On 3/18/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Solaris Express 3/06 Release is now available for download.
Which build is it ?
--
Regards,
Cyril
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike Gerdts wrote:
1) Presumably a "responsible engineer" means that something is
happening.
Not necessarily - I'm currently the responsible engineer in the bug db for 142
bugs & RFE's, some of which have been assigned to me for 5 years or more.
Being human and only having 24 hours in a day,
thanks
i have installed it,but it seams that only Runtime and Compiler without
monodevlop.
how can i get monodevlop and other things in the list above?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@open
On Wed 08 Mar 2006 at 11:42AM, Dan Price wrote:
> On Wed 08 Mar 2006 at 10:49AM, Karyn Ritter wrote:
> > I'll figure out where to put the definitions. This the real status that
> > is in Bugster, so we need to document it anyway
>
> So, I wonder if we could use Perl's WWW::Mechanize [1] or some
Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, ken mays wrote:
Ref: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/jds/downloads/current/
This is one of those great achievements I like seeing
within the community when even Sun engineers are
whipping out the latest UNIX desktop environments for
Solaris users to enjoy.
Sil
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, ken mays wrote:
> Ref: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/jds/downloads/current/
>
> This is one of those great achievements I like seeing
> within the community when even Sun engineers are
> whipping out the latest UNIX desktop environments for
> Solaris users to enjoy.
Silly question
Happy ending,
Flashed the bios to beta 2.05h and the error message disaperred.
Thanks again to all.
Philippe Plouffe
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Roland,
> Are there any plans to support more than 64 CPUs on AMD64 kernels
> anytime soon (e.g. add theoretical support for such configurations) ?
Yes, we have plans to make it possible to raise NCPU above 64. No
specific schedule at this point.
> IMO it could be tricky if this manual tuning
The Solaris Express 3/06 Release is now available for download.
Is this strictly for people on the Solaris Express program ?
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks, Carol. You have seconds. Eric will get you set up.
Jim
> The Crossbow project
> (http://opensolaris.org/os/community/networking/crossb
> owpreso.pdf) is a
> network virtualization technology that greatly
> improves resource
> control, performance and network utilization needed
> to ac
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:54:36AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Is there no way to use gcc's builtin functions except those which should
> be handled by the platform-optimized libc ? Using -fno-builtin is like
> hunting ducks with a Abrahams tank...
Yes, you can say -fno-builtin-. Unfortunately
Thanks, Nicolas. You have seconds. Eric will get you set up.
Jim
> Project Nemo
> (http://opensolaris.org/os/community/networking/nemo-
>
> design.pdf) aims at improving the performance, and
> accelerate the
> development and adoption of high-performance network
> drivers in
> Solaris. Proje
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:53:30PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > Note that when building ON with gcc, we use -fno-builtin.
> >
> > Why ? I understand this is usefull for debugging - but it kills some
> > interesting opportunities for optimisation... ;-(
>
> While I'
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:53:30PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Note that when building ON with gcc, we use -fno-builtin.
>
> Why ? I understand this is usefull for debugging - but it kills some
> interesting opportunities for optimisation... ;-(
While I'm not the one who implemented this, I'
Jonathan Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:40PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Is there any RFE yet which asks to compile the whole kernel+tools with
> > "-xstrconst -xbuiltin=%all" to improve the footprint a little bit for
> > Sun Forte/Workshop/Studio builds (I've checked the bug datab
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:40PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Is there any RFE yet which asks to compile the whole kernel+tools with
> > "-xstrconst -xbuiltin=%all" to improve the footprint a little bit for
> > Sun Forte/Workshop/Studio builds (I've checked the bug d
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:40PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Is there any RFE yet which asks to compile the whole kernel+tools with
> "-xstrconst -xbuiltin=%all" to improve the footprint a little bit for
> Sun Forte/Workshop/Studio builds (I've checked the bug database but
> couldn't find anythi
On 17 Mar 2006, at 20:58, Sebastien Roy wrote:
I keep running into this myself, and it's _always_ because dhcpagent
holds the DLPI device open. Unplumbing IP doesn't cause dhcpagent to
go away, it needs to be killed manually. Paul, was dhcpagent still
running?
Yeah. That'll be it. The int
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:15:40PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Is there any RFE yet which asks to compile the whole kernel+tools with
> "-xstrconst -xbuiltin=%all" to improve the footprint a little bit for
> Sun Forte/Workshop/Studio builds (I've checked the bug database but
> couldn't find anyth
Hi!
Is there any RFE yet which asks to compile the whole kernel+tools with
"-xstrconst -xbuiltin=%all" to improve the footprint a little bit for
Sun Forte/Workshop/Studio builds (I've checked the bug database but
couldn't find anything matching... ;-( ) ? gcc already does the same by
defaul
Felix Schulte wrote:
> On 3/14/06, Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 03/14/06 12:19, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > > Good morning!
> > > Just saw
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> > > - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Su
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Good morning!
> > Just saw
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> > - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
> > lagging behind so much?
>
> I thought the maximum number of AMD64 CPUs is 8.
> As long as there a
Andrei Dorofeev wrote:
> > > I remember the discussion very good. I am complaining that Red Hat is
> > > the technology leader now. Sun had half a year to deal with the
> > > problem. Why is it so difficult to change the number from 21 to 64 as
> > > proposed in the previous discussion?
> >
> > Fai
roland mainz wrote:
Two RFEs for the script which generates the summaries:
- The script should honor "In-Reply-To:" and only the subject header if
there is no "In-Reply-To:" (and/or someone fixes the xx@@@!-forum
software to generate In-Reply-To: the proper way)
- The script should compress (or
Hi. I've been a unix guy for a very long time. One of the things that has
frustrated me is roaming abilities. I'd like to be able to use my laptop (nv
bld 35 currently) at home, at work, and at a coffee shop without having to
worry about sync issues:
- directory services vs. local home dirs
* Ignacio Marambio Cat?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-17 12:04]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> >
> > Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for
> > shutting down a list. This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and
> > be carried out
Ref: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/jds/downloads/current/
This is one of those great achievements I like seeing
within the community when even Sun engineers are
whipping out the latest UNIX desktop environments for
Solaris users to enjoy.
Only thing to note, the latest JDS (GNOME 2.14)
'requires' Solar
One of my pet gripes about x86 systems is having to interact with the
clumsy menu-oriented BIOS. Coming from the SPARC world, I always enjoyed
the clean command-line interface of OBP. Judging from similar comments on
e.g. comp.unix.solaris and private discussions, it seems I'm not alone in
this r
Yeah--totally right. Besides, I liked OZONE after I posted my reply!
LKR
Sean Sprague wrote:
LKR!
You'll despise me for this, but this does not rock my boat; and I have
just worked out why...
OpenSolaris Collective Force 1
This sounds just like a Sun Microsystems product, and not some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dladm create-aggr -d bge0 1
>
> I got an error saying 'device busy'. Now bge0 was definitely gone from
> ifconfig but from looking at the code it was apparent that when the bge
> driver calls mac_register() this has the effect of doing a dls_create()
> and pre
Eric Boutilier wrote:
[snip]
> Size of all threads during period:
>
> Thread size Topic
> --- -
> 50 BeleniX Distro for Linux Format Magazine promotion
> 32 Can we consider ZFS to be production ready now ?
> 24 Building the kernel with Studio 11
> dladm create-aggr -d bge0 1
>
> I got an error saying 'device busy'. Now bge0 was definitely gone from
> ifconfig but from looking at the code it was apparent that when the bge
> driver calls mac_register() this has the effect of doing a dls_create()
> and presumably, therefore, the ag
Below are links to the latest batch of overview reports (rollups).
Reminder, they also appear on the following...
Web page: http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups
RSS Feed: http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups
tools-discuss, 03/01 - 03/15
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for
> shutting down a list. This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and
> be carried out for each of the above lists. I'd also be happy to see
> draft process submissi
On 17 Mar 2006, at 11:39, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You don't need delete-link anymore. Just `ifconfig bge0 unplumb',
create
the aggregation, and drive on.
That's what I surmised I *should* do but, alas, when I tried:
dladm create-aggr -d bge0 1
I got an error saying 'device busy'. Now bge
* Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-17 11:21]:
> Al Hopper wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> >
> >>I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created
> >
> >Agreed.
> >
> >>during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a
> >>lot fewer
For background on what this is, see:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200
[Note: This particular rollup report is for the main list,
opensolaris-discuss. Because this forum doesn't have leader
Regarding where to post the semi-monthly summaries (aka roll-ups, aka
aggregations), I believe there were 3 suggestions:
- Post them to a web page only.
- Create a separate list for the reports and post them there
- Post them to their respective lists
Since there wasn't any specific backing for
Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created
Agreed.
during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a
lot fewer people. When I proposed it, I thought of it as a stopgap
measure to deal wi
Rainer Orth wrote:
Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What about file systems? Why have ZFS and UFS communities (and possibly
NFS in the future) instead of one file system community with three file
system projects under it?
Speaking of which, it occured to me recently, when I posted a que
OK, I'm suggesting that a new child of the main os.o page be added to
provide a top-level view into the complete set of docs, FAQs,
articles, arc cases, etc. that exist, not to change where anything
lives. I think this new page would improve one of the problems that
this proposal identifies, bu
Spencer Shepler writes:
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=6717&tstart=0
>
> Just FYI, the response is forthcoming; the person that was
> drafting something has been a little swamped.
Great, thanks. Anyway, I hope someone finds the suggested reorganization
useful none
On Fri, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What about file systems? Why have ZFS and UFS communities (and possibly
> > NFS in the future) instead of one file system community with three file
> > system projects under it?
>
> Speaking of which, it occured to me rece
Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about file systems? Why have ZFS and UFS communities (and possibly
> NFS in the future) instead of one file system community with three file
> system projects under it?
Speaking of which, it occured to me recently, when I posted a question
about the
LKR!
You'll despise me for this, but this does not rock my boat; and I have just
worked out why...
OpenSolaris Collective Force 1
This sounds just like a Sun Microsystems product, and not something that has been born out of the OpenSolaris Community
- it's not funky or quirky enough (or at
Item 2 is within scope for the docs community.
-Sue
--
Sue Weber, Program Manager-Solaris Documentation
Nevada, Express, Trusted and OpenSolaris
(650) 786-5467 x85467
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Lowe wrote:
> > I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with
> > the proje
Thanks for the help.
I will try latest bios available at Tyan: beta 205h. If that doesn't resolve
it, I'll place a call with Tyan.
I'll get back with my results,
Thanks, to all who helped.
Philippe
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
openso
It's a serious issue that [b]must[/b] be addressed.
I don't know the best way to get the proper BIOS other than to contact Tyan and
ask if they have a BIOS for your machine that fixes AMD Erratum #131.
It's not a matter of the machine not seeing the CPUs or of the machine not
booting, but rathe
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Venky wrote:
> Would it be possible to allow image uploading on the genunix wiki?
>
> Enabling image uploads is normally just a simple matter of setting
> the "wgDisableUploads" variable to "false" in the mediawiki
> "LocalSettings.php" file and making sure that the "images" d
Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
>
> > As a side note: for Linux kernel this code "separation" will *never*
> > work since Linux and its development team doesn't care about such a
> > drivers. Maintaining separated drivers for Linux kernel is extremel
Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuing down that path without providing a more general technical forum
> means that if I want to keep up on the state of the art of the system
> internals, I have to drown in non-technical information and discussion.
> Linux, NetBSD, FreeBSD, and others
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get a technically gripped guy to help me with a step by step "easy"
> procedure to install and get SchilliX running well along with X
> Windows which is built in now.
>
> I have been through the process a few times now and in every case I
> run into a w
Would it be possible to allow image uploading on the genunix wiki?
Enabling image uploads is normally just a simple matter of setting
the "wgDisableUploads" variable to "false" in the mediawiki
"LocalSettings.php" file and making sure that the "images" directory
is writable by the webserver.
Than
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > The real problem that I see is that people may call OpenSolaris a GPL
> > violating project even though there is no reason that would stand a
> > case on court.
>
> Can we have
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] please?
Feel free to creat
Eric Lowe writes:
> A really rough strawman might look something like the following community
> structure in place of "core OS":
>
>kernel
>user commands
>libraries
>
> but that's not perfect either.
No, it's not.
I suppose the problem is that we've really got overlapping sets here
Thanks for the reply,
I checked and I have the revision 04MOAb. And the BIOS see the Dual-Core
correctly and even build34 does too.
The only information I found at TYAN was that 04MOab was needed for "CPU
support for E Stepping CPU requires PCB Revision 04MOAb" and that bios update
2.05 add s
Jim,
Operating System is the entire WOS, from kernel through desktop and servers,
all the consolidations, so presumably you're thinking of the subset of ON
that's not networking. Maybe "Core OS" or something?
Even at that, I think it's really quite vague and likely implicitly
refers to inter
> I disagree about the project docs. I think project docs should live with
> the projects. That's where the conversations and collaboration are
> taking place. I do agree that there should be a top-level link to docs
> from the opensolaris.org home page.
As one of the proposers let me add my tho
On Mar 17, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Phil Plouffe wrote:
Hi,
I just got a new machine with 2 processors Dual-core(AMD Opteron
270) and I installed the SXCR build 34 on it. When it boots I have
the following error message:
--
WARNING: BIOS microcode patch for AMD Athlon(tm) 64/Opteron(tm)
Hi,
I just got a new machine with 2 processors Dual-core(AMD Opteron 270) and I
installed the SXCR build 34 on it. When it boots I have the following error
message:
--
WARNING: BIOS microcode patch for AMD Athlon(tm) 64/Opteron(tm) processor
erratum 131 was not detected; updating your sy
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 3/16/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe and Robert Milkowski for these two bug fixes below
and to Sarah Jelinek and Darren Moffat for sponsoring the fixes through
to putback. Also note that Robert's led to an ARC case.
Will this PSARC case b
I think for the x64/AMD64 platforms there is a "work request" for 64-bit OSes
to support 64 CPUs (SMP) and 1TB of memory per OS instance.
~K
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
OpenSolaris Collective Force 1
(hopefully with 2,3,4,...etc. coming in the future.
It is not limited by number of items on the DVD
It can apply to distros, or later apps, drivers or whatever we want to
have on there.
LKR
Sean Sprague wrote:
Hello all,
As Dennis suggested, "Band of Brothe
On Thu 03/16/06 at 17:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Things were setup that way before projects existed and everything had to be
> >a community. The "Nevada" community (which is misnamed to begin with),
> >should
> >become a ONNV project of an ON community which could also host your
> >inte
H.
OpenSolaris ^3
~K
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith writes:
> > There is already a separate community for networking, so if we go that
> > route I think this community should just be for the OS part.
>
> Then you'ld have to define "OS." The official definition of the Solaris
> Operating System is the entire WOS, from kernel th
Ozone (O3) -> the layer is very important for all the
humanity
Gonzalo Lucena
---
"Your Kung-Fu Is Not Strong"
__
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto.
http://es.
Hi,
could you update me on the status of iSCSI target.
When it will become a part of OpenSolaris ?
TIA,
-- Leon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
"Felix Schulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning!
> Just saw https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-March/msg00049.html
> - Red Hat now supports 64 cpus on AMD64, Sun only 21. Why is Sun
> lagging behind so much?
I thought the maximum number of AMD64 CPUs is 8.
As long as there
>
> The matter of VLAN creation in general... Why has the ability to
> create/destroy VLANs from the dladm cmd line been dropped?
It will return, along with generalized link naming, as part of Clearview's
Vanity Naming:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=5981
> Moreove
Sorry it's take a while for me to look at this but I not some apparent
omissions...
5.1
The 4th arg to dls_create() always used to be the VLAN id. Is it still?
Aside:
The matter of VLAN creation in general... Why has the ability to
create/destroy VLANs from the dladm cmd line been dropped? The
Frank,
OpenSolaris to the Power of 3
[alternative: "OpenSolaris to the power of (F)(Th)ree)", with a
graphical layout that mixes "free" and "three" nicely]
Nice. That also translates into Dennis's DVD labels which could show either
word depending on how you looked at the label.
Sean.
__
OpenSolaris to the Power of 3
[alternative: "OpenSolaris to the power of (F)(Th)ree)", with a
graphical layout that mixes "free" and "three" nicely]
- Frank
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jasse,
Ehh, please skip the religious overtones please.
If you had read carefully, I did state that religious connotations were reasons for _unsuitability_; and that "holy" is
not exclusively for religious usage.
Sean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mail
On Mar 17, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Sean Sprague wrote:
Hello all,
As Dennis suggested, "Band of Brothers" is not a suitable name for
the DVD containing BeleniX, Nexenta and SchilliX; and that a
replacement name should be sought.
Well here's the thread, and a couple of kickoffs that my brain
>Thoughts/suggestions?
OpenSolaris Tres Amigos
-
This message is intended for the addressee only and may
contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended receiver, any disclosure, copying
to any pe
Hello all,
As Dennis suggested, "Band of Brothers" is not a suitable name for the DVD
containing BeleniX, Nexenta and SchilliX; and that a replacement name should be
sought.
Well here's the thread, and a couple of kickoffs that my brain (term used
loosely) has dumped (each with a reason for un
On 3/17/06, Omer Faruk Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,I am not sure if this is the right mailing list to ask (which seems to benot ;) ) but is zfs offically integrated and supported on solaris 10 (sparcor intel)? I couldn't able to find any information about it.
It's been answered several times
78 matches
Mail list logo
