That was a long time ago and I guess we should consider that platform currently unmaintained. May I ask what's your interest in this platform? On 10/28/2014 03:29 PM, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > can somebody please add the maintainer of 'xburst' to > https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/platforms > > when

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain: The glorious return of glibc, ver 2.21

On 03/11/2015 06:17 PM, Jeff Waugh wrote: > It's the eglibc packaging with a bit of spit-polishing. And testing. :-) > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Waugh > [..] On 03/11/2015 06:02 PM, Jeff Waugh wrote: > With > those applied, a default (VoCore, mipsel) build completes > successfully. Please don't jus

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] firewall3 package broken with EGLIBC

On 03/10/2013 04:07 PM, shazz wrote: > trunk/build_dir/target-mips_r2_eglibc-2.17/firewall3-2013-03-02/utils.c: > In function 'fw3_find_command': > trunk/build_dir/target-mips_r2_eglibc-2.17/firewall3-2013-03-02/utils.c:141:19: > error: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function) > trunk/bui

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buildslave "nico" destroys snapshot buildbot timing logic

On 03/23/2013 12:52 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote: > Buildslave "nico" seems to have DNS / connectivity trouble. > [..] > Please fix nico's connectivity or turn it off. Nico is indeed not able to connect to the openwrt.org - however all the other machines (even another VM on the very same host) can. Reboo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buildslave "nico" destroys snapshot buildbot

On 03/25/2013 08:28 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote: > Updating feed 'luci' from > 'http://svn.luci.subsignal.org/luci/trunk/contrib/package' ... > svn: OPTIONS of > 'http://svn.luci.subsignal.org/luci/trunk/contrib/package': Could not > read status line: Connection timed out (http://svn.luci.subsignal.org)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buildslave "nico" destroys snapshot buildbot

On 05/05/2013 12:48 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote: > Nico is again failing svn updates, going through several platforms rapidly. > > svn: Can't connect to host 'svn.openwrt.org': Connection timed out > > > That causes other buildslaves to site idle and many platforms remain > unbuilt. > > http://buildb

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][V5] Zabbix: add extra packages with discovery/userparameter

On 04/24/2013 11:53 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Hi Hello Etienne, > Index: admin/zabbix/files/zabbix_extra_mac80211.init > === > --- admin/zabbix/files/zabbix_extra_mac80211.init (révision 0) > +++ admin/zabbix/files/zabbix_e

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming a package during compilation

On 05/17/2013 08:48 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > Let's say I want to make a package: > > PKG_NAME:=avr-gcc > PKG_VERSION:=1.0 > > but my source is named gcc > PKG_SOURCE:=gcc-$(PACKAGE_VERSION).tar.gz > > When this source gets uncompressed it gets put into. > > target_mipsel/avr-gcc/.. > The

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming a package during compilation

On 05/17/2013 09:25 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > PKG_NAME:=avr-binutils > PKG_VERSION:=2.20.1a > PKG_SOURCE_SUBDIR:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION) > PKG_SOURCE:=binutils-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.bz2 > PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/ This means you're telling OpenWrt, the unpacked folder

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Adding new tickets to bug tracker has been disabled?

On 09/02/2013 05:32 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote: >> TICKET_CREATE privileges are required to perform this operation. You > don't have the required permissions. > > Hopefully this is just a temporary bug. :-( Yep, it was -> fixed. Thanks for telling! ___ openw

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] pulseaudio: InstallDev installs static libraries *.la

On 09/06/2013 06:48 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote: [..] > - $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/*.so* \ > + $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/*.{la,so}* \ Unline your subjects suggests, ".la"-files are _not_ static libraries, but libtool helper-files which we don't use and don't want for sev

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel update to 3.10.12

On 09/15/2013 12:05 PM, Daniel Petre wrote: > Hello, can we have 3.10.12 updated to OpenWrt trunk and patches > refreshed please? We appreciate your interest in this. Feel free to send in patches. Regards mirko ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: [PATCH] nodogsplash crashes when rdir parameter is missing

The project isn't really maintained anymore, but it's definitely worth a try getting a fix upstream. The patch applies and is working, however I wonder whether it creates a memleak, since strdup is called which allocates memory which doesn't get free'ed again. On 05/31/2012 11:33 AM, John Crispin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: [PATCH] nodogsplash crashes when rdir parameter is missing

minor issue). > > On 05/31/2012 03:21 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Mirko Vogt wrote: >>> The project isn't really maintained anymore, but it's definitely worth a >>> try getting a fix upstream. >>> The patch applie

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openvpn-polarssl: RNG signature change

The OpenVPN stuff needs some love in general. I'll try to get openvpn, openvpn-devel and openvpn-polarssl consolidated and reworked in a reasonable way this weekend / next week (which includes updating openvpn-polarssl). mirko On 06/01/2012 07:21 PM, David Favro wrote: > PolarSSL 1.1 (i.e. as o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] binutils tarball md5 mismatch?

Hey, they (GNU-binutils) once silently replaced the binutils-2.20.1 archive with the 2.20.1a version. This was an unfortunate move, since it triggered lot's of confusion (as you're experiencing now..) - OpenEmbedded e.g. head to deal with the situation as well (http://patches.openembedded.org/p

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] binutils tarball md5 mismatch?

On 06/03/2012 03:50 PM, Mirko Vogt wrote: > However, actually I thought the checksums got replaced that time, will check. (Kind of) fixed in r32037. We can't just replace the tarball on our mirror server and change the checksum, since it will break previous builds/releases. That's w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] openvpn-polarssl: RNG signature change

On 06/14/2012 04:29 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Thanks for your work - this is really so much better than what was > there before. Especially using git directly is nice. Thanks! :) > > openvpn-devel-polarssl is not compiling for me right now, though -- > some linkage problem around symbols that s

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] why xburst target mark as BROKEN

On 06/16/2012 10:33 AM, Xiangfu Liu wrote: > Thanks for reply. attachment is the dmesg log. this kernel build at 'Jun 8 > 16:44:01 CST 2012' > base on svn://svn.openwrt.org/openwrt/trunk@32117, works just fine under Ben > Nanonote(QI_LB60). Broken flag removed - applied in 32469. mirko __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Bug in net/dhcp feed package

The point is: We want to tell, from the package name, what's inside an ipkg archive. This is not possible with so-called 'conditional dependencies', which influence the build, taking other config options into account. Vice versa that means: We want to avoid having one and the same package (as in 'n

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Bug in net/dhcp feed package

On 07/27/2012 12:24 AM, Oliver wrote: > As it stands, it is *impossible* to build any of the dhcp tools with IPv6 > support due to this bug, so something should be done in the interim. You might have a valid point, however your attitude to _demand_ getting this fixed (instead of just politely cal

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/3] build fixes with eglibc toolchain

Committed (slightly adjusted) - thanks! On 07/31/2012 05:35 PM, mika.lai...@nokia.com wrote: > This set of patches include fixes for 3 build errors > I noticed when building some of the luci modules > with openwrt trunk where I had selected eglibc instead of uclibc. > > Mika Laitio (3): > libtr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/3] more build fixes to packages with eglibc

Committed (slightly adjusted) - thanks! On 08/01/2012 08:06 PM, mika.lai...@nokia.com wrote: > Here is another set of build fixes to packages when openwrt > uses eglibc instead of uclibc. I have tested the patches > by doing builds both with the openwrt/uclibc toolchain > and openwrt/eglibc toolch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenVPN-Devel default packages break IPv6

On 09/11/2012 04:35 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > busybox' ifconfig program does not understand the "normal Linux ifconfig" > syntax to configure an IPv6 address on the tun0 interface. > > Last time I tested IPv6 with openvpn on openwrt, the openvpn-devel > package unconditionally built with --enable-

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenVPN-Devel default packages break IPv6

On 09/12/2012 03:30 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Commited to openvpn upstream in cae102ae0c2ff934c456cd584cbf87a33cd95206 Nice - glad to see fixes get applied that fast upstream. I also committed the fix into OpenWrt yesterday (https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/33375) to make sure it goes into the AA

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenVPN with netifd

On 10/04/2012 11:29 AM, Joachim Schlipper wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I've thought about these possibilities: > 1. Integrate stuff into existing package ('openvpn') > 2. Create a new package (i.e. openvpn-netifd) and place all stuff there > 3. Create a new package (i.e. openvpn-netifd) with just Makefile

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenVPN with netifd

On 10/04/2012 02:25 PM, Joachim Schlipper wrote: > Am 04.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: >> If I am not mistaken then openvpn-devel is supposed to use the very >> same files as openvpn. Afair its files/ folder is symlinked to the >> openvpn package. > > Good to read, that indeed eliminates

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenVPN with netifd

On 10/04/2012 05:48 PM, Joachim Schlipper wrote: > The openvpn-devel package won't disappear once the 2.3 version of > OpenVPN is released, or does it? I don't see any reason to continue this once 2.3 is out. There are currently features in OpenVPN-trunk which are essential to some users. Once 2.3

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][package] make ltq-dsl-app compile with an eglibc-based toolchain

On 11/22/2012 10:22 AM, Frank Meerkötter wrote: > Hi, > > i had problems building the ltq-dsl-app when switching from > uclibc to eglibc. This patch is adding a needed include, adds > a configure test to figure out where clock_gettime() is located > and runs autoreconfigurer afterwards. > > Pleas

[OpenWrt-Devel] Wireless Battle Mesh 6 (wbm6) in Aalborg, Denmark (April 2013)

Hey hackers! I'd like to inform you about the 6th upcoming Wireless Battle Mesh[1], taking place in Aalborg, Denmark this time, 15 Apr - 21 Apr 2013. Although originally its primary focus was (still is?) on comparing and benchmarking several mesh algorithms in real-world scenarios, it's an event w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][V4] Zabbix: add extra packages with discovery/userparameter

On 01/08/2013 11:31 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Hi Hey, > +define Package/zabbix-extra-mac80211/postinst > +[ -n "$${IPKG_INSTROOT}" ] || /etc/init.d/zabbix_extra_mac80211 enable > +exit 0 > +endef > + > +define Package/zabbix-extra-network/postinst > +[ -n "$${IPKG_INSTROOT}" ] || /etc/init.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] My changes to OpenWRT

On 11/09/2011 01:20 AM, Peter Naulls wrote: > On 11/08/2011 02:15 PM, Michael Geddes wrote: > > I don't know about the target hardware in question or the 64-bit builds, > but for any hope of having glibc/eglibc builds work Building with eglibc should work out of the box. > __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package libssh2

Commited (slighly adjusted*) in r30348 - thanks! *setting PKG_INSTALL and 'Build/Install' is redundant, remove former one On 02/07/2012 01:01 PM, Jiri Slachta wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slachta > Index: feeds/packages/libs/libssh2/Makefile >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eglibc 2.12 fails to build

Hey Emmanuel, I levelled up all versions of eglibc to it's latest revisions of its respective branches ( https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/31300 ) and therewith I guess broke eglibc version 2.12 which I'd like to purge out anyway. Is there any reason for you to stay on 2.12 instead of 2.13? If it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eglibc 2.12 fails to build

On 04/19/2012 11:43 AM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Checked with 2.13, and it indeed works. Glad to hear! > Regarding eglibc selection, it feels weird to me to be able to select > both a version AND a revision. If I want version 2.12, I will probably > stick to its corresponding revision. Same for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eglibc 2.12 fails to build

On 04/18/2012 11:17 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > Unless something has changed very recently, 2.12 and 2.14 builds have > been broken for as long as I've been looking at them, which is the > best part of a year. Only 2.13 builds, and even then you still > need some additional e/glibc patches for the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eglibc 2.12 fails to build

On 04/19/2012 11:43 AM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Force the use of known revision for specific eglibc versions. > Eglibc revision can only be changed if the user selects the trunk > version. > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Deloget > > Index: toolchain/eglibc/Config.in > =

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eglibc 2.12 fails to build

On 04/19/2012 04:00 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Good catch. In fact, HEAD is likely to never be the right choice, even > in other packages. So maybe we can forbid it? That's what I meant with: "Since fetching the latest HEAD of any external source is uncommon and to be avoided anyway (since buil

[OpenWrt-Devel] anybody using glibc over eglibc for a reason?

Hey all, as a matter of fact glibc support is currently unmaintained in OpenWrt and I'd like to drop it entirely. We received quite some complains about buggy/non-working glibc support - most people however got happy with using eglibc in the end (which is supported quite well). However, before pur

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Can we configure OpenWrt by 'curl' ?

As part of LuCI there is a JSON-RPC interface which can be used to configure OpenWrt. With the uci-package you can easily read/write/apply/commit uci related things. http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/wiki/Documentation/JsonRpcHowTo On 04/27/2012 11:41 AM, Xiangfu Liu wrote: > Hi > > I am think use

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Can we configure OpenWrt by 'curl' ?

As far as I know UVL is unmaintained and got obsoleted. This still doesn't fix the broken links however :) On 04/27/2012 01:15 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 27/04/12 12:11, Mirko Vogt wrote: >> As part of LuCI there is a JSON-RPC interface which can be used to >> config

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] update and move util-linux(-ng) and update e2fsprogs

On 04/25/2012 01:33 AM, Luka Perkov wrote: > You think that subject is too big... You did not see the patch yet ;) > > This patch makes several changes with util-linux-ng package: > > * moves it to util-linux (upstream name) > * bumps it to last stable version 2.21.1 (was 2.13.0.1) > * adds se

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3 V1] correct eglibc version numbers

On 04/23/2012 02:54 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > eglibc version number depends on the branch and on the maintenance release > (i.e. the SVN revision). Changing the revision may change the maintenance > version. This patch correlate the SVN revision to the correct version > number - without this ch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3 V1] remove the possibility to select eglibc trunk and disable eglibc SVN revision selection

On 04/23/2012 03:18 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > When selecting a specific eglibc version, it comes with a specific SVN > revision that should not be modified as it (more or less) correspond to > a tagged release. This patch disable the possibility to select a specific > SVN revision on known egli

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3 V1] correct eglibc version numbers

On 04/23/2012 02:54 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > eglibc version number depends on the branch and on the maintenance release > (i.e. the SVN revision). Changing the revision may change the maintenance > version. This patch correlate the SVN revision to the correct version > number - without this ch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] enlightenment RequireCommand

Michael Buesch wrote: > Why do we need the following RequireCommand in enlightenment? > > $(eval $(call RequireCommand,edje_cc, \ > Command not found - please install edje with edje-cc enabled \ > )) > $(eval $(call RequireCommand,eet, \ > Command not found - please install eet \ > )

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] enlightenment RequireCommand

Michael Buesch wrote: > On Monday 29 December 2008 23:10:21 Mirko Vogt wrote: >> Michael Buesch wrote: >>> Why do we need the following RequireCommand in enlightenment? >>> >>> $(eval $(call RequireCommand,edje_cc, \ >>> Command not fou

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to use library and header files in an other packages?

mike xu wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use libuci libraries and uci*.h header files in an > other package, is there a way in openwrt to using them in another > package without copying them into the other package? > > Thanks, > Mike > ___ > openwrt-deve

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86 image name confusion

Jan Hetges wrote: > Hi > i'm confused by the new xyz.fs xyz.image xyz.image.kernel fs => filesystem kernel => kernel image => kernel+filesystem > is there any docs about what is what? above > > thanks > > --Jan > > > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc build failure

Hey David, this should be fixed in revision 15599. Just update your svn checkout. Regards, mirko David A. Bandel wrote: Folks, 2 days ago I built a x86-WRAP package. Build went well (works just fine). Today, I did an `svn up` (silly me), changed a few packages from M to *, and performed a r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Trac on openwrt

Henning Meyer wrote: Hi All, I'd like to get Trac running on openwrt. Unfortunatly Trac requires easy_install, setuptools and Genshi (http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracInstall). I think easy_install and setuptools are just needed for the build - not needed for the running system. You may take

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] What is uci-defaults useful for?

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 23:24 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > Why do we have uci-defaults? Is there an advantage to this over > simply refreshing the jffs from squashfs defaults should we > choose to go back to defaults settings? In my point of view - yes - see below. > > When exactly do uci-defau

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] correct place for target-dependent host tools

Hey Wolfgang, On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:01 +0800, Wolfgang Spraul wrote: > Hi, > I am working on adding support for our upcoming 'XBurst' board into > OpenWrt [1]. Sources are here [2]. > > In addition to all the stuff that targets the device, I have a reflashing tool > running on the host. This t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] correct place for target-dependent host tools

rgets which need to be flashed/programmed in a special way. Greets, mirko On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 11:33 +0200, Mirko Vogt wrote: > Hey Wolfgang, > > On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 14:01 +0800, Wolfgang Spraul wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working on adding support for our upcoming 'XBurst

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Stop at "Please be patient, while OpenWrt loads"

"Please be patient, while OpenWrt loads ..." is the last message shown by the kernel. That indicates, the userspace isn't working / entered at this state, but mounted successfully. Mostly that is one of the following cases: - wrong binary format - /etc/preinit isn't executed by default (the boot

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] KVM images for OpenWRT?

On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 18:38 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any images ready to download I could use to boot an OpenWRT on a > KVM? Yep - the default x86-images are - for kamikaze 8.09.1: http://downloads.openwrt.org/kamikaze/8.09.1/x86/openwrt-x86-ext2.image $ kvm openwrt-x86

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] seems typo in [package/base-files/files/etc/hosts] file

According commit log this was done by purpose: Revision 6292: "Change localhost into a fully qualified name[..]" However this change causes applications/libraries to fail which try to resolve "localhost" which is used quite often. mirko On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:11 +0800, Xiangfu Liu wrote: > H

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] First boot script name ?

Hey, here's an example shell script which is setting a uci autostart-value within the desktop-table: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/feeds/efl/enlightenment/files/uci-defaults/x11_standard The files are autodeleted once they were executed. mirko On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:19 +0100, Jo-Philipp Wic

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How to create an OpenWrt Package Makefile for source without a Makefile

Hey, as the Build/Compile template assumes that the source provides a Makefile, you should override the whole section and should not call Build/Compile/Default. You may want to take a look at the Makefile of (packages/utils/schedtools/Makefile). Have a nice sunday mirko On Sun, 2010-05-02 at

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Some (possibly dumb) questions concerning OpenWRT build system

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 00:10 +0400, Alexey Loukianov wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Good day. alike > > I've been using OpenWRT build system for making specialized firmwares for > various D-Link routers for about a year. The need to build up a fresh firmware > arise

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Some (possibly dumb) questions concerning OpenWRT build system

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 19:25 +0400, Alexey Loukianov wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > 19.05.2010 19:13, Mirko Vogt wrote: > >> drops out obsolete parameters and will ask you how to > >> handle new ones (n/y/m). > >> kernel-pa

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about package dependencies

Hey Alan, let's imagine we have a Makefile/port/package called , and the following within the respective Makefile: DEPENDS:=bar # package will be only selectable, if is selected DEPENDS:=+bar # will be always selectable and - if selected - is going to select automatically as dependency Gree

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about package dependencies

UILD_DEPENDS = X # depends on X while building/compiling The latter one is mostly used when host tools are only needed while compiling, which are compiled/built and referenced by other (host)packages. mirko > > -Alan > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Mirko Vogt wrote: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] silence error when package has no patches

Hey Alan, I don't think this is an good idea - not because of this particular change but that kind changes in general. I'd like to keep our repository _as close as possible_ to the official openwrt backfire branch upstream. Your patch is a cosmetic change - nothing critical, nothing which change

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] add triggerhappy hotkey daemon

(slightly changed) applied in commit 24018 (https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/24018) - thanks! mirko On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:17 +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote: > Triggerhappy is a lightweight hotkey daemon that can launch arbitrary commands > on input events. It supports the hotplugging of devices

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] triggerhappy: update to 0.1.6

Committed in r24076, thanks. Please attach patches as files next time, since inlining often screws them up (in this case spaces <-> tabs). mirko On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 00:07 +0100, Stefan Tomanek wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek > --- > utils/triggerhappy/Makefile |6 +++--- > 1 files

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add TokyoCabinet library

Applied in 27123, thanks On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:36:34 +0200, Obinou wrote: Hello, This patch adds the TokyoCabinet Library into feeds/packages. TokyoCabinet ( http://fallabs.com/tokyocabinet/ ) is a DBM-like library to manage a database. It's similar to the various *DBM libraries that exists, w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add Seeks package

Applied in 27124, thanks On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:55:03 +0200, Obinou wrote: Hello, This patch adds the Seeks program into feeds/packages. Seeks ( http://www.seeks-project.info/site/ ) is an experimental projet to build a distributed, P2P search engine. While for now it's essentially a query agg

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH2] Add Protobuf library (Second submit)

Commit with some adjustments in 27152 ( https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/packages/libs/protobuf/Makefile?rev=27152 ). Changes mostly are related to the use of default rules which apply fine in this case and simplify the Makefile. mirko On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:22:12 +0200, Obinou wrote: Hello,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] eglibc: Bump default version to 2.12

Hey Philipp, are you able to build udevtrigger (part of the hotplug2 package) with eglibc 2.12? I'm asking because of this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9012 Cheers mirko On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:48:57 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Eglibc doesn't build with the native gnu make if

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] eglibc: Bump default version to 2.12

kaged libbsd in r27169 and made hotplug2 depend on libbsd if eglibc is used in r27170 which should solve the issue and offers a simple solution for other packages depending on these functions as well. mirko On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:11:47 +0200, Mirko Vogt wrote: Hey Philipp, are you able to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling error after using glibc

target-powerpc_glibc-2.6.1/hotplug2-201/.built] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/openwrt_trunk-glibc/package/hotplug2 make[2]: *** [package/hotplug2/compile] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/openwrt_trunk-glibc make[1]: *** [/openwrt_trunk-glibc/staging_dir/target-powerpc_glibc-2.6.1/stam

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling error after using glibc

/ticket/9012/hotplug2.patch [4] Pawel On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mirko Vogt wrote: Hello Pawel, this issue is related to: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9012 [1] Attached patch should solve the issue - please report if it does the job. Cheers mirko On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:39:26 -0400

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Commits] r27214 - trunk/toolchain/eglibc

OK, I reverted the commit. However as stated in eglibc features ( http://www.eglibc.org/features ): == Building with -Os EGLIBC supports building the library with compiler optimizing for size -Os instead of for speed -O2. == This is just wrong then.. *sigh* Thanks mirko On Mon, 20 J

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3 1/1] pciutils: need to specify -lresolv explicitly when using eglibc

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:02:05 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: eglibc's libc doesn't include libresolv as part of it. Redux: Need to annotate libbsd dependency as well. Redux: Include support for glibc as well. Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville Why did you add 'libbsd' as dependency for pciu