> I favor the second option for the same reasons as Zane described, but also
> don't think we need a LaunchConfiguration resource. How about just adding a
> attribute to the resources such that the engine knows is not meant to be
> handled in the usual way, and instead it is really a "template" (s
Hi,
The feature to auto-generate IP for cluster (Cluster Management IP and
Availability Group IP) looks good idea. In general there is no need to set
these IP addresses to some "special" values. And this feature will simplify
end-user interface. However, we must provide the chosen IP addresses to
> On 30/01/14 12:20, Randall Burt wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Clint Byrum
> > wrote:
>
> >> >I would hope we would solve that at a deeper level, rather than making
> >> >resources for the things we think will need re-use. I think nested stacks
> >> >allow this level of re-use alre
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:27:29PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:46:09PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> > I'm getting an error from Keystone whenever I try to signal a Heat
> > WaitCondition...
>
> After poking through the code it turned to be an error in Ke
> The deploy ramdisk should ping back the Ironic API and call the
> vendor_passthru/pass_deploy_info with the iscsi informations etc... So,
> make sure you've built your deploy ramdisk after this patch landed on
Any strategies on how to verify if the ramdisk has been deployed on the
server?
Also,
Ok location:
HP's office in Sunnyvale. Dates: Monday 3rd March through friday 7th March.
All welcome, please RSVP to me cc cody.somerville at hp.com so that we
can arrange a suitable sized room @ the venue.
I figure we'll do a everyone-together dinner on tuesday night, but the
rest of the time d
On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> I've been keeping an eye on this thread, and it seems I actually have a few
> minutes to spend on a response today.
>
> To first answer the specific question, while there are some minor technical
> concerns about oslo logging, the bigger concerns a
The current API is stable since this is used by nova and cinder for the
last two releases. Yes, I can act as the maintainer.
Here is the list of reviewers:
Arnaud Legendre
Davanum Srinivas (dims)
garyk
Kartik Bommepally
Sabari Murugesan
Shawn Hartsock
Subbu
Vui Lam
From: Dou
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 19:30:40 -0800:
>>> On 30/01/14 16:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure it is useful to model images in Heat.
>>>
>>> Consider this scenario:
>>>
>>>
>>> resources:
>>> build_done_ha
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: 31 January 2014 12:29
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
>
> On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
> > 1) Every log mess
Thanks, Vipin,
Dims is going work on setting up your repository and help you configure the
review team. Give us a few days to get the details sorted out.
Doug
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Vipin Balachandran <
vbalachand...@vmware.com> wrote:
> The current API is stable since this is used b
Okay, I can accept that migrations shouldn't be supported on sqlite.
However, if that's the case then we need to fix up savanna-db-manage so
that it checks the db connection info and throws a polite error to the
user for attempted migrations on unsupported platforms. For example:
"Database migra
Hi,
In this week's language pack working group meeting we briefly touched
upon questions regarding creation of deployment units, their handling
with respect to plans, etc.
I have created a etherpad page where I have put these and other questions.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RegardingLangPac
Hi Irena,
Thanks for the Reply. See inline…
If possible, can we put details on what would be exactly covered by each BP?
--Robert
On 1/30/14 4:13 PM, "Irena Berezovsky"
mailto:ire...@mellanox.com>> wrote:
Robert,
Thank you very much for the summary.
Please, see inline
From: Robert Li (baoli)
Trevor,
Such check could be useful on alembic side too. Good opportunity for
contribution.
Andrew.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Trevor McKay wrote:
> Okay, I can accept that migrations shouldn't be supported on sqlite.
>
> However, if that's the case then we need to fix up savanna-db-man
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-01-30 07:28:01 -0800:
>> However, due to these changes, I think that devtest no longer works
>> great as a tripleo developer setup. You haven't been able to complete
>> a setup following our docs fo
On 2014-01-31 07:00, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 31 January 2014 12:29
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
On 01/30/2014 07:15 PM,
Hi,
There is a stackforge project Mistral which is aimed to provide generic
workflow service. I believe Zane mentioned it in his previous e-mail.
Currently, this project is at a pilot stage. Mistral has working pilot with
all core components implemented and right now we are finalizing DSL syntax
f
Excerpts from Hugh Brock's message of 2014-01-31 04:53:11 -0800:
> > On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 19:30:40 -0800:
> >>> On 30/01/14 16:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> I'm pretty sure it is useful to model images in Heat.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
> Sent: 31 January 2014 16:01
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards
> > I'd just love to see the ability in the python logger to include the
> > application nam
Hi Irena,
I was initially looking at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-typedriver-extra-port-info
to take care of the extra information required to set up the SR-IOV port. When
the scope of the BP was being decided, we had very little info about our own
design so I didn't
Including openstack-dev ML in response.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, wingwj wrote:
> Hi, Mr Gordon,
>
> Firstly, sorry for my lately reply for this BP..
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/driver-for-huawei-fusioncompute
>
> Honestly speaking, we wrote the first FusionCompute Nova-
On 01/30/2014 03:44 PM, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We made a lot of progress today. We agreed that:
> -- vnic_type will be a top level attribute as binding:vnic_type
> -- BPs:
> * Irena's
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-request-vnic-type for
> binding:vnic_type
>
On 01/31/2014 01:11 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> Including openstack-dev ML in response.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:14 AM, wingwj wrote:
>> Hi, Mr Gordon,
>>
>> Firstly, sorry for my lately reply for this BP..
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/driver-for-huawei-fusioncompute
>>
>> H
I think your driver should implement a wrapper around both VendorPassthru
interfaces and call each appropriately, depending on the request. This
keeps each VendorPassthru driver separate, and encapsulates the logic about
when to call each of them in the driver layer.
As an aside, this is a code pa
On 01/29/2014 10:26 AM, Robert Kukura wrote:
> The neutron patch [1] and nova patch [2], proposed to resolve the
> "get_firewall_required should use VIF parameter from neutron" bug [3],
> replace the binding:capabilities attribute in the neutron portbindings
> extension with a new binding:vif_secur
So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others
advocating
a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this route
was
suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse:
a) homogeneous nodes (to simplify requirements)
b) support diverse hardwa
On 01/31/2014 11:45 AM, Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) wrote:
> Hi Irena,
> I was initially looking
> at
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-typedriver-extra-port-info
> to
> take care of the extra information required to set up the SR-IOV port.
> When the scope of the BP was being
HI All,
I have a question regarding the supported platforms for the diskimage-builder
tool.
I’ve been using Ubuntu for image generation lately, and that seems to work
fine.
At some point, I had hoped to run DIB on CentOS (6.4), but ran into problems
when I tried this. In particular, the de
Jay,
Yep we shouldn't use migrations for sqlite at all.
The major issue that we have now is that we are not able to ensure that DB
schema created by migration & models are same (actually they are not same).
So before dropping support of migrations for sqlite & switching to model
based created sc
Yeah, we are running it on RHEL6.5 and it seems to just work. Haven't tried
CentOS 6.5 specifically but should work the same.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Robert Nettleton [rnettle...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 1:34 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack
Thanks Dmitry, this sounds reasonable
However, returning the chosen IP to user via web UI raises a different
question: we need the dynamic ui for the describing of the deployed apps
and services: the page which is currently available is a legacy UI from the
non-dynamic times of Murano, where we ha
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
> So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others
> advocating
> a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this
> route was
> suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse:
>
> a) ho
This is a follow-up to Jarret Raim's email regarding Barbican's incubation
review:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/025860.html
Please note that the PR for Barbican's DevStack integration can now be
found here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70512/
Thanks for an
Hi, Sean:
Thanks a bunch for the new code. I glimpsed it through once and if I understand
it correctly, the value of the two parameters are saved as the attributes of a
subnet. In other words, I can retrieve the values by:
subnet.ipv6_ra_mode
subnet.ipv6_address_mode
Is that correct? Would you
35 matches
Mail list logo
