Thanks, Vipin, Dims is going work on setting up your repository and help you configure the review team. Give us a few days to get the details sorted out.
Doug On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Vipin Balachandran < vbalachand...@vmware.com> wrote: > The current API is stable since this is used by nova and cinder for the > last two releases. Yes, I can act as the maintainer. > > > > Here is the list of reviewers: > > Arnaud Legendre <arnaud...@gmail.com> > > Davanum Srinivas (dims) <dava...@gmail.com> > > garyk <gkot...@vmware.com> > > Kartik Bommepally <kbommepa...@vmware.com> > > Sabari Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com> > > Shawn Hartsock <harts...@acm.org> > > Subbu <subramanian.neelakan...@gmail.com> > > Vui Lam <v...@vmware.com> > > > > *From:* Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 4:22 AM > *To:* Vipin Balachandran > *Cc:* Donald Stufft; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions) > > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or > straight to oslo.vmware > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Vipin Balachandran < > vbalachand...@vmware.com> wrote: > > This library is highly specific to VMware drivers in OpenStack and not a > generic VMware API client. As Doug mentioned, this library won't be useful > outside OpenStack. Also, it has some dependencies on openstack.common code > as well. Therefore it makes sense if we make this code as part of OSLO. > > > > I think we have consensus that, assuming you are committing to API > stability, this set of code does not need to go through the incubator > before becoming a library. How stable is the current API? > > > > If it stable and is not going to be useful to anyone outside of OpenStack, > we can create an oslo.vmware library for it. I can start working with > -infra next week to set up the repository. > > > > We will need someone on your team to be designated as the lead maintainer, > to coordinate with the Oslo PTL for release management issues and bug > triage. Is that you, Vipin? > > > > We will also need to have a set of reviewers for the new repository. I'll > add oslo-core, but it will be necessary for a few people familiar with the > code to also be included. If you have anyone from nova or cinder who should > be a reviewer, we can add them, too. Please send me a list of names and the > email addresses used in gerrit so I can add them to the reviewer list when > the repository is created. > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > By the way, a work in progress review has been posted for the VMware > cinder driver integration with the OSLO common code ( > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70108/). The nova integration is > currently under progress. > > > > Thanks, > > Vipin > > > > *From:* Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:06 AM > *To:* Donald Stufft > *Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Vipin > Balachandran > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or > straight to oslo.vmware > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 28 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > >> There are several reviews related to adding VMware interface code to the > >> oslo-incubator so it can be shared among projects (start at > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65075/7 if you want to look at the > code). > >> > >> I expect this code to be fairly stand-alone, so I wonder if we would be > >> better off creating an oslo.vmware library from the beginning, instead > of > >> bringing it through the incubator. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > This sounds like a good idea, but it doesn't look OpenStack specific, so > > maybe building a non-oslo library would be better. > > > > Let's not zope it! :) > > +1 on not making it an oslo library. > > > > Given the number of issues we've seen with stackforge libs in the gate, > I've changed my default stance on this point. > > > > It's not clear from the code whether Vipin et al expect this library to be > useful for anyone not working with both OpenStack and VMware. Either way, I > anticipate having the library under the symmetric gating rules and managed > by the one of the OpenStack teams (oslo, nova, cinder?) and VMware > contributors should make life easier in the long run. > > > > As far as the actual name goes, I'm not set on "oslo.vmware" it was just a > convenient name for the conversation. > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Julien Danjou > > # Free Software hacker # independent consultant > > # http://julien.danjou.info > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > ----------------- > Donald Stufft > PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 > DCFA > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
